Leadership challenges of strategic research centres in relation to degree of institutionalisation

References

• Alon, U. (2010). How to build a motivated research group. Molecular Cell, 37, 151–152. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2010.01.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bammer, G. (2008). Enhancing research collaborations: Three key management challenges. Research Policy, 37, 875–887. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boardman, P.C., & Corley, E.A. (2008). University research centers and the composition of research collaborations. Research Policy, 37, 900–913. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolden, R. (2011). Distributed leadership in organizations: A review of theory and research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13, 251–269. doi:10.1111/ijmr.2011.13.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolden, R., Gosling, J., O’Brien, A., Peters, K., Ryan, M., & Haslam, S.A. (2012). Academic leadership: Changing conceptions, identities and experiences in UK higher education. London: Leadership Foundation for Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., & Boardman, P.C. (2003). Managing the new multipurpose, multidiscipline University Research Centers: Institutional innovation in the academic community. Washington, DC: IBM Endowment for the Business of Government.
   Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., & Corley, E.A. (2004). Scientists’ collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33, 599–616. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., Youtie, J., & Libaers, D. (2005). Institutional design and the organization of research: A cross-case analysis of National Institutes of Health Research Centers. Atlanta, GA: Research Value Mapping Program, Georgia Tech.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T. (2012). Global ideas and modern public sector reforms: A theoretical elaboration and empirical discussion of a neoinstitutional theory. The American Review of Public Administration, 42, 635–653. doi:10.1177/0275074012452113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coghlan, D., & Brannick, T. (2010). Doing action research in your own organisation. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Corley, E.A., Boardman, P.C., & Bozeman, B. (2006). Design and the management of multi-institutional research collaborations: Theoretical implications from two case studies. Research Policy, 35, 975–993. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, A., & Kallick, B. (1993). Through the lens of a critical friend. Educational Leadership, 51, 49–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erno-Kjolhede, E., Husted, K., Monsted, M., & Barlebo Wenneberg, S. (2001). Managing university research in the triple helix. Science and Public Policy, 28, 49–55. doi:10.3152/147154301781781679
   Google Scholar
• Franken, M., Penney, D., & Branson, C. (2015). Middle leaders’ learning in a university context. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 37, 190–203. doi:10.1080/1360080X.2015.1019120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield, E. (1986). The 1000 articles most cited in 1961–1982. Essays of an Information Scientist, 9, 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Heinze, T., & Kuhlmann, S. (2008). Across institutional boundaries? Research collaboration in German public sector nanoscience. Research Policy, 37, 888–899. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinze, T., Shapira, P., Rogers, J.D., & Senker, J.M. (2009). Organizational and institutional influences on creativity in scientific research. Research Policy, 38, 610–623. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemlin, S., Allwood, C.M., & Martin, B.R. (2008). Creative knowledge environments. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 196–210. doi:10.1080/10400410802060018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollingsworth, J.R. (2003). Research organisations and major discoveries in twentieth-century science: A case study of excellence in biomedical research. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung.
   Google Scholar
• Laine, P., & Kuoppakangas, P. (2015). A reconceptualization of change strategy – One application of dilemma theory. Journal of Change Management, 15, 332–352. doi:10.1080/14697017.2015.1058845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lashtiotakis, H., Sigurdson, K., & Creso, M. (2013). Pursuing scientific excellence globally: Internationalising research as a policy target. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35, 612–625. doi:10.1080/1360080X.2013.844664
   Google Scholar
• Mallon, W.T. (2006). The benefits and challenges of research centers and institutes in academic medicine: Findings from six universities and their medical schools. Academic Medicine, 81, 502–512. doi:10.1097/01.ACM.0000225212.77088.10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallon, W.T., & Bunton, S.A. (2005). Research centers and institutes in U.S. Medical Schools: A descriptive analysis. Academic Medicine, 80, 1005–1011. doi:10.1097/00001888-200511000-00007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melander, F. (2006). Lokal forskningspolitik. Institutionell dynamik och organisatorisk omvandling vid Lunds universitet 1980–2005 [Local research policy. Institutional dynamics and organizational transformation at Lund University 1980–2005]. In Lund political studies (pp. 145). Lund: Department of Political Science, Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J.W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363. doi:10.1086/226550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myklebust, J.P. (2012). Top research universities show how to beat the economic squeeze. University World News Global Edition, 215, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Nordling, L. (2010). A tale of two Scandinavian cities. Research funding changes trigger hiring in Lund but firing in Copenhagen. Nature News, 100311, 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Öquist, G., & Benner, M. (2012). Fostering breakthrough research: A comparative study. Stockholm: The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B.G. (2012). Institutional theory in political science: The “New Institutionalism”. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, A.M. (1990). Longitudinal field research on change, theory and practice. Organization Science, 1(3), 267–292. doi:10.1287/orsc.1.3.267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponomariov, B.L., & Boardman, P.C. (2010). Influencing scientists’ collaboration and productivity patterns through new institutions: University research centers and scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 39, 613–624. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabharwal, M., & Hu, Q. (2013). Participation in university-based research centers: Is it helping or hurting researchers? Research Policy, 42, 1301–1311. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W.R. (2007). Institutions and organisations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Swaffield, S. (2004). Critical friends: Supporting leadership, improving learning. Improving Schools, 7, 267–278. doi:10.1177/1365480204049340
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Research Council. (2015). Evaluation of the strategic research area initiative 2010–2014. Stockholm: Swedish Research Council. ISBN 978-91-7307-282-3.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Research Council. (2016). The research barometer 2016. Stockholm: Swedish Research Council. ISBN 978-91-7307-311-0.
   Google Scholar
• Tönnies, F. (1887/1963). Community and sociology. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Uhl-Bien, M. (2006). Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 654–676. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar