The territoriality of personalization: New avenues for decentralized personalization in multi-level Western Europe

References

• André, A., Freire, A. and Papp, Z. (2014), Electoral rules and legislators’ personal vote-seeking, in K. Deschouwer and S. Depauw (eds), Representing the People: A Survey Among Members of Statewide and Sub-State Parliaments, pp.87–109. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• André, A., Gallagher, M. and Sandri, G. (2014), Legislators’ constituency orientation, in K. Deschouwer and S. Depauw (eds), Representing the People: A Survey Among Members of Statewide and Sub-State Parliaments, pp.166–188. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balmas, M., et al. (2014), Two routes to personalized politics: centralized and decentralized personalization, Party Politics, Vol.20, No.1, pp.37–51. doi:10.1177/1354068811436037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouard, S., et al. (2013), Why do French MPs focus more on constituency work than on parliamentary work?, The Journal of Legislative Studies, Vol.19, No.2, pp.141–159. doi:10.1080/13572334.2013.787194.
   Google Scholar
• Campus, D. (2002), Leaders, dreams and journeys: Italy’s new political communication, Journal of Modern Italian Studies, Vol.7, No.2, pp.171–191. doi:10.1080/13545710210137938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, J. M. and Shugart, M. S. (1995), Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: a rank ordering of electoral formulas, Electoral Studies, Vol.14, No.4, pp.417–439. doi: 10.1016/0261-3794(94)00035-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carty, R. K. (2004), Parties as Franchise systems: the stratarchical organizational imperative, Party Politics, Vol.10, No.1, pp.5–24. doi:10.1177/1354068804039118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, W. and Young, L. (2015), Personalization of campaigns in an SMP system: the Canadian case, Electoral Studies, Vol.39, pp.306–315. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2014.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deschouwer, K. (2006), Political parties as multi-level organizations, in R. S. Katz and W. J. Crotty (eds), Handbook of Party Politics, pp.291–300. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Deschouwer, K., Depauw, S. and André, A. (2014), Representing the people in parliaments, in K. Deschouwer and S. Depauw (eds), Representing the People: A Survey among Members of Statewide and Sub-State Parliaments, pp.1–18. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Driessens, O., et al. (2010), Personalization according to politicians: a practice theoretical analysis of mediatization, Communications, Vol.35, No.3, pp.309–326. doi:10.1515/COMM.2010.017.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat (2017a). Area by NUTS 3 region[demo_r_d3area] [Datafile].Available at http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset = demo_r_d3area&lang = en (accessed 2 June 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat (2017b). Population on 1 January by age group, sex and NUTS 3 region[demo_r_pjangrp3] [Datafile]. Available at http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset = demo_r_pjangrp3&lang = en (accessed 15 June 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, J. and Denver, D. (2008), From foot-slogging to call centres and direct mail: a framework for analysing the development of district-level campaigning, European Journal of Political Research, Vol.47, No.6, pp.794–826. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2008.00785.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henders, S. J. (2010), Territoriality, Asymmetry, and Autonomy : Catalonia, Corsica, Hong Kong, and Tibet. New York, NY and Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillian.
   Google Scholar
• Holmberg, S. and Oscarsson, H. (2011), Party leader effects on the vote, in K. Aarts, A. Blais and H. Schmitt (eds), Political Leaders and Democratic Elections, pp.35–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holtz-Bacha, C., Langer, A. I. and Merkle, S. (2014), The personalization of politics in comparative perspective: campaign coverage in Germany and the United Kingdom, European Journal of Communication, Vol.29, No.2, pp.153–170. doi:10.1177/0267323113516727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., et al. (2016), Measuring Regional Authority. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkin, J. (2009), Party matters: devolution and party politics in Britain and Spain, Party Politics, Vol.15, No.2, pp.179–198. doi:10.1177/1354068808099980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsen, R. and Skogerbø, E. (2015), Candidate campaigning in parliamentary systems: individualized vs. localized campaigning, Party Politics, Vol.21, No.3, 1354068813487103. doi:10.1177/1354068813487103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karvonen, L. (2010), The Personalization of Politics: A Study of Parliamentary Democracies. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klingemann, H.-D. and Wessels, B. (2001). The political consequences of Germany’s mixed-member system: personalization at the grass roots?, in M. S. Shugart and M. P. Wattenberg (eds), Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?, pp.279–296. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, J. S. (2008), Case studies: types, designs, and logics of inference, Conflict Management and Peace Science, Vol.25, No.1994, pp.1–18. doi:10.1080/07388940701860318.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, P. (2009), From social democracy back to no ideology?—The Scottish National Party and ideological change in a multi-level electoral setting, Regional & Federal Studies, Vol.19, No.4–5, pp.619–637. doi:10.1080/13597560903310402.
