Educational leaders and the professional doctorate dissertation: an analysis of leaders’ interests within the educational leadership corpus

References

• Aiken, J. A., and C. Gerstl-Pepin. 2013. “Envisioning the EdD and PhD as a Partnership for Change.” Planning and Changing 44 (3/4): 162–180.
   Google Scholar
• Alchin, D. 2013. “Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Third Grade Summer Reading Camp Intervention Program in a Large Urban School District.” Electronic Theses and Dissertations. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/2596
   Google Scholar
• Armsby, P., C. Costley, and S. Cranfield. 2018. “The Design of Doctorate Curricula for Practising Professionals.” Studies in Higher Education 43 (12): 2226–2237. doi:10.1080/03075079.2017.1318365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assarroudi, A., F. H. Nabavi, M. R. Armat, A. Ebadi, and M. Vaismoradi. 2018. “Directed Qualitative Content Analysis: The Description and Elaboration of Its Underpinning Methods and Data Analysis Process.” Journal of Research in Nursing 23 (1): 42–55. doi:10.1177/1744987117741667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azorín, C., and M. Ainscow. 2020. “Guiding Schools on Their Journey Towards Inclusion.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 24 (1): 58–76. doi:10.1080/13603116.2018.1450900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailes, L. P., and W. K. Hoy. 2014. “Designing School Contexts for Success: Paternalism or Libertarianism?” International Journal of Educational Management 28 (5): 484–497. doi:10.1108/ijem-02-2013-0027.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1993. “Perceived Self-Efficacy in Cognitive Development and Functioning.” Educational Psychologist 28 (2): 117–148. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baume, D. 2017. “Scholarship in Action.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 54 (2): 111–116. doi:10.1080/14703297.2016.1257950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beard, K. S., W. K. Hoy, and A. W. Hoy. 2010. “Academic Optimism of Individual Teachers: Confirming A New Construct.” Teaching and Teacher Education 26 (5): 1136–1144. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D., A. Fillery-Travis, N. Pizzolato, and B. Sutton. 2018. “The Influence of Professional Doctorates on Practice and the Workplace.” Studies in Higher Education 43 (5): 626–914. doi:10.1080/03075079.2018.1438121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brock, B. L., I. D. Cherney, J. R. Martin, J. M. Breen, and G. Oltman. 2015. “How to Launch a Doctoral Interdisciplinary Leadership Program.” Creighton Journal of Interdisciplinary Leadership 1 (1): 14–23. doi:10.17062/cjil.v1i1.18.
   Google Scholar
• Carver-Thomas, D., and L. Darling-Hammond. 2019. “The Trouble with Teacher Turnover: How Teacher Attrition Affects Students and Schools.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 27 (36): 1–29. doi:10.14507/EPAA.27.3699.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, C., and M. Ainscow. 2019. “Using Research to Promote Equity within Education Systems: Possibilities and Barriers.” British Educational Research Journal 45 (5): 899–917. doi:10.1002/BERJ.3544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coghlan, D. 2019. “Inquiring from the Inside.” Chap. 2 In Inside Organizations: Exploring Organizational Experiences (pp. 17-28). London: SAGE Publications. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781529716856
   Google Scholar
• Conley, D. T. 2012. “Competing Accountability Demands in Urban School Districts.” In Urban Education: A Model for Leadership and Policy, edited by K. Symms Gallagher, R. Goodyear, D. J. Brewer, and R. Rueda, 153–169. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Costley, C., and N. Pizzolato. 2018. “Transdisciplinary Qualities in Practice Doctorates.” Studies in Continuing Education 40 (1): 30–45. doi:10.1080/0158037X.2017.1394287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CPED (Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate). n.d. “Our Vision and Mission.” Accessed 10 September 2020. https://www.cpedinitiative.org/vision-mission
   Google Scholar
• Dou, D., G. Devos, and M. Valcke. 2017. “The Relationships between School Autonomy Gap, Principal Leadership, Teachers’ Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 45 (6): 959–977. doi:10.1177/1741143216653975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Education Act 2002. 2002. UK Public General Acts. Accessed 18 December 2020. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2002/32/contents
   Google Scholar
• Education Act 2011. 2011. UK Public General Acts. Accessed 18 December 2020. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/21/contents/enacted
   Google Scholar
• Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. 1965. United States Department of Education. https://www2.ed.gov/documents/essa-act-of-1965.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ELHE (Educational Leadership and Higher Education). 2020. Executive Ed.D. In Educational Leadership Program Handbook: Fall 2018. University of Central Florida. https://ccie.ucf.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2018/08/Executive-Ed.D.-Handbook.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Union ET Framework 2020. 2020. European Commission. Accessed 18 December 2020. https://ec.europa.eu/education/policies/european-policy-cooperation/et2020-framework_en
   Google Scholar
• Every Student Succeeds Act. 2015. United States Department of Education. Accessed 18 December 2020. https://www.ed.gov/essa?src=rn
   Google Scholar
• Fillery-Travis, A., and L. Robinson. 2018. “Making the Familiar Strange – A Research Pedagogy for Practice.” Studies in Higher Education 43 (5): 841–853. doi:10.1080/03075079.2018.1438098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. 2016. “The Elusive Nature of Whole System Improvement in Education.” Journal of Educational Change 17 (4): 539–544. doi:10.1007/s10833-016-9289-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldring, E. B., J. Grissom, C. M. Neumerski, R. Blissett, J. Murphy, and A. Porter. 2019. “Increasing Principals’ Time on Instructional Leadership: Exploring the SAM® Process.” Journal of Educational Administration 58 (1): 19–37. doi:10.1108/JEA-07-2018-0131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldring, E. B., M. Mavrogordato, and K. T. Haynes. 2015. “Multisource Principal Evaluation Data.” Educational Administration Quarterly 51 (4): 572–599. doi:10.1177/0013161X14556152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, J., S. Kruse, and C. John Tarter. 2016. “Enabling School Structures, Collegial Trust and Academic Emphasis.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 44 (6): 875–891. doi:10.1177/1741143215574505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, Q., C. Day, A. Walker, and K. Leithwood. 2018. “How Successful Secondary School Principals Enact Policy.” Leadership and Policy in Schools 17 (3): 327–331. doi:10.1080/15700763.2018.1496343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, Q., P. Sammons, and J. Chen. 2018. “How Principals of Successful Schools Enact Education Policy: Perceptions and Accounts from Senior and Middle Leaders.” Leadership and Policy in Schools 17 (3): 373–390. doi:10.1080/15700763.2018.1496344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadfield, M., and M. Ainscow. 2018. “Inside a Self-Improving School System: Collaboration, Competition and Transition.” Journal of Educational Change 19 (4): 441–462. doi:10.1007/s10833-018-9330-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., and J. Kovačević. 2019. “A Bibliometric Review of Research on Educational Administration: Science Mapping the Literature, 1960 to 2018.” Review of Educational Research 89 (3): 335–369. doi:10.3102/0034654319830380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochbein, C., and J. A. Perry. 2013. “The Role of Research in the Professional Doctorate.” Planning and Changing 44 (3/4): 181–195.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, D., S. Stringfield, A. Harris, L. Stoll, and T. Mackay. 2014. “School and System Improvement: A Narrative State-of-the-Art Review.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 25 (2): 257–281. doi:10.1080/09243453.2014.885452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoy, A. W., W. K. Hoy, and N. M. Kurz. 2008. “Teacher’s Academic Optimism: The Development of a New Construct.” Teaching and Teacher Education 24: 821–835. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2007.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H.-F., and S. E. Shannon. 2005. “Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis.” Qualitative Health Research 15 (November 9): 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaliszewski, M., A. Fieldsend, and T. McAleavy. 2017. England’s Approach to School Performance Data—Lessons Learned. Reading Berkshire, England: Education Development Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Leech, N. L., and A. J. Onwuegbuzie. 2007. “An Array of Qualitative Data Analysis Tools: A Call for Data Analysis Triangulation.” School Psychology Quarterly 22 (4): 557–584. doi:10.1037/1045-3830.22.4.557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K. 2019. “Characteristics of Effective Leadership Networks: A Replication and Extension.” School Leadership & Management 39 (2): 175–197. doi:10.1080/13632434.2018.1470503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., A. Harris, and D. Hopkins. 2020. “Seven Strong Claims about Successful School Leadership Revisited.” School Leadership & Management 40 (1): 5–22. doi:10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., and C. Riehl. 2003. What We Know About Successful School Leadership. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Laboratory for Student Success, Temple University.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., and J. Sun. 2018. “Academic Culture: A Promising Mediator of School Leaders’ Influence on Student Learning.” Journal of Educational Administration 56 (3): 350–363. doi:10.1108/JEA-01-2017-0009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., J. Sun, and C. McCullough. 2019. “How School Districts Influence Student Achievement.” Journal of Educational Administration 57 (5): 519–539. doi:10.1108/JEA-09-2018-0175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., and V. N. Azah. 2017. “Characteristics of High-Performing School Districts.” Leadership and Policy in Schools 16 (1): 27–53. doi:10.1080/15700763.2016.1197282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muijs, D., D. Reynolds, P. Sammons, L. Kyriakides, B. P. M. Creemers, and C. Teddlie. 2018. “Assessing Individual Lessons Using a Generic Teacher Observation Instrument: How Useful Is the International System for Teacher Observation and Feedback (ISTOF)?” ZDM 50 (3): 395–406. doi:10.1007/s11858-018-0921-9.
   Google Scholar
• No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. 2002. United States Department of Education. https://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/107-110.pdf
   Google Scholar
• NPBEA (National Policy Board for Educational Administration). n.d. Professional Standards for Educational Leaders. Accessed 12 February 2021. http://www.npbea.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Professional-Standards-for-Educational-Leaders_2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oplatka, I. 2009. “The Field of Educational Administration.” Journal of Educational Administration 47 (1): 8–35. doi:10.1108/09578230910928061.
   Google Scholar
• Podolsky, A., T. Kini, L. Darling-Hammond, and J. Bishop. 2019. “Strategies for Attracting and Retaining Educators: What Does the Evidence Say?” Education Policy Analysis Archives 27 (38): 1–47. doi:10.14507/EPAA.27.3722.
   Google Scholar
• Pringle, E., Jr. 2017. “A Study of the Relationship between Second-Order Change Leadership Behaviors of High School Administrators and Student Achievement from 2016-2017.” Electronic Theses and Dissertations. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/5748
   Google Scholar
• Printy, S. M., H. M. Marks, and A. J. Bowers. 2009. “Integrated Leadership: How Principals and Teachers Share Transformational and Instructional Influence.” Journal of School Leadership 19 (5): 504–532. doi:10.1177/105268460901900501.
   Google Scholar
• Printy, S. M., and S. M. Williams. 2015. “Principals’ Decisions.” Educational Policy 29 (1): 179–205. doi:10.1177/0895904814556757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Race to the Top Fund. 2009. United States Department of Education. Accessed 18 December 2020. https://www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, S., J. Lord, E. Parr, and R. Sharkey. 2015. “‘Why Has My World Become More Confusing than It Used to Be?’ Professional Doctoral Students Reflect on the Development of Their Identity.” Management in Education 29 (4): 158–163. doi:10.1177/0892020614567247.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. M. J., C. A. Lloyd, and K. J. Rowe. 2008. “The Impact of Leadership on Student Outcomes: An Analysis of the Differential Effects of Leadership Types.” Educational Administration Quarterly 44 (5): 635–674. doi:10.1177/0013161X08321509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, M., S. K. Patrick, and E. B. Goldring. 2017. “Dilemmas of Prescriptive Practices and Perceived Alignment in Program Implementation.” Peabody Journal of Education 92 (5): 609–626. doi:10.1080/0161956X.2017.1368646.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. 2016. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, A. 2017. “An Analysis of the Readiness and Confidence of High School Administrators to Provide Instructional Leadership in Digital School Environments.” Electronic Theses and Dissertations. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/6062
   Google Scholar
• Storey, V. A., K. A. Hesbol, J. E. Marshall, B. D. Maughan, and A. W. Dolan. 2015. “Examining EdD Dissertations in Practice: The Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate.” International Higher Education Teaching and Learning Associations Review 5: 2. http://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/18280
   Google Scholar
• Stringfield, S., D. Reynolds, and E. C. Schaffer. 2008. “Improving Secondary Students’ Academic Achievement through a Focus on Reform Reliability:4- and 9-Year Findings from the High Reliability Schools Project.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 19 (4): 409–428. doi:10.1080/09243450802535190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. T., and V. A. Storey. 2011. “(Re)designing and Implementing the Professional Doctorate in Education: Comparing Experiences of a Small Independent University and a Large Public University.” International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation 6 (3): 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• ten Bruggencate, G., H. Luyten, J. Scheerens, and P. Sleegers. 2012. “Modeling the Influence of School Leaders on Student Achievement.” Educational Administration Quarterly 48 (4): 699–732. doi:10.1177/0013161X11436272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çalik, T., F. Sezgin, H. Kavgaci, and A. Ç. Kilinç. 2012. “Examinations of Relationships between Instructional Leadership of School Principals and Self-efficacy of Teachers and Collective Teacher Efficacy.” Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice 12 (4): 2404–2498.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., A. J. Bowers, and D. J. Fikis. 2017. “Automated Text Data Mining Analysis of Five Decades of Educational Leadership Research Literature.” Educational Administration Quarterly 53 (2): 289–323. doi:10.1177/0013161X16660585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M. 2013. “Deconstructing Differences in Effectiveness of Teachers of Tenth Grade Non-Proficient Readers in One Florida School District.” Electronic Theses and Dissertations. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/2927
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, X., H. Yin, and Y. Liu. 2019. “The Relationship between Distributed Leadership and Teacher Efficacy in China: The Mediation of Satisfaction and Trust.” Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 28 (6): 509–518. doi:10.1007/s40299-019-00451-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar