When and why do university managers use publication incentive payments?

References

• Andersen, L.B., & Pallesen, T. (2008). Not just for the money? How financial incentives affect the number of publications at Danish research institutions. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 28–47. doi:10.1080/10967490801887889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becher, T., & Trowler, P.R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories. Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines (2nd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beer, M., & Cannon, M.D. (2004). Promise and peril in implementing pay-for-performance. Human Resource Management, 43(1), 3–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellé, N. (2010). Così fan tutte? Adoption and rejection of performance-related pay in Italian municipalities: A cross-sector test of isomorphism. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 30(2), 166–188. doi:10.1177/0734371X09360177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, M.E. (2008). Research quality assessment and the metrication of the social sciences. European Political Science, 7, 52–63. doi:10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P.J., & Powell, W.W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. doi:10.2307/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, B.S., Homberg, F., & Osterloh, M. (2013). Organizational control systems and pay-for-performance in the public service. Organizational Studies, 34(7), 949–972. doi:10.1177/0170840613483655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, T.C. (1987). Beyond monopoly. Laweyers, state crises, and professional empowerment. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, H.F. (2011). University reforms in Denmark and the challenges for political science. European Political Science, 10, 235–247. doi:10.1057/eps.2010.21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingraham, P.W. (1993). Of pigs in pokes and policy diffusion: Another look at pay-for-performance. Public Administration Review, 53(4), 348–356. doi:10.2307/977147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristensen, J.E., Nørreklit, H., & Raffnsøe-Møller, M. (2011). University performance management at Danish Universities. In J.E. Kristensen, H. Nørreklit, & M. Raffnsøe-Møller (Eds.), University performance management. The silent managerial revolution at Danish Universities. Copenhagen: DJØF Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• March, J.G., & Olsen, J.P. (2006). The logic of appropriateness. In M. Moran, M. Rein, & R.E. Goodin (Ed.), Oxford handbook of public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J.W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. doi:10.1086/226550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R.K. (1973). The normative structure of science. In R.K. Merton (Ed.), The sociology of science. Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. (1981). Organizational design: Fashion or fit? Harvard Business Review, 1981(January–February), 103–116.
   Google Scholar
• Moderniseringsstyrelsen (2012). Personaleadministrativ vejledning. Retrieved from http://pav.perst.dk/Om%20PAV.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. (2005). Why and how do state governments adopt and implement “Managing for Results” reforms? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(2), 219–243. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2005). Performance-related pay policies for government policies. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Ouchi, W.G. (1979). A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Science, 25, 833–848. doi:10.1287/mnsc.25.9.833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S., & Berry, F. (2014). Successful diffusion of a failed policy. The case of pay-for-performance in the US federal government. Public Management Review, 16(6), 763–781. doi:10.1080/14719037.2012.750835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, J.L. (1986). Merit pay in the public sector: The case for a failure of theory. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 7(1), 57–69. doi:10.1177/0734371X8600700105
   Google Scholar
• Perry, J.L., Engbers, T., & Yun Jun, S. (2009). Back to the future? Performance-related pay. Empirical research and the perils of persistence. Public Administration Review, 2009(Januar | February), 39–51. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.01939_2.x
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C.C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry. Fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C.C., Drass, K.A., & Davey, S. (2006). Fuzzy-set/qualitative comparative analysis 2.0. Tucson, AZ: Department of Sociology, University of Arizona.
   Google Scholar
• Schack, J., & Wohlert, J. (2015). Sådan burger forskere deres arbejdstid (Notat 42 – 26.01.2015). Copenhagen: DEA.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W.R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests (3rd ed.). London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H.A. (1997). Administrative behavior (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Subramony, M. (2006). Why organizations adopt some human resource management practices and reject others: An exploration of rationales. Human Resource Management, 45(2), 195–210. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-050X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weibel, A., Rost, K., & Osterloh, M. (2010). Pay for performance in the public sector – Benefits and (hidden) costs. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(2), 387–412. doi:10.1093/jopart/mup009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar