Local use of metrics for the research assessment of academics: the case of Poland

References

• Aagaard, K. (2015). How incentives trickle down: Local use of a national bibliometric indicator system. Science & Public Policy, 42(5), 725–737. doi:10.1093/scipol/scu087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aagaard, K., & Schneider, J.W. (2017). Some considerations about causes and effects in studies of performance-based research funding systems. Journal of Informetrics, 11(3), 923–926. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2017.05.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biagioli, M., & Lippman, A. (Eds.). (2020). Gaming the metrics: Misconduct and manipulation in academic research. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, Y. (2010). Global isomorphism and governance Reform in chinese higher education. Tertiary Education and Management, 16(3), 229–241. doi:10.1080/13583883.2010.497391
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D.T. (1976). Assessing the impact of planned social change. Occasional Paper Series, 8. doi:10.1016/0149-7189(79)90048-X
   Google Scholar
• Cocka, P. M. (1980). Science Policy: USA/USSR. Volume II, Science Policy in the Soviet Union. National Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Croucher, G., & Woelert, P. (2016). Institutional isomorphism and the creation of the unified national system of higher education in Australia: An empirical analysis. Higher Education, 71(4), 439–453. doi:10.1007/s10734-015-9914-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Rijcke, S., Wouters, P.F., Rushforth, A.D., Franssen, T.P., & Hammarfelt, B. (2016). Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use: A literature review. Research Evaluation, 25(2), 161–169. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvv038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dey, E.L., Milem, J.F., & Berger, J.B. (1997). Changing patterns of publication productivity: Accumulative advantage or institutional isomorphism? Sociology of Education, 70(4), 308. doi:10.2307/2673269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P.J., & Powell, W.W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. doi:10.2307/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobija, D., Górska, A.M., & Pikos, A. (2019). The impact of accreditation agencies and other powerful stakeholders on the performance measurement in Polish universities. Baltic Journal of Management, 14(1), 84–102. doi:10.1108/BJM-01-2018-0018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammarfelt, B., & Åström, F. (2015). The multi-layered and multilevel use of bibliometric measures in Swedish universities: Isomorphism, translation and strategic choice. 10.
   Google Scholar
• Hammarfelt, B., Nelhans, G., Eklund, P., & Åström, F. (2016). The heterogeneous landscape of bibliometric indicators: Evaluating models for allocating resources at Swedish universities. Research Evaluation, 25(3), 292–305. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvv040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520(7548), 429–431. doi:10.1038/520429a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krog Lind, J. (2019). The missing link: How university managers mediate the impact of a performance-based research funding system. Research Evaluation, 28(1), 84–93. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvy038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulczycki, E. (2017). Assessing publications through a bibliometric indicator: The case of comprehensive evaluation of scientific units in Poland. Research Evaluation, 26(1), 41–52. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvw023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulczycki, E., Korzeń, M., & Korytkowski, P. (2017). Toward an excellence-based research funding system: Evidence from Poland. Journal of Informetrics, 11(1), 282–298. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2017.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwiek, M., & Szadkowski, K. (2018). Higher Education systems and institutions, Poland. Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions, 1–10. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_392-1
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J.W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. doi:10.1086/226550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouritzen, P.E., & Opstrup, N. (2020). Performance management at universities: The danish bibliometric research indicator at work. Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-21325-1
   Google Scholar
• Musselin, C. (2018). New forms of competition in higher education. Socio-Economic Review, 16(3), 657–683. doi:10.1093/ser/mwy033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazarovets, S. (2020). Controversial practice of rewarding for publications in national journals. Scientometrics, 124(1), 813–818. doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03485-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neave, G. (1998). The evaluative state reconsidered. European Journal of Education, 33(3), 265–284.
   Google Scholar
• Neff, M.W. (2018). Publication incentives undermine the utility of science: Ecological research in Mexico. Science & Public Policy, 45(2), 191–201. doi:10.1093/scipol/scx054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochsner, M., Kancewicz-Hoffman, N., Ma, L., Holm, J., Gedutis, A., Šima, K., Hug, S. E., Dewaele, A., & Jong, S. D. (2020). ENRESSH Policy Brief Research Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.12049314
   Google Scholar
• Pölönen, J., Guns, R., Kulczycki, E., Sivertsen, G., & Engels, T.C.E. (2020). National lists of scholarly publication channels: An overview and recommendations for their construction and maintenance. Journal of Data and Information Science. doi:10.2478/jdis-2021-0004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauder, M., & Espeland, W. N. (2009). The Discipline of Rankings: Tight Coupling and Organizational Change. American sociological review, 74(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, J.W., Aagaard, K., & Bloch, C.W. (2016). What happens when national research funding is linked to differentiated publication counts?: A comparison of the Australian and Norwegian publication-based funding models. Research Evaluation, 25(3), 244–256. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvv036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shu, F., Quan, W., Chen, B., Qiu, J., Sugimoto, C.R., & Larivière, V. (2020). The role of web of science publications in China’s tenure system. Scientometrics, 122(3), 1683–1695. doi:10.1007/s11192-019-03339-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivertsen, G. (2017). Unique, but still best practice? The research excellence framework (REF) from an international perspective. Palgrave Communications, 3, 17078. doi:10.1057/palcomms.2017.78
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woelert, P., & McKenzie, L. (2018). Follow the money? How Australian universities replicate national performance-based funding mechanisms. Research Evaluation, June, 1–12. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvy018
   Google Scholar