The research-practice nexus in doctoral education: the voices of social and health sciences PhD candidates and graduates

References

• Armsby, P., C. Costley, and S. Cranfield. 2018. “The Design of Doctorate Curricula for Practising Professionals.” Studies in Higher Education 43 (12): 2226–2237. doi:10.1080/03075079.2017.1318365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao, Y., B. M. Kehm, and Y. Ma. 2018. “From Product to Process. The Reform of Doctoral Education in Europe and China.” Studies in Higher Education 43 (3): 524–541. doi:10.1080/03075079.2016.1182481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogle, D., M. Dron, J. Eggermont, and J. W. van Henten. 2010. Doctoral Degrees beyond 2010: Training Talented Researchers for Society. Leuven: League of European Research Universities. https://www.leru.org/publications/doctoral-degrees-beyond-2010-training-talented-researchers-for-society
   Google Scholar
• Borrell-Damian, L., R. Morais, and J. H. Smith. 2015. Collaborative Doctoral Education in Europe: Research Partnerships and Employability for Researchers - Report on DOC-CAREERS II Project. Brussels: European University Association. https://eua.eu/resources/publications/362:collaborative-doctoral-education-in-europe-research-partnerships-and-employability-for-researchers%E2%80%94-report-on-doc-careers-ii-project.html
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., A. Fillery-Travis, N. Pizzolato, and B. Sutton. 2018. “The Influence of Professional Doctorates on Practice and the Workplace.” Studies in Higher Education 43 (5): 914–926. doi:10.1080/03075079.2018.1438121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, P. 2013. “Professional Education: Resolving Tensions around the Value of Different Types of Knowledge in Teacher Education and Nurse Education.” In Initial Education of Teachers and Nurses: Identities and Environments, edited by A. Lopes, 135–152. Porto: Livpsic.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology, no. 2: 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Bryan, B., and K. Guccione. 2018. “Was It Worth It? A Qualitative Exploration into Graduate Perceptions of Doctoral Value.” Higher Education Research & Development 37 (6): 1124–1140. doi:10.1080/07294360.2018.1479378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso, S., O. Tavares, and C. Sin. 2019. “Can You Judge a Book by Its Cover? Industrial Doctorates in Portugal.” Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning 9 (3): 279–289. doi:10.1108/HESWBL-05-2018-0056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, J., E. F. Smith, and F. Gelves‐Gomez. 2018. “Doctoring Knowledge or Acknowledging Doctors?” Geographical Research 56 (4): 484–488. doi:10.1111/1745-5871.12305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, T. 2017. “The Study of Academic Profession – Contributions from and to the Sociology of Professions.” In Theory and Method in Higher Education Research, edited by J. Huisman and T. Malcolm, 59–76. Bingley: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• CFE Research. 2014. The Impact of Doctoral Careers: Final Report. Leicester: CFE Research. https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20200923113459/https://www.ukri.org/skills/reports-and-data-sources/impact-of-doctoral-careers/
   Google Scholar
• Costley, C., and J. Fulton, eds. 2019. Methodologies for Practice Research; Approaches for Professional Doctorates. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2014. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Deem, R. 2020. “Rethinking Doctoral Education: University Purposes, Academic Cultures, Mental Health and the Public Good.” In Structural and Institutional Transformations in Doctoral Education, edited by S. Cardoso, O. Tavares, C. Sin, and T. Carvalho, 13–42. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• EUA-CDE (European University Association, Council for Doctoral Education). 2018. Doctoral Education: Why It Matters for Europe. Brussels: European University Association. https://eua-cde.org/reports-publications/299:doctoral-education-why-it-matters-for-europe.html
   Google Scholar
• FFMS (Fundação Francisco Manuel dos Santos). 2020. “Data From: Doutoramentos (ISCED 8) por 100 mil hab. com 25+ anos [Doctorates (ISCED 8) per 100 thousand inhabitants with 25+ years old].” ( dataset). PORDATA. Accessed 28 May 2020. https://www.pordata.pt/Europa/Doutoramentos±(ISCED±8)±por±100±mil±habitantes±com±25±e±mais±anos-2410
   Google Scholar
• Fillery-Travis, A., K. Maguire, N. Pizzolatti, L. Robinson, A. Lowley, N. Stel, P. Mans, et al. 2017. Insights from Practice. A Handbook for Supervisors of Modern Doctorate Candidates. Brussels: Eurodoc. http://www.eurodoc.net/news/2017/handbook-for-supervisors-of-doctoral-candidates-from-our-superprofdoc-project
   Google Scholar
• Fox, A., and B. Slade. 2014. “What Impact Can Organisations Expect from Professional Doctorates?” Professional Development in Education 40 (4): 546–560. doi:10.1080/19415257.2013.843579.
   Google Scholar
• Frayling, C. 1993. “Research in Art and Design.„ Royal College of Art Reserach Papers 1(1): 1–5. https://researchonline.rca.ac.uk/384/3/frayling_research_in_art_and_design_1993.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Germain-Alamartine, E., R. Ahoba-Sam, S. Moghadam-Saman, and G. Evers. 2020. “Doctoral Graduates’ Transition to Industry: Networks as a Mechanism? Cases from Norway, Sweden and the UK.” Studies in Higher Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/03075079.2020.1754783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, and M. Trow. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• GUS. 2017. Higher Education Institutions and Their Finances in 2016. Warsaw: GUS (Central Statistical Office).
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, S., and E. Walsh. 2016. “Beyond Knowledge and Skills: Rethinking the Development of Professional Identity during the STEM Doctorate.” Studies in Higher Education 41 (1): 37–50. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.915301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasgall, A., B. Saenen, L. Borrell-Damian, F. V. Deynze, M. Seeber, and J. Huisman. 2019. Doctoral Education in Europe Today: Approaches and Institutional Structures. Brussels: European University Association. https://eua.eu/resources/publications/809:doctoral-education-in-europe-today-approaches-and-institutional-structures.html
   Google Scholar
• Hramiak, A. 2017. “The Impact of Doctoral Studies on Personal and Professional Lives.” Work Based Learning e-Journal International 7 (1): 20–39.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. 2018. “Contemporary Trends in Professional Doctorates.” Studies in Higher Education 43 (5): 814–825. doi:10.1080/03075079.2018.1438095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kehm, B. 2006. “Doctoral Education in Europe and North America: A Comparative Analysis.” In The Formative Years of Scholars, edited by U. Teichler, 67–78. London: Portland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, M., J. Newnham, and E. Chapman. 2012. “The Biomedical Doctorate in the Contemporary University: Education or Training and Why It Matters.” Higher Education 63 (5): 631–644. doi:10.1007/s10734-011-9464-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalczuk-Walędziak, M., A. Lopes, I. Menezes, and N. Tormenta. 2017. “Teachers Pursuing a Doctoral Degree: Motivations and Perceived Impact.” Educational Research 59 (3): 335–352. doi:10.1080/00131881.2017.1345287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristoffersen, M., B. F. Oftedal, and F. Friberg. 2020. “From A Professional Practitioner to A Practice-Based Researcher: A Qualitative Study of Norwegian PhD Candidates in the Fields of Health, Welfare and Education.” Studies in Continuing Education 1–17. doi:10.1080/0158037X.2020.1732333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., and K. Dawson. 2013. “Exploring the Impact of a Professional Practice Education Doctorate in Educational Environments.” Studies in Continuing Education 35 (2): 165–178. doi:10.1080/0158037X.2012.736380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwiek, M. 2020. “Poland: An Abundance of Doctoral Students but a Scarcity of Doctorates.” In Trends and Issues in Doctoral Education. A Global Perspective, edited by M. Yudkevich, P. Altbach, and H. De Wit, 103–126. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kyvik, S., and T. B. Olsen. 2012. “The Relevance of Doctoral Training in Different Labour Markets.” Journal of Education and Work 25 (2): 205–224. doi:10.1080/13639080.2010.538376.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A. 2018. “How Can We Develop Supervisors for the Modern Doctorate?” Studies in Higher Education 43 (5): 878–890. doi:10.1080/03075079.2018.1438116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, D., R. Becker, and K. Coate. 2005. “To Prove Myself at the Highest Level: The Benefits of Doctoral Study.” Higher Education Research & Development 24 (2): 135–149. doi:10.1080/07294360500062904.
   Google Scholar
• Lopes, A., and I. Menezes. 2018. “The Construction of the Self as a Researcher: Reflections on the Process of Post-graduate Training.” Educar Em Revista 34 (71): 103–124. doi:10.1590/0104-4060.62649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAlpine, L. 2017. “Building on Success? Future Challenges for Doctoral Education Globally.” Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education 8 (2): 66–77. doi:10.1108/SGPE-D-17-00035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McSherry, R., J. Bettany-Saltikov, E. Cummings, K. Walker, K. Ford, and K. Walsh. 2019. “Are You Measuring the Impacts and Outcomes of Your Professional Doctorate Programme?” Studies in Continuing Education 41 (2): 207–225. doi:10.1080/0158037X.2018.1555801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MNiSW (Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego). 2017. Doktorat Wdrożeniowy [Implementation Doctorate]. https://www.gov.pl/web/nauka/projekt-doktorat-wdrozeniowy
   Google Scholar
• MNiSW (Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego). 2020. Ustawa z dnia 20 lipca 2018 r. – Prawo o szkolnictwie wyższym i nauce. Dz.U. 2020.85 t.j. [ The Law on Higher Education and Science].
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2019. OECD Review of Higher Education, Research and Innovation. Portugal: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264308138-en.
   Google Scholar
• PAN. 2017. Kodeks Etyki Pracownika Naukowego [Code of Ethics for Researchers]. https://instytucja.pan.pl/images/2016/komisja_etyki/Kodeks_etyki_pracownika_naukowego_-_wydanie_II_-_2016_r.pdf
   Google Scholar
• PCM (Presidência do Conselho de Ministros). 2018. “Decreto-Lei nº65/2018 de 16 de agosto [Decree-Law no 65/2018, from August 16].” In Diario da Republica nº 157 - I Serie A, 4147–4182. https://data.dre.pt/eli/dec-lei/65/2018/08/16/p/dre/pt/html
   Google Scholar
• Prøitz, T. S., and L. Wittek. 2020. “New Directions in Doctoral Programmes: Bridging Tensions between Theory and Practice?” Teaching in Higher Education 25 (5): 560–578. doi:10.1080/13562517.2019.1577813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santiago, R., A. Magalhães, and M. T. Carvalho. 2005. O surgimento do managerialismo no sistema de ensino superior português [The Emergence of Managerialism in the Portuguese Higher Education System]. Coimbra: CIPES - Fundação das Universidades Portuguesas.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, J. M., H. Horta, and M. Heitor. 2016. “Too Many PhDs? An Invalid Argument for Countries Developing Their Scientific and Academic Systems: The Case of Portugal.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 113: 352–362. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.12.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoonenboom, J., and R. B. Johnson. 2017. “How to Construct a Mixed Methods Research Design.” KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 69 (Suppl 2): 107–131. doi:10.1007/s11577-017-0454-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Servage, L. 2009. “Alternative and Professional Doctoral Programs: What Is Driving the Demand?” Studies in Higher Education 34 (7): 765–779. doi:10.1080/03075070902818761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, P., H. Curtis, G. Sanders, J. Kuit, and J. Fulton. 2011. “Student Perceptions of the Professional Doctorate.” Work Based Learning e-Journal 2 (1): 135–154. https://wblearning-ejournal.com/en/volume-2,-issue-1—october-2011
   Google Scholar
• SPCE (Sociedade Portuguesa de Ciências da Educação). 2014. Instrumento de regulação ético-deontológica. Carta ética [Instrument of Ethical-deontological Regulation. Ethical Charter]. Porto: SPCE. http://www.spce.org.pt/regulacaoeticodeontologia.html
   Google Scholar
• Stevens-Long, J., S. A. Schapiro, and C. McClintock. 2012. “Passionate Scholars: Transformative Learning in Doctoral Education.” Adult Education Quarterly 622 (2): 180–198. doi:10.1177/0741713611402046.
   Google Scholar
• Tazzyman, S., S. Hancock, P. Wakeling, G. Birkin, and L. Bowes. 2020. Review of the PhD in Social Sciences. Rapid Evidence Assessment. Leicester: CFE Research. https://esrc.ukri.org/files/news-events-and-publications/news/review-of-the-phd-in-social-science/
   Google Scholar
• van der Boon, J., S. Kahmen, K. Maes, and C. Waaijer. 2018. Delivering talent: Careers of Researchers inside and outside Academia. Leuven: League of European Research Universities. https://www.leru.org/publications/delivering-talent-careers-of-researchers-inside-and-outside-academia#
   Google Scholar
• van Nes, F., T. Abma, H. Jonsson, and D. Deeg. 2010. “Language Differences in Qualitative Research: Is Meaning Lost in Translation?” European Journal of Ageing 7: 313–316. doi:10.1007/s10433-010-0168-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellington, J., and P. Sikes. 2006. “‘A Doctorate in a Tight Compartment’: Why Do Students Choose a Professional Doctorate and What Impact Does It Have on Their Personal and Professional Lives?” Studies in Higher Education 31 (6): 723–734. doi:10.1080/03075070601004358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkes, L. M., and S. Mohan. 2008. “Nurses in the Clinical Area: Relevance of a PhD.” Collegian 15 (4): 135–141. doi:10.1016/j.colegn.2008.05.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolderink, M., K. Putnik, H. van der Boom, and G. Klabbers. 2015. “The Voice of PhD Candidates and PhD Supervisors. A Qualitative Exploratory Study Amongst PhD Candidates and Supervisors to Evaluate the Relational Aspects of PhD Supervision in the Netherlands.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 10: 217–235. doi:10.28945/2276.
   Google Scholar
• Zusman, A. 2017. “Changing Degrees: Creation and Growth of New Kinds of Professional Doctorates.” The Journal of Higher Education 88 (1): 33–61. doi:10.1080/00221546.2016.1243941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar