A centennial review of the English regional question: Whose policy space is it?

References

• Agnew, J. 2015. “Unbundled Territoriality and Regional Politics.” Territory, Politics, Governance 3 (2): 119–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., and G. Haughton. 2011. “Challenging Localism.” Town and Country Planning 80 (7/8): 314–317.
   Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., and G. Haughton. 2012. “Post-Political Spatial Planning in England: A Crisis of Consensus?” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 37 (1): 89–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., and G. Haughton. 2013. “The Evolution and Trajectories of English Spatial Governance: ‘Neoliberal’ Episodes in Planning.” Planning Practice and Research 28 (1): 6–26.
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C. 2000. “The Networked Polity: Regional Development in Western Europe.” Governance 13 (2): 279–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, T. L. 2011. “Capitalise and Empower: Exploring Alternatives to Demolition by Housing Market Renewal Pathfinders.” Doctoral diss., University of Birmingham.
   Google Scholar
• Audit Commission. 1989. Urban Regeneration and Economic Development: The Local Government Dimension. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Ayres, S., and G. Pearce. 2005. “Building Regional Governance in England: The View from Whitehall.” Policy and Politics 33 (4): 581–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baden, T., and C. Swain. 2013. “Government Expectations of Regional Spatial Strategies.” In English Regional Planning 2000-2010: Lessons for the Future, edited by C. Swain, T. Marshall, and T. Baden, 113–134. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, M. 2002. “Government Offices for the Regions and Regional Planning.” In Contemporary Issues in Regional Planning, edited by T. Marshall, J. Glasson, and P. Headicar, 70–87. Aldesrshot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, M., I. Deas, and C. Wong. 1999. “Obscure Ritual or Administrative Luxury? Integrating Strategic Planning and Regional Development.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 26 (5): 763–782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, M., P. Roberts, and R. Shaw. 2003. Stakeholder Involvement in Regional Planning: National Report of the TCPA Study Supported by ODPM. London: TCPA.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, M., and C. Wong. 2013. “The Delusion of Strategic Spatial Planning: What’s Left After the Labour Government’s English Regional Experiment?” Planning Practice and Research 28 (1): 83–103.
   Google Scholar
• Balchin, P., L. Sykora, and G. Bull. 1999. Regional Policy and Planning in Europe. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Benneworth, P., I. Hardill, M. Baker, and L. Budd. 2006. “The Rise of the English Regions: an Introduction.” In The Rise of the English Regions?, edited by I. Hardill, P. Benneworth, M. Baker, and L. Budd, 3–21. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Broadhurst, K. 2018. “In the Pursuit of Economic Growth: Drivers and Inhibitors of Place-Based Partnerships.” Regional Studies, Regional Science 5 (1): 332–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowell, R., and S. Owens. 2006. “Governing Space: Planning Reform and the Politics of Sustainability.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 24 (3): 403–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crisp, R., E. Ferrari, S. Fothergill, T. Gore, and P. Wells. 2019. Strong Economies, Better Places: Local and Regional Development Policies for a Labour Government. London: The Labour Party.
   Google Scholar
• Cullingworth, B., and V. Nadin. 2006. Town and Country Planning in the UK. 14th ed. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• DCLG (Department for Communities and Local Government). 2011. Enterprise Zone Prospectus. London: DCLG.
   Google Scholar
• DCLG (Department for Communities and Local Government). 2012. National Planning Policy Framework. London: DCLG.
   Google Scholar
• DCLG (Department for Communities and Local Government). 2014. Community Right to Build. London: DCLG.
   Google Scholar
• Deas, I., and L. Pugalis. 2014. Regionalism in the UK: Recent Trajectories and Future Prospects. Manchester: University of Manchester
   Google Scholar
• DETR (Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions). 1999. A Better Quality of Life. London: DETR.
   Google Scholar
• DETR (Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions). 2000. Planning Policy Guidance Note 11: Regional Planning. London: DETR.
   Google Scholar
• Dickovick, J. T. 2006. “Municipalization as Central Government Strategy: Central-Regional–Local Politics in Peru, Brazil, and South Africa.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 37 (1): 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everingham, J. A. 2009. “Australia’s Regions: Congested Governance or Institutional Void?” Public Policy and Administration 24 (1): 84–102.
   Google Scholar
• Growe, A., M. Baker, and A. Ziafati Bafarasat. 2020. “The Legitimation of Planning Processes as a Challenge to Metropolitan Governance.” Administrative Sciences 10 (34): 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Hager, C. 2012. “Revisiting the Ungovernability Debate: Regional Governance and Sprawl in the USA and UK.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 36 (4): 817–830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. 1973. Containment of Urban England (Volume 1): Urban and Metropolitan Growth Processes or Megalopolis Denied. London: Allen and Unwin (for P.E.P.).
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. 2007. “Evolution of Strategic Planning and Regional Development.” In Strategic Planning for Regional Development in the UK: A Review of Principles and Practices, edited by H. T. Dimitriou, and R. Thompson, 10–27. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harvie, C. 1991. “English Regionalism: The Dog That Never Barked.” In National Identities, edited by B. Crick, 48–61. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Haughton, G. 2012. “Planning and Growth.” Town and Country Planning 81 (3): 121–125.
   Google Scholar
• Haughton, G., P. Allmendinger, D. Counsell, and G. Vigar. 2010. The New Spatial Planning: Territorial Management with Soft Spaces and Fuzzy Boundaries. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haughton, G., and D. Counsell. 2004. Regions, Spatial Strategies and Sustainable Development. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heseltine, M. 2019. Empowering English Cities. Birmingham: West Midlands Combined Authority.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. 1963. The North East: A Programme for Development and Growth. Cmd 2206. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. 2010. Local Growth: Realising Every Place’s Potential. London: TSO.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. 2012. Unlocking Growth in Cities: City Deals – Wave 1. London: HM Government.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. 2017. Industrial Strategy: Building a Britain fit for the Future. London: HM Government.
   Google Scholar
• HM Treasury, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform and Department for Communities and Local Government. 2007. Review of Sub-National Economic Development and Regeneration. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., G. N. Marks, and A. H. Schakel. 2010. The Rise of Regional Authority: A Comparative Study of 42 Democracies. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, E. 1898. Garden Cities of Tomorrow: A Peaceful Path to Real Reform. London: Swan Sonnenschein and Co, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• James, P., and S. Donaldson. 2001. “Action for Sustainability: Northwest England’s Tool for Regional Strategic Sustainability Appraisal.” Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 3 (3): 413–430.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 2003. “Governance and Meta-Governance: on Reflexivity, Requisite Variety and Requisite Irony.” In Governance as Social and Political Communication, edited by H. P. Bang, 101–116. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 2004. “Hollowing out the ‘Nation-State’ and Multilevel Governance.” In A Handbook of Comparative Social Policy, edited by P. Kennett, 11–25. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 2016. “State Theory.” In Handbook on Theories of Governance, edited by C. Ansell, and G. Torfing, 71–86. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. 2018. “The March of Governance and the Actualities of Failure: The Case of Economic Development Twenty Years on.” International Social Science Journal 68 (227-228): 25–41.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M., and G. MacLeod. 2004. “Regional Spaces, Spaces of Regionalism: Territory, Insurgent Politics and the English Question.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 29 (4): 433–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, P., M. Wynn, D. Hillier, and D. Comfort. 2017. “A Commentary on the City Deals in the UK.” Journal of Public Affairs 17 (3): 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kösecik, M., and N. Kapucu. 2003. “Conservative Reform of Metropolitan Counties: Abolition of the GLC and MCCs in Retrospect.” Contemporary British History 17 (3): 71–94.
   Google Scholar
• Laffin, M., J. Mawson, and C. Ormston. 2014. “Public Services in a ‘Postdemocratic Age’: an Alternative Framework to Network Governance.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 32 (4): 762–776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, S., and C. Game. 1991. “English Metropolitan Governance Since Abolition: An Evaluation of the Abolition of the English Metropolitan County Councils.” Public Administration 69 (2): 141–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lister, R. 1998. “From Equality to Social Inclusion: New Labour and the Welfare State.” Critical Social Policy 18 (55): 215–225.
   Google Scholar
• Lister, R. 2001. “New Labour: A Study in Ambiguity from a Position of Ambivalence.” Critical Social Policy 21 (4): 425–447.
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod, G., and M. Goodwin. 1999. “Space, Scale and State Strategy: Rethinking Urban and Regional Governance.” Progress in Human Geography 23 (4): 503–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, G., L. Hooghe, and A. H. Schakel. 2008a. “Patterns of Regional Authority.” Regional and Federal Studies 18 (2-3): 167–181.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, G., L. Hooghe, and A. H. Schakel. 2008b. “Measuring Regional Authority.” Regional and Federal Studies 18 (2-3): 111–121.
   Google Scholar
• Marlow, D. 2019. “Local Enterprise Partnerships: Seven-Year Itch, or in Need of a Radical re-Think? – Lessons from Cambridgeshire and Peterborough, UK” Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit 34 (2): 139–148.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D. 2008. “Understanding British Government: Analysing Competing Models.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 10 (2): 251–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, T. 2003. “English Regional Planning: Recent Progress and Current Government Proposals.” Planning Practice and Research 18 (1): 81–93.
   Google Scholar
• Mawson, J. 1998. “English Regionalism and New Labour.” Regional & Federal Studies 8 (1): 158–175.
   Google Scholar
• Mawson, J., S. Aulakh, and S. Snape. 2005. The Integration of Regional Spatial Strategies: Report for the English Regions Network. Coventry: Warwick University Business School.
   Google Scholar
• McGuiness, D., and J. Mawson. 2017. “The Rescaling of Sub-National Planning: Can Localism Resolve England’s Spatial Planning Conundrum?” Town Planning Review 88 (3): 283–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government. 2018. Strengthened Local Enterprise Partnerships. London: HM Government.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government. 2019. National Planning Policy Framework. London: MHCLG.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government. 2020. Planning for the Future: White Paper August 2020. London: MHCLG.
   Google Scholar
• Mired, H. 2011. “Empowering the English Regions: Assessing New Labour’s Institutional Arsenal.” Observatoire de la Société Britannique 10: 95–114.
   Google Scholar
• Morphet, J. 2011. Effective Practice in Spatial Planning. RTPI Library Series. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Murdoch, J., and M. Tewdwr-Jones. 1999. “Planning and the English Regions: Conflict and Convergence Amongst the Institutions of Regional Governance.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 17 (6): 715–729.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, E., and R. Adam. 2017. All Change: Why Britain Is So Prone to Policy Reinvention, and What Can Be Done About it. London: Institute for Government.
   Google Scholar
• Northern Way Steering Group. 2004. Moving Forward: The Northern Way - First Growth Strategy Report: Summary. Newcastle upon Tyne: Northern Way Steering Group.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. 2003. Sustainable Communities: Building for the Future. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. 2004. Planning Policy Statement 11: Regional Spatial Strategies. London: TSO.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. 2005. Planning Policy Statement 1: Delivering Sustainable Development. Norwich: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Palumbo, A. 2014. “The Regulatory State vs. the Networked Polity: Confronting Narratives of Change.” Observatoire de la Société Britannique 16: 125–141.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, G., and S. Ayres. 2006. “New Patterns of Governance in the English Region: Assessing Their Implications for Spatial Planning.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 24 (6): 909–927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, G., and S. Ayres. 2009. “Governance in the English Regions: The Role of the Regional Development Agencies.” Urban Studies 46 (3): 537–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, G., J. Mawson, and S. Ayres. 2008. “Regional Governance in England: A Changing Role for the Government’s Regional Offices?” Public Administration 86 (2): 443–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, F., S. Connolly, J. Durnin, and K. Jackson. 2013. “Prospects for ‘Place-Based’industrial Policy in England: The Role of Local Enterprise Partnerships.” Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit 28 (7-8): 828–841.
   Google Scholar
• Pickles, E. 2010. “It's the Local Economy Stupid.” Conservative Home, July 30th 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Pike, A., M. Coombes, P. O’Brien, and J. Tomaney. 2018. “Austerity States, Institutional Dismantling and the Governance of sub-National Economic Development: The Demise of the Regional Development Agencies in England.” Territory, Politics, Governance 6 (1): 118–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pike, A., D. Marlow, A. McCarthy, P. O’Brien, and J. Tomaney. 2015. “Local Institutions and Local Economic Development: The Local Enterprise Partnerships in England, 2010.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 8 (2): 185–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugalis, L., and G. Bentley. 2013. “Storming or Performing? Local Enterprise Partnerships Two Years on.” Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit 28 (7-8): 863–874.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. 1996. “The New Governance: Governing without Government.” Political Studies 44 (4): 652–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, P. 1996. “Regional Planning Guidance in England and Wales: Back to the Future?” Town Planning Review 67 (1): 97–109.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, P. W., and M. G. Lloyd. 2000. “Regional Development Agencies in England: New Strategic Regional Planning Issues?” Regional Studies 34 (1): 75–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandford, M. 2006. “English Regionalism through the Looking Glass: Perspectives on the English Question from the North-East and Cornwall.” National Identities 8 (1): 77–93.
   Google Scholar
• Sandford, M. 2017. “Signing Up to Devolution: The Prevalence of Contract Over Governance in English Devolution Policy.” Regional & Federal Studies 27 (1): 63–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shutt, J., L. Pugalis, and G. Bentley. 2012. “LEPS – Living Up to the Hype? The Changing Framework for Regional Economic Development and Localism in the UK.” In Changing Gear - Is Localism the New Regionalism, edited by M. Ward, and S. Hardy, 12–24. London: Smith Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Skelcher, C. 2000. “Changing Images of the State: Overloaded, Hollowed-out, Congested.” Public Policy and Administration 15 (3): 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. C. 1964. Regionalism in England 1: Regional Institutions – A Guide. London: The Action Society Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, K. 2002. “Reaching out to Regional Government in England?” In Globalisation and Regionalisation: Challenges for Public Policy, edited by D. B. Audretsch, and C. F. Bonser, 23–47. Norwell: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, C., T. Marshall, and T. Baden. 2013. “Introduction.” In English Regional Planning 2000-2010: Lessons for the Future, edited by Swain, C., T. Marshall, and T. Baden, 1–8. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• TCPA (Town and Country Planning Association). 2018. Planning 2020: Final Report of the Raynsford Review of Planning in England. London: TCPA.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, R. 2007. “Strategic and Regional Planning in the Greater South East.” In Strategic Planning for Regional Development in the UK: A Review of Principles and Practices, edited by H. T. Dimitriou, and R. Thompson, 251–270. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tomaney, J. 2016. “Limits of Devolution: Localism, Economics and Post-Democracy.” The Political Quarterly 87 (4): 546–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UK2070 Commission. 2019. Fairer and Stronger: Rebalancing the UK Economy. Second Report: Moving Up the Gears – The Seven National Priorities for Action.
   Google Scholar
• UK2070 Commission. 2020. Make No Little Plans: Acting at Scale for a Fairer and Stronger Future: Final Report of the UK2070 Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Wannop, U. A. 1995. The Regional Imperative: Regional Planning and Governance in Britain, Europe and the United States. London: Regional Studies Association/Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, K., J. Newman, P. John, N. Theodore, J. Macleavy, and A. Cochrane. 2015. “Whatever Happened to Local Government? A Review Symposium.” Regional Studies, Regional Science 2 (1): 435–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, C. 1978. “Regional Theory and Regionalism: Towards Rethinking the Regional Question.” Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 9 (6): 397–413.
   Google Scholar
• Wintour, P. 2012. “Eric Pickles threatens to strip councils of planning powers.” The Guardian, September 6.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, C., M. Baker, B. Webb, S. Hincks, and A. Schulze-Baing. 2015. “Mapping Policies and Programmes: The Use of GIS to Communicate Spatial Relationships in England.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 42 (6): 1020–1039.
   Google Scholar
• Ziafati Bafarasat, A. 2016. “Exploring New Systems of Regionalism: An English Case Study.” Cities 50: 119–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziafati Bafarasat, A. 2018. “‘Theorizing’ Regime Theory: A City-Regional Perspective.” Journal of Urban Affairs 40 (3): 412–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziafati Bafarasat, A., and M. Baker. 2016. “Building Consensus for Network Power? Some Reflections on Strategic Spatial Planning in the North West Region of England.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 34 (5): 900–926.
   Google Scholar
• Ziafati Bafarasat, A., and E. Oliveira. 2020. “Disentangling Three Decades of Strategic Spatial Planning in England Through Participation, Project Promotion and Policy Integration.” European Planning Studies. Advance online publication.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziafati Bafarasat, A., and L. Pugalis. 2020. “In Search of Cohesive Metropolitan Governance: Enticements and Obligations.” European Planning Studies 28 (8): 1474–1492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar