4,591
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Reframing the university as an emergent organisation: implications for strategic management and leadership in higher education

& ORCID Icon

References

  • Askling, B., & Stensaker, B. (2002). Academic leadership: Prescriptions, practices and paradoxes. Tertiary Education and Management, 8(2), 113–125.
  • Bastedo, M.N. (2012). The organization of higher education: Managing colleges for a new era. Baltimore, MD: JHU Press.
  • Blaschke, S., Frost, J., & Hattke, F. (2014). Towards a micro foundation of leadership, governance, and management in universities. Higher Education, 68(5), 711–732.
  • Bleiklie, I., Enders, J., & Lepori, B. (2017). Managing universities: Policy and organizational change from a western european comparative perspective. Netherlands: Springer.
  • Bleiklie, I., & Lange, S. (2010). Competition and leadership as drivers in German and Norwegian university reforms. Higher Education Policy, 23(2), 173–193.
  • Bolden, R., Gosling, J., O’Brien, A., Peters, K., Ryan, M., Haslam, A., … Winklemann, K. (2012). Academic leadership: Changing conceptions, identities and experiences in UK higher education (p.). Leadership Foundation for Higher Education. doi:10.13140/2.1.1957.6009
  • Bolden, R., Petrov, G., & Gosling, J. (2008). Tensions in higher education leadership: Towards a multi-level model of leadership practice. Higher Education Quarterly, 62(4), 358–376.
  • Bolden, R., Petrov, G., & Gosling, J. (2009). Distributed leadership in higher education: Rhetoric and reality. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 37(2), 257–277.
  • Bolman, L.G., & Gallos, J.V. (2011). Reframing academic leadership (1st ed) ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Brunsson, N., & Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2000). Constructing organizations: The example of public sector reform. Organization Studies, 21(4), 721–746.
  • Bushe, G.R. (2010). Clear leadership: sustaining real collaboration and partnership at work. (Revised Edition). Boston: Nicholas Brealey.
  • Bushe, G.R., & Marshak, R.J. (2009). Revisioning organization development: Diagnostic and dialogic premises and patterns of practice. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 45(3), 348–368.
  • Bushe, G.R., & Marshak, R.J. (Eds.). (2015). Dialogic organization development: The theory and practice of transformational change (1st ed). Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, a BK Business book.
  • Bushe, G.R., & Marshak, R.J. (2016). The dialogic mindset: Leading emergent change in a complex world - ProQuest. Organization Development Journal, 34(1), 37–65.
  • Cameron, E., & Green, M. (2015). Making sense of change management: a complete guide to the models, tools and techniques of organizational change. London: Kogan Page Publishers.
  • Clark, B.R. (2004). Delineating the character of the entrepreneurial university. Higher Education Policy, 17(4), 355–370.
  • Cohen, M., March, J., & Olsen, J. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1–25.
  • Crevani, L., Lindgren, M., & Packendorff, J. (2010). Leadership, not leaders: On the study of leadership as practices and interactions. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26(1), 77–86.
  • Cummings, T.G., & Worley, C.G. (2015). Organization development & change ((10th ed.). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.
  • Cynthia, H., Thomas, L., & David, G. (2005). Discourse and collaboration: The role of conversations and collective identity. Academy of Management Journal, 30(1), 58–77.
  • De Boer, H.F., Enders, J., & Leisyte, L. (2007). Public sector reform in dutch higher education: The organizational transformation of the university. Public Administration, 85(1), 27–46.
  • Deem, R., & Brehony, K.J. (2005). Management as ideology: The case of ‘new managerialism’ in higher education. Oxford Review of Education, 31(2), 217–235.
  • Edwin, N., Melnick, J., & Nevis, S. (2008). Organizational change through powerful micro-level interventions the Cape Cod model. OD Practitioner, 40, 3.
  • Ekman, M., Lindgren, M., & Packendorff, J. (2017). Universities need leadership, academics need management: Discursive tensions and voids in the deregulation of Swedish higher education legislation. Higher Education, 1–23. doi:10.1007/s10734-017-0140-2
  • Enders, J., De Boer, H., & Weyer, E. (2013). Regulatory autonomy and performance: The reform of higher education re-visited. Higher Education, 65(1), 5–23.
  • Franco-Santos, M., Nalick, M., Rivera-Torres, P., & Gomez-Mejia, L. (2017). Governance and well-being in academia: Negative consequences of applying an agency theory logic in higher education: Governance and well-being in academia. British Journal of Management, 28(4), 711–730.
  • Frølich, N., Huisman, J., Slipersæter, S., Stensaker, B., & Bótas, P.C.P. (2013). A reinterpretation of institutional transformations in European higher education: Strategising pluralistic organisations in multiplex environments. Higher Education, 65(1), 79–93.
  • Frølich, N., Stensaker, B., & Huisman, J. (2017). Understanding $. In: Bleiklie, Ivar, Enders, Jürgen, Lepori, Benedetto (Eds.),Managing universities (pp. 167–188). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-53865-5_7
  • Fumasoli, T., & Huisman, J. (2013). Strategic agency and system diversity: Conceptualizing institutional positioning in higher education. Minerva, 51(2), 155–169.
  • Gornitzka, Å. (1999). Governmental policies and organisational change in higher education. Higher Education, 38(1), 5–31.
  • Grant, D., & Marshak, R.J. (2011). Toward a discourse-centered understanding of organizational change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47(2), 204–235.
  • Griffin, D., & Stacey, R.D. (2005). Complexity and the experience of leading organizations. Oxon and New York: Taylor & Francis.
  • HEFCE. (2008). HEFCE strategic plan 2006–11. Retrieved January 6, 2018, from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/data/year/2008/HEFCE,strategic,plan,2006-11,/
  • Hempsall, K. (2014). Developing leadership in higher education: Perspectives from the USA, the UK and Australia. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 36(4), 383–394.
  • Hinton, K.E. (2012). A practical guide to strategic planning in higher education. Retrieved from http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=3544821
  • Huisman, J., De, B.H., Dill, D.D., & Souto-Otero, M. (2016). The Palgrave International Handbook of Higher Education Policy and Governance. Netherlands: Springer.
  • Jarzabkowski, P., Balogun, J., & Seidl, D. (2007). Strategizing: The challenges of a practice perspective. Human Relations, 60(1), 5–27.
  • Johnson, B. (2014). Reflections: A perspective on paradox and its application to modern management. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50(2), 206–212.
  • Jones, S., & Harvey, M. (2017). A distributed leadership change process model for higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 39(2), 126–139.
  • Kezar, A. (2013a). How colleges change: Understanding, leading, and enacting change. Oxon and New York: Routledge.
  • Kezar, A. (2013b). Understanding sensemaking/sensegiving in transformational change processes from the bottom up. Higher Education, 65(6), 761–780.
  • Kezar, A.J., (Ed). (2008). Rethinking leadership in a complex, multicultural, and global environment: New concepts and models for higher education. In (1st ed). Sterling, Va: Stylus Pub.
  • Kezar, A.J., Carducci, R., & Contreras-McGavin, M. (2006). Rethinking th. ASHE Higher Education Report, 31(6), 1–218.
  • Kezar, A.J., & Lester, J. (2011). Enhancing campus capacity for leadership: An examination of grassroots leaders in higher education. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
  • Krucken, G., Castor, C., Kosmutzky, A., & Torka, M. (Eds.). (2006). Towards a multiversity?: Universities between global trends and national traditions. Bielefeld; Piscataway, NJ: Transcript Verlag.
  • Krücken, G., & Meier, F. (2006). Turning the university into an organizational actor. In: G. Drori/J. Meyer/H. Hwang (eds),  Globalization and organization: World society and organizational change (pp. 241–257). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Manning, K. (2013). Organizational theory in higher education. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Marginson, S. (2006). Putting “Public” back into the public university. Thesis Eleven, 84(1), 44–59.
  • Mintzberg, H., & Waters, J.A. (1989). Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. In D. Asch & C. Bowman (eds), Readings in strategic management. London: Palgrave.
  • Molesworth, M., Scullion, R., & Nixon, E. (2010). The marketisation of higher education. Oxon and New York: Routledge.
  • Musselin, C. (2006). Are universities specific organisations?. In G. Krucken, A. Kosmutzky, & M. Torka (Eds.), Towards a multiversity? Universities between global trends and national traditions. Biefeld.
  • Nyhagen, G.M., & Baschung, L. (2013). New organisational structures and the transformation of academic work. Higher Education, 66(4), 409–423.
  • O’Meara, K., Terosky, A.L., & Neumann, A. (2008). Faculty careers and work lives: A professional growth perspective. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
  • O’Reilly, C.A., & Tushman, M.L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185–206.
  • OECD. (2008). Tertiary education for the knowledge society: Volume 1: Special features: Governance, funding, quality - Volume 2: Special features: Equity, innovation, labour market, internationalisation - OECD. Retrieved April 11, 2017, from http://www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond-school/tertiaryeducationfortheknowledgesocietyvolume1specialfeaturesgovernancefundingquality-volume2specialfeaturesequityinnovationlabourmarketinternationalisation.htm
  • Olsen, J.P. (2007). The institutional dynamics of the European University. In: Olen, Johan P., Massen P. (eds.), University dynamics and European integration (pp. 25–54). Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5971-1_2
  • Olson, E.E., & Eoyang, G.H. (2001). Facilitating organization change: Lessons from complexity science. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.
  • Parks, S.D. (2005). Leadership can be taught: A bold approach for a complex world. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
  • Preymann, S., Sterrer, S., Ehrenstorfer, B., Gaisch, M., & Aichinger, R. (2016). Harmonising the interface between academic and administrative mind-sets. In C. Sarrico, P. Teixeira, A. Magalhães, A. Veiga, M.J. Rosa, & T. Carvalho (Eds.), Global challenges, national initiatives, and institutional responses (pp. 236–237). Rotterdam: SensePublishers. doi:10.1007/978-94-6300-675-0_12
  • Ramirez, F.O. (2012). The world society perspective: Concepts, assumptions, and strategies. Comparative Education, 48(4), 423–439.
  • Ramirez, F.O., & Christensen, T. (2013). The formalization of the university: Rules, roots, and routes. Higher Education, 65(6), 695–708.
  • Ray, K., & Gopplett, J. (2013). From special to ordinary dialogic OD in day-to-day complexity. OD Practitioner, 45(1), 42–46.
  • Rhoades, G., & Sporn, B. (2002). New models of management adn shifing costs of production: Europe and the United States. Tertiary Education and Management, 8(2002), 3–28.
  • Scharmer, C.O. (2009). Theory U: Leading from the future as it emerges (1 ed.). San Francisco, CA; London: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  • Scott, W. (2015). Organizatonal theory and higher education. Journal of Orgnanization Theory in Education. 1, 1. Retrieved from www.organizationaltheoryineducation.com
  • Scott, W.R., & Davis, G.F. (2007). Organizations and organizing: Rational, natural, and open systems perspectives (1 ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Seeber, M., Lepori, B., Montauti, M., Enders, J., De Boer, H., Weyer, E., … Reale, E. (2015). European universities as complete organizations? Understanding identity, hierarchy and rationality in public organizations. Public Management Review, 17(10), 1444–1474.
  • Shattock, M. (2010). Managing successful Universities. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Shaw, P. (2002). Changing conversations in organizations: A complexity approach to change. London; New York: Routledge.
  • Slaughter, S. A., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: markets, state, and higher education. Baltimore, MD: JHU Press.
  • Stacey, R. (2015). Understanding organizations as complex responsive processes of relating. Dialogic Organization Development: the Theory and Practice of Transformational Change, 151–176.
  • Stacey, R.D. (2011). Strategic management and organisational dynamics: The challenge of complexity to ways of thinking about organisations (6th ed.). Harlow, England; New York: Financial Times Prentice Hall.
  • Stacey, R.D., & Griffin, D. (2005). A complexity perspective on researching organizations: Taking experience seriously. Oxon and New York: Taylor & Francis.
  • Stewart, B., Khare, A., & Schatz, R. (2016). Volatility, uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity in higher education. In O. Mack, A. Khare, A. Krämer, & T. Burgartz (Eds.), Managing in a VUCA world (pp. 241–250). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16889-0_16
  • Thomas, R., & Hardy, C. (2011). Reframing resistance to organizational change. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 27(3), 322–331.
  • European University Association, & Conraths, B; Trusso, A. (2007). Managing the university community: Exploring good practice. Brussels: European University Association.
  • Tsoukas, H., & Chia, R. (2002). On organizational becoming – Rethinking organizational change. Organization Science, 13(5), 567–582.
  • Vaara, E., & Whittington, R. (2012). Strategy-as-practice: Taking social practices seriously. The Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 285.
  • Van de Ven, A.H., & Poole, M.S.; others. (1995). Explaining development and change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 510–540.
  • Van de Ven, A.H., & Poole, M.S. (2005). Alternative approaches for studying organizational change. Organization Studies, 26(9), 1377–1404.
  • Weick, K.E., & Quinn, R.E. (1999). Organizational change and development. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 361–386.
  • Weisbord, M., & Janoff, S. (2010). Future search: Getting the whole system in the room for vision, commitment, and action. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  • Whitley, R. (2008). Construction universities as strategic actors: Limitations and variations (Working Paper No. 557). Manchester Business School working paper. Retrieved from https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/50654
  • Zhao, E.Y., Fisher, G., Lounsbury, M., & Miller, D. (2017). Optimal distinctiveness: Broadening the interface between institutional theory and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 38(1), 93–113.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.