A taxonomic foundation for evidence-based research on employee performance management

References

• Abrahamson, E. (1991). Managerial fads and fashions: The diffusion and rejection of innovations. Academy of Management Review, 16, 586–612. doi:10.5465/AMR.1991.4279484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler, S., Campion, M., Colquitt, A., Grubb, A., Murphy, K., Ollander-Krane, R., & Pulakos, E. D. (2016). Industrial and Organizational Psychologist, 9, 219–252.
   Google Scholar
• Aguinis, H. (2014). Performance management (3rd ed.). Edinburgh Gate, UK: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, T. D., & Rush, M. C. (1998). The effects of organizational citizenship behavior on performance judgments: A field study and a laboratory experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 247–260. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appelbaum, S. H., Nadeau, D., & Cyr, M. (2008). Performance appraisal in a matrix organization: A case study (part two). Industrial and Commercial Training, 40, 295–299. doi:10.1108/00197850810900048
   Google Scholar
• Appelbaum, S. H., Roy, M., & Gilliland, T. (2011). Globalization of performance appraisals: Theory and applications. Management Decisions, 49, 570–585. doi:10.1108/00251741111126495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvey, R. D., & Murphy, K. R. (1998). Performance appraisal in work settings. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 141–168. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, H. D., & Sarwar, S. (2010). Improving performance management practices. Journal of Management Research, 2, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Athey, T. R., & McIntyre, R. M. (1987). Effect of rater training on rater accuracy: Levels-of-processing theory and social facilitation theory perspectives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 567–572. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.72.4.567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atwater, L. E., Ostroff, C., Yamarino, F. J., & Fleenor, J. W. (1998). Self-other agreement: Does it really matter? Personnel Psychology, 51, 577–598. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1998.tb00252.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avery, D. R., McKay, P. F., & Wilson, D. C. (2008). What are the odds? How demographic similarity affects the prevalence of perceived employment discrimination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 235–249. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, C. G., & Murphy, K. R. (1985). Toward narrowing the research-practice gap in performance appraisal. Personnel Psychology, 38, 335–345. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1985.tb00551.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120. doi:10.1177/014920639101700108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett, D., & Francis-Smythe, J. A. (2016). Bridging the divide in work and organisational psychology: Evidence from practice. European Journal of Work and Organisational Psychology, 25, 615–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartol, K. M., Durham, C. C., & Poon, J. M. (2001). Influence of performance appraisal rating segmentation on motivation and fairness perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1106–1119. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardin, J. H. (1992). An “analytic” framework for customer-based performance content development and appraisal. Human Resource Management Review, 2, 81–102. doi:10.1016/1053-4822(92)90019-M
   Google Scholar
• Bernardin, J. H., Hagan, C. M., Kane, J. S., & Villanova, P. (1998). Effective performance management: A focus on precision, customers, and situational constraints. In J. W. Smither (Eds.), Performance appraisal: State of the art in practice (pp. 3–48). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Biddle, B. J. (1979). Role theory: Expectations, identities, and behaviors. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blume, B. D., Baldwin, T. T., & Rubin, R. S. (2009). Reactions to different types of forced distribution performance appraisal systems. Journal of Business Psychology, 24, 77–91. doi:10.1007/s10869-009-9093-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobko, P., & Colella, A. (1994). Employee reactions to performance standards: A review and research propositions. Personnel Psychology, 47, 1–29. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1994.tb02407.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boice, D. F., & Kleiner, B. H. (1997). Designing effective performance appraisal systems. Work Study, 46, 197–201. doi:10.1108/00438029710367622
   Google Scholar
• Borman, W. C. (1979). Format and training effects on rating accuracy and rater errors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 410–421. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.64.4.410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borman, W. C., & Vallon, W. R. (1974). A view of what can happen when behavioral expectation scales are developed in one setting and used in another. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 197–201. doi:10.1037/h0036312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudreau, J., & Rice, S. (2015). Bright, shiny objects and the future of HR. Harvard Business Review, 93, 72–78. http://web.b.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.lib.purdue.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=2&sid=7d9f54c3-0dbf-4595-acf3-6fdc914ffcdd%40sessionmgr101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouskila-Yam, O., & Kluger, A. N. (2011). Strength-based performance appraisal and goal setting. Human Resource Management, 21, 137–147. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2010.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, D. E., & Ostroff, C. (2004). Understanding HRM-firm performance linkages: The role of the “strength” of the HRM system. Academy of Management Review, 29, 203–221. doi:10.5465/AMR.2004.12736076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracken, D. W., & Rose, D. S. (2011). When does 360-degree feedback create behavior change? And how would we know it when it does? Journal of Business & Psychology, 26, 183–192. doi:10.1007/s10869-011-9218-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bretz, R. D., Jr., Milkovich, G. T., & Read, W. (1992). The current state of performance appraisal research and practice: Concerns, directions, and implications. Journal of Management, 18, 321–352. doi:10.1177/014920639201800206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briner, R., & Denyer, D. (2012). Systematic review and evidence synthesis as a practice and scholarship tool. In D. Rousseau (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidence-based management (pp. 112–130). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Briner, R. B., & Rousseau, D. M. (2011). Evidence-based I–O psychology: Not there yet but now a little nearer? Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 4, 76–82.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M., & Benson, J. (2005). Managing to overload? Work overload and performance appraisal processes. Group & Organization Management, 30, 99–124. doi:10.1177/1059601104269117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brutus, S. (2010). Words versus numbers: A theoretical exploration of giving and receiving narrative comments in performance appraisal. Human Resource Management Review, 20, 144–157. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchner, T. W. (2007). Performance management theory: A look from the performer’s perspective with implications for HRD. Human Resource Development International, 10, 59–73. doi:10.1080/13678860601170294
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, M., & Goodall, A. (2015). Reinventing performance management. Harvard Business Review, 40–50. http://web.vdw.co.za/sara/file%20storage/Documents/2015/Reinventing%20Performance%20Management%20-%20HBR%20APR%2015.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, R. J. (1996). Performance appraisal and counseling in a professional services firm. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 17, 21–26.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R. A., Oppler, S. H., & Sager, C. H. (1993). A theory of performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 35–70). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Campion, M. A., Fink, A. A., Ruggeberg, B. J., Carr, L., Phillips, G., & Odman, R. B. (2011). Doing competencies well: Best practices in competency modeling. Personnel Psychology, 64, 225–262. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01207.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capelli, P. (2015). Why we love to hate HR … and what HR can do about it. Harvard Business Review, 93, 54–61. http://web.b.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.lib.purdue.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=2&sid=5688b00b-ea19-4c2d-a623-e72b085723a6%40sessionmgr103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catano, V. M., Darr, W., & Campbell, C. A. (2007). Performance appraisal of behavior-based competencies: A reliable and valid procedure. Personnel Psychology, 60, 201–230. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00070.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chattopadhayay, R., & Ghosh, A. K. (2012). Performance appraisal based on a forced distribution system: Its drawbacks and remedies. International Journal of Productivity, 61, 881–896. doi:10.1108/17410401211277138
   Google Scholar
• Chiang, F. F., & Birtch, T. A. (2010). Appraising performance across borders: An empirical examination of the purposes and practices of performance appraisal in a multi-country context. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 1365–1393. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00937.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Church, A. H. (1995). From both sides now performance appraisals: Political tools or effective measures? Industrial and Organizational Psychologist, 33, 57–65.
   Google Scholar
• Cleveland, J. N., Murphy, K. R., & Williams, R. E. (1989). Multiple uses of performance appraisal: Prevalence and correlates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 130–135. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.1.130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, A. B., Harvey, R. D., & Ravden, D. (2005). Sources of political distortions in performance appraisals: Appraisal purpose and rater accountability. Group & Organization Management, 30, 42–60. doi:10.1177/1059601104267666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling, J. (2013). Reframing performance reviews for greater impact. People & Strategy, 36, 66–76. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1767144327?pq-origsite=gscholar
   Google Scholar
• Delery, J. E., & Doty, D. H. (1996). Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurations: Performance predictions. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 802–883. doi:10.2307/256713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeNisi, A., & Smith, C. E. (2014). Performance appraisal, performance management, and firm-level performance: A review, a proposed model, and new directions for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 8, 127–179. doi:10.1080/19416520.2014.873178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeNisi, A. S. (2011). Managing performance to change behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 31, 262–276. doi:10.1080/01608061.2011.619414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeNisi, A. S., & Murphy, K. (2017). Performance appraisal and performance management: 100 years of progress? Journal of Applied Psychology, 102, 421–433. doi:10.1037/apl0000085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeNisi, A. S., & Pritchard, R. D. (2006). Performance appraisal, performance management, and improving individual performance: A motivational framework. Management and Organization Review, 2, 253–277. doi:10.1111/j.1740-8784.2006.00042.x
   Google Scholar
• Dierdorff, E. C., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Consensus in work role requirements: The influence of discrete occupational context on role expectations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1228–1241. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dierdorff, E. C., Rubin, R. S., & Bachrach, D. G. (2012). Role expectations as antecedents of citizenship and the moderating effects of work context. Journal of Management, 38, 573–598. doi:10.1177/0149206309359199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbins, G. H., Cardy, R. L., & Platz-Vieno, S. J. (1990). A contingency approach to appraisal satisfaction: An initial investigation of the joint effects of organizational variables and appraisal characteristics. Journal of Management, 16, 619–632. doi:10.1177/014920639001600307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorfman, P. W., Stephan, W. G., & Loveland, J. (1986). Performance appraisal behaviors: Supervisor perceptions and subordinate reactions. Personnel Psychology, 39, 579–597. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1986.tb00954.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, D. C. (1981). The multiple socialization of organization members. Academy of Management Review, 6, 309–318. doi:10.5465/AMR.1981.4287859
   Google Scholar
• Ferris, G. R., Munyon, T. P., Basik, K., & Buckley, M. R. (2008). The performance evaluation context: Social, emotional, cognitive, political, and relationship components. Human Resource Management Review, 18, 146–163. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, H. S., & Holley, W. H. (1982). The relationship of performance appraisal system characteristics to verdicts in selected employment discrimination cases. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 392–406. doi:10.2307/255999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fink, L. S., & Longenecker, C. O. (1998). Training as a performance appraisal improvement strategy. Career Development International, 3, 243–251. doi:10.1108/13620439810234509
   Google Scholar
• Fleishman, E. A., & Quaintance, M. K. (1984). Taxonomies of human performance. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, C. (1995). New directions for performance appraisal: Some findings and observations. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 3, 191–196. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.1995.tb00027.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folger, R., Konovsky, M. A., & Cropanzano, R. (1992). A due process metaphor for performance appraisal. Research in Organizational Behavior, 14, 129–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, K. J., Kraiger, K., & Schechtman, S. L. (1986). Study of race effects in objective indices and subjective evaluations of performance: A meta-analysis of performance criteria. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 330–337. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerhart, B. (2007). Horizontal and vertical fit in human resource systems. In C. Ostroff & T. Judge (Eds.), Perspectives on organizational fit, SIOP organizational frontiers series (pp. 317–348). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, W. F., Findley, H. M., & Feild, H. S. (1997). Procedural fairness in performance appraisal: Beyond the review session. Journal of Business and Psychology, 11, 493–506. doi:10.1007/BF02195894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilliland, S. W., & Langdon, J. C. (1998). Creating performance management systems that promote perceptions of fairness. In J. W. Smither (Ed.), Performance appraisal: State of the art in practice (pp. 209–243). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H. (2001). Appraising the performance of performance appraisal. IEEE Spectrum, 61–63. doi:10.1109/6.963247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goler, L., Gale, J., & Grant, A. (2016). Let’s not kill performance evaluations yet: Facebook’s experience shows why they can still be valuable. Harvard Business Review, 94, 91–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M., Parker, S., & Collins, C. (2009). Getting credit for proactive behavior: Supervisor reactions depend on what you value and feel. Personnel Psychology, 62, 31–55. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.01128.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. (1986). Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 340–342. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.2.340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J., Roberge, M. E., Ho, V. T., & Rousseau, D. M. (2004). Fairness as an “i-deal”: Justice in under-the-table employment arrangements. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 22, 1–34. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/purdue/reader.action?docID=554813
   Google Scholar
• Grote, D. (2000). Public sector organizations: Today’s innovative leaders in performance management. Public Personnel Management, 29, 1–20. doi:10.1177/009102600002900101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, S. H., & Rouse, E. D. (2015). An inductive study of feedback interactions over the course of creative projects. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 375–404. doi:10.5465/amj.2012.0737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heneman, R. L., & Gresham, M. T. (1998). Performance-based pay plans. In J. W. Smither (Ed.), Performance appraisal: State of the art in practice (pp. 496–497). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Heslin, P. A., & VandeWalle, D. (2011). Performance appraisal procedural justice: The role of manager’s implicit person theory. Journal of Management, 37, 1694–1718. doi:10.1177/0149206309342895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillery, J. M., & Wexley, K. N. (1974). Participation effects in appraisal interviews conducted in a training situation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 168–171. doi:10.1037/h0036522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, B. J., Gorman, C. A., Blair, C. A., Meriac, J. P., Overstret, B., & Atchley, E. K. (2012). Evidence for the effectiveness of an alternative multisource performance rating methodology. Personnel Psychology, 65, 531–563. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2012.01252.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holley, W. H., & Feild, H. S. (1977). The law and performance appraisal in education: A review of court cases and implications for use. Journal of Law & Education, 6, 427–448.
   Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ito, T. A., Larsen, J. T., Smith, N. K., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1998). Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: The negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 887–900. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.887
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. E. (2013). Behavioral perspective on strategic human resource management. In E. H. Kressker (Ed.), Encyclopedia of management theory (pp. 66–72). Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. E., & Schuler, R. S. (1995). Understanding human resource management in the context of organizations and their environments. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 237–264. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.46.020195.001321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. E., Schuler, R. S., & Jiang, K. (2014). An aspirational framework for strategic human resource management. Academy of Management Annals, 8, 1–56. doi:10.1080/19416520.2014.872335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns, G. (1993). Constraints on the adoption of psychology-based personnel practices: Lessons from organizational innovation. Personnel Psychology, 46, 569–592. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb00885.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns, G. (2001). The psychology of lateness, absenteeism, and turnover. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. K. Sinangil, & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work, and organizational psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 232–325). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. W. (2001). The relative importance of task and contextual performance dimensions to supervisor judgments of overall performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 984–996. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.984
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, T. A., & Ferris, G. R. (1993). Social context of performance evaluation decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 80–105. doi:10.2307/256513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kinicki, A. J., Jacobson, K. J. L., Peterson, S. J., & Prussia, G. E. (2013). Development and validation of the performance management behavior questionnaire. Personnel Psychology, 66, 1–45. doi:10.1111/peps.12013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleiman, L. S., & Durham, R. L. (1981). Performance appraisal, promotion, and the courts: A critical review. Personnel Psychology, 34, 103–121. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1981.tb02181.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleingeld, A., Van Tuijl, H., & Algera, J. A. (2004). Participation in the design of performance management systems: A quasi-experimental field study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 831–851. doi:10.1002/job.266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, T. J., & Sulsky, L. M. (2009). Measurement and assessment issues in performance appraisal. Canadian Psychology, 50, 161–171. doi:10.1037/a0015668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korsgaard, A. M., & Roberson, L. (1995). Procedural justice in performance appraisal: The role of instrumental and non-instrumental voice in performance appraisal discussions. Journal of Management, 21, 657–669. doi:10.1016/0149-2063(95)90004-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraiger, K., & Ford, K. J. (1985). A meta-analysis of ratee race effects in performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 56–65. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.70.1.56
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuvaas, B. (2011). The interactive role of performance appraisal reactions and regular feedback. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26, 123–137. doi:10.1108/02683941111102164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landy, F. J., Barnes, J. L., & Murphy, K. R. (1978). Correlates of perceived fairness and accuracy of performance appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 751–754. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.63.6.751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landy, F. J., & Farr, J. L. (1980). Performance rating. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 72–107. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.87.1.72
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latham, G. P., Almost, J., Mann, S., & Moore, C. (2005). New developments in performance management. Organizational Dynamics, 34, 77–87. doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2004.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latham, G. P., Fay, C. H., & Saari, L. M. (1979). The development of behavioral observation scales for appraising the performance of foremen. Personnel Psychology, 32, 299–311. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1979.tb02136.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, P. E., & Williams, J. R. (2004). The social context of performance appraisal: A review and framework for the future. Journal of Management, 30, 881–905. doi:10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, H. A., & Sulsky, L. M. (2009). Rating formats and rater training redux: A context-specific approach for enhancing the effectiveness of performance management. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 41, 227–240. doi:10.1037/a0015165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, D. C., Bartol, K. M., & Kehoe, P. E. (2000). The legal ramifications of performance appraisal: The growing significance. Public Personnel Management, 29, 379–405. doi:10.1177/009102600002900307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConnell, C. R. (2003). The manager’s approach to employee performance problems. Health Care Manager, 22, 63–69.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller, C. S., Kaspin, J. A., & Schuster, M. H. (1990). The impact of performance appraisal methods on age discrimination in employment act cases. Personnel Psychology, 43, 555–578. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1990.tb02396.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 845–856. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motowidlo, S. J., & Van Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 475–480. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.79.4.475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Najmi, M., Rigas, J., & Fan, I.-S. (2005). A framework to review performance measurement systems. Business Process Management Journal, 11, 109–122. doi:10.1108/14637150510591129
   Google Scholar
• Nankervis, A. R., & Compton, R. L. (2006). Performance management: Theory in practice? Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 44, 83–101. doi:10.1177/1038411106061509
   Google Scholar
• Ng, K. Y., Koh, C., Ang, S., Kennedy, J. C., & Chang, K. Y. (2011). Rating leniency and halo in multisource feedback ratings: Testing cultural assumptions of power distance and individualism-collectivism. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 1033–1044. doi:10.1037/a0023368
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, S. L. (2009). International performance appraisals: A review of the literature & agenda for future research. The Journal of American Academy of Business, 14, 171–180.
   Google Scholar
• Paladino, B. (2007). 5 key principles of corporate performance management. Strategic Finance, 89, 33–41. https://search.proquest.com/docview/229774419/fulltextPDF/A8DDB90DCBDD4D06PQ/1?accountid=13360
   Google Scholar
• Payne, S. C., Horner, M. T., Boswell, W. R., Schroeder, A. N., & Stine-Cheyne, K. J. (2009). Comparison of online and traditional performance appraisal systems. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24, 256–544. doi:10.1108/02683940910974116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, J. L., & Porter, L. W. (1986). Employee responses to formal performance appraisal feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 211–218. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.2.211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peretz, H., & Fried, Y. (2012). National cultures, performance appraisal practices, and organizational absenteeism and turnover: A study across 21 countries. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 448–459. doi:10.1037/a0026011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettijohn, C. E., Pettijohn, L. S., & d’Amico, M. (2001). Characteristics of performance appraisals and their impact on sales force satisfaction. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12, 127–146. doi:10.1002/hrdq.4
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2006). Evidence-based management. Harvard Business Review, 84, 62–74. https://hec.unil.ch/docs/files/56/1290/pfeffer_&_sutton_2006_evidence_based_management_hbr.pdf
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichler, S. (2012). The social context of performance appraisal and appraisal reactions: A meta-analysis. Human Resource Management, 51, 709–732. doi:10.1002/hrm.21499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posthuma, R. A., Campion, M. C., Masimova, M., & Campion, M. A. (2013). A high performance work practices taxonomy: Integrating the literature and directing future research. Journal of Management, 39, 1184–1220. doi:10.1177/0149206313478184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard, R. D., Harrell, M. M., DiazGranados, D., & Guzman, M. J. (2008). The productivity measurement and enhancement system. A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 540–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulakos, E. D. (1984). A comparison of rater training programs: Error training and accuracy training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 581–588. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.4.581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulakos, E. D., Hanson, R. M., Arad, S., & Moye, N. (2015). Performance management can be fixed: An on-the-job experiential learning approach for complex behavior change. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8, 51–76. doi:10.1017/iop.2014.2
   Google Scholar
• Rees, D. W., & Porter, C. (2004). Appraisal pitfalls and the training implications – Part 2. Industrial and Commercial Training, 36, 29–34. doi:10.1108/00197850410516094
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, R. R., & McGourty, J. (1998). Performance appraisal in team settings. In J. W. Smither (Ed.), Performance appraisal: State of the art in practice (pp. 244–275). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, M. L., Biondi, L., Gomes, R., Melo, A. I., Ohemeng, F., Perez-Lopez, G., Rossi, A., & Sutiyono, W. (2012). Current state of public sector performance management in seven selected countries. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 61, 235–271. doi:10.1108/17410401211205632
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, G. E. (2002). Employee performance appraisal system participation: A technique that works. Public Personnel Management, 31, 333–342. doi:10.1177/009102600203100306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M. (2012a). Envisioning evidence-based management. In Rousseau (Ed.), The oxford handbook of evidence-based management (pp. 3–24). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M. (2012b). Organizational behavior’s contributions to evidence-based management. In Rousseau (Ed.), The oxford handbook of evidence-based management (pp. 61–78). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M., Manning, J., & Denyer, D. (2008). Evidence in management and organization science: Assembling the field’s full weight of scientific knowledge through syntheses. Academy of Management Annals, 2, 475–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rynes, S. L., Gerhart, B., & Parks, L. (2005). Personnel psychology: Performance evaluation and pay for performance. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 571–600. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rynes, S. L., Giluk, T. L., & Brown, K. G. (2007). The very separate worlds of academic and practitioner periodicals in human resource management: Implications for evidence-based management. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 987–1008. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2007.27151939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sackett, P. R., & DeVore, C. (2001). Counterproductive behaviors at work. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. K. Sinangil, & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work, and organizational psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 145–164). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Scanduto, A., Hunt, B., & Schmerling, D. (2015). A performance management solution: Productivity measurement and enhancement system (ProMES). Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8, 93–99. doi:10.1017/iop.2015.4
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, B., White, S. S., & Paul, M. C. (1998). Linking service climate and customer perceptions of service quality: Tests of a causal model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 150–163. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweiger, I., & Summers, G. E. (1994). Optimizing the value of performance appraisals. Managerial Auditing Journal, 9, 3–7. doi:10.1108/02686909410071124
   Google Scholar
• Selden, S., & Sowa, J. E. (2011). Performance management and appraisal in human service organizations: Management and staff perspectives. Public Personnel Management, 40, 251–264. doi:10.1177/009102601104000305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, S. B., & Wexley, K. N. (1984). Reaction of employees to performance appraisal interviews as a function of their participation in rating scale development. Personnel Psychology, 37, 703–710. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1984.tb00534.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair, D., & Zairi, M. (1995). Benchmarking best-practice performance measurement within companies using total quality management. Benchmarking for Quality Management & Technology, 53, 1–11. doi:10.1108/14635779510099248
   Google Scholar
• Smither, J. W. (2015). The fate of performance ratings: Don’t write the obituary yet. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8, 77–80. doi:10.1017/iop.2015.1
   Google Scholar
• Soltani, E. (2005). Conflict between theory and practice: TQM and performance appraisal. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 22, 796–818. doi:10.1108/02656710510617238
   Google Scholar
• Spinks, N., Wells, B., & Meche, M. (1999). Appraising the appraisals: Computerized performance appraisal systems. Career Development International, 4, 94–100. doi:10.1108/13620439910254713
   Google Scholar
• Staw, B. M. (1976). Knee-deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 27–44. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(76)90005-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D. L., Gueutal, H. G., & Mcintosh, B. (1984). The effects of feedback sequence and expertise of the rater on perceived feedback accuracy. Personnel Psychology, 37, 487–506. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1984.tb00525.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. M., Tracy, K. B., Renard, M. K., Harrison, K. J., & Carroll, S. J. (1995). Due process in performance appraisal: A quasi-experiment in procedural justice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 495–523. doi:10.2307/2393795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tziner, A., & Kopelman, R. E. (2002). Is there a preferred performance rating format? A non-psychometric perspective. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51, 479–503. doi:10.1111/1464-0597.00104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varma, A., Pichler, S., & Srinivas, E. S. (2005). The role of interpersonal affect in performance appraisal: Evidence from two samples - the US and India. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16, 2029–2044. doi:10.1080/09585190500314904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veglahn, P. A. (1993). Key issues in performance appraisal challenges: Evidence for court and arbitration decisions. Labor Law Journal, 44, 595–606. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1290654901/fulltextPDF/769AD478A7DE4A40PQ/1?accountid=13360
   Google Scholar
• Viswesvaran, C. (2001). Assessment of individual job performance: A review of the past century and a look ahead. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. K. Sinangil, & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work, and organizational psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 110–126). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Viswesvaran, C., Schmidt, F. L., & Ones, D. S. (2005). Is there a general factor in ratings of job performance? A meta-analytic framework for disentangling substantive and error influences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 108–131. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X. M., Wong, K. E., & Kwong, J. Y. (2010). The roles of rater goals and rate performance levels in the distortion of performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 546–561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner, J. M., & Bolino, M. C. (1997). Explaining U.S. courts of appeals decisions involving performance appraisal: Accuracy, fairness, and validation. Personnel Psychology, 50, 1–24. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb00898.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14, 490–495. doi:10.5465/AMR.1989.4308371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. (1981). The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87, 548–577. doi:10.1086/227496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woehr, D. J. (1994). Understanding frame-of-reference training: The impact of training on the recall of performance information. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 525–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, J., & Murphy, K. R. (1993). Modesty bias in self-ratings of performance: A test of the cultural relativity hypothesis. Personnel Psychology, 46, 357–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, F., & Woodman, R. W. (2010). Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 323–342. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2010.49388995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun, G. J., Donahue, L. M., Dudley, N. M., & McFarland, L. A. (2005). Rater personality, rating format, and social context: Implications for performance appraisal ratings. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13, 97–107. doi:10.1111/j.0965-075X.2005.00304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zedeck, S., Imparato, N., Krausz, M., & Oleno, T. (1974). Development of behaviorally anchored rating scales as a function of organizational level. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 249–252. doi:10.1037/h0036521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar