Web 2.0-enabled team relationships: an actor-network perspective

References

• Adler, P. S., Kwon, S.-W., & Heckscher, C. (2008). Professional work: The emergence of collaborative community. Organization Science, 19(2), 359–376. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akrich, M., & Latour, B. (1992). A convenient vocabulary for the semiotics of human and nonhuman actors. In W. Bijker & J. Law(Eds.), Shaping technology/building society studies in sociotechnological change (pp. 259–264). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Akrich, M. (1992). The description of technical objects. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnological change (pp. 205–224). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Albion, P., & Gutke, H. J. (2010, July 26). Successful succession through shared leadership: Preparing a new generation of educational leaders. Sydney Symposium The Future of Teacher Education and School Leader Education. Creating the Vision.
   Google Scholar
• Altamimi, L. (2013). A lexical analysis of social software literature. Informatica Economica, 17(1/2013), 14–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12948/14531305/17.1.2013.02
   Google Scholar
• Andrejevic, M. (2004). The work of watching one another: Lateral surveillance, risk, and governance. Surveillance and Society, 2(4), 479–497. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v2i4.3359
   Google Scholar
• Andriole, S. J. (2010). Business impact of Web 2.0 technologies. Communications of the ACM, 53(12), 67–79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/1859204.1859225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arsenault, P. M. (2004). Validating generational differences: A legitimate diversity and leadership issue. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 25(2), 124–141. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730410521813
   Google Scholar
• Avolio, B. J., & Kahai, S. S. (2003). Adding the ‘E’ to E-leadership: How it may impact your leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 31(4), 325–338. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-2616(02)00133-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avolio, B. J., Kahai, S. S., & Dodge, G. E. (2000). E-leadership: Implications for theory, research, and practice. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 615–668. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(00)00062-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avolio, B. J., Sosik, J. J., Kahai, S. S., & Baker, B. (2014). E-leadership: Re-examining transformations in leadership source and transmission. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 101–131. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barley, S. R., Meyerson, D. E., & Grodal, S. (2011). E-mail as a source and symbol of stress. Organization Science, 22(4), 887–906. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, B., & Fulmer, I. S. (2004). The medium and the message: The adaptive use of communication media in dyadic influence. The Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 272–292. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2004.12736093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer, D., & Burrows, R. (2010). Consumption, prosumption and participatory web cultures an introduction. Journal of Consumer Culture, 10(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540509354009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belz, F.-M., & Baumbach, W. (2010). Netnography as a method of lead user identification. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(3), 304–313. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00571.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennis, W. (2013). Leadership in a digital world: Embracing Transparency and adaptive capacity. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 635–636. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43825927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, K. (2010). Living in the control society: Surveillance, users and digital screen technologies. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 13(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877909348536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilgram, V., Brem, A., & Voigt, K. (2008). User-centric innovations in new product development-systematic identification of lead users harnessing interactive and collaborative online tools. International Journal Of Innovation Management, 12(3), 419–458. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919608002096
   Google Scholar
• Bimber, B. (1994). Three faces of technological determinism. In M. R. Smith & L. Marx (Eds.), Does technology drive history? The dilemma of technological determinism (pp. 79–100). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bingham, T., & Conner, M. (2010). The new social learning: A guide to transforming organizations through social media. Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bloomfield, B. P., & Vurdubakis, T. (2000). Paper traces: Inscribing organizations and information technology. In B. P. Bloomfield, R. Coombs, D. Knights, & D. Littler (Eds.), Information technology and organizations: Strategies, networks, and integration (pp. 85–111). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, A. J., & McDonald, M. P. (2011). The social organization: How to use social media to tap the collective genius of your customers and employees. Harvard Business Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. D., Middleton, D., & Lightfoot, G. (2001). Performing the past in electronic archives: Interdependencies in the discursive and non-discursive ordering of institutional rememberings. Culture and Psychology, 7(2), 123–144. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X0172001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bughin, J., Chui, M., & Miller, A. (2009). How companies are benefiting from Web 2.0: McKinsey global survey results. McKinsey & Company. http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/business_technology/how_companies_are_benefiting_from_web_20_mckinsey_global_survey_results
   Google Scholar
• Butts, M. M., Becker, W. J., & Boswell, W. R. (2015). Hot buttons and time sinks: The effects of electronic communication during nonwork time on emotions and work-nonwork conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 58(3), 763–788. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In L. John (Ed.), Power, action and belief (pp. 196–233). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (1991). Techno-economic networks and irreversibility. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination (pp. 132–161). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (1993). Variety and irreversibility in networks of technique conception and adoption. In D. Foray & C. Freeman (Eds.), Technology and the wealth of nations: Dynamics of constructed advantage (pp. 232–268). Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Cascio, W. F., & Montealegre, R. (2016). How technology is changing work and organizations. In F. P. Morgeson (Ed.), Annual review of organizational psychology and organizational behavior, vol 3 (Vol. 3, pp. 349–375). Annual Reviews.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2001). The internet galaxy: Reflections on the internet, business, and society. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society: The information age: Economy, society, and culture (Vol. 1, 2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, S. C. H. (2013). Paternalistic leadership and employee voice: Does information sharing matter? Human Relations, 1–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713503022
   Google Scholar
• Chang, K. K., & Kane, G. C. (2013). Walking the legal tightrope of social business. MIT Sloan Management Review. http://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/walking-the-legal-tightrope-of-social-business/
   Google Scholar
• Chui, M., Dewhurst, M., & Pollak, L. (2013). Building the social enterprise (McKinsey Quarterly, November Ed.). McKinsey. http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/organization/building_the_social_enterprise
   Google Scholar
• Church, A. H., Gilbert, M., Oliver, D. H., Paquet, K., & Surface, C. (2002). The role of technology in organization development and change. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 4(4), 493–511. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/152342202237525
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. G., & Gibson, C. B. (Eds.). (2003). Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for effective virtual teams. Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Coine, T., & Babbitt, M. (2014). A world gone social: How companies must adapt to survive. AMACOM.
   Google Scholar
• Colbert, A., Yee, N., & George, G. (2016). The digital workforce and the workplace of the future. Academy of Management Journal, 59(3), 731–739. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.4003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, H. M., & Yearley, S. (1992). Epistemological chicken. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 301–326). Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cotterrell, R. (1999). Transparency, mass media, ideology and community. Journal for Cultural Research, 3(4), 414–426. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14797589909367176
   Google Scholar
• Cramton, C. D., & Orvis, K. L. (2003). Overcoming barriers to information sharing in virtual teams. In C. Gibson & S. Cohen (Eds.), Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness (eBook Collection EBSCOhost) (pp. 214–229). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, K. M., Worth, A., & Sheikh, A. Actor-network theory and its role in understanding the implementation of information technology developments in healthcare. (2010). BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 10(1), 1–11. EDSWSS. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-10-67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunliffe, A. L., & Eriksen, M. (2011). Relational leadership. Human Relations, 64(11), 1425–1449. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726711418388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Agostino, D., & Cone, E. (2007). Taking the lead. CIO Insight, 80, 49–55.
   Google Scholar
• Deiser, R., & Newton, S. (2013). Six social-media skills every leader needs. McKinsey & Company. http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/high_tech_telecoms_internet/six_social-media_skills_every_leader_needs
   Google Scholar
• DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5(2), 121–147. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.2.121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behaviour and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869–884. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.26279183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elam, M. (1999). Living dangerously with bruno latour in a hybrid world. Theory, Culture and Society, 16(4), 1–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/02632769922050692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elder-Vass, D. (2015). Disassembling actor-network theory. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 45(1), 100–121. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393114525858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellul, J. (1967). The technological society with an introduction by Robert K. Merton (J. Wilkinson, Trans.). Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, L., & Waguespack, D. M. (2007). Brokerage, boundary spanning, and leadership in open innovation communities. Organization Science, 18(2), 165–180. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florini, A. (2007). The battle over transparency. In A. Florini (Ed.), The right to know: Transparency for an open world (pp. 1–18). Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gajendran, R. S., & Joshi, A. (2012). Innovation in globally distributed teams: The role of LMX, communication frequency, and member influence on team decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(6), 1252–1261. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028958
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, L., Janssen, O., & Shi, K. (2011). Leader trust and employee voice: The moderating role of empowering leader behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(4), 787–798. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.05.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gartner, Inc. (2019). Gartner says worldwide social software and collaboration revenue to nearly double by 2023. Gartner. https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/09-24-2019-gartner-says-worldwide-social-software-and-collaboration-revenue-to-nearly-double-by-2023
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, C. B., Huang, L., Kirkman, B. L., & Shapiro, D. L. (2014). Where global and virtual meet: The value of examining the intersection of these elements in twenty-first-century teams. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 217–244. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091240
   Google Scholar
• Gilson, L. L., Maynard, M. T., Jones Young, N. C., Vartiainen, M., & Hakonen, M. (2015). Virtual teams research: 10 years, 10 themes, and 10 opportunities. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1313–1337. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314559946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship Based approach to leadership: Development of leader member-exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2012). A good man but a bad wizard. About the limits and future of transparency of democratic governments. Information Polity: The International Journal Of Government & Democracy In The Information Age, 17(3,4), 293–302. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-2012-000288
   Google Scholar
• Grübler, A. (2003). Technology and global change. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Handke, L., Costa, P. L., Klonek, F. E., O’Neill, T. A., & Parker, S. K. (2020). Team perceived virtuality: An emergent state perspective. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2020.1806921
   Google Scholar
• Hinds, P. J., Roberts, T. L., & Jones, H. (2004). Whose job is it anyway? A study of human-robot interaction in a collaborative task. Human–Computer Interaction, 19(1–2), 151–181. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2004.9667343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoch, J. E., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2014). Leading virtual teams: Hierarchical leadership, structural supports, and shared team leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(3), 390–403.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030264
   Google Scholar
• Howard, P. N. (2006). Communication, society, and politics: New media campaigns and the managed citizen. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, T. P. (1998). Technological Momentum. In M. R. Smith & L. Marx (Eds.), Does technology drive history?: The dilemma of technological determinism (pp. 1–36). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2000). Leadership in the shaping and implementation of collaboration agendas: How things happen in a (not quite) joined up world. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1159–1175. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/1556343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2005). Managing to collaborate. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jaradat, M. H. (2013). The notion of administrative transparency among academic leaderships at Jordanian universities. Education, 134(1), 74–81. https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1G1-346808448/the-notion-of-administrative-transparency-among-academic
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, N. R., MoreauL, L., Nicholson, D., Ramchurn, S., Roberts, S., Rodden, T., & Rogers, A. (2014). Human-agent collectives. Communications of the ACM, 57(12), 80–88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2629559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, M. F., Šabanović, S., Eyssel, F., & Fraune, M. (2017). Robots in groups and teams. Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (pp. 401–407). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3022198.3022659
   Google Scholar
• Kahai, S. S. (2013). Leading in a digital age: What’s different, issues raised, and what we know. In M. C. Bligh & R. E. Riggio (Eds.), Exploring distance in leader-follower relationships: When near is far and far is near (pp. 63–108). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S., & Lee, H. (2006). The impact of organizational context and information technology on employee knowledge-sharing capabilities. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 370–385. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00595.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kipnis, D. (1993). Unanticipated consequences of using behavior technology. The Leadership Quarterly, 4(2), 149–171. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(93)90009-I
   Google Scholar
• Klein, H. K., & Kleinman, D. L. (2002). The social construction of technology: Structural considerations. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 27(1), 28–52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390202700102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korzynski, P. (2013). Online social networks and leadership: Implications of a new online working environment for leadership. International Journal of Manpower, 34(8), 975–994. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-07-2013-0173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2007). The leadership challenge (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V. (2002). The field behind the screen: Using netnography for marketing research in online communities. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.39.1.61.18935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V. (2010). Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J., Chao, G. T., Grand, J. A., Braun, M. T., & Kuljanin, G. (2016). Capturing the multilevel dynamics of emergence: Computational modeling, simulation, and virtual experimentation. Organizational Psychology Review, 6(1), 3–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386614547955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreps, D., & Kimppa, K. Theorising Web 3.0: ICTs in a changing society. (2015). Information Technology & People, 28(4), 726–741. Emerald Insight. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-09-2015-0223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, L., & DeChurch, L. A. (2020). Leading teams in the digital age: Four perspectives on technology and what they mean for leading teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(1), 101377. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1986). the powers of association. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 264–280). Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (1986). On power and its tactics: A view from the sociology of science. The Sociological Review, 34(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1986.tb02693.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systems Practice, 5(4), 379–393. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, C. (2007). Technology, technological determinism and the transformational model of technical activity. In C. Lawson, J. S. Latsis, & N. M. O. Martins (Eds.), Contributions to social ontology (pp. 32–49). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leonardi, P. M., Neeley, T. B., & Gerber, E. M. (2012). How managers use multiple media: Discrepant events, power, and timing in redundant communication. Organization Science, 23(1), 98–117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardi, P. M., Treem, J. W., & Jackson, M. H. (2010). The connectivity paradox: Using technology to both decrease and increase perceptions of distance in distributed work arrangements. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38(1), 85–105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880903483599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, W., Zhu, R., & Yang, Y. (2010). I warn you because I like you: Voice behavior, employee identifications, and transformational leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(1), 189–202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. (2005). In defence of privacy: Mediating the public/private boundary at home. In S. Livingstone (Ed.), Audiences and publics: When cultural engagement matters for the public sphere, changing media, changing Europe (Vol. 2, pp. 163–186). Intellect Books.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., & Bober, M. (2003). UK children go online: Listening to young people’s experiences [online]. LSE Research Online. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/archive/0000388
   Google Scholar
• Lojeski, K. S., & Reilly, R. R. (2010). Leading the virtual workforce: How great leaders transform organizations in the 21st century. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas Jr, H. C., & Olson, M. (1994). The impact of information technology on organizational flexibility. Journal of Organizational Computing, 4(2), 155–176. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10919399409540221
   Google Scholar
• Luo, Y., Jiang, H., & Kulemeka, O. (2015). Strategic social media management and public relations leadership: Insights from industry leaders. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 9(3), 167–196. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2014.960083
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (2013). The digitally engaged patient: Self-monitoring and self-care in the digital health era. Social Theory & Health, 11(3), 256–270. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/sth.2013.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, D. A., & Wajcman, J. (Eds.). (1999). The social shaping of technology (2nd ed.). Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield, J. (2010). The nature of change or the law of unintended consequences. Imperial College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, J. P. (2006, September 27). Information technology, disruption and disorder: Australian customs and IT. Seventh Association of Internet Researchers Conference. Association of Internet Researchers Annual Conference.
   Google Scholar
• McAfee, A. P. (2006). Enterprise 2.0: The dawn of emergent collaboration. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(3), 21–28. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/enterprise-the-dawn-of-emergent-collaboration/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesmer-Magnus, J., DeChurch, L., Jimenez-Rodriguez, M., Wildman, J., & Shuffler, M. (2011). A meta-analytic investigation of virtuality and information sharing in teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 214–225. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, C., & Kirby, J. (2010). The big idea: Leadership in the age of transparency. Harvard Business Review, 88(4), 38–46. https://hbr.org/2010/04/the-big-idea-leadership-in-the-age-of-transparency
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milliken, E. W., Morrison, E. W., & Hewlin, P. F. (2003). An exploratory study of employee silence: Issues that employees don’t communicate upward and why. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1453–1476. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammad, K. (2009). E-leadership: The emerging new leadership for the virtual organization. Journal of Managerial Sciences, 3(1), 1–21. https://www.qurtuba.edu.pk/jms/default_files/JMS/3_1/01_khawaj.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Newcombe, T. (2009). From obscurity to OVERDRIVE. Public CIO, 7(5), 12–17.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, R., Chang, V., Walters, R. J., & Wills, G. B. (2016). Web 2.0—The past and the future. International Journal of Information Management, 36(4), 591–598. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, E. S. W., Schweitzer, L., & Lyons, S. T. (2010). New generation, great expectations: A field study of the millennial generation. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 281–292. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9159-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nimmo, R. (2011). Actor-network theory and methodology: Social research in a more-than-human world. Methodological Innovations Online, 6(3), 108–119. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4256/mio.2011.010
   Google Scholar
• Norman, S., Avolio, B., & Luthans, F. (2010). The impact of positivity and transparency on trust in leaders and their perceived effectiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(3), 350–364. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, T. (2007). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Communications And Strategies, 65(1), 17–37.
   Google Scholar
• Okhuysen, G. A., Lepak, D., Ashcraft, K. L., Labianca, G., (Joe), Smith, V., & Steensma, H. K. (2013). Theories of work and working today. Academy of Management Review, 38(4), 491–502. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira, J., & Clegg, S. (2015). Paradoxical puzzles of control and circuits of power. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 12(4), 425–451. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-02-2015-0023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2008). The entanglement of technology and work in organizations. Information Systems and Innovation Group, Department of Management, LSE, Working Paper Series, No 168. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/33898/1/wp168.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrini, E. K., & Scandura, T. A. (2008). Paternalistic leadership: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 34(3), 566–593. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1989). The social construction of facts and artifacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, & T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology (pp. 17–50). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Randel, A. E., & Ranft, A. L. (2007). Motivations to maintain social ties with coworkers: The moderating role of turnover intentions on information exchange. Group & Organization Management, 32(2), 208–232. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601106286778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyt, J.-N., & Wiesenfeld, B. M. (2015). Seeing the forest for the trees: Exploratory learning, mobile technology, and knowledge workers’ role integration behaviors. Academy of Management Journal, 58(3), 739–762. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudman, R., & Bruwer, R. Defining Web 3.0: Opportunities and challenges. (2016). The Electronic Library, 34(1), 132–154. Emerald Insight. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-08-2014-0140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R., Cetina, K. K., & Savigny, E. V. (Eds.). (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203977453
   Google Scholar
• Scott, S. V., & Orlikowski, W. J. (2014). Entanglements in practice: Performing anonymity through social media. MIS Quarterly, 38(3), 873–893. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.3.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamir, B., & Ben-Ari, E. (1999). Leadership in an open army? Civilian connections, interorganizational frameworks, and changes in military leadership. In G. J. Hunt, G. E. Dodge, & L. Wong (Eds.), Out-of-the-box leadership: Transforming the twenty-first century army and other top-performing organizations (pp. 15–40). JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shamir, B. (1999). Leadership in boundaryless organizations: Disposable or indispensable? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 49–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/135943299398438
   Google Scholar
