3,428
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Enabling equality of access in higher education for underrepresented groups: a realist ‘small step’ approach to evaluating widening participation

ORCID Icon

References

  • Baker, Z. 2019. “Reflexivity, Structure and Agency: Using Reflexivity to Understand Further Education Students’ Higher Education Decision-making and Choices.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 40 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1080/01425692.2018.1483820.
  • Ball, S. J., and C. Vincent. 1998. “‘I Heard It on the Grapevine’: ‘Hot’ Knowledge and School Choice.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 19 (3): 377–400. doi:10.1080/0142569980190307.
  • Ball, S. J., J. Davies, M. David, and D. Reay. 2002. “‘Classification’ and ‘Judgement’: Social Class and the ‘Cognitive Structures’ of Choice of Higher Education.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 23 (1): 51–72. doi:10.1080/01425690120102854.
  • Barbour, R. S. 2007. Doing Focus Groups. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
  • Blamey, A., and M. Mackenzie. 2007. “Theories of Change and Realistic Evaluation: Peas in a Pod or Apples and Oranges?” Evaluation 13 (4): 439–455. doi:10.1177/1356389007082129.
  • Boliver, V., S. Gorard, and N. Siddiqui. 2017. “A More Radical Approach to Contextualised Admissions.” In Where Next for Widening Participation and Fair Access? New Insights from Leading Thinkers, edited by N. Hillman, 23–28. Oxford: HEPI & Brightside.
  • Borghans, L., B. H. H. Golsteyn, A. Stenberg, and J. van Wouwe. 2015. “Does Expert Advice Improve Educational Choice?” PLOS One 10 (12): 1–28. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145378.
  • Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. 1986. “The Forms of Capital.” In Handbook of Theory and Research for Sociology of Education, edited by J. G. Richardson, 241-258. New York: Greenwood.
  • Bradley, H., and N. Ingram. 2013. “Banking on the Future: Choices, Aspirations and Economic Hardship in Working-Class Student Experience.” In Class Inequality in Austerity Britain: Power, Difference and Suffering, edited by W. Atkinson, S. Roberts, and M. Savage, 51–69. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Brown, G. 2018. “Realist Evaluation.” In Five Years of WPREU: Critical Reflections on Evaluation, Policy and Practice in Widening Participation and Student Success, edited by J. Crockford, Z. Baker, G. Brown, R. Hordósy, S. Linskill, and M. Miller, 76–80. Sheffield: University of Sheffield.
  • BIS (Department for Business, Innovation & Skills). 2016. Success as a Knowledge Economy: Teaching Excellence, Social Mobility & Student Choice. London: HMSO.
  • Burke, P. J., and M. Lumb. 2018. “Researching and Evaluating Equity and Widening Participation: Praxis-Based Frameworks.” In Evaluating Equity and Widening Participation in Higher Education, edited by P. J. Burke, A. Hayton, and J. Stevenson, 14-30. London: Trentham Books.
  • Case, J. M. 2015. “A Social Realist Perspective on Student Learning in Higher Education: The Morphogenesis of Agency.” Higher Education Research & Development 34 (5): 841–852. doi:10.1080/07294360.2015.1011095.
  • Colucci, E. 2007. ““Focus Groups Can Be Fun”: The Use of Activity-Oriented Questions in Focus Group Discussions.” Qualitative Health Research 17 (10): 1422–1433. doi:10.1177/1049732307308129.
  • Crozier, G., D. Reay, and J. Clayton. 2019. “Working the Borderlands: Working-Class Students Constructing Hybrid Identities and Asserting Their Place in Higher Education.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 40 (7): 922–937. doi:10.1080/01425692.2019.1623013.
  • Crozier, G., D. Reay, J. Clayton, L. Colliander, and J. Grinstead. 2008. “Different Strokes for Different Folks: Diverse Students in Diverse Institutions - Experiences of Higher Education.” Research Papers in Education 23 (2): 167–177. doi:10.1080/02671520802048703.
  • Dawson, P., and S. L. Dawson. 2018. “Sharing Successes and Hiding Failures: ‘Reporting Bias’ in Learning and Teaching Research.” Studies in Higher Education 43 (8): 1405–1416. doi:10.1080/03075079.2016.1258052.
  • Dyke, M., B. Johnston, and A. Fuller. 2012. “Approaches to Reflexivity: Navigating Educational and Career Pathways.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 33 (6): 831–848. doi:10.1080/01425692.2012.686895.
  • Harries, E., L. Hodgson, and J. Noble. 2014. Creating Your Theory of Change: NPC’s Practical Guide. London: New Philanthropy Capital.
  • Harrison, N., K. Vigurs, J. Crockford, C. McCaig, R. Squire, and L. Clark. 2018. Evaluation of Outreach Interventions for under 16 Year Olds: Tools and Guidance for Higher Education Providers. Bristol: Office for Students.
  • Harrison, N., and R. Waller. 2017. “Evaluating Outreach Activities: Overcoming Challenges through a Realist ‘Small Steps’ Approach.” Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education 21 (2–3): 81–87. doi:10.1080/13603108.2016.1256353.
  • Hatt, S., A. Baxter, and J. Tate. 2005. “Who Benefits from Widening Participation? A Study of Targeting in the South West of England.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 29 (4): 341–351. doi:10.1080/03098770500353508.
  • Hayton, A., and A. Bengry-Howell. 2016. “Theory, Evaluation, and Practice in Widening Participation: A Framework Approach to Assessing Impact.” London Review of Education 14 (3): 41–53. doi:10.18546/LRE.14.3.04.
  • Hunt, C., B. Collins, A. Wardrop, M. Hutchings, V. Heaslip, and C. Pritchard. 2018. “First- and Second-Generation Design and Engineering Students: Experience, Attainment and Factors Influencing Them to Attend University.” Higher Education Research & Development 37 (1): 30–43. doi:10.1080/07294360.2017.1342607.
  • Jones, S. 2013. ““Ensure that You Stand Out from the Crowd”: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Personal Statements according to Applicants’ School Type.” Comparative Education Review 57 (3): 397–423. doi:10.1086/670666.
  • Kahn, P. 2016. “Reflexivity and Agency: Critical Realist and Archerian Analyses of Access and Participation.” In Access to Higher Education: Theoretical Perspectives and Contemporary Challenges, edited by A. Mountford-Zimdars and N. Harrison, 128–141. London: Routledge.
  • Kamberelis, G., G. Dimitriadis, and A. Welker. 2018. “Focus Group Research And/in Figured Worlds.” In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by M. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 692–716. London: SAGE.
  • Kandiko, C. B., and M. Mawer. 2013. Student Expectations and Perceptions of Higher Education Student Expectations and Perceptions of Higher Education. London: Quality Assurance Agency & King’s Learning Institute.
  • Kitzinger, J. 1994. “The Methodology of Focus Groups: The Importance of Interaction between Research Participants.” Sociology of Health & Illness 16 (1): 103–121. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.ep11347023.
  • Massey, O. T. 2011. “A Proposed Model for the Analysis and Interpretation of Focus Groups in Evaluation Research.” Evaluation and Program Planning 34 (1): 21–28. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.06.003.
  • McGuigan, M., S. McNally, and G. Wyness. 2016. “Student Awareness of Costs and Benefits of Educational Decisions: Effects of an Information Campaign.” Journal of Human Capital 10 (4): 482–519. doi:10.1086/689551.
  • Moore, J., J. Sanders, and L. Higham. 2013. Literature Review of Research into Widening Participation to Higher Education: Report to HEFCE and OFFA by ARC Network. Bristol: HEFCE & OFFA.
  • OfS (Office for Students). 2018a. Regulatory Advice 6: Good Practice Advice on the Preparation of Access and Participation Plans for 2019–20, OfS 2018.06. London: OGL.
  • OfS (Office for Students). 2018b. Regulatory Notice 1: Access and Participation Plan Guidance for 2019–20, OfS 2018.03. London: OGL.
  • OfS (Office for Students). 2019. National Collaborative Outreach Programme (NCOP): Two Years On, OfS 2019.45. London: OGL.
  • Pawson, R. 2006. Evidence-Based Policy: A Realist Perspective. London: SAGE.
  • Pawson, R. 2013. The Science of Evaluation: A Realist Manifesto. London: SAGE.
  • Pawson, R., and N. Tiley. 1997. Realistic Evaluation. London: SAGE.
  • Purcell, K., P. Elias, R. Ellison, G. Atfield, D. Adam, and I. Livanos. 2008. Applying for Higher Education – The Diversity of Career Choices, Plans and Expectations. London: Higher Education Career Services Unit.
  • Raby, R. (2010). „Public selves, inequality, and interruptions: The creation of meaning in focus groups with teens.„ International Journal of Qualitative Methods 9 (1): 1-15. doi:10.1177/160940691000900101
  • Reay, D. 2017. Miseducation: Inequality, Education and the Working Classes. Bristol: Policy Press.
  • Renfrew, K., P. Davies, H. Baird, A. Hughes, H. Green, J. Mangan, and K. Slack. 2010. Understanding the Information Needs of Users of Public Information about Higher Education: Report to HEFCE by Oakleigh Consulting and Staffordshire University. Bristol: HEFCE.
  • Sanders, J., and L. Higham. 2012. The Role of Higher Education Students in Widening Access, Retention and Success: A Literature Synthesis of the Widening Access, Student Retention and Success National Programmes Archive. York: Higher Education Academy.
  • Shaw, J. 2012. “A Case Study Exploring Student Choice Making Behaviour and Progression Agreements.” Research in Post-Compulsory Education 17 (1): 115–123. doi:10.1080/13596748.2012.649969.
  • Trust, S. 2008. Increasing Higher Education Participation Amongst Disadvantaged Young People and Schools in Poor Communities: Report to the National Council for Educational Excellence. London: Sutton Trust.
  • Turner, M. L. 2017. “Like, Love, Delete: Social Media’s Influence on College Choice.” Journal of College Admission 237 (Fall): 31–33.
  • Wheeldon, J., and M. Ahlberg. 2017. “Mind Maps in Qualitative Research.” In Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences, edited by P. Liamputtong, 1-17. Singapore: Springer.
  • Whitty, G., A. Hayton, and S. Tang. 2015. “Who You Know, What You Know and Knowing the Ropes: A Review of Evidence about Access to Higher Education Institutions in England.” Review of Education 3 (1): 27–67. doi:10.1002/rev3.3038.
  • Yilmaz, K. 2013. “Comparison of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Traditions: Epistemological, Theoretical, and Methodological Differences.” European Journal of Education 48 (2): 311–325. doi:10.1111/ejed.12014.