686
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Standard Research Articles

Social media network homophily among political candidates in multilevel settings

, & ORCID Icon

References

  • Aragón, P., K. E. Kappler, A. Kaltenbrunner, D. Laniado, and Y. Volkovich. 2013. “Communication Dynamics in Twitter During Political Campaigns: The Case of the 2011 Spanish National Election.” Policy & Internet 5 (2): 183–206.
  • Bache, I., I. Bartle, and M. Flinders. 2016. “Multi-level Governance.” In Handbook on Theories of Governance, edited by Christopher Ansell, and Jacob Torfing, 486–498. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Beyers, J., and P. Bursens. 2006. “The European Rescue of the Federal State: How Europeanisation Shapes the Belgian State.” West European Politics 29 (5): 1057–1078.
  • Boireau, M., M. Gagliolo, E. van Haute, and L. Sudulich. 2015. “The Determinants and Dynamics of Twitter-Based Interactions Among Candidates.” Paper Presented at the Workshop ‘Digital Media, Power, and Democracy in Election Campaigns’, Washington, DC.
  • Borchert, J., and K. Stolz. 2011. “Introduction: Political Careers in Multi-Level Systems.” Regional & Federal Studies 21 (2): 107–115.
  • Bouteca, N., E. D’heer, and S. Lannoo. 2017. “How Second-Order is the Regional Level? An Analysis of Tweets in Simultaneous Campaigns.” Political Studies 65 (4): 1021–1039.
  • Brancati, D. 2008. “The Origins and Strengths of Regional Parties.” British Journal of Political Science 38: 135–159.
  • Caluwaerts, D., and M. Reuchamps. 2015. “Combining Federalism with Consociationalism: Is Belgian Consociational Federalism Digging Its Own Grave?” Ethnopolitics 14 (3): 277–295.
  • Cherepnalkoski, D., A. Karpf, I. Mozetič, and M. Grčar. 2016. “Cohesion and Coalition Formation in the European Parliament: Roll-Call Votes and Twitter Activities.” PloS ONE 11 (11): e0166586.
  • Coffé, H. 2006. “‘The Vulnerable Institutional Complexity.’ The 2004 Regional Elections in Brussels.” Regional and Federal Studies 16 (1): 99–107.
  • Conover, M. D., B. Gonçalves, A. Flammini, and F. Menczer. 2012. “Partisan Asymmetries in Online Political Activity.” EPJ Data Science 1: 6.
  • De Winter, L. 1998. “Parliament and Government in Belgium: Prisoners of Partitocracy.” In Parliaments and Executives in Western Europe, edited by Philip Norton, 97–122. London: Frank Cass.
  • De Winter, L., D. della Porta, and K. Deschouwer. 1996. “Comparing Similar Countries: Italy and Belgium.” Res Publica (liverpool, England) 38: 215–236.
  • De Winter, L., and P. Dumont. 2006. “Do Belgian Parties Undermine the Democratic Chain of Delegation?” West European Politics 29 (5): 957–976.
  • Deschouwer, K. 2002. “Falling Apart Together. The Changing Nature of Belgian Consociationalism.” Acta Politica 37: 68–85.
  • Deschouwer, K. 2009. “Coalition Formation and Congruence in a Multi-Layered Setting: Belgium 1995–2008.” Regional & Federal Studies 19 (1): 13–35.
  • Deschouwer, K. 2012. The Politics of Belgium: Governing a Divided Society. 2nd ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Dodeigne, J. 2018. “Who Governs? The Disputed Effects of Regionalism on Legislative Career Orientation in Multilevel Systems.” West European Politics 41 (3): 728–753.
  • Enderlein, H., S. Walti, and M. Zurn. 2010. Handbook on Multi-Level Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Esteve Del Valle, M., M. Broersma, and A. Ponsioen. 2021. “Political Interaction Beyond Party Lines: Communication Ties and Party Polarization in Parliamentary Twitter Networks.” Social Science Computer Review, Advance Online Publication. Doi: 10.1177/0894439320987569.
  • Freelon, D. 2014. “On the Interpretation of Digital Trace Data in Communication and Social Computing Research.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 58: 59–75.
  • Fruchterman, T. M. J., and E. M. Reingold. 1991. “Graph Drawing by Force-Directed Placement.” Software: Practice and Experience 21 (11): 1129–1164.
  • Gagnon, A.-G., and J. Tully. 2001. Multinational Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Guerrero-Solé, F. 2018. “Interactive Behavior in Political Discussions on Twitter: Politicians, Media, and Citizens’ Patterns of Interaction in the 2015 and 2016 Electoral Campaigns in Spain.” Social Media + Society October-November: 1–16.
  • Guerrero-Solé, F., and H. Lopez-Gonzalez. 2019. “Government Formation and Political Discussions in Twitter: An Extended Model of Quantifying Political Distances in Multiparty Democracies.” Social Science Computer Review 37 (1): 3–21.
  • Hagberg, A., P. Swart, and D. Schult. 2008. “Exploring Network Structure, Dynamics, and Function Using Networkx (LA-UR-08-05495; LA-UR-08-5495).” Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States). https://www.osti.gov/biblio/960616-exploring-network-structure-dynamics-function-using-networkx.
  • Happaerts, S. 2015. “Multi-Level Climate Governance and the Role of the Subnational Level.” Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences 12 (4): 285–301.
  • Himelboim, I. 2014. “Political Television Hosts on Twitter: Examining Patterns of Interconnectivity and Selfexposure in Twitter Political Talk Networks.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 58: 76–96.
  • Hooghe, L., G. Marks, A. H. Schakel, S. C. Osterkatz, S. Niedzwiecki, and S. Shair-Rosenfield. 2016. Measuring Regional Authority: A Postfunctionalist Theory of Governance, Volume I. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Horowitz, D. L. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Hsu, C-l., and H. W. Park. 2012. “Mapping Online Social Networks of Korean Politicians.” Government International Quarterly 29: 169–181.
  • Jungherr, A. 2016. “Twitter use in Election Campaigns: A Systematic Literature Review.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 13 (1): 72–91.
  • Lietz, H., C. Wagner, A. Bleier, and M. Strohmaier. 2014. “When Politicians Talk: Assessing Online Conversational Practices of Political Parties on Twitter.” Proceedings of the Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media: 285-294.
  • Lijphart, A. 1977. Democracy in Plural Societies. A Comparative Exploration. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Lijphart, A. 2008. Thinking About Democracy: Power Sharing and Majority Rule in Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge.
  • McPherson, M., L. Smith-Lovin, and J. M. Cook. 2001. “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.” Annual Review of Sociology 27: 415–444.
  • Metaxas, P. T., E. Mustafaraj, K. Wong, L. Zeng, M. O. Keefe, and S. Finn. 2021. “What Do Retweets Indicate? Results from User Survey and Meta-Review of Research.” Proceedings of the Ninth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 9 (1): 658–661.
  • Mosleh, M., C. Martel, D. Eckles, and D. G. Rand. 2021. “Shared Partisanship Dramatically Increases Social tie Formation in a Twitter Field Experiment.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118 (7), Doi: 10.1073/pnas.2022761118.
  • Newman, M. E. J. 2003. “The Structure and Function of Complex Networks.” SIAM Review 45 (2): 167–256.
  • Pilet, J.-B., F. Tronconi, P. Onate, and L. Verzichelli. 2014. “Career Patterns in Multilevel Systems.” In Representing the People: A Survey among Members of Statewide and sub-State Parliaments, edited by Kris Deschouwer, and Sam Depauw, 209–226. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Plotkowiak, T., and K. Stanoevska-Slabeva. 2013. “German Politicians and Their Twitter Networks in the Bundestag Election 2009.” First Monday 18 (5-6).
  • Poirier, J. 2002. “Formal Mechanisms of Intergovernmental Relations in Belgium.” Regional and Federal Studies 12 (3): 32–50.
  • Put, G.-H., J. Smulders, and B. Maddens. 2014. Een Analyse van het Profiel van de Vlaamse Verkozenen bij de Kamerverkiezingen van 1987 Tot en Met 2014. Leuven: KU Leuven.
  • Schakel, A. H., L. Hooghe, and G. Marks. 2015. “Multilevel Governance and the State.” In The Oxford Handbook of Transformations of The State, edited by Stephan Leibfried, Evelyne Huber, Matthew Lange, Jonah D. Levy, and John D. Stephens, 269–285. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Seymour, M., and A.-G. Gagnon. 2012. Multinational Federalism: Problems and Prospects. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Shorish, J., and R. Ackland. 2014. “Political Homophily on the Web.” In Analyzing Social Media Data and Web Networks, edited by Marta Cantijoch, Rachel Gibson, and Stephen Ward, 25–46. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Sunstein, C. R. 2007. Republic.com 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Swenden, W. 2006. Federalism and Regionalism in Western Europe. A Comparative and Thematic Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Swenden, W., and M. T. Jans. 2006. “Will It Stay or Will It Go?’ Federalism and the Sustainability of Belgium.” West European Politics 29 (5): 877–894.
  • Tsvetovat, M., and A. Kouznetsov. 2011. Social Network Analysis for Startups: Finding Connections on the Social Web. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.
  • Vanlangenakker, I., B. Maddens, and G. J. Put. 2013. “Career Patterns in Multilevel States: An Analysis of the Belgian Regions.” Regional Studies 47 (3): 356–367.
  • Vliet, L., P. van Törnberg, and J. Uitermark. 2021. “Political Systems and Political Networks: The Structure of Parliamentarians’ Retweet Networks in 19 Countries.” International Journal of Communication 15 (0): 21.
  • Watts, R. L. 2008. Comparing Federal Systems. 3rd ed. Kingston: Queens University.
  • Weaver, I. S., H. Williams, I. Cioroianu, M. Williams, T. Coan, and S. Banducci. 2018. “Dynamic Social Media Affiliations among UK Politicians.” Social Networks 54: 132–144.
  • Wüest, B., C. Mueller, and T. Willi. 2021. “Controlled Networking: Organizational Cohesion and Programmatic Coherence of Swiss Parties on Twitter.” Party Politics 27 (3): 581–596.