   Google Scholar
• Massetti, E. (2009), Explaining regionalist party positioning in a multi-dimensional ideological space: a framework for analysis, Regional & Federal Studies, Vol.19, No.4–5, pp.501–531. doi:10.1080/13597560903310246.
   Google Scholar
• Midtbø, T., et al. (2014). Do the media set the agenda of parliament or is it the other way around? Agenda interactions between MPs and mass Media, in K. Deschouwer and S. Depauw (eds), Representing the People: A Survey among Members of Statewide and Sub-State Parliaments, pp.188–209. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, S. (2015), Theorizing Decentralization: Comparative Evidence from Sub-National Switzerland. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ohr, D. (2011), Changing patterns in political communication, in K. Aarts, A. Blais and H. Schmitt (eds), Political Leaders and Democratic Elections, pp.11–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poguntke, T. and Webb, P. (2005), The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rahat, G. and Sheafer, T. (2007), The personalization(s) of politics: Israel, 1949–2003, Political Communication, Vol.24, No.1, pp.65–80. doi:10.1080/10584600601128739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohlfing, I. (2012), Case, case study, and causation: core concepts and fundamentals, in I. Rohlfing (ed), Case Studies and Causal Inference, pp.23–60. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Roller, E. and Van Houten, P. (2003), A national party in a regional party system: the PSC-PSOE in Catalonia, Regional and Federal Studies, Vol.13, No.3, pp.1–22. doi:10.1080/13597560308559432.
   Google Scholar
• Samuels, D. J. (2002), Pork barreling is not credit claiming or advertising: campaign finance and the sources of the personal vote in Brazil, The Journal of Politics, Vol.64, No.3, pp.845–863. doi:10.1111/0022-3816.00149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swenden, W. and Maddens, B. (2009), Territorial party politics in Western Europe: a framework for analysis, in W. Swenden and B. Maddens (eds), Territorial Party Politics in Western Europe, pp.1–30. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. (2010), The strategy of paired comparison: toward a theory of practice, Comparative Political Studies, Vol.43, No.2, pp.230–259. doi:10.1177/0010414009350044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Aelst, P., Sheafer, T. and Stanyer, J. (2012). The personalization of mediated political communication: a review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings, Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, Vol.13, No.2, pp.203–220. doi:10.1177/1464884911427802.
   Google Scholar
• Van Houten, P. (2009), Multi-level relations in political parties: a delegation approach, Party Politics, Vol.15, No.2, pp.137–156. doi:10.1177/1354068808099978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vliegenthart, R., Boomgaarden, H. G. and Boumans, J. W. (2011), Changes in political news coverage: personalization, conflict and negativity in British and Dutch newspapers, in K. Brants and K. Voltmer (eds), Political Communication in Postmodern Democracy: Challenging the Primacy of Politics, pp.92–110. Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillian.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteley, P. and Seyd, P. (2003), How to win a landslide by really trying: the effects of local campaigning on voting in the 1997 British general election, Electoral Studies, Vol.22, No.2, pp.301–324. doi:10.1016/S0261-3794(02)00017-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zittel, T. (2015), Constituency candidates in comparative perspective – how personalized are constituency campaigns, why, and does it matter?, Electoral Studies, Vol.39, pp.286–294. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2014.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zittel, T. and Gschwend, T. (2008), Individualised constituency campaigns in mixed-member electoral systems: candidates in the 2005 German elections, West European Politics, Vol.31, No.5, pp.978–1003. doi:10.1080/01402380802234656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar