From state neuroticism to momentary task performance: A person × situation approach

REFERENCES

• Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., Taris, T. W., Schaufeli, W. B., & Schreurs, P. J. G. (2003). A multigroup analysis of the job demands-resources model in four home care organizations. International Journal of Stress Management, 10, 16–38. doi:10.1037/1072-5245.10.1.16
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Verbeke, W. (2004). Using the job demands-resources model to predict burnout and performance. Human Resource Management, 43, 83–104. doi:10.1002/hrm.20004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., van Emmerik, I. H., Geurts, S. A. E., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Recovery turns job demands into challenges: A diary study on work engagement and performance [PDF document]. Retrieved from http://www.hettyvanemmerik.com/Presentations/+2008AOMHandoutDiaryPaperOB.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (2005). Yes, personality matters: Moving on to more important matters. Human Performance, 18, 359–372. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1804_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9–30. doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beal, D. J. (2012). Industrial/organizational psychology. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 144–159). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Beal, D. J., & Weiss, H. M. (2003). Methods of ecological momentary assessment in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 6, 440–464. doi:10.1177/1094428103257361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beal, D. J., Weiss, H. M., Barros, E., & MacDermid, S. M. (2005). An episodic process model of affective influences on performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1054–1068. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boals, A., Southard-Dobbs, S., & Blumenthal, H. (2014). Adverse events in emerging adulthood are associated with increases in neuroticism. Journal of Personality. doi:10.1111/jopy.12095
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolger, N., & Schilling, E. A. (1991). Personality and the problems of everyday life: The role of neuroticism in exposure and reactivity to daily stressors. Journal of Personality, 59, 355–386. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1991.tb00253.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boswell, W. R., Olson-Buchanan, J. B., & LePine, M. A. (2004). Relations between stress and work outcomes: The role of felt challenge, job control, and psychological strain. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64, 165–181. doi:10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00049-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalal, R. S., Bhave, D. P., & Fiset, J. (2014). Within-person variability in job performance: A theoretical review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 40, 1396–1436. doi:10.1177/0149206314532691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, K., & Harris, C. (2005). A daily diary study of coping in the context of the job demands–control–support model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 219–237. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2004.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debusscher, J., Hofmans, J., & De Fruyt, F. (2014). The curvilinear relationship between state neuroticism and momentary task performance. PLoS ONE. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0106989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Fruyt, F., & Salgado, J. F. (2003). Applied personality psychology: Lessons learned from the IWO field. European Journal of Personality, 17, S123-131. doi:10.1002/per.486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denissen, J. J. A., & Penke, L. (2008). Neuroticism predicts reactions to cues of social inclusion. European Journal of Personality, 22, 497–517. doi:10.1002/per.682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eysenck, M. W., & Graydon, J. (1989). Susceptibility to distraction as a function of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 681–687. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(89)90227-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, C. D., & To, M. L. (2012). Using experience sampling methodology in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior. Advance online publication. doi:10.1002/job.1803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleeson, W. (2012). Perspectives on the person: Rapid growth and opportunities for integration. In K. Deaux & M. Snyder (Eds.), Oxford handbook of personality and social psychology (pp. 33–63). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frederickx, S., & Hofmans, J. (2014). The role of personality in the initiation of communication situations. Journal of Individual Differences, 35, 30–37. doi:10.1027/1614-0001/a000124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geldhof, G. J., Preacher, K. J., & Zyphur, M. J. (2014). Reliability estimation in a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework. Psychological Methods, 19, 72–91. doi:10.1037/a0032138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grube, A., Schroer, J., Hentzschel, C., & Hertel, G. (2008). The event reconstruction method: An efficient measure of experience-based job satisfaction. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81, 669–689. doi:10.1348/096317907X251578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunthert, K. C., & Wenze, S. J. (2012). Daily diary methods. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 144–159). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Hampson, S. E. (2012). Personality processes: Mechanisms by which personality traits “get outside the skin”. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 315–339. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoekstra, H. A., Ormel, J., & de Fruyt, F. (1996). NEO persoonlijkheidsvragenlijsten NEO-PI-R en NEO-FFI. Handleiding. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmans, J., Gelens, J., & Theuns, P. (2014). Enjoyment as a mediator in the relationship between task characteristics and work effort: An experience sampling study. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23, 693–705. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2013.792229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurtz, G. M., & Donovan, J. J. (2000). Personality and job performance: The Big Five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 869–879. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, T. A., & Ilies, R. (2002). Relationship of personality to performance motivation: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 797–807. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.797
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, T. A., Klinger, R., Simon, L. S., & Yang, I. W. F. (2008). The contributions of personality to organizational behavior and psychology: Findings, criticisms, and future research directions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1982–2000. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00136.x
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science, 306, 1776–1780. doi:10.1126/science.1103572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kell, H. J., Rittmayer, A. D., Crook, A. E., & Motowidlo, S. J. (2010). Situational content moderates the association between the Big Five personality traits and behavioral effectiveness. Human Performance, 23, 213–228. doi:10.1080/08959285.2010.488458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le, H., Oh, I., Robbins, S. B., Ilies, R., Holland, E., & Westrick, P. (2011). Too much of a good thing: Curvilinear relationships between personality traits and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 113–133. doi:10.1037/a0021016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LePine, J. A., Podsakoff, N. P., & LePine, M. A. (2005). A meta-analytic test of the challenge stressor-hindrance stressor framework: An explanation for inconsistent relationships among stressors and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 764–775. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2005.18803921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüdtke, O., Roberts, B. W., Trautwein, U., & Nagy, G. (2011). A random walk down university avenue: Life paths, life events, and personality trait change at the transition to university life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 620–637. doi:10.1037/a0023743
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, M. A., & Brown, J. D. (2006). Trait aggressiveness and situational provocation: A test of the traits as situational sensitivities (TASS) model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1100–1113. doi:10.1177/0146167206288488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard, D. C., & Hakel, M. D. (1997). Effects of objective and subjective task complexity on performance. Human Performance, 10, 303–330. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1004_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (2008). Toward a unified theory of personality: Integrating dispositions and processing dynamics within the cognitive-affective processing system. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 208–241). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Morgeson, F. P., Campion, M. A., Dipboye, R. L., Hollenbeck, J. R., Murphy, K., & Schmitt, N. (2007). Reconsidering the use of personality tests in personnel selection contexts. Personnel Psychology, 60, 683–729. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00089.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Oerlemans, W. G. M., & Bakker, A. B. (2014). Why extraverts are happier: A day reconstruction study. Journal of Research in Personality, 50, 11–22. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2014.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., Zyphur, M. J., & Zhang, Z. (2010). A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15, 209–233. doi:10.1037/a0020141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodell, J. B., & Judge, T. A. (2009). Can “good” stressors spark “bad” behaviors? The mediating role of emotions in links of challenge and hindrance stressors with citizenship and counterproductive behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1438–1451. doi:10.1037/a0016752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotundo, M., & Sackett, P. R. (2002). The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: A policy-capturing approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 66–80. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salgado, J. F. (2003). Predicting job performance using FFM and non-FFM personality measures. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 323–346. doi:10.1348/096317903769647201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherbaum, C. A., & Ferreter, J. M. (2009). Estimating statistical power and required sample sizes for organizational research using multilevel modeling. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 347–367. doi:10.1177/1094428107308906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, T. R. (2004). The role of neuroticism on psychological and physiological stress responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 795–804. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrout, P. E., & Lane, S. P. (2011). Psychometrics. In M. R. Mehl & T. A. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 302–320). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smillie, L. D., Yeo, G. B., Furnham, A. F., & Jackson, C. J. (2006). Benefits of all work and no play: The relationship between neuroticism and performance as a function of resource allocation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 139–155. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suls, J., & Martin, R. (2005). The daily life of the garden-variety neurotic: Reactivity, stressor exposure, mood spillover, and maladaptive coping. Journal of Personality, 73, 1485–1510. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00356.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 500–517. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tett, R. P., & Guterman, H. A. (2000). Situation trait relevance, trait expression, and cross-situational consistency: Testing a principle of trait activation. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 397–423. doi:10.1006/jrpe.2000.2292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tett, R. P., Jackson, D. N., & Rothstein, M. (1991). Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 44, 703–742. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00696.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, J. R., Beehr, T. A., & Christiansen, N. D. (2010). Toward a better understanding of the effects of hindrance and challenge stressors on work behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76, 68–77. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2009.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601–617. doi:10.1177/014920639101700305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar