When expressing forgiveness backfires in the workplace: victim power moderates the effect of expressing forgiveness on transgressor compliance

References

• Adams, G. S. (2016). Asymmetries between victims’ and transgressors’ perspectives following interpersonal transgressions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10, 722–735. doi:10.1111/spc3.v10.12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, G. S., Zou, X., Inesi, M. E., & Pillutla, M. M. (2015). Forgiveness is not always divine: When expressing forgiveness makes others avoid you. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 126, 130–141. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiello, A., Pratto, F., & Pierro, A. (2013). Framing social dominance orientation and power in organizational context. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 35, 487–495. doi:10.1080/01973533.2013.823614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andenaes, J. (1971). Deterrence and specific offenses. The University of Chicago Law Review, 38, 537–553. doi:10.2307/1599029
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C., & Brown, C. E. (2010). The functions and dysfunctions of hierarchy. In A. Brief & B. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 55–89). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. C, & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aquino, K., Grover, S. L., Goldman, B., & Folger, R. (2003). When push doesn’t come to shove interpersonal forgiveness in workplace relationships. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12, 209–216. doi:10.1177/1056492603256337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aquino, K., Tripp, T. M., & Bies, R. J. (2001). How employees respond to personal offense: The effects of blame attribution, victim status, and offender status on revenge and reconciliation in the workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 52–59. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aquino, K., Tripp, T. M., & Bies, R. J. (2006). Getting even or moving on? Power, procedural justice, and types of offense as predictors of revenge, forgiveness, reconciliation, and avoidance in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 653–668. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.653
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, J., & Coyne, S. M. (2005). An integrated review of indirect, relational, and social aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 212–230. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0903_2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balliet, D., Mulder, L. B., & Van Lange, P. A. (2011). Reward, punishment, and cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 594–615. doi:10.1037/a0023489
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandalos, D. L., and Finney, S. J. Item Parceling Issues in Structural Equation Modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides and R. E. Schumaker  (Eds.), New Developments and Techniques in Structural Equation Modeling, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 2001, pp. 362-427).
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., Exline, J. J., & Sommer, K. L. (1998). The victim role, grudge theory, and two dimensions of forgiveness. In E. L. Worthington Jr. (Ed.), Dimensions of forgiveness: Psychological research and theological principles (pp. 79–106). Philadelphia, PA: Templeton Foundation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beccaria, C. (1963). On crimes and punishments. ( H. Paolucci, Ed. & Trans.). New York, NY: Bobbs-Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Beersma, B., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2011). How the grapevine keeps you in line: Gossip increases contributions to the group. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 642–649. doi:10.1177/1948550611405073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berdahl, J. L., & Martorana, P. (2006). Effects of power on emotion and expression during a controversial group discussion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 497–509. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bies, R. J., Barclay, L. J., Tripp, T. M., & Aquino, K. (2016). A systems perspective on forgiveness in organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 245-318.
   Google Scholar
• Boster, F. J., Cruz, S., Manata, B., DeAngelis, B. N., & Zhuang, J. (2016). A meta-analytic review of the effect of guilt on compliance. Social Influence, 11, 54–67. doi:10.1080/15534510.2016.1142892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradfield, M., & Aquino, K. (1999). The effects of blame attributions and offender likableness on forgiveness and revenge in the workplace. Journal of Management, 25, 607–631. doi:10.1177/014920639902500501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright, D. S., & Exline, J. J. (2011). Forgiveness at four levels: Intrapersonal, relational, organizational and collective-group. In K. Cameron & G. Spreitzer (Eds.), Handbook of positive organizational scholarship (pp. 244–259). New York, NY: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell, C., & Dixon, R. (2010). Love, forgiveness, and trust: Critical values of the modern leader. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 91–101. doi:10.1007/s10551-009-0184-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, K., & Caza, A. (2002). Organizational and leadership virtues and the role of forgiveness. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9, 33–48. doi:10.1177/107179190200900103
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105. doi:10.1037/h0046016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlisle, R. D., Tsang, J.-A., Ahmad, N. Y., Worthington, E. L., Jr, Witvliet, C. V., & Wade, N. (2012). Do actions speak louder than words? Differential effects of apology and restitution on behavioral and self-report measures of forgiveness. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 7, 294–305. doi:10.1080/17439760.2012.690444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsmith, J. M., & Gross, A. E. (1969). Some effects of guilt on compliance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11, 232–239. doi:10.1037/h0027039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsmith, K. M., Darley, J. M., & Robinson, P. H. (2002). Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 284–299. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., Darby, B. L., & Vincent, J. E. (1973). Transgression and altruism: A case for hedonism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 502–516. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(73)90031-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, P. T., Kugler, K. G., Mitchinson, A., & Foster, C. (2013). Navigating conflict and power at work: The effects of power and interdependence asymmetries on conflict in organizations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 1963–1983. doi:10.1111/jasp.2013.43.issue-10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortina, L. M., & Magley, V. J. (2003). Raising voice, risking retaliation: Events following interpersonal mistreatment in the workplace. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 8, 247–265. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.8.4.247
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cox, S., Bennett, R. J., Tripp, T. M., & Aquino, K. (2012). An empirical test of forgiveness motives‘ effects on employees’ health and well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17, 330–340. doi:10.1037/a0028314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crockett, M. J., Özdemir, Y., & Fehr, E. (2014). The value of vengeance and the demand for deterrence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 2279–2286. doi:10.1037/xge0000018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cryder, C. E., Loewenstein, G., & Scheines, R. (2013). The donor is in the details. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120, 15–23. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming, G. (2014). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological science, 25(1), 7-29.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, D. (2005). Dominance, status, and social hierarchies. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 676–697). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• De Dreu, C. K., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741–749. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Dreu, C. K. W. (Ed.). (2014). Social conflict within and between groups. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Dreu, C. K. W., & Van Vianen, A. E. M. (2001). Managing relationship conflict and the effectiveness of organizational teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 309–328. doi:10.1002/job.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Reuver, R. S. M. (2006). The influence of organizational power on conflict dynamics. Personnel Review, 35, 589–603. doi:10.1108/00483480610682307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decoster, S., Camps, J., Stouten, J., Vandevyvere, L., & Tripp, T. M. (2013). Standing by your organization: The impact of organizational identification and abusive supervision on followers’ perceived cohesion and tendency to gossip. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 623–634. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1612-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Den Hartog, D. N., De Hoogh, A. H., & Keegan, A. E. (2007). The interactive effects of belongingness and charisma on helping and compliance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1131–1139. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detert, J. R., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Speaking up to higher-ups: How supervisors and skip-level leaders influence employee voice. Organization Science, 21, 249–270. doi:10.1287/orsc.1080.0405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorff, E. N. (1998). The elements of forgiveness: A Jewish approach. In E. L. Worthington (Ed.), Dimensions of forgiveness (pp. 29–55). Philadelphia, PA: Templeton Foundation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dupré, K. E., & Barling, J. (2006). Predicting and preventing supervisory workplace aggression. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11, 13–26. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.11.1.13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 1–22. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzioni, A. (1961). A comparative analysis of complex organizations. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Exline, J. J., Deshea, L., & Holeman, V. T. (2007). Is apology worth the risk? Predictors, outcomes, and ways to avoid regret. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26, 479–504. doi:10.1521/jscp.2007.26.4.479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Exline, J. J., Worthington, E. L., Jr., Hill, P., & McCullough, M. E. (2003). Forgiveness and justice: A research agenda for social and personality psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 337–348. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_06
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehr, R., & Gelfand, M. J. (2012). The forgiving organization: A multilevel model of forgiveness at work. Academy of Management Review, 37, 664–688. doi:10.5465/amr.2010.0497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehr, R., Yam, K. C. S., & Dang, C. (2015). Moralized leadership: The construction and consequences of ethical leader perceptions. Academy of Management Review, 40, 182–209. doi:10.5465/amr.2013.0358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkel, E. J., Rusbult, C. E., Kumashiro, M., & Hannon, P. A. (2002). Dealing with betrayal in close relationships: Does commitment promote forgiveness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 956–974. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, A. H., & Roseman, I. J. (2007). Beat them or ban them: The characteristics and social functions of anger and contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 103–115. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48, 621–628. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.48.6.621
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327–358. doi:10.1037/h0061470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fragale, A. R, Rosen, B, Xu, C, & Merideth, I. (2009). The higher they are, the harder they fall: the effects of wrongdoer status on observer punishment recommendations and intentionality attributions. Organizational Behavior And Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 53-65. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, J.R.P. & Raven, B. The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, 1959, pp. 150–67.
   Google Scholar
• Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453–466. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galinsky, A. D., Jordan, J., & Sivanathan, N. (2008). Harnessing power to capture leadership. In D. Forsyth & C. Hoyt (Eds.), Social psychology and leadership. Westport, CT: Praeger Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, J. P. (1968). Crime, punishment, and deterrence. Southwestern Social Science Quarterly, 48, 515–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, J. P. (1975). Crime, punishment, and deterrence. New York, NY: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Goodstein, J., Butterfield, K., & Neale, N. (2016). Moral repair in the workplace: A qualitative investigation and inductive model. Journal of business ethics, 138(1), 17-37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J. (2013). Moral tribes: Emotion, reason, and the gap between us and them. New York, NY: Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G. (1989). Compliance in an interrogative situation: A new scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 535–540. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(89)90035-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. (2013). Moral psychology for the twenty-first century. Journal of Moral Education, 42, 281–297. doi:10.1080/03057240.2013.817327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannon, P. A., Rusbult, C. E., Finkel, E. J., & Kamashiro, M. (2010). In the wake of betrayal: Amends, forgiveness, and the resolution of betrayal. Personal Relationships, 17, 253–278. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01275.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280–1300. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. In P. Z. Mark (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 1–46). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hollinger, R. C., & Clark, J. P. (1983). Deterrence in the workplace: Perceived certainty, perceived severity, and employee theft. Social Forces, 62, 398–418. doi:10.1093/sf/62.2.398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogervorst, N., De Cremer, D., & Van Dijke, M. H. (2010). Why leaders not always disapprove of unethical follower behavior: It depends on the leader’s self-interest and accountability. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 29–41. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0793-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogervorst, N., De Cremer, D., & Van Dijke, M. H. (2013). When do leaders grant voice? How leaders’ perceptions of followers’ control and belongingness needs affect the enactment of fair procedures. Human Relations, 66, 973–992. doi:10.1177/0018726713482150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inness, M., Barling, J., & Turner, N. (2005). Understanding supervisor-targeted aggression: A within-person, between-jobs design. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 731–739. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, T. A., & Martocchio, J. J. (1995). The role of fairness orientation and supervisor attributions in absence disciplinary decisions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 10, 115–137. doi:10.1007/BF02249274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaptein, M. (2011). Understanding unethical behavior by unraveling ethical culture. Human Relations, 64, 843–869. doi:10.1177/0018726710390536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karremans, J. C., & Smith, P. K. (2010). Having the power to forgive: When the experience of power increases interpersonal forgiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1010–1023. doi:10.1177/0146167210376761
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelln, B. R. C., & Ellard, J. H. (1999). An equity theory analysis of the impact of forgiveness and retribution on transgressor compliance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 864–872. doi:10.1177/0146167299025007008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemper, T. D. (1978). A social interactional theory of emotions. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kish-Gephart, J., Detert, J. R., Treviño, L. K., & Edmondson, A. C. (2009). Silenced by fear: The nature, sources, and consequences of fear at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 29, 163–193. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2009.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurzynski, M. J. (1998). The virtue of forgiveness as a human resource management strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 77–85. doi:10.1023/A:1005762514254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwok, C.-K., Au, W. T., & Ho, J. (2005). Normative controls and self-reported counterproductive behaviors in the workplace in China. Applied Psychology, 54, 456–475. doi:10.1111/apps.2005.54.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakens, D., & Etz, A. J. (2014). Too True to be Bad: When Sets of Studies With Significant and Nonsignificant Findings Are Probably True. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1948550617693058
   Google Scholar
• Lammers, J., Stoker, J. I., & Stapel, D. A. (2010). Power and behavioral approach orientation in existing power relations and the mediating effect of income. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 543–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 146–159. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leunissen, J. M., De Cremer, D., & Folmer, C. P. R. (2012). An instrumental perspective on apologizing in bargaining: The importance of forgiveness to apologize. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33, 215–222. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2011.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, L. M., Simmons, B. L., & Nelson, D. L. (2007). Health among leaders: Positive and negative affect, engagement and burnout, forgiveness and revenge. The Journal of Management Studies, 44, 243–260. doi:10.1111/joms.2007.44.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. The Academy of Management Annals, 2, 351–398. doi:10.1080/19416520802211628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullough, M. E., Fincham, F. D., & Tsang, J.-A. (2003). Forgiveness, forbearance, and time: The temporal unfolding of transgression-related interpersonal motivations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 540–557. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullough, M. E., Kurzban, R., & Tabak, B. A. (2013). Cognitive systems for revenge and forgiveness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 1–15. doi:10.1017/S0140525X11002160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullough, M. E., Root, L. M., Tabak, B., & Witvliet, C. V. O. (2009). Forgiveness. In S. J. Lopez (Ed.), Handbook of positive psychology (2nd ed., pp. 427–435). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNulty, J. K. (2010). Forgiveness increases the likelihood of subsequent partner transgressions in marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 787–790. doi:10.1037/a0021678
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNulty, J. K. (2011). The dark side of forgiveness: The tendency to forgive predicts continued psychological and physical aggression in marriage. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 770–783. doi:10.1177/0146167211407077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNulty, J. K, & Russell, V. M. (2016). Forgive and forget, or forgive and regret? whether forgiveness leads to less or more offending depends on offender agreeableness. Personality And Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(5), 616-631. doi:10.1177/0146167216637841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNulty, J. K., & Russell, V. M. (2016). Forgive and forget, or forgive and regret? Whether forgiveness leads to less or more offending depends on offender agreeableness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 616–631. doi:10.1177/0146167216637841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, M. S., & Ambrose, M. L. (2007). Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1159–1168. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mok, A., & De Cremer, D. (2015). Overlooking interpersonal hurt: A global processing style influences forgiveness in work relationships. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24, 267–278. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2014.892872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooney, L., Strelan, P., & McKee, I. (2016). How forgiveness promotes offender pro‐relational intentions: The mediating role of offender gratitude. British journal of social psychology, 55(1), 44-64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, E. W., & Rothman, N. B. (2009). Silence and the dynamics of power. In J. Greenberg & M. S. Edwards (Eds.), Voice and silence in organizations. Bingley UK: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Mulder, L. B., Van Dijk, E., De Cremer, D., & Wilke, H. A. (2006). Undermining trust and cooperation: The paradox of sanctioning systems in social dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 147–162. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, K., & Tyler, T. (2008). Procedural justice and compliance behaviour: The mediating role of emotions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 652–668. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagin, D. S. (2013). Deterrence: A review of the evidence by a criminologist for economists. Annual Review of Economics, 5, 83–105. doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-072412-131310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagin, D. S., & Pogarsky, G. (2003). An experimental investigation of deterrence: Cheating, self-serving bias, and impulsivity. Criminology, 41, 167–194. doi:10.1111/crim.2003.41.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2006). Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 941–966. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2010). The effects of organizational embeddedness on development of social capital and human capital. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 696–712. doi:10.1037/a0019150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palanski, M. E. (2012). Forgiveness and reconciliation in the workplace: A multi-level perspective and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 109, 275–287. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-1125-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitesa, M., & Thau, S. (2013). Compliant sinners, obstinate saints: How power and self-focus determine the effectiveness of social influences in ethical decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 635–658. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plutchik, R. (2003). Emotions and life: Perspectives from psychology, biology and evolution. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M. (1982). Determinants of a supervisor’s use of rewards and punishmens: A literature review and suggestions for further research. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 29, 58–83. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(82)90242-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, T. C., Cullen, F. T., Blevins, K. R., Daigle, L. E., & Madensen, T. D. (2006). The empirical status of deterrence theory: A meta-analysis. Taking Stock: The Status of Criminological Theory, 15, 367–396.
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riordan, C. A., Dunaway, F. A., Haa, P., James, M. K., & Kruge, D. (1984). Prosocial behavior following transgression: Evidence for intrapsychic and interpersonal motives. The Journal of Social Psychology, 124, 51–55. doi:10.1080/00224545.1984.9924536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357–387. doi:10.1111/pere.1998.5.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saint-Mont, U. (2015). Randomization does not help much, comparability does. PloS One, 10, e0132102. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0132102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekerka, L. E., Comer, D. R., & Godwin, L. N. (2014). Positive organizational ethics: Cultivating and sustaining moral performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 119, 435–444. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1911-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, G. D., Lee, J. J., Cuddy, A. J. C., Renshon, J., Oveis, C., Gross, J. J., & Lerner, J. S. (2012). Leadership is associated with lower levels of stress. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 17903–17907. doi:10.1073/pnas.1207042109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shnabel, N., & Nadler, A. (2008). A needs-based model of reconciliation: Satisfying the differential emotional needs of victim and perpetrator as a key to promoting reconciliation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 116–132. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shnabel, N., Nadler, A., Ullrich, J., Dovidio, J. F., & Carmi, D. (2009). Promoting reconciliation through the satisfaction of the emotional needs of victimized and perpetrating group members: The needs-based model of reconciliation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1021–1030. doi:10.1177/0146167209336610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, L. J., Rivera, A. N., & Tedeschi, J. T. (1979). Transgression-compliance: Guilt, negative affect, or impression management? The Journal of Social Psychology, 108, 57–62. doi:10.1080/00224545.1979.9711961
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SimanTov-Nachlieli, I., & Shnabel, N. (2014). Feeling both victim and perpetrator: Investigating duality within the needs-based model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 301–314. doi:10.1177/0146167213510746
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359–1366. doi:10.1177/0956797611417632
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stouten, J., & Tripp, T. M. (2009). Claiming more than equality: Should leaders ask for forgiveness? The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 287–298. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strelan, P. G., & Sutton, R. M. (2011). When just-world beliefs promote and when they inhibit forgiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 163–168. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struthers, C. W., Eaton, J., Shirvani, N., Georghiou, M., & Edell, E. (2008). The effect of preemptive forgiveness and a transgressor’s responsibility on shame, motivation to reconcile, and repentance. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 30, 130–141. doi:10.1080/01973530802209178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabak, B. A., McCullough, M. E., Luna, L. R., Bono, G., & Berry, J. W. (2012). Conciliatory gestures facilitate forgiveness and feelings of friendship by making transgressors appear more agreeable. Journal of Personality, 80, 503–536. doi:10.1111/jopy.2012.80.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teper, R., Zhong, C.-B., & Inzlicht, M. (2015). How emotions shape moral behavior: Some answers (and questions) for the field of moral psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9, 1–14. doi:10.1111/spc3.v9.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tepper, B. J., Carr, J. C., Breaux, D. M., Geider, S., Hu, C., & Hua, W. (2009). Abusive supervision, intentions to quit, and employees’ workplace deviance: A power/dependence analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109, 156–167. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thau, S., & Mitchell, M. S. (2010). Self-gain or self-regulation impairment? Tests of competing explanations of the supervisor abuse and employee deviance relationship through perceptions of distributive justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1009–1031. doi:10.1037/a0020540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjosvold, D., & Wisse, B. (Eds.). (2009). Power and interdependence in organizations. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge UK..
   Google Scholar
• Treviño, L. K. (1992). Experimental approaches to studying ethical-unethical behavior in organizations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2, 121–136. doi:10.2307/3857567
   Google Scholar
• Tuk, M. A., Zhang, K., & Sweldens, S. (2015). The propagation of self-control: Self-control in one domain simultaneously improves self-control in other domains. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 639–654. doi:10.1037/xge0000065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2005). Can businesses effectively regulate employee conduct? The antecedents of rule following in work settings. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 1143–1158. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2005.19573114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhlmann, E. L., Heaphy, E., Ashford, S. J., Zhu, L., & Sanchez-Burks, J. (2013). Acting professional: An exploration of culturally bounded norms against nonwork role referencing. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 866–886. doi:10.1002/job.1874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijke, M. H., De Cremer, D., & Mayer, D. M. (2010). The role of authority power in explaining procedural fairness effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 488–502. doi:10.1037/a0018921
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Rhee, H.J., Suurmond, R., & Hak, T. (2015). User manual for Meta-Essentials: Workbooks for meta-analyses (Version 1.0). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Erasmus Research Institute of Management. Retrieved from www.erim.eur.nl/research-support/meta-essentials
   Google Scholar
• Verboon, P., & van Dijke, M. (2011). When do severe sanctions enhance compliance? The role of procedural fairness. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32, 120–130. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2010.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, H. M., Exline, J. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (2008). Interpersonal consequences of forgiveness: Does forgiveness deter or encourage repeat offenses? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 453–460. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. A., Sparks, J., Gonzales, J. E., Hess, Y. D., & Ledgerwood, A. (2017). Using independent covariates in experimental designs: Quantifying the trade-off between power boost and Type I error inflation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 72, 118–124. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1994). The PANAS-X: Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule-expanded form. Ames, IA: The University of Iowa.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenzel, M., & Okimoto, T. G. (2010). How acts of forgiveness restore a sense of justice: Addressing status/power and value concerns raised by transgressions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 401–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witvliet, C. V., Ludwig, T. E., & Bauer, D. J. (2002). Please forgive me: Transgressors’ emotions and physiology during imagery of seeking forgiveness and victim responses. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 21, 219–233.
   Google Scholar
• Wohl, M. J., & McGrath, A. L. (2007). The perception of time heals all wounds: Temporal distance affects willingness to forgive following an interpersonal transgression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1023–1035. doi:10.1177/0146167207301021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yukl, G., & Falbe, C. M. (1991). Importance of different power sources in downward and lateral relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 416–423. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.76.3.416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajac, E. J., & Westphal, J. D. (1996). Who shall succeed? How CEO/board preferences and power affect the choice of new CEOs. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 64–90. doi:10.2307/256631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, X., Van Dijke, M., Leunissen, J. M., Giurge, L., & De Cremer, D. (2016). When saying sorry may not help: Transgressor power moderates the effect of an apology on forgiveness in the workplace. Human Relations, 69, 1387–1418. doi:10.1177/0018726715611236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zitek, E. M., Jordan, A. H., Monin, B., & Leach, F. R. (2010). Victim entitlement to behave selfishly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 245–255. doi:10.1037/a0017168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar