29,619
Views
263
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Systematically reviewing remote e-workers’ well-being at work: a multidimensional approach

ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 51-73 | Received 20 Nov 2017, Accepted 15 Oct 2018, Published online: 01 Nov 2018

References

  • *Akkirman, A. D., & Harris, D. L. (2005). Organizational communication satisfaction in the virtual workplace. Journal of Management Development, 24, 397–409.
  • Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16, 40–68.
  • Alvesson, M. (2001). Knowledge work: Ambiguity, image and identity. Human Relations, 54, 863–886.
  • *Anderson, A. J., Kaplan, S. A., & Vega, R. P. (2015). The impact of telework on emotional experience: When, and for whom, does telework improve daily affective well-being? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24, 882–897.
  • Bailey, D. E., & Kurland, N. B. (2002). A review of telework research: Findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 383–400.
  • *Baruch, Y. (2000). Teleworking: Benefits and pitfalls as perceived by professionals and managers. New Technology, Work and Employment, 15, 34–49.
  • *Baker, E., Avery, G. C., & Crawford, J. (2006). Home alone: The role of technology in telecommuting. Information Resources Management Journal, 19, 1–22.
  • Beauregard, A., Basile, K., & Canonico, E. (2013). Home is where the work is: A new study of homeworking in Acas – and beyond (Report No 10/13). Retrieved from Acas research publications website: www.acas.org.uk/researchpapers.
  • *Bentley, K., & Yoong, P. (2000). Knowledge work and telework: An exploratory study. Internet Research, 10, 346–356.
  • *Bélanger, F., Collins, R. W., & Cheney, P. H. (2001). Technology requirements and work group communication for telecommuters. Information Systems Research, 12, 155–176.
  • Bentley, T. A., Teo, S. T. T., McLeod, L., Tan, F., Bosua, R., & Gloet, M. (2016). The role of organisational support in teleworker wellbeing: A socio-technical systems approach. Applied Ergonomics, 52, 207–215.
  • Boell, S. K., Cecez‐Kecmanovic, D., & Campbell, J. (2016). Telework paradoxes and practices: The importance of the nature of work. New Technology, Work and Employment, 31, 114–131.
  • Braukmann, J., Schmitt, A., Ďuranová, L., & Ohly, S. (2017). Identifying ICT-related affective events across life domains and examining their unique relationships with employee recovery. Journal of Business and Psychology, 33, 529–544.
  • Brief, A. P., & Weiss, H. M. (2002). Organizational behavior: Affect in the workplace. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 279–307.
  • *Caillier, J. G. (2012). The impact of teleworking on work motivation in a U.S. federal government agency. American Review of Public Administration, 42, 461–480.
  • *Chen, W., & McDonald, S. (2015). Do networked workers have more control? The implications of teamwork, telework, ICTs, and social capital for job decision latitude. American Behavioral Scientist, 59, 492–507.
  • Chesley, N. (2010). Technology use and employee assessments of work effectiveness, workload, and pace of life. Information, Communication & Society, 13, 485–514.
  • Chesley, N. (2014). Information and communication technology use, work intensification and employee strain and distress. Work, Employment and Society, 28, 589–610.
  • *Cooper, C. D., & Kurland, N. B. (2002). Telecommuting, professional isolation, and employee development in public and private organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 511–532.
  • *Collins, A. M., Hislop, D., & Cartwright, S. (2016). Social support in the workplace between teleworkers, office‐based colleagues and supervisors. New Technology, Work and Employment, 31, 161–175.
  • Crowe, M., & Sheppard, L. (2011). A review of critical appraisal tools show they lack rigor: Alternative tool structure is proposed. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64, 79–89.
  • *Dambrin, C. (2004). How does telework influence the manager-employee relationship? International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, 4, 358–374.
  • Daniels, K. (2000). Measures of five aspects of affective well-being at work. Human Relations, 53, 275–294.
  • Davenport, T. H., Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Beers, M. C. (1996). Improving knowledge work processes. Sloan Management Review, 37, 53–66.
  • *De Menezes, L. M., & Kelliher, C. (2011). Flexible working and performance: A systematic review of the evidence for a business case. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13, 452–474.
  • De Menezes, L. M., & Kelliher, C. (2017). Flexible working, individual performance, and employee attitudes: Comparing formal and informal arrangements. Human Resource Management, 56, 1051–1070.
  • Derks, D., Duin, D., Tims, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2015). Smartphone use and work–Home interference: The moderating role of social norms and employee work engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88, 155–177.
  • Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.
  • Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 403–425.
  • *Dimitrova, D. (2003). Controlling teleworkers: Supervision and flexibility revisited. New Technology, Work & Employment, 18, 181–195.
  • El-Farr, H. K. (2009). Knowledge work and workers: A critical literature review. Leed University Business School, Working Paper Series, 1, 1–15.
  • Ellison, J. K. (2012). Ergonomics for telecommuters and other remote workers. Professional Safety, 57, 86–90.
  • *Fay, M. J., & Kline, S. L. (2011). Coworker relationships and informal communication in high-intensity telecommuting. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 39, 144–163.
  • *Fay, M. J., & Kline, S. L. (2012). The influence of informal communication on organizational identification and commitment in the context of high-intensity telecommuting. Southern Communication Journal, 77, 61–76.
  • Eurofound and the International Labour Office (2017). Working anytime, anywhere: The effects on the world of work.Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, and the International Labour Office, Geneva. Retrieved from Eurofound Publications website https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications/
  • Felstead, A., & Henseke, G. (2017). Assessing the growth of remote working and its consequences for effort, well-being and work-life balance. New Technology, Work and Employment, 32, 195–212.
  • Fersch, B. (2012). ‘German angst’vs ‘Danish easy-going’?On the role and relevance of insecurity and uncertainty in the lives of freelancers in Denmark and Germany. Sociology, 46, 1125–1139.
  • *Fonner, K. L., & Roloff, M. E. (2010). Why teleworkers are more satisfied with their jobs than are office-based workers: When less contact is beneficial. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38, 336–361.
  • Frenkel, S., Korczynski, M., Donoghue, L., & Shire, K. (1995). Re-constituting work: Trends towards knowledge work and info-normative control. Work, Employment and Society, 9, 773–796.
  • *Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1524–1541.
  • *Gálvez, A., Martínez, M. J., & Pérez, C. (2011). Telework and work-life balance: Some dimensions for organisational change. Journal of Workplace Rights, 16, 273–297.
  • *Gajendran, R. S., Harrison, D. A., & Delaney Klinger, K. (2014). Are telecommuters remotely good citizens? Unpacking telecommuting’s effects on performance via i-deals and job resources. Personnel Psychology, 68, 353–393.
  • Garza, J. L. B., Catalano, P. J., Katz, J. N., Huysmans, M. A., & Dennerlein, J. T. (2012). Developing a framework for predicting upper extremity muscle activities, postures, velocities, and accelerations during computer use: The effect of keyboard use, mouse use, and individual factors on physical exposures. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 9, 691–698.
  • *Golden, T. D., & Veiga, J. F. (2005). The impact of extent of telecommuting on job satisfaction: Resolving inconsistent findings. Journal of Management, 31, 301–318.
  • *Golden, T. D. (2006a). Avoiding depletion in virtual work: Telework and the intervening impact of work exhaustion on commitment and turnover intentions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69, 176–187.
  • *Golden, T. D. (2006b). The role of relationships in understanding telecommuter satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 319–340.
  • *Golden, T. D., Veiga, J. F., & Dino, R. N. (2008). The impact of professional isolation on teleworker job performance and turnover intentions: Does time spent teleworking, interacting face-to-face, or having access to communication-enhancing technology matter? Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1412–1421.
  • *Golden, T. D., & Veiga, J. F. (2008). The impact of superior–Subordinate relationships on the commitment, job satisfaction, and performance of virtual workers. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 77–88.
  • *Golden, T. D. (2012). Altering the effects of work and family conflict on exhaustion: Telework during traditional and non-traditional work hours. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27, 255–269.
  • *Grant, C. A., Wallace, L. M., & Spurgeon, P. C. (2013). An exploration of the psychological factors affecting remote e-worker’s job effectiveness, well-being and work-life balance. Employee Relations, 35, 527–546.
  • Haines III, V. Y., St-Onge, S., & Archambault, M. (2002). Environmental and person antecedents of telecommuting outcomes. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 14, 32–50.
  • Halford, S. (2005). Hybrid workspace: Re-spatialisations of work, organisation and management. New Technology, Work and Employment, 20, 19–33.
  • *Harker Martin, B., & MacDonnell, R. (2012). Is telework effective for organizations? A meta-analysis of empirical research on perceptions of telework and organizational outcomes. Management Research Review, 35, 602–616.
  • Harrington, S. S., & Walker, B. L. (2004). The effects of ergonomics training on the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of teleworkers. Journal of Safety Research, 35, 13–22.
  • *Hartig, T., Kylin, C., & Johansson, G. (2007). The telework tradeoff: Stress mitigation vs. constrained restoration. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 56, 231–253.
  • *Hayman, J. (2010). Flexible work schedules and employee well-being. New Zealand Journal of Employment Relations, 35, 76–87.
  • Healy, G., Lawler, S., Thorp, A., Neuhaus, M., Robson, E., Owen, N., & Dunstan, D. (2012). Reducing prolonged sitting in the workplace. (An evidence review: Full report). Melbourne, Australia: Victorian Health Promotion Foundation.
  • Hislop, D. (2013). Driving, communicating and working: Understanding the work-related communication behaviours of business travellers on work-related car journeys. Mobilities, 8, 220–237.
  • Hislop, D., Axtell, C., Collins, A., Daniels, K., Glover, J., & Niven, K. (2015). Variability in the use of mobile ICTs by homeworkers and its consequences for boundary management and social isolation. Information and Organization, 25, 222–232.
  • Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44, 513–524.
  • *Igbaria, M., & Guimaraes, T. (1999). Exploring differences in employee turnover intentions and its determinants among telecommuters and non-telecommuters. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16, 147–164.
  • *Ilozor, D. B., Ilozor, B. D., & Carr, J. (2001). Management communication strategies determine job satisfaction in telecommuting. Journal of Management Development, 20, 495–507.
  • *Hornung, S., & Glaser, J. (2009). Home-based telecommuting and quality of life: Further evidence on an employee-oriented human resource practice. Psychological Reports, 104, 395–402.
  • *Kelliher, C., & Anderson, D. (2010). Doing more with less? Flexible working practices and the intensification of work. Human Relations, 63, 83–106.
  • Kinnunen, U., Feldt, T., Sianoja, M., de Bloom, J., Korpela, K., & Geurts, S. (2017). Identifying long-term patterns of work-related rumination: Associations with job demands and well-being outcomes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26, 514–526.
  • Kirk, J., & Belovics, R. (2006). Making e-working work. Journal of Employment Counseling, 43, 39–46.
  • Kompier, M. A., Taris, T. W., & Van Veldhoven, M. (2012). Tossing and turning-insomnia in relation to occupational stress, rumination, fatigue, and well-being. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 38, 238–246.
  • *Konradt, U., Hertel, G., & Schmook, R. (2003). Quality of management by objectives, task-related stressors, and non-task-related stressors as predictors of stress and job satisfaction among teleworkers. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 12, 61–79.
  • *Kossek, E. E., Lautsch, B. A., & Eaton, S. C. (2006). Telecommuting, control, and boundary management: Correlates of policy use and practice, job control, and work–Family effectiveness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 347–367.
  • Kossek, E. E., Lautsch, B. A., & Eaton, S. C. (2009). Good teleworking: Under what conditions does teleworking enhance employees’ well-Being? In Y. Amichai-Hamburger (Ed.), Technology and psychological well-being (pp. 148–173). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • *Lapierre, L. M., & Allen, T. D. (2006). Work-supportive family, family-supportive supervision, use of organizational benefits, and problem-focused coping: Implications for work-family conflict and employee well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11, 169–181.
  • *Lal, B., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2009). Homeworkers’ usage of mobile phones; social isolation in the home-workplace. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 22, 257–274.
  • *Kröll, C., Doebler, P., & Nüesch, S. (2017). Meta-analytic evidence of the effectiveness of stress management at work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26, 677–693.
  • Lautsch, B. A., Kossek, E. E., & Eaton, S. C. (2009). Supervisory approaches and paradoxes in managing telecommuting implementation. Human Relations, 62, 795–827.
  • Leonardi, P. M., Treem, J. W., & Jackson, M. H. (2010). The connectivity paradox: Using technology to both decrease and increase perceptions of distance in distributed work arrangements. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38, 85–105.
  • Lister¸, K. (2016). Latest telecommuting statistics. Global workplace analytics. Retrieved from http://globalworkplaceanalytics.com/
  • Madsen, S. R. (2001). The benefits, challenges, and implication of teleworking: A literature review. Journal of Culture and Religion 1, 148–158.
  • Maitland, A., & Thomson, P. (2014). Future work (expanded and updated): Changing organizational culture for the new world of work. London, UK: Springer.
  • *Mann, S., Varey, R., & Button, W. (2000). An exploration of the emotional impact of tele-working via computer-mediated communication. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 15, 668–690.
  • *Mann, S., & Holdsworth, L. (2003). The psychological impact of teleworking: Stress, emotions and health. New Technology, Work and Employment, 18, 196–211.
  • *Marsh, K., & Musson, G. (2008). Men at work and at home: Managing emotion in telework. Gender, Work & Organization, 15, 31–48.
  • Matusik, S. F., & Mickel, A. E. (2011). Embracing or embattled by converged mobile devices? Users’ experiences with a contemporary connectivity technology. Human Relations, 64, 1001–1030.
  • Mazmanian, M., Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (2013). The autonomy paradox: The implications of mobile email devices for knowledge professionals. Organization Science, 24, 1337–1357.
  • Mazzi, A. (1996). Alternative office structures for telecommuters. R. Watson & R. Bostrom (Eds), Proceedings of Telecommuting ‘96 Conference, Florida. Retrieved from http://www.cba.uga.edu/tc96/proceedings.html
  • McCloskey, D. W., & Igbaria, M. (2003). Does “out of sight” mean “out of mind”? An empirical investigation of the career advancement prospects of telecommuters. Information Resources Management Journal, 16, 19–34.
  • *McDonald, P., Bradley, L., & Brown, K. (2008). Visibility in the workplace: Still an essential ingredient for career success? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19, 2198–2215.
  • McDowall, A., & Kinman, G. (2017). The new nowhere land? A research and practice agenda for the “always on” culture. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 4, 256–266.
  • Michelson, W. (2000). Home-based employment and quality of life: A time-use analysis. In E. Diener (Ed.), Advances in quality of life theory and research (pp. 183–203). New York, NY: Kluwer.
  • Middleton, C. A. (2007). Illusions of balance and control in an always-on environment: A case study of BlackBerry users. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 21, 165–178.
  • Moe, K., & &Shandy, D. (2010). Glass ceilings & 100-hour couples: What the opt-out phenomenon can teach us about work and family. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia Press.
  • Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., … Stewart, L. A.; PRISMA-P Group. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4, 1–9.
  • *Montreuil, S., & Lippel, K. (2003). Telework and occupational health: A Quebec empirical study and regulatory implications. Safety Science, 41, 339–358.
  • *Morganson, V. J., Major, D. A., Oborn, K. L., Verive, J. M., & Heelan, M. P. (2010). Comparing telework locations and traditional work arrangements: Differences in work-life balance support, job satisfaction, and inclusion. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25, 578–595.
  • *Mulki, J. P., & Jaramillo, F. (2011). Workplace isolation: Salespeople and supervisors in USA. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22, 902–923.
  • Newell, S., Robertson, M., Scarbrough, H., & Swan, J. (2009). Managing knowledge work and innovation. London: Palgrave Macmillan International Higher Education.
  • *Nijp, H. H., Beckers, D. G., van de Voorde, K., Geurts, S. A., & Kompier, M. A. (2016). Effects of new ways of working on work hours and work location, health and job-related outcomes. Chronobiology International, 33, 604–618.
  • Nilles, J. (1975). Telecommunications and organizational decentralization. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 23, 1142–1147.
  • O’Cathain, A. (2010). Assessing the quality of mixed methods research: Towards a comprehensive framework. In A. Tashakkori& & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 531–555). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • *O’Neill, T. A., Hambley, L. A., Greidanus, N. S., MacDonnell, R., & Kline, T. J. (2009). Predicting teleworker success: An exploration of personality, motivational, situational, and job characteristics. New Technology, Work and Employment, 24, 144–162.
  • Parasuraman, S., & Greenhaus, J. H. (2002). Toward reducing some critical gaps in work–Family research. Human Resource Management Review, 12, 299–312.
  • Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Malden, US: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Pinsonneault, A., & Boisvert, M. (2001). The impacts of telecommuting on organizations and individuals: A review of the literature. In N.J. Johnson (Ed.), Telecommuting and virtual offices: Issues and opportunities (pp. 163–185). Hersey: USA IGI Global.
  • Pluye, P., Gagnon, M. P., Griffiths, F., & Johnson-Lafleur, J. (2009). A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in mixed studies reviews. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46, 529–546.
  • Putnam, L. L., Myers, K. K., & Gailliard, B. M. (2014). Examining the tensions in workplace flexibility and exploring options for new directions. Human Relations, 67, 413–440.
  • Pyöriä, P. (2005). The concept of knowledge work revisited. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9, 116–127.
  • *Raghuram, S., Wiesenfeld, B., & Garud, R. (2003). Technology enabled work: The role of self-efficacy in determining telecommuter adjustment and structuring behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 180–198.
  • Ragu-Nathan, T. S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Tu, Q. (2008). The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: Conceptual development and empirical validation. Information Systems Research, 19, 417–433.
  • Ramírez, Y. W., & Nembhard, D. A. (2004). Measuring knowledge worker productivity: A taxonomy. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5, 602–628.
  • Reaney, P. (2012, January). About one in five workers worldwide telecommute: Poll. Reuters. Retrieved from https://uk.reuters.com/
  • *Redman, T., Snape, E., & Ashurst, C. (2009). Location, location, location: Does place of work really matter? British Journal of Management, 20, 171–181.
  • Reis, H. T., & Gable, S. L. (2000). Event-sampling and other methods for studying everyday experience. In T. H. Reis & M. C. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 190–222). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • *Richardson, J., & McKenna, S. (2014). Reordering spatial and social relations: A case study of professional and managerial flexworkers. British Journal of Management, 25, 724–736.
  • Rognes, J. (2002). Telecommuting resistance, soft but strong: Development of telecommuting over time, and related rhetoric, in three organizations (Working Paper No. 2002: 1). Stockholm: Stockholm School of Economics. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2002/er01)
  • Rothmann, S. (2008). Job satisfaction, occupational stress, burnout and work engagement as components of work-related wellbeing. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 34, 11–16.
  • Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.
  • Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719–727.
  • *Sardeshmukh, S. R., Sharma, D., & Golden, T. D. (2012). Impact of telework on exhaustion and job engagement: A job demands and job resources model. New Technology, Work and Employment, 27, 193–207.
  • Schieman, S., & Glavin, P. (2011). Education and work-family conflict: Explanations, contingencies and mental health consequences. Social Forces, 89, 1341–1362.
  • Schlachter, S., McDowall, A., Cropley, M., & Inceoglu, I. (2017). Voluntary work-related technology use during non-work time: A narrative synthesis of empirical research and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 1–22.
  • *Sewell, G., & Taskin, L. (2015). Out of sight, out of mind in a new world of work? Autonomy, control, and spatiotemporal scaling in telework. Organization Studies, 36, 1507–1529.
  • Sonnentag, S., Binnewies, C., & Mojza, E. J. (2008). “Did you have a nice evening?” A day-level study on recovery experiences, sleep, and affect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 674–684.
  • *Staples, D. S. (2001). A study of remote workers and their differences from non-remote workers. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 13, 3–14.
  • *Suh, A., & Lee, J. (2017). Understanding teleworkers’ technostress and its influence on job satisfaction. Internet Research, 27, 140–159.
  • Sullivan, C. (2003). What’s in a name? Definitions and conceptualisations of teleworking and homeworking. New Technology, Work and Employment, 18, 158–165.
  • Taris, T. W., & Schaufeli, W. (2015). Individual well-being and performance at work: A conceptual and theoretical overview. In M. Van Veldhoven & R. Peccei (Eds.), Well-being and performance at work: The role of context (pp. 15–34). London: Psychology Press.
  • *Taskin, L., & Edwards, P. (2007). The possibilities and limits of telework in a bureaucratic environment: Lessons from the public sector. New Technology, Work & Employment, 22, 195–207.
  • *Ten Brummelhuis, L. L., Haar, J. M., & van der Lippe, T. (2010). Collegiality under pressure: The effects of family demands and flexible work arrangements in the Netherlands. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21, 2831–2847.
  • Ter Hoeven, C. L., & Van Zoonen, W. (2015). Flexible work designs and employee well-being: Examining the effects of resources and demands. New Technology, Work and Employment, 30, 237–255.
  • *Tietze, S., & Musson, G. (2005). Recasting the home-work relationship: A case of mutual adjustment? Organization Studies, 26, 1331–1352.
  • Tietze, S., & Nadin, S. (2011). The psychological contract and the transition from office‐based to home‐based work. Human Resource Management Journal, 21, 318–334.
  • *Troup, C., & Rose, J. (2012). Working from home: Do formal or informal telework arrangements provide better work-family outcomes? Community, Work & Family, 15, 471–486.
  • Van Horn, J. E., Taris, T. W., Schaufeli, W. B., & Schreurs, P. J. (2004). The structure of occupational well‐being: A study among Dutch teachers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 365–375.
  • *Vittersø, J., Akselsen, S., Evjemo, B., Julsrud, T. E., Yttri, B., & Bergvik, S. (2003). Impacts of home-based telework on quality of life for employees and their partners quantitative and qualitative results from a European survey. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4, 201–233.
  • *Virick, M., DaSilva, N., & Arrington, K. (2010). Moderators of the curvilinear relation between extent of telecommuting and job and life satisfaction: The role of performance outcome orientation and worker type. Human Relations, 63, 137–154.
  • *Vega, R. P., Anderson, A. J., & Kaplan, S. A. (2015). A within-person examination of the effects of telework. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30, 313–323.
  • *Vander Elst, T., Verhoogen, R., Sercu, M., Van Den Broeck, A., Baillien, E., & Godderis, L. (2017). Not extent of telecommuting, but job characteristics as proximal predictors of work-related well-being. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 59, e180–186.
  • Wang, Y, & Haggerty, N. (2011). Individual virtual competence and its influence on work outcomes. Journal Of Management Information Systems, 27(4), 299–334.
  • Warr, P. (1994). A conceptual framework for the study of work and mental health. Work & Stress, 8, 84–97.
  • Warr, P. (1999). Well-being and the workplace. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 392–412). New York: Russel Sage.
  • Warr, P. B. (1987). Work, unemployment, and mental health. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • *Windeler, J. B., Chudoba, K. M., & Sundrup, R. Z. (2017). Getting away from them all: Managing exhaustion from social interaction with telework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38, 977–995.
  • Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009). Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74, 235–244.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.