Predicting higher education outcomes and implications for a postsecondary institution ratings system

References

• American Council on Education. (2014, January 31). Letter to Richard Reeves, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.acenet.edu/news-room/Documents/Higher-Ed-Assoc-PIRS-Comments.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Assistance, S.F. (2014). Hearing Transcript-Postsecondary Institution Ratings System: Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance. 113th Cong. 2.
   Google Scholar
• Bettinger, E.P. (2012). Financial aid: A blunt instrument for increasing degree attainment. In A.P. Kelly & M. Schneider (Eds.), Getting to graduation: The complete agenda in higher education.Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, Project MUSE.
   Google Scholar
• Blumenstyk, G. (2015). Lessons from the Education Department’s ratings reversal. Chronicle of Higher Education, 61(40), A4.
   Google Scholar
• Hauptman, A.M. (2012). Increasing higher education attainment in the United States: Challenges and opportunities. In A.P. Kelly & M. Schneider (Eds.), Getting to graduation: The complete agenda in higher education. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, Project MUSE.
   Google Scholar
• Hazelkorn, E. (2015). Rankings and the reshaping of higher education: The battle for world-class excellence. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Higher Education Act of 1965. (2014). 20 U.S.C. 1015 Introduction: A different kind of college ranking. (Cover story). Washington Monthly, 46(9/10), 19–22.
   Google Scholar
• Hosch, B.J. (2008, November). Institutional and student characteristics that predict graduation and retention rates. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the North East Association for Institutional Research, Providence, RI.
   Google Scholar
• Kelchen, R. (2014). Federal college ratings: A primer and potential implications. Journal of College Admission, 225, 12–15.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, A.P., & Schneider, M. (2012). Getting to graduation: The completion agenda in higher education. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press, Project MUSE.
   Google Scholar
• Lewontin, M. (2014). 4 key questions experts are asking about Obama’s college-ratings plan. Chronicle of Higher Education, 61(4), A14.
   Google Scholar
• Meredith, M. (2004). Why do universities compete in the ratings game? An empirical analysis of the effects of the US news and world report college rankings. Research in Higher Education, 45(5), 443–461. doi:10.1023/B:RIHE.0000032324.46716.f4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, J.M. (2009). Consumer-driven reform of higher education: A critical look at new amendments to the higher education act. Journal of Law and Policy, 17, 531–578.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2015). Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) Data Center. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, A., & Kelly, A.P. (2014). Access, affordability, and success: How do America’s colleges fare, and what could it mean for the President’s ratings plan? Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Roksa, J. (2015). Gradations or extremes: Another look at the college ratings. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 47(2), 62–67. doi:10.1080/00091383.2015.1019318
   Google Scholar
• Stecklow, S. (1995). Cheat sheets: College inflate SATs and graduation rates in popular guidebooks. Wall Street Journal A, 1, A6.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, B.K. (2002). Transfer rates: A problematic criterion for measuring the community college. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2002(117), 13–24. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1536-0733
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Education. (2015a). US department of education: College ratings system. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/documents/college-completion/college-ratings-overview.pdf
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Education. (2015b). A new system of college ratings – Invitation to comment. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/documents/college-affordability/framework-invitation-comment.pdf
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Education. (2015c). Integrated postsecondary education data system glossary. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/glossary/
   Google Scholar
• Viaene, J., & Zilcha, I. (2013). Public funding of higher education. Journal of Public Economics, 108, 78–89. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.09.008
   Google Scholar
• Ward, N.L. (2006). Improving equity and access for low-income and minority youth into institutions of higher education. Urban Education, 41(1), 50–70. doi:10.1177/0042085905282253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar