Interpersonal aspect of written feedback: a community college students’ perspective

References

• Bailey, T. 2009. “Challenge and Opportunity: Rethinking the Role and Function of Developmental Education in Community College.” New Directions for Community Colleges 2009 (145): 11–30. doi:10.1002/cc.352.
   Google Scholar
• Beaumont, C., M. O’Doherty, and L. Shannon. 2011. “Reconceptualising Assessment Feedback: A Key to Improving Student Learning?” Studies in Higher Education 36 (6): 671–687. doi:10.1080/03075071003731135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitchener, J., and D. R. Ferris. 2012. Written Corrective Feedback in Second Language Acquisition and Writing. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bitchener, J., and U. Knoch. 2009. “The Value of a Focused Approach to Written Corrective Feedback.” ELT Journal 63 (3): 204–211. doi:10.1093/elt/ccn043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitchener, J., and U. Knoch. 2010. “Raising the Linguistic Accuracy Level of Advanced L2 Writers with Written Corrective Feedback.” Journal of Second Language Writing 19 (4): 207–217. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2010.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitchener, J., S. Young, and D. Cameron. 2005. “The Effect of Different Types of Corrective Feedback on ESL Student Writing.” Journal of Second Language Writing 14 (3): 191–205. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2005.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D., and E. Molloy, eds. 2013. Feedback in Higher and Professional Education: Understanding It and Doing It Well. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, A., and K. Charmaz. 2007. “Introduction. Grounded Theory Research: Methods and Practices.” In The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory, edited by A. Bryant and K. Charmaz, 1–28. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Busse, V. 2013. “How Do Students of German Perceive Feedback Practices at University? A Motivational Exploration.” Journal of Second Language Writing 22 (4): 406–424. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2013.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D. 2006. “Differing Perceptions in the Feedback Process.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (2): 219–233. doi:10.1080/03075070600572132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D. 2009. “Trust, Distrust and Their Impact on Assessment Reform.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34 (1): 79–89. doi:10.1080/02602930801895786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D. 2016. “Feedback as Dialogue.” In Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1–6. http://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_389-1
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D., D. Salter, M. Yang, and J. Lam. 2011. “Developing Sustainable Feedback Practices.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (4): 395–407. doi:10.1080/03075071003642449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carolan, B. V. 2014. Social Network Analysis and Education: Theory, Methods and Applications. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chong, I. 2017. “Reconsidering Teacher, Peer, and Computer-Generated Feedback”. TESOL Journal 8 (4): 886–893. doi:10.1002/tesj.334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, I. 2018a. “Interplay among Technical, Socio-Emotional and Personal Factors in Written Feedback Research.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (2): 185–196. doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1317712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, S. W. 2018b. “A Three-Stage Model for Implementing Focused Written Corrective Feedback.” TESL Canada Journal 34 (2): 71–82. doi:10.18806/tesl.v34i2.1267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. M., and F. B. Brawer. 2003. The American Community College. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, S. M., and L. M. Goldstein. 1999. “ESL Student Revision after Teacher-written Comments: Text, Contexts, and Individuals.” Journal of Second Language Writing 8(2): 147–179. doi:10.1016/s1060-37343(99)80126-x.
   Google Scholar
• Dowden, T., S. Pittaway, H. Yost, and R. McCarthy. 2013. “Students’ Perceptions of Written Feedback in Teacher Education: Ideally Feedback Is a Continuing Two-Way Communication that Encourages Progress.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (3): 349–362. doi:10.1080/02602938.2011.632676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Education Bureau (EDB). 2016. Assistance Schemes for Self-Financing Post-Secondary Education Institutions. Hong Kong: Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. 2009. “A Typology of Written Corrective Feedback Types.” ELT Journal 63 (2): 97–107. doi:10.1093/elt/ccn023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R., Y. Sheen, M. Murakami, and H. Takashima. 2008. “The Effects of Focused and Unfocused Written Corrective Feedback in an English as a Foreign Language Context.” System 36 (3): 353–371. doi:10.1016/j.system.2008.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrokhi, F., and S. Sattarpour. 2012. “The Effects of Direct Written Corrective Feedback on Improvement of Grammatical Accuracy of High-Proficient L2 Learners.” World Journal of Education 2 (2). doi:10.5430/wje.v2n2p49.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, P. 2011. “Student Perceptions of Quality Feedback in Teacher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36 (1): 51–62. doi:10.1080/02602930903197883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris, D. R., H. Liu, A. Sinha, and M. Senna. 2013. “Written Corrective Feedback for Individual L2 Writers.” Journal of Second Language Writing 22 (3): 307–329. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fike, D. S., and R. Fike. 2008. “Predictors of First-Year Student Retention in the Community College.” Community College Review 36 (2): 68–88. doi:10.1177/0091552108320222.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G., and C. Simpson. 2004. “Does Your Assessment Support Your Students’ Learning.” Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 1 (1): 3–31.
   Google Scholar
• Hanh, N. D., and R. Ramnath. 2016. “Students’ Reactions to Teacher Written Feedback in Their Compositions at an Giang University, Vietnam.” The New English Teacher: An International Journal 10 (1): 42–54.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, R., P. Hartley, and A. Skelton. 2001. “Getting the Message Across: The Problem of Communicating Assessment Feedback.” Teaching in Higher Education 6 (2): 269–274. doi:10.1080/13562510120045230.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. 2013. “Faculty Feedback: Perceptions and Practices in L2 Disciplinary Writing.” Journal of Second Language Writing 22 (3): 240–253. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, K., and F. Hyland. 2006a. “Feedback on Second Language Students’ Writing.” Language Teaching 39 (2): 83–101. doi:10.1017/S0261444806003399.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K., and F. Hyland. 2006b. Chapter 11. Interpersonal Aspects of Response: Constructing and interpreting teacher written feedback. https://www2.caes.hku.hk/kenhyland/files/2012/08/Interpersonal-aspects-of-response_constructing-and-interpreting-teacher-written-feedback.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S. R., V. Torres, and J. Arminio. 2014. Negotiating the Complexities of Qualitative Research in Higher Education: Fundamental Elements and Issues. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, G., and D. L. Schallert. 2008. “Meeting in the Margins: Effects of the Teacher–Student Relationship on Revision Processes of EFL College Students Taking a Composition Course.” Journal of Second Language Writing 17 (3): 165–182. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2007.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H. H., A. P. Leong, and G. Song. 2017. “Investigating Teacher Perceptions of Feedback.” ELT Journal 71 (1): 60–68. doi:10.1093/elt/ccw047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, I. 2008. “Student Reactions to Teacher Feedback in Two Hong Kong Secondary Classrooms.” Journal of Second Language Writing 17 (3): 144–164. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2007.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, I. 2014. “Revisiting Teacher Feedback in EFL Writing from Sociocultural Perspectives.” TESOL Quarterly 48 (1): 201–213. doi:10.1002/tesq.153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leki, I. 1991. “The Preferences of ESL Students for Error Correction in College‐Level Writing Classes.” Foreign Language Annals 24 (3): 203–218. doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.1991.tb00464.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leki, I. 2006. ““You Cannot Ignore”: L2 Graduate Students’ Response to Discipline-Based Written Feedback.” In Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues, edited by K. Hyland and F. Hyland, 266–286. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mahfoodh, O. H. A. 2017. ““I Feel Disappointed”: EFL University Students’ Emotional Responses Towards Teacher Written Feedback.” Assessing Writing 31: 53–72. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe, R. H. 2000. No One to Waste: A Report to Public Decision-Makers and Community College Leaders. Philadelphia, PA: American Association of Community Colleges.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. 2009. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation: Revised and Expanded from Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, J. L., and W. Baker. 2007. “Teacher-Written Feedback: Student Perceptions, Teacher Self-Assessment, and Actual Teacher Performance.” Journal of Second Language Writing 16 (2): 82–99. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2007.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulliner, E., and M. Tucker. 2015. “Feedback on Feedback Practice: Perceptions of Students and Academics.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (2): 266–288. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1103365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molloy, Elizabeth, Francesc Burrell-Carrio, and Ron Epstein. 2013. “Impact of Emotions in Feedback”. In Feedback in Higher and Professional Education: Understanding It and Doing It Well, edited by David Boud and Elizabeth Molloy, 50-71. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• National Student Survey (NSS) report. 2017. Higher Education Funding Council for England. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/student/news/national-student-survey-2016-overall-satisfaction-results
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. 2010. “From Monologue to Dialogue: Improving Written Feedback Processes in Mass Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (5): 501–517. doi:10.1080/02602931003786559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orsmond, P., and S. Merry. 2011. “Feedback Alignment: Effective and Ineffective Links between Tutors’ and Students’ Understanding of Coursework Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36 (2): 125–136. doi:10.1080/02602930903201651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polio, C. 2012. “The Relevance of Second Language Acquisition Theory to the Written Error Correction Debate.” Journal of Second Language Writing 21 (4): 375–389. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porte, G. K. 1997. “The Etiology of Poor Second Language Writing: The Influence of Perceived Teacher Preferences on Second Language Revision Strategies.” Journal of Second Language Writing 6 (1): 61–78. doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(97)90006-0.
   Google Scholar
• Price, M., K. Handley, J. Millar, and B. O’Donovan. 2010. “Feedback: All that Effort, but What Is the Effect?” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (3): 277–289. doi:10.1080/02602930903541007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. 2016. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers [E-reader version]. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sheen, Y. 2007. “The Effect of Focused Written Corrective Feedback and Language Aptitude on ESL Learners’ Acquisition of Articles.” TESOL Quarterly 41 (2): 255–283. doi:10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00059.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheen, Y., D. Wright, and A. Moldawa. 2009. “Differential Effects of Focused and Unfocused Written Correction on the Accurate Use of Grammatical Forms by Adult ESL Learners.” System 37 (4): 556–569. doi:10.1016/j.system.2009.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shintani, N., and R. Ellis. 2013. “The Comparative Effect of Direct Written Corrective Feedback and Metalinguistic Explanation on Learners’ Explicit and Implicit Knowledge of the English Indefinite Article.” Journal of Second Language Writing 22 (3): 286–306. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shintani, N., R. Ellis, and W. Suzuki. 2014. “Effects of Written Feedback and Revision on Learners’ Accuracy in Using Two English Grammatical Structures.” Language Learning 64:(1): 103–131. doi:10.1111/lang.12029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommers, N. 1980. “Revision Strategies of Student Writers and Experienced Adult Writers.” College Composition and Communication 31 (4): 378–388. doi:10.2307/356588.
   Google Scholar
• Stefanou, C., and A. Révész. 2015. “Direct Written Corrective Feedback, Learner Differences, and the Acquisition of Second Language Article Use for Generic and Specific Plural Reference.” The Modern Language Journal 99 (2): 263–282. doi:10.1111/modl.12212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storch, N. 2010. “Critical Feedback on Written Corrective Feedback Research.” International Journal of English Studies 10 (2): 29–46. doi:10.6018/ijes/2010/2/119181.
   Google Scholar
• Storch, N. 2018. “Written Corrective Feedback from Sociocultural Theoretical Perspectives: A Research Agenda.” Language Teaching 51 (2): 262–277. doi:10.1017/s0261444818000034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tight, M., K. H. Mok, J. Huisman, and C. C. Morphew, eds. 2009. The Routledge International Handbook of Higher Education. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• To, J. 2016. “‘This Is Not What I Need’: Conflicting Assessment Feedback Beliefs in a Post-Secondary Institution in Hong Kong.” Research in Post-Compulsory Education 21 (4): 447–467. doi:10.1080/13596748.2016.1226588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truscott, J. 1996. “The Case against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes.” Language Learning 46 (2): 327–369. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsui, A. B., and M. Ng. 2000. “Do Secondary L2 Writers Benefit from Peer Comments?” Journal of Second Language Writing 9 (2): 147–170. doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(00)00022-9.
   Google Scholar
• Waller, L., and M. Papi. 2017. “Motivation and Feedback: How Implicit Theories of Intelligence Predict L2 Writers’ Motivation and Feedback Orientation.” Journal of Second Language Writing 35: 54–65. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2017.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watty, K., R. Carr, P. De Lange, B. O’Connell, and B. Howieson. 2011. “Student Perceptions of Feedback in Australian University Accounting Education”. Paper presented at 2011 Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand (AFAANZ) Conference, Australia, 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, M. R. 2006. “Do Students Value Feedback? Student Perceptions of Tutors’ Written Responses.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 31 (3): 379–394. doi:10.1080/02602930500353061.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, M., and D. Carless. 2013. “The Feedback Triangle and the Enhancement of Dialogic Feedback Processes.” Teaching in Higher Education 18 (3): 285–297. doi:10.1080/13562517.2012.719154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yung, M., and G. Postiglione. 2005. “Globalization and Sustainability of the Community College in the Asia-Pacific Region: The Case of Hong Kong and the Chinese Mainland.” Hong Kong Teachers’ Centre Journal 4: 19–34.
   Google Scholar