A temporal common ground for learning: The moderating effect of shared mental models on the relation between team learning behaviours and performance improvement

References

• Barnes, C. M., Hollenbeck, J. R., Wagner, D. T., DeRue, D. S., Nahrgang, J. D., & Schwind, K. M. (2008). Harmful help: The costs of backing-up behavior in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 529–539. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beersma, B., Hollenbeck, J. R., Humphrey, S. E., Moon, H., Conlon, D. E., & Ilgen, D. R. (2003). Cooperation, competition, and team performance: Toward a contingency approach. The Academy of Management Journal, 46, 572–590. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/30040650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 349–381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bliese, P. D., & Ployhart, R. E. (2002). Growth modeling using random coefficient models: Model building, testing, and illustrations. Organizational Research Methods, 5, 362–387. doi:10.1177/109442802237116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (1992). UCINET IV network analysis software. Columbia, MO: Analytic Technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Brannick, M. T., Chan, D., Conway, J. M., Lance, C. E., & Spector, P. E. (2010). What is method variance and how can we cope with it? A panel discussion. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 407–420. doi:10.1177/1094428109360993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunderson, J. S., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2003a). Management team learning orientation and business unit performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 552–560. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.552
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunderson, J. S., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2003b). When to put the brakes on learning. Harvard Business Review, 81, 20–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Converse, S. (1993). Shared mental models in expert team decision-making. In N. J. Castellan Jr. (Ed.), Individual and group decision-making: Current issues (pp. 221–246). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, P., Passos, A. M., & Bakker, A. (2014). Empirical validation of the team work engagement construct. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 13, 34–45. doi:10.1027/1866-5888/a000102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P. L., Graça, A. M., Marques-Quinteiro, P., Santos, C. M., Caetano, A., & Passos, A. M. (2013). Multilevel research in the field of organizational behavior: An empirical look at 10 years of theory and research. SAGE Open, 1–17. doi:10.1177/2158244013498244.
   Google Scholar
• Cronin, M. A., & Weingart, L. R. (2007). Representational gaps, information processing, and conflict in functionally diverse teams. Academy of Management Review, 32, 761–773. doi:10.5465/AMR.2007.25275511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronin, M. A., Weingart, L. R., & Todorova, G. (2011). Dynamics in groups: Are we there yet? The Academy of Management Annals, 5, 571–612. doi:10.1080/19416520.2011.590297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culpepper, S. A., & Aguinis, H. (2011). R is for revolution: A cutting-edge, free, open source statistical package. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 735–740. doi:10.1177/1094428109355485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeChurch, L. A., & Mesmer-Magnus, J. R. (2010). The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 32–53. doi:10.1037/a0017328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decuyper, S., Dochy, F., & Van Den Bossche, P. (2010). Grasping the dynamic complexity of team learning: An integrative model for effective team learning in organisations. Educational Research Review, 5, 111–133. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2010.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350–383. doi:10.2307/2666999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A. C. (2003). Managing the risk of learning: Psychological safety in work teams. In M. West (Ed.), International handbook of organizational teamwork (pp. 255–276). London: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A. C., Dillon, J. R., & Roloff, K. S. (2007). 6 Three perspectives on team learning. The Academy of Management Annals, 1, 269–314. doi:10.1080/078559811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A. C., Winslow, A. B., Bohmer, R. M., & Pisano, G. P. (2003). Learning how and learning what: Effects of tacit and codified knowledge on performance improvement following technology adoption. Decision Sciences, 34, 197–224. doi:10.1111/1540-5915.02316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, B. D., Day, E. A., Arthur, W., & Bell, S. T. (2006). Relationships among team ability composition, team mental models, and team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 727–736. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.727
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericksen, J., & Dyer, L. (2004). Right from the start: Exploring the effects of early team events on subsequent project team development and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 438–471. doi:10.2307/4131442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiol, C. M., & Lyles, M. A. (1985). Organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 10, 803–813. doi:10.5465/AMR.1985.4279103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fussell, S. R., & Krauss, R. M. (1989). The effects of intended audience on message production and comprehension: Reference in a common ground framework. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 203–219. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(89)90019-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersick, C. J. G. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9–41. doi:10.2307/256496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gevers, J. M. P., Rutte, C. G., & Van Eerde, W. (2006). Meeting deadlines in work groups: Implicit and explicit mechanisms. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 55, 52–72. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2006.00228.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guchait, P., & Hamilton, K. (2013). The temporal priority of team learning behaviors vs. shared mental models in service management teams. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 33, 19–28. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behaviour (pp. 315–342). New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hackman, J. R., & Wageman, R. (2005). A theory of team coaching. Academy of Management Review, 30, 269–287. doi:10.5465/AMR.2005.16387885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey, S. E., Morgeson, F. P., & Mannor, M. J. (2009). Developing a theory of the strategic core of teams: A role composition model of team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 48–61. doi:10.1037/a0012997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, L. R., Demaree, R. J., & Wolf, G. (1993). Rwg: An assessment of within group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 306–309. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multi method examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanfer, R., & Ackerman, P. L. (1989). Motivation and cognitive abilities: An integrative/ aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 657–690. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.4.657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimoski, R., & Mohammed, S. (1994). Team mental model: Construct or metaphor? Journal of Management, 20, 403–437. doi:10.1177/0149206309356804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2008). Team learning, development, and adaptation. In V. I. Sessa & M. London (Eds.), Work group learning: Understanding, improving and assessing how groups learn in organizations (pp. 15–44). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Chao, G. T. (2012). Macrocognition, team learning, and team knowledge: Origins, emergence, and measurement. In E. Salas, S. M. Fiore, & M. P. Letsky (Eds.), Theories of team cognition: Cross-disciplinary perspectives (pp. 19–48). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J., Chao, G. T., & Jensen, J. M. (2010). Building an infrastructure for organizational learning: A multilevel approach. In S. W. J. Kozlowski & E. Salas (Eds.), Learning training, and development in organizations (pp. 363–403). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J., Gully, S. M., Nason, E. R., & Smith, E. M. (1999). Developing adaptive teams: A theory of compilation and performance across levels and time. In D. R. Ilgen & E. D. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of work performance: Implications for staffing, personnel actions, and development (pp. 240–292). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7, 77–124. doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multi-level approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 3–90). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kraiger, K., Ford, J. K., & Salas, E. (1993). Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 311–328. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauss, R. M., & Fussell, S. R. (1991). Constructing shared communicative environments. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially-shared cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C.-L. C. (1988). Timing of feedback and verbal learning. Review of Educational Research, 58, 79–97. doi:10.3102/00346543058001079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, B.-C., & Klein, K. J. (2006). Team mental models and team performance: A field study of the effects of team mental model similarity and accuracy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 403–418. doi:10.1002/job.387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacMillan, J., Entin, E. E., & Serfaty, D. (2004). Communication overhead: The hidden cost of team cognition. In E. Salas & S. M. Fiore (Eds.), Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance (pp. 61–82). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71–87. doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, M. A., Zaccaro, S. J., & Mathieu, J. E. (2000). Performance implications of leader briefings and team-interaction training for team adaptation to novel environments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 971–986. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques-Quinteiro, P., Passos, A. M., & Curral, L. (2014). Thought self-leadership and effectiveness in self-management teams. Leadership. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1742715014543579
   Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 273–283. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J. E., & Rapp, T. L. (2009). Laying the foundation for successful team performance trajectories: The roles of team charters and performance strategies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 90–103. doi:10.1037/a0013257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J. E., & Taylor, S. R. (2006). Clarifying conditions and decision points for mediational type inferences in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 1031–1056. doi:10.1002/job.406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard, M. T., & Gilson, L. L. (2014). The role of shared mental model development in understanding virtual team effectiveness. Group & Organization Management, 39, 3–32. doi:10.1177/1059601113475361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed, S., Ferzandi, L., & Hamilton, K. (2010). Metaphor no more: A 15-year review of the team mental model construct. Journal of Management, 36, 876–910. doi:10.1177/0149206309356804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed, S., & Nadkarni, S. (2011). Temporal diversity and team performance: The moderating role of team temporal leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 489–508. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2011.61967991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed, S., & Nadkarni, S. (2014). Are we all on the same temporal page? The moderating effects of temporal team cognition on the polychronicity diversity-team performance relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 404–422. doi:10.1037/a0035640
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreland, R. L., & McMinn, J. G. (2010). Group reflexivity and performance. In S. R. Thye & E. J. Lawler (Eds.), Advances in Group Processes (Vol. 27, pp. 63–95). Emerald Group Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/S0882-6145%282010%290000027006
   Google Scholar
• Pearsall, M. J., Ellis, A. P. J., & Bell, B. S. (2010). Building the infrastructure: The effects of role identification behaviors on team cognition development and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 192–200. doi:10.1037/a0017781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, J. C., & Bates, D. M. (2000). Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pisano, G. P., Bohmer, R. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2001). Organizational differences in rates of learning: Evidence from the adoption of minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Management Science, 47, 752–768. doi:10.1287/mnsc.47.6.752.9811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitariu, A. H., & Ployhart, R. E. (2010). Explaining change: Theorizing and testing dynamic mediated longitudinal relationships. Journal of Management, 36, 405–429. doi:10.1177/0149206308331096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ployhart, R. E., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2010). Longitudinal research: The theory, design, and analysis of change. Journal of Management, 36, 94–120. doi:10.1177/0149206309352110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reagans, R., Argote, L., & Brooks, D. (2005). Individual experience and experience working together: Predicting learning rates from knowing who knows what and knowing how to work together. Management Science, 51, 869–881. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1050.0366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resick, C. J., Murase, T., Bedwell, W. L., Sanz, E., Jiménez, M., & DeChurch, L. A. (2010). Mental model metrics and team adaptability: A multi-facet multi-method examination. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 14, 332–349. doi:10.1037/a0018822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rico, R., Sánchez-Manzanares, M., Gil, F., & Gibson, C. (2008). Team implicit coordination processes: A team knowledge-based approach. Academy of Management Review, 33, 163–184. doi:10.5465/AMR.2008.27751276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe, R. A. (2008). Time in applied psychology: The study of “what happens” rather than “what is”. The European Psychologist, 13, 37–52. doi:10.1027/1016-9040.13.1.37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe, R. A., Gockel, C., & Meyer, B. (2012). Time and change in teams: Where we are and where we are moving. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21, 629–656. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2012.729821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, M. A., Bedwell, W. L., Wildman, J. L., Fritzsche, B. A., Salas, E., & Burke, C. S. (2011). Managing adaptive performance in teams: Guiding principles and behavioral markers for measurement. Human Resource Management Review, 21, 107–122. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2010.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, C. M., & Passos, A. M. (2013). Team mental models, relationship conflict and effectiveness over time. Team Performance Management, 19, 363–385. doi:10.1108/TPM-01-2013-0003
   Google Scholar
• Savelsbergh, C., Gevers, J., Van Der Heijden, B. I. J. M., & Poell, R. F. (2012). Team role stress: Relationships with team learning and performance in project teams. Group & Organization Management, 37, 67–100. doi:10.1177/1059601111431977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savelsbergh, C. M. J. H., Van Der Heijden, B. I. J. M., & Poel, R. F. (2009). The development and empirical validation of a multidimensional measurement instrument for team learning behaviors. Small Group Research, 40, 578–607. doi:10.1177/1046496409340055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schippers, M. C., Den Hartog, D. N., & Koopman, P. L. (2007). Reflexivity in teams: A measure and correlates. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 56, 189–211. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2006.00250.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schippers, M. C., Den Hartog, D. N., Koopman, P. L., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2008). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing team reflexivity. Human Relations, 61, 1593–1616. doi:10.1177/0018726708096639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schippers, M. C., Den Hartog, D. N., Koopman, P. L., & Wienk, J. A. (2003). Diversity and team outcomes: The moderating effects of outcome interdependence and group longevity and the mediating effect of reflexivity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 779–802. doi:10.1002/job.220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schippers, M. C., Homan, A. C., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2013). To reflect or not to reflect: Prior team performance as a boundary condition of the effects of reflexivity on learning and final team performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 6–23. doi:10.1002/job.1784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, J. D., & Willet, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sonnentag, S. (2012). Time in organizational research: Catching up on a long neglected topic in order to improve theory. Organizational Psychology Review, 2, 361–368. doi:10.1177/2041386612442079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spector, P. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9, 221–232. doi:10.1177/1094428105284955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stachowski, A. A., Kaplan, S. A., & Waller, M. J. (2009). The benefits of flexible team interaction during crises. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1536–1543. doi:10.1037/a0016903
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standifer, R., & Bluedorn, A. (2006). Alliance management teams and entrainment: Sharing temporal mental models. Human Relations, 59, 903–927. doi:10.1177/0018726706067596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standifer, R. L., Raes, A. M. L., Peus, C., Passos, A. M., Santos, C. M., & Weisweiler, S. (2015). Time in teams: Impact of cognitions and conflict. Journal of Managerial Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1108/JMP-09-2012-0278
   Google Scholar
• Stout, R. J., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Milanovich, D. M. (1999). Planning, shared mental models, and coordinated performance: An empirical link is established. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 41, 61–71. doi:10.1518/001872099779577273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tindale, R. S., Smith, C. M., Thomas, L. S., Filkins, J., & Sheffey, S. (1996). Shared representations and asymmetric social influence processes in small groups. In E. Witte & J. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behavior: Consensual action by small groups (Vol. 1, pp. 81–103). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Tindale, R. S., Stawiski, S., & Jacobs, E. (2008). Shared cognitions and group learning. In V. Sessa & M. London (Eds.), Work group learning: Understanding, improving, and assessing how groups learn in organizations (pp. 73–90). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Uitdewilligen, S., Waller, M. J., & Pitariu, A. H. (2013). Mental model updating and team adaptation. Small Group Research, 44, 127–158. doi:10.1177/1046496413478205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Vegt, G., & Bunderson, S. (2005). Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 532–547. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2005.17407918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dyck, C., Frese, M., Baer, M., & Sonnentag, S. (2005). Organizational error management culture and its impact on performance: A two-study replication. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1228–1240. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Ginkel, W. P., Tindale, R. S., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2009). Team reflexivity, development of shared task representations, and the use of distributed information in group decision making. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 13, 265–280. doi:10.1037/a0016045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Woerkom, M., & Croon, M. (2009). The relationships between team learning activities and team performance. Personnel Review, 38, 560–577. doi:10.1108/00483480910978054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vashdi, D. R., Bamberger, P. A., & Erez, M. (2013). Can surgical teams ever learn? The role of coordination, complexity, and transitivity in action team learning. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 945–971. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webber, S. S., Chen, G., Payne, S. C., Marsh, S. M., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2000). Enhancing team mental model measurement with performance appraisal practices. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 307–322. doi:10.1177/109442810034001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, M. A. (2000). Reflexivity, revolution and innovation in work teams. In M. M. Beyerlein, D. A. Johnson, & S. T. Beyerlein (Eds.), Product development teams (Vol. 5, pp. 1–29). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. M., Goodman, P. S., & Cronin, M. A. (2007). Group learning. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1041–1059. doi:10.5465/AMR.2007.26585724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, S. S. (2004). Distal and local group learning: Performance trade-offs and tensions. Organization Science, 15, 645–656. doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar