480
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The populist challenge: Multi-level electoral coordination in Brazil’s 2018 elections

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Almeida, Maria Hermínia T. 2005. “Recentralizando a Federação?” Revista de Sociologia e Política 24: 29–40. doi: 10.1590/S0104-44782005000100004
  • Arretche, Marta. 2007. “The Veto Power of Sub-National Governments in Brazil: Political Institutions and Parliamentary Behaviour in the Post-1988 Period.” Brazilian Political Science Review 1 (2): 40–73.
  • Arretche, Marta. 2010. “Federalism, Bicameralism, and Institutional Change: General Trends and One Case-Study.” Brazilian Political Science Review 4 (2): 10–31.
  • Borges, André, Adrian Albala, and Lucia Burtnik. 2017. “Pathways to Nationalization in Multilevel Presidential Systems: Accounting for Party Strategies in Brazil and Argentina.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 47 (4): 648–672. doi: 10.1093/publius/pjx024
  • Borges, André, and Ryan Lloyd. 2016. “Presidential Coattails and Electoral Coordination in Multilevel Elections: Comparative Lessons from Brazil.” Electoral Studies 43: 104–114. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2016.05.009
  • Borges, André, and Mathieu Turgeon. 2019. “Presidential Coattails in Coalitional Presidentialism.” Party Politics 25 (2): 192–202. doi: 10.1177/1354068817702283
  • Calvo, Ernesto, Fernando Guarnieri, and Fernando Limongi. 2015. “Why Coalitions? Party System Fragmentation, Small Party Bias, and Preferential Vote in Brazil.” Electoral Studies 39: 219–229. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2015.03.012
  • Chhibber, Pradeep K., and Ken Kollman. 2004. The Formation of National Party Systems Federalism and Party Competition in Canada, Great Britain, India, and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Chiru, Mihail. 2015. “Early Marriages Last Longer: Pre-Electoral Coalitions and Government Survival in Europe.” Government and Opposition 50 (2): 165–188. doi: 10.1017/gov.2014.8
  • Cox, Gary. 1999. “Electoral Rules and Electoral Coordination.” Annual Review of Political Science 2 (1): 145–161. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.145
  • Desposato, Scott. 2004. “The Impact of Federalism on National Party Cohesion in Brazil.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29 (2): 259–285. doi: 10.3162/036298004X201177
  • Detterbeck, Klaus, and Eve Hepburn. 2010. “Party Politics in Multi-Level Systems.” In New Directions in Federalism Studies, edited by Jan Erk, and Wilfried Swenden, 106–125. London: Routledge.
  • Erikson, Robert, and Mikhail G. Filippov. 2001. “Electoral Balancing in Federal and Sub-National Elections: The Case of Canada.” Constitutional Political Economy 12 (4): 313–331. doi: 10.1023/A:1012529023870
  • Filippov, Mikhail G., Peter Ordeshook, and Olga Shvetsova. 2004. Designing Federalism: A Theory of Self-Sustainable Federal Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Golder, Sona N. 2006a. “Pre-Electoral Coalition Formation in Parliamentary Democracies.” British Journal of Political Science 36 (2): 193–212. doi: 10.1017/S0007123406000123
  • Golder, Matt. 2006b. “Presidential Coattails and Legislative Fragmentation.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (1): 34–48. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00168.x
  • Gomes, Sandra. 2012. “Fiscal Powers to Subnational Governments: Reassessing the Concept of Fiscal Autonomy.” Regional & Federal Studies 22 (4): 387–406. doi: 10.1080/13597566.2012.679849
  • Hicken, Allen, and Heather Stoll. 2011. “Presidents and Parties: How Presidential Elections Shape Coordination in Legislative Elections.” Comparative Political Studies 44 (7): 854–883. doi: 10.1177/0010414011401231
  • Hooghe, Liesbet, Gary Marks, Arjan H. Schakel, Sandra Chapman Osterkatz, Sara Niedzwiecki, and Sarah Shair-Rosenfield. 2016. Measuring Regional Authority: A Postfunctionalist Theory of Governance (Vol. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Jeffery, Charlie, and Dan Hough. 2003. “Regional Elections in Multi-Level Systems.” European Urban and Regional Studies 10 (3): 199–212. doi: 10.1177/09697764030103002
  • Jones, Mark P. 1994. “Presidential Election Laws and Multipartism in Latin America.” Political Research Quarterly 47 (1): 41–57. doi: 10.1177/106591299404700103
  • Laakso, Markku, and Rein Taagepera. 1979. ““Effective” Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 12 (1): 3–27. doi: 10.1177/001041407901200101
  • Lago, Ignacio, and José Ramón Montero. 2009. “Coordination between Electoral Arenas in Multilevel Countries.” European Journal of Political Research 48 (2): 176–203. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2008.00832.x
  • Leiras, Marcelo. 2006. “Parties, Provinces and Electoral Coordination: A Study on the Determinants of Party and Party System Aggregation in Argentina, 1983–2005.” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Notre Dame.
  • Limongi, Fernando, and Rafael Cortez. 2010. “As eleições de 2010 e o quadro partidário.” Novos Estudos - CEBRAP 88: 21–37. doi: 10.1590/S0101-33002010000300002
  • Limongi, Fernando, and Fabricio Vasselai. 2018. “Entries and Withdrawals: Electoral Coordination Across Different Offices and the Brazilian Party Systems.” Brazilian Political Science Review 12 (3). doi: 10.1590/1981-3821201800030001
  • Melo, Carlos R. 2010. “Eleições Presidenciais, Jogos Aninhados E Sistema Partidário No Brasil.” Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política 4: 13–41.
  • Melo, Carlos R., and Rafael Câmara. 2012. “Estrutura da Competição pela Presidência e Consolidação do Sistema Partidário no Brasil.” Dados 55 (1): 71–117. doi: 10.1590/S0011-52582012000100003
  • Mudde, Cas, and Cristobal Rovira Kaltwasser. 2017. Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Niedzwiecki, Sara, Sandra Chapman, Liesbet Hooghe, and Gary Marks. 2019. “The RAI Travels to Latin America: Measuring Regional Authority Under Regime Change.” Regional & Federal Studies. doi:10.1080/13597566.2018.1489248.
  • Panebianco, Angelo. 1988. Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ribeiro, Pedro Floriano, and Elodie Fabre. 2019. “Multilevel Party Organizations in a Fragmented Presidential System: The Case of Brazil.” Regional & Federal Studies. doi:10.1080/13597566.2019.1591375.
  • Ribeiro, Pedro Floriano, and Luís Locatelli. 2019. “Time after Time: Party Organizational Strength in New and Old Democracies.” Opinião Pública 25 (1): 199–233. doi: 10.1590/1807-01912019251199
  • Rodden, Jonathan, and Erik Wibbels. 2011. “Dual Accountability and the Nationalization of Party Competition: Evidence from Four Federations.” Party Politics 17 (5): 629–653. doi: 10.1177/1354068810376182
  • Samuels, David. 2002. “Presidentialized Parties: The Separation of Powers and Party Organization and Behavior.” Comparative Political Studies 35 (4): 461–483. doi: 10.1177/0010414002035004004
  • Samuels, David. 2003. Ambition, Federalism, and Legislative Politics in Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Samuels, David, and Mathew Shugart. 2010. Presidents, Parties, and Prime Ministers: How the Separation of Powers Affects Party Organization and Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Samuels, David, and Cesar Zucco. 2018. Partisans, Antipartisans, and Nonpartisans: Voting Behavior in Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Santos, Fabiano, and Fabiano Pegurier. 2011. “Political Careers in Brazil: Long-term Trends and Cross-sectional Variation.” Regional & Federal Studies 21 (2): 165–183. doi: 10.1080/13597566.2011.529759
  • Schakel, Arjan H. 2013a. “Congruence between Regional and National Elections.” Comparative Political Studies 46 (5): 631–662. doi: 10.1177/0010414011424112
  • Schakel, Arjan H. 2013b. “Nationalisation of Multilevel Party Systems: A Conceptual and Empirical Analysis.” European Journal of Political Research 52 (2): 212–236. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2012.02067.x
  • Shugart, Matthew, and John Carey. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Spoon, Jae-Jae, and Karleen J. West. 2015. “Alone or Together? How Institutions Affect Party Entry in Presidential Elections in Europe and South America.” Party Politics 21 (3): 393–403. doi: 10.1177/1354068812473870
  • Thorlakson, Lori. 2007. “An Institutional Explanation of Party System Congruence: Evidence from Six Federations.” European Journal of Political Research 46 (1): 69–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00647.x

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.