The effectiveness of academic workload models in an institution: a staff perspective

References

• Academic Workload Guidelines. (2012). University of Tasmania. Retrieved from http://www.human-resources.utas.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/257891/Academic-Workload-Guidelines-2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ASA. (2006–2008). Academic staff agreement. Tasmania: University of Tasmania.
   Google Scholar
• ASA. (2010–2012). Academic staff agreement. Tasmania: University of Tasmania.
   Google Scholar
• ASA. (2013–2016). Academic staff agreement. Tasmania: University of Tasmania.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Council of Deans of Education Inc. (ACDE). (2002). Selling firm foundations: Financing higher education. Submission to the Department of Education, Science & Training. Melbourne Training.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Vice-Chancellors’ Committee (AVCC). (2004). Laying the foundations. AVCC Submission to the Review of the Indexation of University Funding.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, R., & Middlehurst, R. (1993). The lost profession. Higher Education in Europe, 18(2), 110–128. doi:10.1080/0379772930180209
   Google Scholar
• Bellamy, S., Morley, C., & Watty, K. (2003). Why business academics remain in Australian universities despite deteriorating working conditions and reduced job satisfaction: An intellectual puzzle. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 25, 13–28. doi:10.1080/13600800305740
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Coates, H., Goedegebuure, L., van der Lee, J., & Meek, L. (2008). The Australian academic profession in 2001: A first analysis of survey results (A CHELP_ACER report). Melbourne: Centre for Higher Education Management and Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. (2008). Review of Australian higher education, final report. Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace relations.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, K., & Treadgold, E. (2007). Changing patterns of governance for Australian universities. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(1), 13–29. doi:10.1080/07294360601166786
   Google Scholar
• Henkel, M. (2007). Academic identities and policy change in higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Houston, D., Meyer, L.H., & Paewai, S. (2006). Academic staff workloads and job satisfaction: Expectations and values in academe. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 28(1), 17–30. doi:10.1080/13600800500283734
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, A.L., & Morgan, K. (2009). The vanishing idea of a scholarly life: Workload calculations and the loss of academic integrity in Western Sydney. Australian Universities Review, 51(2), 62–69.
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, J., Fluck, A., & Jetson, T. (2012). Placing a value on academic work. Australian Universities’ Review, 54(2), 50–60.
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, J.D.J. (2008). Efficiency and effectiveness in higher education: Who is accountable for what? Australian Universities Review, 50(1), 11–20.
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, J.D.J. (2009). Work-based research in a large organisation: The transformation from change agent to researcher. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 14(4), 369–385. doi:10.1080/13596740903360943
   Google Scholar
• Kwok, J.T. (2013). Impact of ERA research assessment on university behaviour and their staff. South Melbourne: National Tertiary Education Union (NTEU). Retrieved from http://issuu.com/nteu/docs/impact_of_era
   Google Scholar
• Langford, P.H. (2010). Benchmarking work practices and outcomes in Australian universities using an employee survey. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 32(1), 41–53. doi:10.1080/13600800903440543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, M., & Ingersoll, L. (2010). Regulated autonomy or autonomous regulation? Collective bargaining and academic workloads in Australian universities. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 32(2), 137–148. doi:10.1080/13600800903440592
   Google Scholar
• Marginson, S., & Considine, M. (2000). The enterprise university: Power, governance and reinvention in Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P. (1998). What makes a university effective? Griffiths University Inaugural Professional Lectures. Queensland: Griffith Institute for Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Soliman, I. (1999, 12–15July). The academic workload problematic. Paper presented at HERDSA Annual International Conference, Melbourne. Retrieved from http://www.herdsa.org.au/wpcontent/uploads/conference/1999/pdf/Soliman.PDF]
   Google Scholar
• Vardi, I. (2009). The impacts of different types of workload allocation models on academic satisfaction and working life. Higher Education, 57, 499–508. doi:10.1007/s10734-008-9159-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeichner, K., & Noffke, S. (2001). Practitioner research. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 298–330). Washington, DC: AERA.
   Google Scholar