Using student evaluations to improve individual and department teaching qualities

References

• Abrami, P. C., S. d’Apollonia, and P. A. Cohen. 1990. “Validity of Student Rating of Instruction: What We Know and What We Do Not.” Journal of Educational Psychology 82 (2): 219–231.10.1037/0022-0663.82.2.219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aleamoni, L. M. 1999. “Student Rating Myths versus Research Facts from 1924 to 1998.” Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 13 (2): 153–166.10.1023/A:1008168421283
   Google Scholar
• Aleamoni, L. M., and M. Yimer. 1973. “An Investigation of the Relationship between Colleague Rating, Student Rating, Research Productivity and Academic Rank in Rating Instructional Effectiveness.” Journal of Educational Psychology 64 (3): 274–277.10.1037/h0034584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auckland University of Technology. 2013. “Academic Promotions & Progression Procedures – Lecturers.” https://aut.ac.nz/documents/procedures/employment/ACADEMIC-PROMOTION-and-PROGRESSION-PROCEDURES-Lecturers-16-08-2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Balemi, A. 2012. “Better Use of Teaching/Course Evaluations.” Certificate of Academic Practice Research Projects. Auckland: Centre for Academic Development, University of Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. 1999. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, R., and L. Paterson. 2005. “Coming down from the Ivory Tower? Academics’ Civic and Economic Engagement with the Community.” Oxford Review of Education 31 (3): 331–351.10.1080/03054980500221934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookfield, S. D. 1990. The Skillful Teacher. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Brookfield, S. D. 1995. Becoming a Critically Reflective Teacher. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J., E. Campbell, C. Hobson, J. McPartland, A. Mood, and F. Weinfled. 1966. Equality of Educational Opportunity. Washington, DC: US Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
   Google Scholar
• Costin, F., W. T. Greenough, and R. Menges. 1971. “Student Ratings of College Teaching: Reliability, Validity, and Usefulness.” Review of Educational Research 41 (5): 511–535.10.3102/00346543041005511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, P. L., and H. L. Bradshaw. 1968. “Perception of Characteristics of Effective University Teachers: A Scaling Analysis.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 28 (4): 1079–1085.10.1177/001316446802800406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, P., and R. Guest. 2010. “What Effect Do We Really Have on Students’ Understanding and Attitudes? How Do We Know? [Editorial].” International Review of Economics Education 9 (1): 6–9.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, K. O. 1975. Student Evaluation of Instruction. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Drucker, A. J., and H. H. Remmers. 1951. “Do Alumni and Students Differ in Their Attitudes toward Instructors?” Journal of Educational Psychology 42 (3): 129–143.10.1037/h0055547
   Google Scholar
• Edmundson, M. 1997. “On the Uses of a Liberal Education.” Harper’s Magazine 295 ( September): 39–49.
   Google Scholar
• Everly, J. C., and L. M. Aleamoni. 1972. “The Rise and Fall of the Advisor: Students Attempt to Evaluate Their Instructors.” Journal of the National Association of Colleges and Teachers of Agriculture 16 (2): 43–45.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing, A. 2012. “Estimating the Impact of Relative Expected Grade on Student Evaluations of Teachers.” Economics of Education Review 31 (1): 141–154.10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forgasz, H., and G. Leder. 2006. “Academic Life: Monitoring Work Patterns and Daily Activities.” Australian Educational Researcher 33 (1): 1–22.10.1007/BF03246278
   Google Scholar
• Glassick, C. E., M. T. Huber, and G. I. Maeroff. 1997. Scholarship Assessed: Evaluation and the Professoriate. San Francisco, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Hamermesh, D. S., and A. Parker. 2005. “Beauty in the Classroom: Instructors’ Pulchritude and Putative Pedagogical Productivity.” Economics of Education Review 24 (4): 369–376.10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.07.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, P., B. Thiele, and J. Currie. 1998. “Success, Gender and Academic Voices. Consuming Passion or Selling the Soul?” Gender and Education 10 (2): 133–148.10.1080/09540259820989
   Google Scholar
• Hativa, N. 1996. “University Instructors’ Ratings Profiles: Stability over Time, and Disciplinary Differences.” Research in Higher Education 37 (3): 341–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, T. P. 1973. “Similarity of Student Ratings across Instructors, Courses and Time.” Research in Higher Education 1 (2): 149–154.10.1007/BF00991336
   Google Scholar
• Ingersoll, R., and J. Kralik. 2004. “The Impact of Mentoring on Teacher Retention: What the Research Says.” Education Commission of the States. http://www.gse.upenn.edu/pdf/rmi/ECS-RMI-2004.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Isely, P., and H. Singh. 2005. “Do Higher Grades Lead to Favorable Student Evaluations?” The Journal of Economic Education 36 (1): 29–42.10.3200/JECE.36.1.29-42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, V. E. 2003. Grade Inflation: A Way out. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, G., K. Galvin, and D. Woodhouse. 1999. Universities as Critic and Conscience of Society: The Role of Academic Freedom. AAU Series on Quality (27). Wellington: New Zealand Universities Academic Audit.
   Google Scholar
• Kearns, H., and M. Gardiner. 2007. “Is It Time Well Spent? The Relationship between Time Management Behaviours, Perceived Effectiveness and Work‐Related Morale and Distress in a University Context.” Higher Education Research & Development 26 (2): 235–247.10.1080/07294360701310839
   Google Scholar
• Kirp, D., ed. 2003. Shakespeare, Einstein, and the Bottom Line. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, P. T. 2002a. “Getting Good Evaluations.” In Being a Teacher in Higher Education, edited by H. Eggins, 178–186. Buckingham: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, P. T., ed. 2002b. Being a Teacher in Higher Education. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koon, J., and H. G. Murray. 1995. “Using Multiple Outcomes to Validate Student Ratings of Overall Teacher Effectiveness.” The Journal of Higher Education 66 (1): 61–81.10.2307/2943951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langbein, L. 2008. “Management by Results: Student Evaluation of Faculty Teaching and the Mis-Measurement of Performance.” Economics of Education Review 27 (4): 417–428.10.1016/j.econedurev.2006.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macfarlane, B. 2005. “The Disengaged Academic: The Retreat from Citizenship.” Higher Education Quarterly 59 (4): 296–312.10.1111/hequ.2005.59.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Malcolm, W., and N. Tarling. 2007. Crisis of Identity?: The Mission and Management of Universities in New Zealand. Wellington: Dunmore Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. 1984. “Students’ Evaluations of University Teaching: Dimensionality, Reliability, Validity, Potential Biases, and Utility.” Journal of Educational Psychology 76 (5): 707–754.10.1037/0022-0663.76.5.707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., and J. U. Overall. 1979. “Long-Term Stability of Students’ Evaluations: A Note on Feldman’s Consistency and Variability among College Students in Rating Their Teachers and Courses.” Research in Higher Education 10 (2): 139–147.10.1007/BF00976226
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, M. A. 2006. “Determinants of How Students Evaluate Teachers.” The Journal of Economic Education 37 (1): 3–20.10.3200/JECE.37.1.3-20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. 2014. Investing in Educational Success – The Learning and Achievement Challenge. Wellington, NZ: Office of the Minister of Education. http://www.minedu.govt.nz/theMinistry/EducationInitiatives/InvestingInEducationalSuccess/KeyInformation.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Mirus, R. 1973. “Some Implications of Student Evaluation of Teachers.” Journal of Economics Education 5 (1): 35–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, J. P., and K. A. Lynch. 1984. “Grade Inflation, Real Income, Simultaneity, and Teaching Evaluations.” The Journal of Economic Education 15 (1): 21–37.10.2307/1182499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxford Dictionary of English. 2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peeters, A. R. 2005. “Flanders: Improving Inclusion Policies and Services.” In Learning with Other Countries: International Models of Early Education and Care, 36–39. London: National Day Care Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Perrings, C. 1988. The Cost of Tuition and the Options for Reform in the Public Funding of New Zealand Universities. Wellington: Institute of Policy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M., and P. Roberts. 1999. University Futures and the Politics of Reform in New Zealand. Palmerston North: Dunmore Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. T. E. 2005. “Instruments for Obtaining Student Feedback: A Review of the Literature.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30 (4): 387–415.
   Google Scholar
• Rojstaczer, S., and C. Healy. 2012. “Where A Is Ordinary: The Evolution of American College and University Grading, 1940–2009.” Teachers College Record 114 (7): 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabot, R., and J. Wakeman-Linn. 1991. “Grade Inflation and Course Choice.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (1): 159–170.10.1257/jep.5.1.159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, E. G. 1990. “Effect of Instructor and Class Characteristics on Students’ Class Evaluations.” Research in Higher Education 31 (1): 135–148.10.1007/BF00992258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparkes, A. 2007. “Embodiment, Academics, and the Audit Culture: A Story Seeking Consideration.” Qualitative Research 7 (4): 521–550. doi:10.1177/1468794107082306.10.1177/1468794107082306
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, P., P. Constantineau, and G. Fallis. 2010. “Academic Citizenship: An Academic Colleagues’ Working Paper.” Accessed October 26, 2010. http://www.queensu.ca/secretariat/senate/COU/AcadCitizen.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Trigwell, K. 2003. “A Relational Approach Model for Academic Development.” In The Scholarship of Academic Development, edited by H. Eggins and R. MacDonald, 23–33. Buckingham: Open University Press and SRHE.
   Google Scholar
• University of Auckland. 2010. “Academic Promotions Policy.” https://policies.auckland.ac.nz/policy-display-register/academic-promotion-for-research-fellows-senior-research-fellows-lecturers-senior-lecturers-(IEA).pdf
   Google Scholar
• University of Auckland. 2014. “Policy on Enhancement and Evaluation of Teaching and Courses.” https://policies.auckland.ac.nz/policy-display-register/enhancement-and-evaluation-of-teaching-and-courses-policy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Urban, M. 2008. “Dealing with Uncertainty: Challenges and Possibilities for the Early Childhood Profession.” European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 16 (2): 135–152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13502930802141584
   Google Scholar
• Wenglinsky, H. 2000. How Teaching Matters: Bringing the Classroom Back into Discussions of Teacher Quality. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED447128.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J., and G. Cappuccini‐Ansfield. 2007. “Fitness for Purpose? National and Institutional Approaches to Publicising the Student Voice.” Quality in Higher Education 13 (2): 159–172.10.1080/13538320701629186
   Google Scholar