• Shapin, S. (1998). Placing the view from nowhere: Historical and sociological problems in the location of science. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 23(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-2754.1998.00005.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simanowski, R. (Ed.). (2016). Digital humanities and digital media: Conversations on politics, culture, aesthetics, and literacy. Open Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. R., & Marx, L. (1994). Does technology drive history? : The dilemma of technological determinism (M. R. Smith & L. Marx, Eds.). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. R., & Marx, L. (1998). Technological determinism in American culture. In M. R. Smith, & L. Marx (Eds), Does technology drive history? The dilemma of technological determinism (pp. 1–36). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smola, K. W., & Sutton, C. D. (2002). Generational differences: Revisiting generational work values for the new millennium. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(4), 363–382. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/job.147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spector, P. (2014). Introduction: The problems and promise of contemporary leadership theories. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(5), 597. Wiley Online Library(Early View). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1930
   Google Scholar
• Stanton, A., & Stanton, W. (2013). Digital natives or digital neophytes: Business student perspectives on course-based Web 2.0 applications. Academy Of Educational Leadership Journal, 17(1), 119–137. https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1G1-332655979/digital-natives-or-digital-neophytes-business-student
   Google Scholar
• Stanton, J. M., & Barnes-Farrell, J. L. (1996). Effects of electronic performance monitoring on personal control, task satisfaction and task performance. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(6), 738–745. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.6.738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subašić, E., Reynolds, K. J., Turner, J. C., Veenstra, K. E., & Haslam, S. A. (2011). Leadership, power and the use of surveillance: Implications of shared social identity for leaders’ capacity to influence. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(1), 170–181. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.12.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takaragawa, S., & Carty, V. (2012). The 2008 U.S. Presidential Election and New Digital Technologies: Political Campaigns as Social Movements and the Significance of Collective Identity. Tamara Journal For Critical Organization Inquiry, 10(4), 73–89. https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/sociology_articles/9/
   Google Scholar
• Tett, G. (2015). The silo effect: The peril of expertise and the promise of breaking down barriers. Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Tredgold, P. G. (2014). Are you connected? Leadership in the era of social media. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, 28(6), 9–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/dlo-05-2014-0032
   Google Scholar
• Turkle, S. (2005). The second self: Computers and the human spirit (20th anniversary). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Tushman, M. L., & Murmann, J. P. (2003). Dominant designs, technology cycles, and organizational outcomes. In R. Garud, A. Kumaraswamy, & R. N. Langlois (Eds.), Managing in the modular Age: Architectures, networks, and organizations (pp. 316–347). Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Uhl-Bien, M. (2006). Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 654–676. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valcour, P. M., & Hunter, L. W. (2005). Technology, organizations and work-life integration. In E. E. Kossek & S. J. Lambert (Eds.), Work and life integration: Organizational, cultural, and individual perspectives (pp. 61–84). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Van House, A. N. (2004). Science and technology studies and information studies. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 38(1), 3–86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440380102
   Google Scholar
• Venters, J. W., Green, M. T., & Lopez, D. M. (2012). Social media: A leadership challenge. Business Studies Journal, 4(SpecialIssue 1), 85–93.
   Google Scholar
• Vodanovich, S., Sundaram, D., & Myers, M. (2010). Digital natives and ubiquitous information systems. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 711–723. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, J., & Sandberg, A. (2010). Generational leadership. ReadyToManage Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, J. P., & Bowman, J. S. (2016). Electronic surveillance at work. Administration & Society, 48(5), 628–651. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399714556502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westin, A. F. (1992). Two key factors that belong in a macroergonomic analysis of electronic monitoring: Employee perceptions of fairness and the climate of organizational trust or distrust. Applied Ergonomics, 23(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(92)90008-J
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westwood, R. (1997). Harmony and patriarchy: The cultural basis for paternalistic headship among the overseas Chinese. Organization Studies, 18(3), 445–480. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069701800305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodward, J. (1965). Industrial organization: Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woolgar, S. (1991). The turn to technology in social studies of science. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 16(1), 20–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399101600102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyatt, S. (2008). Technological determinism is dead; Long live technological determinism. In E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, & J. Wajcman (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology (3rd ed., pp. 165–180). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. (1988). In the age of the smart machine: The future of work and power. Basic Books Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. (1996). The Emperor’s new information economy. In W. J. Orlikowski, G. Walsham, M. R. Jones, & J. I. DeGross (Eds.), Information technology and changes in organizational work (pp. 13–17). Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar