Climate as situational strength: Safety climate strength as a cross-level moderator of the relationship between conscientiousness and safety behaviour

References

• Azen, R., & Budescu, D. V. (2003). The dominance analysis approach for comparing predictors in multiple regression. Psychological Methods, 8, 129–148. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.8.2.129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barling, J., Loughlin, C., & Kelloway, E. K. (2002). Development and test of a model linking safety-specific transformational leadership and occupational safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 488–496. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (2009). Select on conscientiousness and emotional stability. In E. A. Locke (Ed.), Handbook of principles of organizational behavior (2nd ed., pp. 19–40). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Beus, J. M., Bergman, M. E., & Payne, S. C. (2010). The influence of organizational tenure on safety climate strength: A first look. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42, 1431–1437. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2009.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliese, P. D., & Britt, T. W. (2001). Social support, group consensus and stressor-strain relationships: Social context matters. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 425–436. doi:10.1002/job.95
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliese, P. D., & Halverson, R. R. (1998). Group consensus and psychological well-being: A large field study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 563–580. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01720.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10, 99–109. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1002_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, M. J., Sarpy, S. A., Tesluk, P. E., & Smith-Crowe, K. (2002). General safety performance: A test of a grounded theoretical model. Personnel Psychology, 55, 429–457. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00116.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 687–732). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234–246. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. doi:10.1080/10705510701301834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christian, M. S., Bradley, J. C., Wallace, J. C., & Burke, M. J. (2009). Workplace safety: A meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1103–1127. doi:10.1037/a0016172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, S., & Robertson, I. T. (2005). A meta-analytic review of the Big Five personality factors and accident involvement in occupational and non-occupational settings. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 355–376. doi:10.1348/096317905X26183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalal, R. S., & Credé, M. (2013). Job satisfaction. In K. F. Geisinger (Ed.), American psychological association handbook of testing and assessment in psychology: Vol. 1: Test theory and testing and assessment in industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 675–691). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Dalal, R. S., & Meyer, R. D. (2012). The implications of situational strength for HRM. In W. Rothwell, E. Series, & G. M. Benscotter (Eds.), The encyclopedia of human resource management (Vol. 3, pp. 298–306). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer/Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, J. F., González-Romá, V., Davis, A., & West, M. A. (2008). Organizational climate and climate strength in UK hospitals. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17, 89–111. doi:10.1080/13594320601046664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dedrick, R. F., & Greenbaum, P. E. (2011). Multilevel confirmatory factor analysis of a scale measuring interagency collaboration of children’s mental health agencies. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 19, 27–40. doi:10.1177/1063426610365879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 1–22. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12, 121–138. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, M. G. (1985). A Monte-Carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderated multiple regression analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36, 305–323. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(85)90002-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Romá, V., Peiró, J. M., & Tordera, N. (2002). An examination of the antecedents and moderator influences of climate strength. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 465–473. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, M. A., & Neal, A. (2000). Perceptions of safety at work: A framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 347–358. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.5.3.347
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 327–347. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2007.24634438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, D., Morgeson, F., & Gerras, S. (2003). Climate as a moderator of the relationship between leader-member exchange and content specific citizenship: Safety climate as an exemplar. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 170–178. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, D. A., & Gavin, M. B. (1998). Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. Journal of Management, 24, 623–641. doi:10.1177/014920639802400504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, L., Choi, C., Ko, C., McNeil, P., Minton, M., Wright, M., & Kim, K. (2008). Organizational and psychological climate: A review of theory and research. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17, 5–32. doi:10.1080/13594320701662550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., Mulaik, S. A., & Ladd, R. T. (1992). Validity generalization in the context of situational models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 3–14. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.77.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 114–158). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Judge, T. A., & Ilies, R. (2002). Relationship of personality to performance motivation: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 797–807. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.797
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S., & Tetrick, L. E. (2011). Workplace safety and accidents: An industrial and organizational psychology perspective. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 455–472). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 815–852. doi:10.1177/1094428106296642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindell, M. K., & Brandt, C. J. (2000). Climate quality and climate consensus as mediators of the relationship between organizational antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 331–348. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57, 705–717. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2004). What should we do about motivation theory? Six recommendations for the twenty-first century. Academy of Management Review, 29, 388–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luria, G. (2008). Climate strength–how leaders form consensus. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 42–53. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J. E., Aguinis, H., Culpepper, S. A., & Chen, G. (2012). Understanding and estimating the power to detect cross-level interaction effects in multilevel modeling. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 951–966. doi:10.1037/a0028380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, R. D., Dalal, R. S., & Bonaccio, S. (2009). A meta-analytic investigation into the moderating effects of situational strength on the conscientiousness–performance relationship. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 1077–1102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, R. D., Dalal, R. S., José, I. J., Hermida, R., Chen, T. R., Vega, R. P., … Khare, V. P. (2014). Measuring job-related situational strength and assessing its interactions with personality and voluntary work behavior. Journal of Management, 40, 1010–1041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, R. D., Dalal, R. S., & Hermida, R. (2010). A review and synthesis of situational strength in the organizational sciences. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, 121–140.
   Google Scholar
• Miron, A. M., & Brehm, J. W. (2006). Reactance theory—40 years later. Zeitschrift Für Sozialpsychologie, 37, 9–18. doi:10.1024/0044-3514.37.1.9
   Google Scholar
• Mischel, W. (1977). The interaction of person and situation. In D. Magnusson & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology (pp. 333–352). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Neal, A., & Griffin, M. A. (2006). A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 946–953. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.946
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2008). The relationship of age to ten dimensions of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 392–423. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostroff, C., Kinicki, A. J., & Muhammad, R. S. (2013). Organizational culture and climate. In I. B. Weiner (Series Ed.), N. Schmitt & S. Highhouse (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 12. Industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 643–676). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, S. K., & Ohly, S. (2008). Designing motivating jobs: An expanded framework for linking work characteristics and motivation. In R. Kanfer, G. Chen, & R. D. Pritchard (Eds.), Work motivation: Past, present, and future (pp. 233–284). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, L. H., & O’Connor, E. J. (1980). Situational constraints and work outcomes: The influence of a frequently overlooked construct. Academy of Management Review, 5, 391–397.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Liu, X. (2000). Statistical power and optimal design for multisite randomized trials. Psychological Methods, 5, 199–213. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.5.2.199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberson, Q. M., Sturman, M. C., & Simons, T. L. (2007). Does the measure of dispersion matter in multilevel research? A comparison of the relative performance of dispersion indexes. Organizational Research Methods, 10, 564–588. doi:10.1177/1094428106294746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saucier, G. (1994). Mini-markers: A brief version of Goldberg’s unipolar Big-Five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 506–516. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6303_8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, B., Ehrhart, M. G., & Macey, W. H. (2011). Perspectives on organizational climate and culture. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology: Vol. 1. Building and developing the organization (pp. 373–414). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, B., & Reichers, A. E. (1983). On the etiology of climates. Personnel Psychology, 36, 19–39. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1983.tb00500.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, B., Salvaggio, A. N., & Subirats, M. (2002). Climate strength: A new direction for climate research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 220–229. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siemsen, E., Roth, A., & Oliveira, P. (2010). Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 456–476. doi:10.1177/1094428109351241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond freedom & dignity. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, M., & Ickes, W. (1985). Personality and social behavior. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., pp. 883–948). New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Van Vianen, A. E. M., De Pater, I. E., Bechtoldt, M. N., & Evers, A. (2011). The strength and quality of climate perceptions. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26, 77–92. doi:10.1108/02683941111099637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, C., & Chen, G. (2006). A multilevel integration of personality, climate, self‐regulation, and performance. Personnel Psychology, 59, 529–557. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00046.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, J. C., & Vodanovich, S. J. (2003). Workplace safety performance: Conscientiousness, cognitive failure, and their interaction. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 8, 316–327. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.8.4.316
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wells, D. L., Moorman, R. H., & Werner, J. M. (2007). The impact of the perceived purpose of electronic performance monitoring on an array of attitudinal variables. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 18, 121–138. doi:10.1002/hrdq.1194
   Google Scholar
• Zohar, D. (1980). Safety climate in industrial organizations: Theoretical and applied implications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 96–102. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.65.1.96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar, D. (2000). A group-level model of safety climate: Testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 587–596. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar, D., & Hofmann, D. A. (2012). Organizational climate and culture. In S. W. J. Kozlowski (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 643–666). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zohar, D., & Luria, G. (2005). A multilevel model of safety climate: Cross-level relationships between organization and group-level climates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 616–628. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar, D., & Tenne-Gazit, O. (2008). Transformational leadership and group interaction as climate antecedents: A social network analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 744–757. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.744
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar