Spotlight on ethics: institutional review boards as systemic bullies

References

• AAUP. (2000). Protecting human beings: Institutional review boards and social science research. American Association of University Professors. Retrieved from http://www.aaup.org/report/institutional-review-boards-and-social-science-research
   Google Scholar
• Abbott, L., & Grady, C. (2011). A systematic review of the empirical literature evaluating IRBs: What we know and what we still need to learn. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: An International Journal, 6, 3–20. doi:10.1525/jer.2011.6.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amdur, R.J., & Biddle, C. (1997). Institutional review board approval and publication of human research results. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 277, 909–914. doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03540350059034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annas, G.J. (2001). Reforming informed consent to genetic research. Journal of the American Medical Association, 286, 2326–2328. doi:10.1001/jama.286.18.2326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bledsoe, C.H., Sherin, B., Galinsky, A.G., & Headley, N.M. (2007). Regulating creativity: Research and survival in the IRB iron cage. Northwestern University Law Review, 101, 593–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyes, W.J., Happel, S.K., & Hogan, T.D. (1984). Publish or perish: Fact or fiction? The Journal of Economic Education, 15, 136–141. doi:10.1080/00220485.1984.10845061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J.G. (1998). Institutional review boards: A time for reform. (OEI-01-97-00193). Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-01-97-00193.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brunstein, K.A., Sourander, A., & Gould, M. (2010). The association of suicide and bullying in childhood to young adulthood: A review of cross-sectional and longitudinal research findings. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. Revue Canadienne de Psychiatrie, 55, 282–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Code of Federal Regulations. (2009). Title 45 – Public welfare C.F.R. § 46 – Protection of human subjects. Washington, DC: United States Congress.
   Google Scholar
• Cowie, H., Naylor, P., Rivers, I., Smith, P.K., & Pereira, B. (2002). Measuring workplace bullying. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 33–51. doi:10.1016/S1359-1789(00)00034-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dake, J.A., Price, J.H., & Telljohann, S.K. (2003). The nature and extent of bullying at school. Journal of School Health, 73, 173–180. doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2003.tb03599.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeHue, F., Bolman, C., & Völlink, T. (2008). Cyberbullying: Youngsters’ experiences and parental perception. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11, 217–223. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.0008
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dellasega, C.A. (2009). Bullying among nurses. AJN, American Journal of Nursing, 109, 52–58. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000344039.11651.08
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dougherty, D.S., & Kramer, M.W. (2005a). Organizational power and the institutional review board. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 33, 277–284. doi:10.1080/00909880500149494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dougherty, D.S., & Kramer, M.W. (2005b). A rationale for scholarly examination of institutional review boards: A case study. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 33, 183–188. doi:10.1080/00909880500149270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dziak, K., Anderson, R., Sevick, M.A., Weisman, C.S., Levine, D.W., & Scholle, S.H. (2005). Variations among institutional review board reviews in a multisite health services research study. Health Services Research, 40, 279–290. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00353.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einarsen, S., & Raknes, B.I. (1997). Harassment at work and the victimization of men. Violence and Victims, 12, 247–263.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feeley, M.M. (2007). Legality, social research, and the challenge of institutional review boards. Law & Society Review, 41, 757–776. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00322.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, C.J., San Miguel, C., Kilburn, J.C., & Sanchez, P. (2007). The effectiveness of school-based anti-bullying programs: A meta-analytic review. Criminal Justice Review, 32, 401–414. doi:10.1177/0734016807311712
   Google Scholar
• Fitch, K.L. (2005). Difficult interactions between IRBs and investigators: Applications and solutions. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 33, 269–276. doi:10.1080/00909880500149486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucar, E. (2002). How much oversight is necessary to protect human subjects? JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 287, 716–717. doi:10.1001/jama.287.6.716-a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, J., & Katz, M.D. (1982). Inconsistency and institutional review boards. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 248, 197–202. doi:10.1001/jama.1982.03330020041027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, L.A., Lowery, J.C., Kowalski, C.P., & Wyszewianski, L. (2006). Impact of institutional review board practice variation on observational health services research. Health Services Research, 41, 214–230. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00458.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunsalus, C.K., Bruner, E.M., Burbules, N.C., Dash, L., Finkin, M., Goldberg, J.P., … Aronson, D. (2007). The Illinois white paper: Improving the system for protecting human subjects: Counteracting IRB ‘Mission Creep’. Qualitative Inquiry, 13, 617–649. doi:10.1177/1077800407300785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, A. (2005). The development and operation of IRBs: Medical regulations and social science. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 33, 189–203. doi:10.1080/00909880500149353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammerschmidt, D.E., & Keane, M.A. (1992). Institutional review board (IRB) review lacks impact on the readability of consent forms for research. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 304, 348–351. doi:10.1097/00000441-199212000-00003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, Å.M., Hogh, A., Persson, R., Karlson, B., Garde, A.H., & Ørbæk, P. (2006). Bullying at work, health outcomes, and physiological stress response. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 60, 63–72. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.06.078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirshon, J.M., Krugman, S.D., Witting, M.D., Furuno, J.P., Limcangco, M.R., Perisse, A.R., & Rasch, E.K. (2002). Variability in institutional review board assessment of minimal-risk research. Academic Emergency Medicine, 9, 1417–1420. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2002.tb01612.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornstein, H. (1996). Brutal bosses: And their prey. New York, NY: Riverhead Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, M., Vickers, M.H., Wilkes, L., & Jackson, D. (2010). A typology of bullying behaviours: The experiences of Australian nurses. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 19, 2319–2328. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03160.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith-Spiegel, P., & Koocher, G.P. (2005). The IRB paradox: Could the protectors also encourage deceit? Ethics & Behavior, 15, 339–349. doi:10.1207/s15327019eb1504_5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klitzman, R. (2011). The ethics police?: IRBs’ views concerning their power. PLos One, 6(12), e28773. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koerner, A.F. (2005). Communication scholars’ communication and relationship with their IRBs. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 33, 231–241. doi:10.1080/00909880500149395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, M.W., Miller, V.D., & Commuri, S. (2009). Faculty and institutional review board communication. Communication Education, 58, 497–515. doi:10.1080/03634520903006208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krousel-Wood, M., Muntner, P., Jannu, A., Hyre, A., & Breault, J. (2006). Does waiver of written informed consent from the institutional review board affect response rate in a low-risk research study? Journal of Investigative Medicine, 54, 174–179. doi:10.2310/6650.2006.05031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lariscy, R.W. (2009). IRBs and communication research: Some perplexing issues. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53, 668–671. doi:10.1080/08838150903333098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, D., & Rayner, C. (2003). Bullying and human resource management. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace: International perspectives in research and practice (pp. 370–382). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Leymann, H. (1990). Mobbing and psychological terror at workplaces. Violence and Victims, 5(2), 119–126.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leymann, H. (1996). The content and development of mobbing at work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 165–184. doi:10.1080/13594329608414853
   Google Scholar
• Librett, M., & Perrone, D. (2010). Apples and oranges: Ethnography and the IRB. Qualitative Research, 10, 729–747. doi:10.1177/1468794110380548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y.S., & Tierney, W.G. (2004). Qualitative research and institutional review boards. Qualitative Inquiry, 10, 219–234. doi:10.1177/1077800403262361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marais, S., & Herman, M. (1997). Corporate hyenas at work: How to spot and out with them by being hyenawise. Petoria: Kagiso.
   Google Scholar
• McKay, R., Arnold, D.H., Fratzl, J., & Thomas, R. (2008). Workplace bullying in academia: A Canadian study. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 20, 77–100. doi:10.1007/s10672-008-9073-3
   Google Scholar
• Menikoff, J. (2007). Where’s the law-Uncovering the truth about IRBs and censorship. Northwestern University Law Review, 101, 791–800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Namie, G., & Namie, R. (2000). The bully at work: What you can do to stop the hurt and reclaim your dignity on the job. Naperville, IL: Sourcebooks.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Act. (1974). P.L. 93–348. C.F.R. Washington, DC: United States Congress.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, M.B., Matthiesen, S.B., & Einarsen, S. (2010). The impact of methodological moderators on prevalence rates of workplace bullying. A meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 955–979. doi:10.1348/096317909X481256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuremberg Code. (1949). Trials of war criminals before the Nuremberg military tribunals under Control Council law. No.10 (Vol. 2, pp. 181–182). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• O’Moore, M., & Kirkham, C. (2001). Self-esteem and its relationship to bullying behaviour. Aggressive Behavior, 27, 269–283. doi:10.1002/ab.1010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojala, K., & Nesdale, D. (2004). Bullying and social identity: The effects of group norms and distinctiveness threat on attitudes towards bullying. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 22, 19–35. doi:10.1348/026151004772901096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olweus, D. (1993). Victimization by peers: Antecedents and long-term outcomes. In K.H. Rubin & J.B. Asendorpf (Eds.), Social withdrawal, inhibition, and shyness in childhood (pp. 315–341). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Olweus, D. (1994). Bullying at school. In L.R. Huesmann (Ed.), Aggressive behaviour: Current perspectives (pp. 97–130). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olweus, D. (1999). Sweden. In P.K. Smith, Y. Morita, J. Junger-Tas, D. Olweus, R.F. Catalano, & P. Slee (Eds.), The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective (pp. 7–27). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Olweus, D. (2003). A profile of bullying at school. Educational Leadership, 60(6), 12–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, C. (1998). Workplace bullying: Do something! Journal of Occupational Health and Safety Australia and New Zealand, 14, 581–585.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, C., & Hoel, H. (1997). A summary review of literature relating to workplace bullying. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 7, 181–191. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1298(199706)7:3<181::AID-CASP416>3.0.CO;2-Y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosser, V.J. (2004). Faculty members’ intentions to leave: A national study on their worklife and satisfaction. Research in Higher Education, 45, 285–309. doi:10.1023/B:RIHE.0000019591.74425.f1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salancik, G.R., & Pfeffer, J. (1977). Who gets power – and how they hold on to it: A strategic-contingency model of power. Organizational Dynamics, 5(3), 3–21. doi:10.1016/0090-2616(77)90028-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleem, T., & Khalid, U. (2011). Institutional review boards–A mixed blessing. International Archives of Medicine, 4, 19. doi:10.1186/1755-7682-4-19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1–15. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1996)22:1<1::AID-AB1>3.0.CO;2-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sansone, R.A., McDonald, S., Hanley, P., Sellbom, M., & Gaither, G.A. (2004). The stipulations of one institutional review board: A five year review. Journal of Medical Ethics, 30, 308–310. doi:10.1136/jme.2002.002105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shweder, R.A. (2006). Protecting human subjects and preserving academic freedom: Prospects at the University of Chicago. American Ethnologist, 33, 507–518. doi:10.1525/ae.2006.33.4.507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark, L. (2007). Victims in our own minds? IRBs in myth and practice. Law & Society Review, 41, 777–786. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00323.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tokunaga, R.S. (2010). Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 277–287. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, R.F. (2007). Institutional review board mission creep. The Independent Review, 11, 547–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapf, D. (1999). Organisational, work group related and personal causes of mobbing/bullying at work. International Journal of Manpower, 20, 70–85. doi:10.1108/01437729910268669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapf, D., Escartín, J., Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., & Vartia, M. (2011). Empirical findings on prevalence and risk groups of bullying in the workplace. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C.L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Developments in theory, research and practice (pp. 75–105). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar