https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8530-7105
References
- Ball, S. (2007). Education Plc. Understanding private sector participation in public sector education. London/New York: Routledge.
- Ball, S. (2012). Global education Inc. New policy networks and the neo-liberal imaginary. London/New York: Routledge.
- Biesta, G. J. J. (2021). Higher education in the impulse society: For a university that teaches. In C. Bohndick, M. Bülow-Schramm, D. Paul, & G. Reinmann (Eds.), Hochschullehre im Spannungsfeld zwischen individueller und institutioneller Verantwortung (pp. 10–18). New York: Springer.
- Feinberg, W. (2001). Choice, autonomy, need-definition and educational reform. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 20(5), 402–409.
- Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York: Routledge.
- King-Rice, J. (2003). Teacher quality: Understanding the effectiveness of teacher attributes. Washington DC: Economic Policy Institute.
- Kliebard, H. W. (2004). The struggle for the American curriculum, 1893-1958 (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
- Labaree, D. (2010). Someone has to fail: The zero-sum game of public schooling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- McKinsey & Co. (2007). McKinsey report: How the world’s best performing school systems come out on top. Retrieved from https://www.bing.com/search?q=McKinsey+Report%3A+How+the+world%27s+best+performing+school+systems+come+out+on+top.&cvid=ce9e2544fd98491082e83d5975a00c7b&aqs=edge.69i57.317j0j4&FORM=ANAB01&PC=U531
- OECD. (2005). Teachers matter: Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers. Paris: Author.
- Ravitch, D. (2011). The death and life of the great American school system. New York: Basic Books.