The range and limitation of sub-national regime variations under electoral authoritarianism: The case of Russia

References

• Behrend, J., and L. Whitehead. 2016. “The Struggle for Subnational Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 27 (2): 155–169. doi: 10.1353/jod.2016.0023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burshard, S. 2013. “You Have to Know Where to Look in Order to Find It: Competitiveness in Botswana’s Dominant Party System.” Government and Opposition 48 (1): 115–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donno, D. 2013. “Elections and Democratization in Authoritarian Regimes.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (3): 703–716. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Law No. 67. 2002. ‘Ob osnovnykh garantiyakh izbiratel’nykh prav i prava na uchastie v referendume grazhdan Rossiiskoi Federtatsii’, June 12.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Law No. 95. 2014. ‘О vnesenii izmenenii v Federal’nyi zakon, Ob osnovnykh garantiyakh izbiratel’nykh prav i prava na uchastie v referendum grazhdan RF’, May 5.
   Google Scholar
• Frye, T., O. J. Reuter, and D. Szakonyi. 2014. “Political Machines at Work Voter Mobilization and Electoral Subversion in the Workplace.” World Politics 66 (2): 195–228. doi: 10.1017/S004388711400001X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, E. 2005. “Boundary Control: Subnational Authoritarianism in Democratic Countries.” World Politics 58 (1): 101–132. doi: 10.1353/wp.2006.0018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, E., and J. Suarez-Cao. 2010. “Federalised Party Systems and Subnational Party Competition: Theory and an Empirical Application to Argentina.” Comparative Politics 43 (1): 21–39. doi: 10.5129/001041510X12911363510312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilley, B. 2010. “Democratic Enclaves in Authoritarian Regimes.” Democratization 17 (3): 389–415. doi: 10.1080/13510341003700196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraudi, A. 2015. Democrats and Autocrats: Pathways of Subnational Undemocratic Regime Continuity within Democratic Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Golosov, G. 2010. “The Effective Number of Parties: A New Approach.” Party Politics 16 (2): 171–192. doi: 10.1177/1354068809339538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golosov, G. 2012. “Russia’s Regional Legislative Elections, 2003–2007: Authoritarianism Incorporated.” In Regional Politics in Russia Under Putin and Medvedev, edited by C. Ross, 37–54. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Golosov, G. 2013. “Machine Politics: The Concept and Its Implications for Post-Soviet Studies.” Demokratizatsiya 21 (4): 459–480.
   Google Scholar
• Herron, E., and M. Nishikawa. 2001. “Contamination Effects and the Number of Parties in Mixed-Superposition Electoral Systems.” Electoral Studies 20 (1): 63–86. doi: 10.1016/S0261-3794(00)00002-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, M., and P. Roessler. 2006. “Liberalizing Electoral Outcomes in Competitive Authoritarian Regimes.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (2): 365–381. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00189.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutcheson, D. 2017. “Contextualizing the 2016 State Duma Election.” Russian Politics 2 (4): 383–410. doi: 10.1163/2451-8921-00204001
   Google Scholar
• Keating, M. 2008. “Thirty Years of Territorial Politics.” West European Politics 31 (1–2): 60–81. doi: 10.1080/01402380701833723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korgunyuk, Yu, C. Ross, and S. Shpagin. 2018. “Party Reforms and the Unbalancing of the Cleavage Structure in Russian Regional Elections, 2012–2015.” Europe-Asia Studies 70 (2): 155–181. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2017.1417976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kynev, A., and A. Lyubarev. 2016. Registratsiya Kandidatov i Partiinykh Spiskov na Vyborakh. Moscow: KGI.
   Google Scholar
• Kynev, A., A. Lyubarev, and A. Maksimov. 2017. Itogi vydvizheniya i Registratsii Kandidatov i partiinykh Spisok na Vyborakh Prestabitel’nykh Organov Vlasti Rossiiskikh Regionov i ikh Administrativnyikh Tsentrov. Moscow: KGI.
   Google Scholar
• Laakso, M., and R. Taagepera. 1979. “Effective Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 12 (1): 3–27. doi: 10.1177/001041407901200101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libman, A. 2017. “Subnational Political Regimes and Formal Economic Regulation: Evidence from Russian Regions.” Regional and Federal Studies 27 (2): 127–151. doi: 10.1080/13597566.2017.1308925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyubarev, A. 2017. Itogi Monitoringa Izbiratel’nyk Kampanii 2012–17 Godov: Analiticheskii Doklad. Moscow: KGI.
   Google Scholar
• Magaloni, B. 2006. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Molinar, J. 1991. “Counting the Number of Parties: An Alternative Index.” American Political Science Review 85 (4): 1383–1391. doi: 10.2307/1963951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moraski, B., and W. Reisinger. 2003. “Explaining Electoral Competition across Russia’s Regions.” Slavic Review 62 (2): 278–301. doi: 10.2307/3185578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, R., and E. Scheiner. 2004. “Mixed Electoral Systems and Electoral System Effects: Controlled Comparison and Cross-National Analysis.” Electoral Studies 23 (4): 575–599. doi: 10.1016/S0261-3794(03)00056-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panov, P., and C. Ross. 2013. “Patterns of Electoral Contestation in Russian Regional Assemblies: Between Competitive and Hegemonic Authoritarianism.” Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization 21 (3): 369–400.
   Google Scholar
• Panov, P., and C. Ross. 2016a. “Explanatory Factors for Electoral Turnout in the Russian Federation: The Regional Dimension.” Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization 24 (3): 51–70.
   Google Scholar
• Panov, P., and C. Ross. 2016b. “Levels of Centralization and Autonomy in Russia’s ‘Party of Power’: Cross-Regional Variations.” Europe-Asia Studies 68 (2): 232–252. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2015.1125854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panov, P., and C. Ross. 2018. “The Dynamic Nationalisation of Voting for United Russia: The Stability / Instability of Regional Deviations from National Results.” East European Politics 34 (1): 97–114. doi: 10.1080/21599165.2017.1415886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regiony Rossii: Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskie Pokazateli 2016. 2016. Moskva: Rosstat.
   Google Scholar
• Reisinger, W., and B. Moraski. 2010. “Regional Changes and Changing Regional Relations.” In The Politics of Sub-National Authoritarianism in Russia, edited by V. Gel’man, and C. Ross, 67–84. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Reuter, O. J., and R. Turovsky. 2014. “Dominant Party Rule and Legislative Leadership in Authoritarian Regimes.” Party Politics 20 (5): 663–674. doi: 10.1177/1354068812448689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, C. 2002. Federalism and Democratization in Russia. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, C. 2011. “Regional Elections and Electoral Authoritarianism in Russia.” Europe-Asia Studies 63 (4): 641–661. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2011.566428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saikkonen, I. 2016. “Variation in Subnational Electoral Authoritarianism: Evidence from the Russian Federation.” Democratization 23 (3): 437–458. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2014.975693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schedler, A. 2002. “Elections Without Democracy: The Menu of Manipulation.” Journal of Democracy 13 (2): 36–50. doi: 10.1353/jod.2002.0031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shevtsova, L. 2012. “Putinism Under Siege: Implosion, Atrophy, or Revolution?” Journal of Democracy 23 (3): 19–32. doi: 10.1353/jod.2012.0040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, S. 2005. “Perverse Accountability: A Formal Model of Machine Politics with Evidence from Argentina.” American Political Science Review 99 (3): 315–325. doi: 10.1017/S0003055405051683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turovsky, R. 2015. “The Systemic Opposition in Authoritarian Regimes: A Case Study of Russian Regions.” In Systemic and Non-Systemic Opposition in the Russian Federation: Civil Society Awakes? edited by C. Ross, 121–138. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vserossiiskaya Perepis’ Naseleniya. 2010. Table ‘National Composition of the RF Population’. Accessed March 18, 2018. http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/perepis2010/perepis_itogi1612.htm.
   Google Scholar
• White, A. 2015. “How Ethnicity Matters in Russian Elections: Ethnic Minorities and Support for the United Russia Party.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 56 (5): 524–546. doi: 10.1080/15387216.2015.1120680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, A. 2016. “Electoral Fraud and Electoral Geography: United Russia Strongholds in the 2007 and 2011 Russian Parliamentary Elections.” Europe-Asia Studies 68 (7): 1127–1178. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2016.1219978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, D. 2017. “Modifying Electoral Authoritarianism. What the 2016 Parliamentary Elections Tell Us about the Nature of Resilience of the Putin Regime.” Russian Politics 2 (4): 482–501. doi: 10.1163/2451-8921-00204005
   Google Scholar