2,287
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The implications of perceived leader favouritism in the context of leader-member exchange relationships

&
Pages 88-99 | Received 16 Feb 2017, Accepted 16 Oct 2017, Published online: 31 Oct 2017

References

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Anand, S., Vidyarthi, P. R., & Park, H. P. (2015). LMX differentiation: Understanding relational leadership at individual and group levels. In T. N. Bauer & B. Erdogan (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of leader‐member exchange (pp. 263–293). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., & Walumbwa, F. O. (2007). Authentic leadership questionnaire. Gallup Leadership Institute, Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden Inc. Retrieved from http://www.mindgarden.com.
  • Bank, S. P. (1988). Favoritism. Journal of Children in Contemporary Society, 19, 77–89. doi:10.1300/J274v19n03_05
  • Bauer, T. N., & Green, S. G. (1996). Development of a leader-member exchange: A longitudinal test. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1538–1567. doi:10.2307/257068
  • Bernerth, J. B., & Aguinis, H. (2016). A critical review and best‐practice recommendations for control variable usage. Personnel Psychology, 69, 229–283. doi:10.1111/peps.12103
  • Bolino, M. C., & Grant, A. M. (2016). The bright side of being prosocial at work, and the dark side, too: A review and agenda for research on other-oriented motives, behavior, and impact in organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 10, 599–670. doi:10.1080/19416520.2016.1153260
  • Bolino, M. C., Hsiung, H. H., Harvey, J., & LePine, J. A. (2015). “Well, I’m tired of tryin’!” Organizational citizenship behavior and citizenship fatigue. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 56. doi:10.1037/a0037583
  • Bolino, M. C., & Turnley, W. H. (2008). Old faces, new places: Equity theory in cross-cultural contexts. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 29–50. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379
  • Bolino, M. C., & Turnley, W. H. (2009). Relative deprivation among employees in lower-quality leader-member exchange relationships. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 276–286. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.001
  • Bolino, M. C., Turnley, W. H., Gilstrap, J. B., & Suazo, M. M. (2010). Citizenship under pressure: What’s a “good soldier” to do? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 835–855. doi:10.1002/job.635
  • Boll, T., Ferring, D., & Filipp, S. H. (2003). Perceived parental differential treatment in middle adulthood: Curvilinear relations with individuals’ experienced relationship quality to sibling and parents. Journal of Family Psychology, 17, 472–487. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.17.4.472
  • Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instrument. In W. Lonner & J. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 137–164). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Cappelli, P. (2017, February 17). Why bosses should stop thinking of ‘A Players,’ ‘B Players’ and ‘C Players’. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://online.wsj.com
  • Chatterjee, S., & Price, B. (1991). Regression diagnostics. New York: Wiley.
  • Cole, M. S., Bruch, H., & Vogel, B. (2006). Emotion as mediators of the relations between perceived supervisor support and psychological hardiness on employee cynicism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 463–484. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379
  • Crosby, F. (1976). A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review, 83, 85–113. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.83.2.85
  • Crosby, F. (1984). Relative deprivation in organizational settings. Research in Organizational Behavior, 6, 51–93.
  • Dansereau, F., Cashman, J., & Graen, G. (1973). Instrumentality theory and equity theory as complementary approaches in predicting the relationship of leadership and turnover among managers. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 10, 184–200. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(73)90012-3
  • Dansereau, F., Graen, G., & Haga, W. J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 46–78. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(75)90005-7
  • Dasborough, M. T., Ashkanasy, N. M., Tee, E. J., & Tse, H. M. (2009). What goes around comes around: How meso-level negative emotional contagion can ultimately determine organizational attitudes toward leaders. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 571–585. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.04.009
  • Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137–149. doi:10.1111/josi.1975.31.issue-3
  • Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W. H., Liden, R. C., Brouer, R. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader-member exchange: Integrating the past with an eye toward the future. Journal of Management, 38, 1715–1759. doi:10.1177/0149206311415280
  • Erdogan, B. (2002). Leader-member exchange differentiation fairness: Evidence for a new construct. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Chicago.
  • Erdogan, B., & Bauer, T. N. (2010). Differentiated leader–member exchanges: The buffering role of justice climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1104–1120. doi:10.1037/a0020578
  • Erdogan, B., & Liden, R. C. (2002). Social exchanges in the workplace: A review of recent developments and future research directions in leader-member exchange theory. In Neider & C. A. Schriesheim (Eds.), Leadership (pp. 65–114). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
  • Farh, J. L., Earley, P. C., & Lin, S. C. (1997). Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behaviour in Chinese society. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 421–444. doi:10.2307/2393733
  • Farmer, S. M., Van Dyne, L., & Kamdar, D. (2015). The contextualized self: How team-member exchange leads to coworker identification and helping OCB. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 583–595. doi:10.1037/a0037660
  • Feinberg, M., & Hetherington, E. M. (2001). Differential parenting as a within-family variable. Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 22–37. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.15.1.22
  • Ferris, G. R. (1985). Role of leadership in the employee withdrawal process: A constructive replication. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 777–781. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.70.4.777
  • Finzi-Dottan, R., & Cohen, O. (2010). Young adult sibling relations: The effects of perceived parental favoritism and narcissism. The Journal of Psychology, 145, 1–22. doi:10.1080/00223980.2010.528073
  • Fisher, C. D. (2000). Mood and emotions while working: Missing pieces of job satisfaction? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 185–202. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379
  • Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7, 286–299. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.286
  • Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader–member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 827–844. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.827
  • Graen, G. (1976). Role-making processes within complex organizations. In . Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (1201–1245). Chicago: Rand McNally.
  • Graen, G. B., & Scandura, T. A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 175–208.
  • Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219–247. doi:10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
  • Greenberg, J., & Scott, K. S. (1996). Why do workers bite the hands that feed them? Employee theft as a social exchange process. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behaviour (Vol. 18, pp. 111–156). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Han, G. (2010). Trust and career satisfaction: The mediating role of LMX. Career Development International, 15, 437–458. doi:10.1108/13620431011075321
  • Harrison, D. A., Newman, D. A., & Roth, P. L. (2006). How important are job attitudes? Meta-analytic comparisons of integrative behavioral outcomes and time sequences. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 305–325. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2006.20786077
  • Henderson, D. J., Liden, R. C., Glibkowski, B. C., & Chaudhry, A. (2009). LMX differentiation: A multilevel review and examination of its antecedents and outcomes. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 517–534. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.04.003
  • Henderson, D. J., Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., Bommer, W. H., & Tetrick, L. E. (2008). Leader–member exchange, differentiation, and psychological contract fulfilment: A multilevel examination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1208–1219. doi:10.1037/a0012678
  • Hofmann, D. A., & Gavin, M. B. (1998). Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Theoretical and methodological implications for organizational science. Journal of Management, 24, 623–641. doi:10.1177/014920639802400504
  • Hooper, D. T., & Martin, R. (2008). Beyond personal leader–member exchange (LMX) quality: The effects of perceived LMX variability on employee reactions. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 20–30. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.12.002
  • Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 755–768. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755
  • Kumar, P., & Ghadially, R. (1989). Organizational politics and its effects on members of organizations. Human Relations, 42, 305–314. doi:10.1177/001872678904200402
  • Landis, R. S., Beal, D. J., & Tesluk, P. (2000). A comparison of approaches to forming composite measures in structuring equation models. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 186–207. doi:10.1177/109442810032003
  • LePine, J. A., Erez, A., & Johnson, D. E. (2002). The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behaviour: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 52–65. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.52
  • Liden, R. C., Erdogan, B., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2006). Leader‐member exchange, differentiation, and task interdependence: Implications for individual and group performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 723–746. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379
  • Liden, R. C., Sparrowe, R. T., & Wayne, S. J. (1997). Leader-member exchange theory: The past and potential for the future. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 15, pp. 47–119). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Stilwell, D. (1993). A longitudinal study on the early development of leader-member exchanges. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 662–674. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.662
  • Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Nagengast, B., Morin, A. J. S., & Von Davier, M. (2013). Why item parcels are (almost) never appropriate: Two wrongs do not make a right—Camouflaging misspecification with item parcels in CFA models. Psychological Methods, 18, 257–284. doi:10.1037/a0032773
  • Martin, R., Thomas, G., Legood, A., & Dello Russo, S. (In Press). Leader–member exchange (LMX) differentiation and work outcomes: Conceptual clarification and critical review. Journal of Organizational Behavior. doi:10.1002/job.2202
  • Maslyn, J. M., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2001). Leader–member exchange and its dimensions: Effects of self-effort and other’s effort on relationship quality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 697–708. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.697
  • Maslyn, J. M., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2005). LMX differentiation: Key concepts and related empirical findings. In G. B. Graen & J. A. Graen (Eds.), Global organizing designs (pp. 73–98). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
  • Matta, F. K., Scott, B. A., Koopman, J., & Conlon, D. E. (2015). Does seeing “eye to eye” affect work engagement and organizational citizenship behavior? A role theory perspective on LMX agreement. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 1686–1708. doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0106
  • Organ, D. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (2006). Organizational citizenship behaviour: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Pajo, K., Coetzer, A., & Guenole, N. (2010). Formal development opportunities and withdrawal behaviours by employees in small and medium‐sized enterprises. Journal of Small Business Management, 48, 281–301. doi:10.1111/j.1540-627X.2010.00295.x
  • Podsakoff, N. P., Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Blume, B. D. (2009). Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviours: A meta-analysis. In Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 122–141).
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed. ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Scandura, T. A., & Schriesheim, C. A. (1994). Leader-member exchange and supervisor career mentoring as complementary constructs in leadership research. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1588–1602. doi:10.2307/256800
  • Schriesheim, C. A., Castro, S. L., & Cogliser, C. C. (1999). Leader-member exchange (LMX) research: A comprehensive review of theory, measurement, and data-analytic practices. Leadership Quarterly, 10, 63–113. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(99)80009-5
  • Schyns, B., & Day, D. (2010). Critique and review of leader–member exchange theory: Issues of agreement, consensus, and excellence. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19, 1–29. doi:10.1080/13594320903024922
  • Seers, A., Petty, M. M., & Cashman, J. F. (1995). Team-member exchange under team and traditional management. Group and Organization Management, 20, 18–38. doi:10.1177/1059601195201003
  • Shapira-Lishchinsky, O., & Tsemach, S. (2014). Psychological empowerment as a mediator between teachers’ perceptions of authentic leadership and their withdrawal and citizenship behaviors. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50, 675–712. doi:10.1177/0013161X13513898
  • Sin, H. P., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2009). Understanding why they don’t see eye to eye: An examination of leader–member exchange (LMX) agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1048–1057. doi:10.1037/a0014827
  • Sparrowe, R. T., & Liden, R. C. (2005). Two routes to influence: Integrating leader-member exchange and social network perspectives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 505–535. doi:10.2189/asqu.50.4.505
  • Spector, P. E., & Che, X. X. (2014). Re-examining citizenship: How the control of measurement artifacts affects observed relationships of organizational citizenship behavior and organizational variables. Human Performance, 27, 165–182. doi:10.1080/08959285.2014.882928
  • Townsend, J., Phillips, J. S., & Elkins, T. J. (2000). Employee retaliation: The neglected consequence of poor leader-member exchange relations. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 457–463. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.5.4.457
  • Tse, H. H., Lam, C. K., Lawrence, S. A., & Huang, X. (2013). When my supervisor dislikes you more than me: The effect of dissimilarity in leader–member exchange on coworkers’ interpersonal emotion and perceived help. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 974–988. doi:10.1037/a0033862
  • Vidyarthi, P. R., Liden, R. C., Anand, S., Erdogan, B., & Ghosh, S. (2010). Where do I stand? Examining the effects of leader–member exchange social comparison on employee work behaviours. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 849–861. doi:10.1037/a0020033
  • Wayne, S. J., Liden, R. C., Kraimer, M. L., & Graf, I. K. (1999). The role of human capital, motivation and supervisor sponsorship in predicting career success. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 577–595. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.