Becoming an interdisciplinary scientist: an analysis of students’ experiences in three computer science doctoral programmes

References

• Amabile, T.M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to ‘The social psychology of creativity’. Oxford: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Bammer, G. (2005). Integration and implementation sciences: Building a new specialization. Ecology & Society, 10(2), 95–107.
   Google Scholar
• Billett, S. (1998). Understanding workplace learning: Cognitive and sociocultural perspectives. In D. Boud (Ed.), Current issues and new agendas in workplace learning (pp. 47–68). Adelaide: NCVER.
   Google Scholar
• Billett, S. (2006). Relational interdependence between social and individual agency in work and working life. Mind, Culture, & Activity, 13(1), 53–69. doi:10.1207/s15327884mca1301_5
   Google Scholar
• Boden, D., Borrego, M., & Newswander, L.K. (2011). Student socialization in interdisciplinary doctoral education. Higher Education, 62(6), 741–755. doi:10.1007/s10734-011-9415-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrego, M., & Newswander, L.K. (2008). Characteristics of successful cross-disciplinary engineering education collaborations. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(2), 123–134. doi:10.1002/jee.2008.97.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrego, M., & Newswander, L.K. (2010). Definitions of interdisciplinary research: Toward graduate-level interdisciplinary learning outcomes. The Review of Higher Education, 34(1), 61–84. doi:10.1353/rhe.2010.0006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce, A., Lyall, C., Tait, J., & Williams, R. (2004). Interdisciplinary integration in Europe: The case of the fifth framework programme. Futures, 36(4), 457–470. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calatrava Moreno, M.C., Auzinger, T., & Werthner, H. (2016). On the uncertainty of interdisciplinarity measurements due to incomplete bibliographic data. Scientometrics, 107(1), 213–232. doi:10.1007/s11192-016-1842-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European University Association. (2007). Doctoral programmes in Europe’s universities: Achievements and challenges. Brussels: Author.
   Google Scholar
• European University Association. (2010). Salzburg II recommendations. European universities achievements since 2005 in implementing the Salzburg Principles. Report prepared for European Universities and Ministers of Higher Education. Brussels: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Gagné, M., & Deci, E.L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362. doi:10.1002/job.v26:4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiger, R.L., & Sá, C.M. (2008). Tapping the riches of science: Universities and the promise of economic growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Golde, C.M., & Gallagher, H.A. (1999). The challenges of conducting interdisciplinary research in traditional doctoral programs. Ecosystems, 2(4), 281–285. doi:10.1007/s100219900076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holley, K. (2009). The challenge of an interdisciplinary curriculum: A cultural analysis of a doctoral-degree program in neuroscience. Higher Education, 58(2), 241–255. doi:10.1007/s10734-008-9193-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood, N. (2010). Doctoral experience and learning from a sociocultural perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 35(7), 829–843. doi:10.1080/03075070903348412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, J.S. (1994). Geographical proximity and scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 31(1), 31–43. doi:10.1007/BF02018100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kehm, B. (2006). Doctoral education in Germany within the European framework. In G. Gorzka & U. Lanzendorf (Eds.), Europeanising doctoral studies: The Russian Federation and Germany on the way to Bologna (pp. 51–70). Kassel: Unidruckerei.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, J.T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lattuca, L.R. (2002). Learning interdisciplinarity: Sociocultural perspectives on academic work. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(6), 711–739. doi:10.1353/jhe.2002.0054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misra, S., Harvey, R.H., Stokols, D., Pine, K.H., Fuqua, J., Shokair, S.M., & Whiteley, J.M. (2009). Evaluating an interdisciplinary undergraduate training program in health promotion research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 36(4), 358–365. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.11.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, J.M. (2008). Transdisciplinary training: Key components and prerequisites for success. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(2), S133–S140. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Academies. (2004). Facilitating interdisciplinary research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation. (2006). Investing in America’s future: Strategic plan. Tech. Rep. Arlington, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Nyhagen, G.M., & Baschung, L. (2013). New organisational structures and the transformation of academic work. Higher Education, 66(4), 409–423. doi:10.1007/s10734-013-9612-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pecher, H., & Thomas, J. (2004). Austria. In J. Sadlak (Ed.), Doctoral studies and qualifications in Europe and the United States: Status and prospects (pp. 13–35). Bucharest: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Pfirman, S., & Martin, P.J. (2010). Facilitating interdisciplinary scholars. In R. Frodeman, J.T. Klein, & C. Mitcham (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (pp. 387–403). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, A.L., & Rafols, I. (2009). Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time. Scientometrics, 81(3), 719–745. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-2197-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, J., Lancaster, F.W., & Allen, B. (1997). Types and levels of collaboration in interdisciplinary research in the sciences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(10), 893–916. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafols, I., & Meyer, M. (2007). How cross-disciplinary is bionanotechnology? Explorations in the specialty of molecular motors. Scientometrics, 70(3), 633–650. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-0305-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values (Vol. 438). New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfield, P.L. (1992). The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences. Social Science & Medicine, 35(11), 1343–1357. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(92)90038-R
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sá, C.M. (2008). ‘Interdisciplinary strategies’ in US research universities. Higher Education, 55(5), 537–552. doi:10.1007/s10734-007-9073-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, R.A., & Chen, L. (2009). Developing a framework for work integrated research higher degree studies in an Australian engineering context. European Journal of Engineering Education, 34(2), 155–169. doi:10.1080/03043790902833325
   Google Scholar
• Stokols, D. (2014). Training the next generation of transdisciplinarians. In M. O’Rourke, S. Crowley, S.D. Eigenbrode, & J. Wulfhorst (Eds.), Enhancing communication & collaboration in interdisciplinary research (pp. 56–81). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tedre, M. (2014). The science of computing: Shaping a discipline. New York, NY: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Välimaa, J. (1998). Culture and identity in higher education research. Higher Education, 36(2), 119–138. doi:10.1023/A:1003248918874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Rijnsoever, F.J., Hessels, L.K., & Vandeberg, R.L. (2008). A resource-based view on the interactions of university researchers. Research Policy, 37(8), 1255–1266. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, C.A. (1998). Building a care and research team. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 160(2), 137–140. doi:10.1016/S0022-510X(98)00213-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar