Teaming up with temps: the impact of temporary workers on team social networks and effectiveness

References

• Agneessens, F., & Wittek, R. (2012). Where do intra-organizational advice relations come from? The role of informal status and social capital in social exchange. Social Networks, 34, 333–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almaatouq, A., Radaelli, L., Pentland, A., & Shmueli, E. (2016). Are you your friends’ friend? Poor perception of friendship ties limits the ability to promote behavioral change. PloS One, 11, e0151588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, M., Leenders, R. T. A., Oldham, G. R., & Vadera, A. K. (2010). Win or lose the battle for creativity: The power and perils of intergroup competition. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 827–845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balkundi, P., & Harrison, D. A. (2006). Ties, leaders, and time in teams: Strong inference about network structure’s effects on team viability and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 49–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee, M., Tolbert, P. S., & DiCiccio, T. (2012). Friend or foe? The effects of contingent employees on standard employees’ work attitudes. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23, 2180–2204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, S. T., Villado, A. J., Lukasik, M. A., Belau, L., & Briggs, A. L. (2011). Getting specific about demographic diversity variable and team performance relationships: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 37, 709–743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bidwell, M., Briscoe, F., Fernandez-Mateo, I., & Sterling, A. (2013). The employment relationship and inequality: How and why changes in employment practices are reshaping rewards in organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 7, 61–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingham, J. B., Oldroyd, J. B., Thompson, J. A., Bednar, J. S., & Bunderson, J. S. (2014). Status and the true believer: The impact of psychological contracts on social status attributions of friendship and influence. Organization Science, 25, 73–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). UCINET for windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce, A. S., Ryan, A. M., Imus, A. L., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). “Temporary worker, permanent loser?” A model of the stigmatization of temporary workers. Journal of Management, 33, 5–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995). Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 20, 343–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carboni, I., & Ehrlich, K. (2013). The effect of relational and team characteristics on individual performance: A social network perspective. Human Resource Management, 52, 511–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chattopadhyay, P., & George, E. (2001). Examining the effects of work externalization through the lens of social identity theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 781–788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly, C. E., & Kelloway, E. K. (2003). Predictors of employees’ perceptions of knowledge sharing cultures. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 24, 294–301.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, E. R., & Lepine, J. A. (2013). A configural theory of team processes: Accounting for the structure of taskwork and teamwork. Academy of Management Review, 38, 32–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curşeu, P. L., Raab, J., Han, J., & Loenen, A. (2012). Educational diversity and group effectiveness: A social network perspective. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27, 576–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis-Blake, A., Broschak, J. P., & George, E. (2003). Happy together? How using nonstandard workers affects exit, voice, and loyalty among standard employees. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 475–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedkin, N. E. (1991). Theoretical foundations for centrality measures. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 1478–1504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Banker, B. S., Houlette, M., Johnson, K. M., & McGlynn, E. A. (2000). Reducing intergroup conflict: From superordinate goals to decategorization, recategorization, and mutual differentiation. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4, 98–114.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, D. G. (2005). Part-time and contingent employment. In J. Barling, E. K. Kelloway, & M. R. Frone (Eds.), Handbook of work stress (pp. 517–541). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• George, E., & Chattopadhyay, P. (2005). One foot in each camp: The dual identification of ontract workers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 68–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gower, J. C., & Legendre, P. (1986). Metric and euclidean properties of dissimilarity coefficients. Journal of Classification, 3, 5–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grund, T. U. (2012). Network structure and team performance: The case of English Premier League soccer teams. Social Networks, 34, 682–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1199–1228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslam, S. A., van Knippenberg, D., Platow, M., & Ellemers, N. (2003). Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henttonen, K., Janhonen, M., Johanson, J., & Puumalainen, K. (2010). The demographic antecedents and performance consequences of the social-network structure in work teams. Team Performance Management, 16, 388–412.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 184–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. I. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25, 121–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornsey, M. J., & Hogg, M. A. (2000). Subgroup relations: A comparison of mutual intergroup differentiation and common ingroup identity models of prejudice reduction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 242–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huberman, B. A., Loch, C. H., & Önçüler, A. (2004). Status as a valued resource. Social Psychology Quarterly, 67, 103–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM Corp. ( Released 2013). IBM SPSS statistics for windows (Version Version 22.0). Armonk, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005). Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517–543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31, 386–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalleberg, A. L. (2000). Nonstandard employment relations: Part-time, temporary and contract work. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 341–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, A. A. (2010). Unlocking knowledge transfer potential: Knowledge demonstrability and superordinate social identity. Organization Science, 21, 643–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, A. A., Argote, L., & Levine, J. M. (2005). Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96, 56–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearney, E., & Gebert, D. (2009). Managing diversity and enhancing team outcomes: The promise of transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 77–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, K. J., Beng-Chong, L., Saltz, J. L., & Mayer, D. M. (2004). How do they get there? An examination of the antecedents of centrality in team networks. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 952–963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 333–375). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kumbasar, E., Rommey, A. K., & Batchelder, W. H. (1994). Systematic biases in social perception. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 477–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. H., Qureshi, I., Konrad, A. M., & Bhardwaj, A. (2014). Proactive personality heterophily and the moderating role of proactive personality on network centrality and psychological outcomes: A longitudinal study. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29, 381–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, J. R., & Miller, J. (1979). Work and friendship ties in organizations: A comparative analysis of relational networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 181–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas, C. J., & Hox, J. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology, 1, 86–92.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marler, J. H., Woodard Barringer, M., & Milkovich, G. T. (2002). Boundaryless and traditional contingent employees: Worlds apart. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 425–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehra, A., Kilduff, M., & Brass, D. J. (1998). At the margins: A distinctiveness approach to the social identity and social networks of underrepresented groups. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 441–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R., Boyle, B., Parker, V., Giles, M., Chiang, V., & Joyce, P. (2015). Managing inclusiveness and diversity in teams: How leader inclusiveness affects performance through status and team identity. Human Resource Management, 54, 217–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, R. E. (1994). Flesh peddlers and warm bodies: The temporary help industry and its workers. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ravlin, E. C., & Thomas, D. C. (2005). Status and stratification processes in organizational life. Journal of Management, 31, 966–987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reagans, R., Zuckerman, E., & McEvily, B. (2004). How to make the team: Social networks vs. demography as criteria for designing effective teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 101–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, A. W., Scully, J., & West, M. A. (2005). Intergroup conflict and intergroup effectiveness in organizations: Theory and scale development. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 14, 177–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, C. L., & Walker, H. A. (1995). Status structures. In K. S. Cook, G. A. Fine, & J. S. House (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology (pp. 281–310). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, V., & Aube, C. (2010). Team self-managing behaviors and team effectiveness: The moderating effect of task routineness. Group & Organization Management, 35, 751–781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (2000). Social network analysis: A handbook. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, K. L., Restubog, S. L. D., & Zagenczyk, T. J. (2013). A social exchange-based model of the antecedents of workplace exclusion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 37–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sluss, D. M., Ployhart, R. E., Cobb, M. G., & Ashforth, B. E. (2012). Generalizing newcomers’ relational and organizational identifications: Processes and prototypicality. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 949–975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparrowe, R. T., Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Kraimer, M. L. (2001). Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 316–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Tempest, S. (2009). Learning from the alien: Knowledge relationships with temporary workers in network contexts. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20, 912–927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsui, A. S., Egan, T. D., & O’Reilly III, C. A. (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 549–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Vegt, G. S., Bunderson, S., & Kuipers, B. (2010). Why turnover matters in self- managing work teams: Learning, social integration, and task flexibility. Journal of Management, 36, 1168–1191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk, H., Meyer, B., van Engen, M., & Loyd, D. L. (2017). Microdynamics in diverse teams: A review and integration of the diversity and stereotyping literatures. Academy of Management Annals, 11, 517–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk, H., & van Engen, M. L. (2013). A status perspective on the consequences of work group diversity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86, 223–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk, H., van Engen, M. L., & van Knippenberg, D. (2012). Defying conventional wisdom: A meta-analytical examination of the differences between demographic and job-related diversity relationships with performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119, 38–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Emmerik, I. H., & Brenninkmeijer, V. (2009). Deep-level similarity and group social capital: Associations with team functioning. Small Group Research, 40, 650–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg, D., & Schippers, M. C. (2007). Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 515–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Oostrum, J., & Rabbie, J. M. (1995). Intergroup competition and cooperation within autocratic and democratic management regimes. Small Group Research, 26, 269–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Hippel, C., & Kalokerinos, E. K. (2012). When temporary employees are perceived as threatening: Antecedents and consequences. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 33, 200–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkin, C. L. (2013). I can’t get no job satisfaction: Meta-analysis comparing permanent and contingent workers. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 47–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittenbaum, G. M., & Bowman, J. M. (2005). Member status and information exchange in decision-making groups. Research on Managing Groups and Teams, 7, 143–168.
   Google Scholar