Investigating project sustainability: technology as a development object in a community-based project in Naryn, Kyrgyzstan

References

• Agadjanian, V., & Gorina, E. (2019). Economic swings, political instability and migration in Kyrgyzstan. European Journal of Population, 35(2), 285–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad, S. M., & Talib, N. B. A. (2010). Improvement of project sustainability by community participation: A case of Abbottabad District in Pakistan. African Journal of Business Management, 4(17), 3761–3768.
   Google Scholar
• Appadurai, A. (1986). Introduction: Commodities and the politics of value. In A. Appadurai (Ed.), The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective (pp. 3–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Avgerou, C., & Walsham, G. (2000). In C. Avegerou, and G. Walsham (Eds.), Information technology in context: Studies from the perspective of developing countries (pp.). University of North London voices in development management. Ashgate Publishing, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Birke, F. M., & Knierim, A. (2020). ICT for agriculture extension: Actor network theory for understanding the establishment of agricultural knowledge centers in South Wollo, Ethiopia. Information Technology for Development, 26(3), 591–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (1986). Some Elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of st brieuc bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196–223). London and Boston: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carolan, M. S. (2004). Ontological politics: Mapping a complex environmental problem. Environmental Values, 13(4), 497–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassidy, E. F., Leviton, L. C., & Hunter, D. E. K. (2006). The relationships of program and organizational capacity to program sustainability: What helps programs survive? Evaluation and Program Planning, 29(2), 149–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavalheiro, G., & Joia, L. (2016). Examining the implementation of a European patent management system in Brazil from an actor-network theory perspective. Information Technology for Development, 22(2), 220–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordella, A., & Hesse, J. (2014). E-government in the making: An actor network perspective. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 8(2), 283–308.
   Google Scholar
• Crewett, W. (2012). Improving the sustainability of pasture use in Kyrgyzstan. Mountain Research and Development, 32(3), 267–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Laet, M., & Mol, A. (2000). The Zimbabwe bush pump: Mechanics of a fluid technology. Social Studies of Science, 30(2), 225–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dedeke, A. N. (2017). Creating sustainable tourism ventures in protected areas: An actor-network theory analysis. Tourism Management, 61, 161–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz Andrade, A., & Urquhart, C. (2010). The affordances of actor network theory in ICT for development research. Information Technology and People, 23(4), 352–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dörre, & Schütte, S. (2018). Potential and challenges for development in Naryn Krygyzstan. Berlin Geographical Papers (38). Centre for Development Studies, Freie Universität Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Elbanna, A. (2011). The theoretical and analytical inclusion of actor network theory and its implication on ICT research. In A. Tatnall (Ed.), Actor-network theory and technology innovation (pp. 130–142). Hershey, New York: Information Science Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Eskerod, P., & Huemann, M. (2013). Sustainable development and project stakeholder management: What standards say? International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 6(1), 36–50.
   Google Scholar
• Foggin, J. M., Brombal, D., & Razmkhah, A. (2021). Thinking like a mountain: Exploring the potential of relational approaches for transformative nature conservation. Sustainability, 13(22), 12884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, X., Pietrobelli, C., & Soete, L. (2011). The role of foreign technology and indigenous innovation in the emerging economies: Technological change and catching-up. World Development, 39(7), 1204–1212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gad, C., & Jensen, C. B. (2010). On the consequences of post-ANT. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 35(1), 55–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1997). Mice into wormholes: A comment on the nature of no nature. In G. L. Downey & J. Dumit (Eds.), Cyborgs and citadels: Anthropological interventions into emerging sciences and technologies (pp. 209–243). Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research.
   Google Scholar
• Heeks, R., & Dev. (2013). Development studies research and actor-network theory. Actor-network theory for development Accessed 12 September 2021 ( Working Paper 1). Working Paper 1) https://ssrn.com/abstract=3540083
   Google Scholar
• Heeks, R., & Stanforth, C. (2015). Technological change in developing countries: Opening the black box of process using actor-network theory. Development Studies Research, 2(1), 33–50.
   Google Scholar
• Karpouzoglou, T., Dewulf, A., Perez, K., Gurung, P., Regmi, S., Isaeva, A., … Cieslik, K. (2020). From present to future development pathways in fragile mountain landscapes. Environmental Science and Policy, 114, 606–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpouzoglou, T., Zulkafli, Z., Grainger, S., Dewulf, A., Buytaert, W., & Hannah, D. M. (2016). Environmental Virtual Observatories (EVOs): Prospects for knowledge co-creation and resilience in the information age. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 18, 40–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasymov, U., & Thiel, A. (2019). Understanding the role of power in changes to pastoral institutions in Kyrgyzstan. International Journal of the Commons, 13(2), 931–948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, M. (2014). The good project: Humanitarian relief NGOs and the Fragmentation of reason. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1991). We have never been modern. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (1987). On the social explanation of technical change: The case of the portuguese maritime expansion. Technology and Culture, 28(2), 227–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2002). Objects and spaces. Theory. Culture and Society, 19(5–6 91–105).
   Google Scholar
• Law, J., & Callon, M. (1992). The life and death of an aircraft: A network analysis of technical change. In W. E. Bijker, and J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology – Building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 21–52). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lescureux, N., & Linnell, D. J. C. (2013). The effect of rapid social changes during post-communist transition on perceptions of the human - wolf relationships in Macedonia and Kyrgyzstan. Pastoralism, 3(1), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, J., Isaeva, A., Zerriffi, H., Eddy, I. M. S., Foggin, M., Gergel, S. E., & Hagerman, S. M. (2019). Testing for consensus on Kyrgyz rangelands: Local perceptions in Naryn Oblast. Ecology and Society, 24(4), 36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, D., & Mosse, D. (2006). Bloomfield, CT: Development Brokers and Translators. Kumarian Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lungo, M. P., Mavole, J., & Martin, O. (2017). Determinants of project sustainability beyond donor support: Case of caritas Norway supported governance project in mansa diocese, Zambia. Arts and Social Sciences Journal, 8(3). doi:10.4172/2151-6200.1000278
   Google Scholar
• Mann, L. (2018). Left to other peoples’ devices? A political economy perspective on the big data revolution in development. Development and Change, 49(1), 3–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W., III (1972). The limits to growth; A report for the club of rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. Universe Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mestre, I. (2019, 26). The way to the pastures: How to reconcile community-based pasture management with mobility in agro-pastoral systems in the Naryn province of Kyrgyzstan. Ager, 2019, 151–187.
   Google Scholar
• Michael, M. (2017). Actor-Network Theory: Trials, Trails and Translations. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mog, J. M. (2004). Struggling with sustainability - A comparative framework for evaluating sustainable development programs. World Development, 32(12), 2139–2160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, A. (1999). Ontological politics. A word and some questions. The Sociological Review, 47(1), 74–89.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, B., Fisher, R., Pickering, S., & Garnett, S. (2014). Post-project evaluation of the sustainability of development project outcomes: A case study in eastern Indonesia. Development in Practice, 24(3), 379–389.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2019). Better Criteria for Better Evaluation Accessed 21 October 2021. Form www.oecd.org/dac/evaluation.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (n.d.). Paris Declaration and Accra Agenda for Action Accessed 21 October 2021. From https://www.oecd.org/dac/effectiveness/parisdeclarationandaccraagendaforaction.htm
   Google Scholar
• Pade, C., Mallinson, B., & Sewry, D. (2008). an elaboration of critical success factors for rural ICT project sustainability in developing countries: Exploring the DWESA case. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 10(4), 32–55.
   Google Scholar
• Pansera, M., & Martinez, F. (2017). Innovation for development and poverty reduction: An integrative literature review. Journal of Management Development, 36(1), 2–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penteado, I. M., Do Nascimento, A. C. S., Corrêa, D., Moura, E. A. F., Zilles, R., Gomes, M. C. R. L., … Pacífico, A. C. N. (2019). Among people and artifacts: Actor-network theory and the adoption of solar ice machines in the Brazilian Amazon. Energy Research and Social Science, 53, 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasouli, A. H., & Kumarasuriyar, D. A. (2016). The social dimension of sustainability: Towards some definitions and analysis. Journal of Social Science for Policy Implications, 4(2), 23–34.
   Google Scholar
• Redfield, P. (2016). Fluid technologies: The bush pump, the LifeStraw ® and microworlds of humanitarian design. Social Studies of Science, 46(2), 159–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, J. (2009). Using actor-network theory to trace an ICT (telecenter) implementation trajectory in an African women’s micro-enterprise development organization. Information Technology and International Development, 5(3), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Rosset, A., Ibraimova, A., Kapalova, A., Isakov, A., & Azhibekov, B. (2018). Citizen science comes to school: Kyrgyz students protect their local water resources. In J. Xu (Ed.), Mountain Futures: Innovation and inspiration from the world’s highlands (pp. 117–122). World Agroforestry Centre. Available at https://www.worldagroforestry.org/publication/mountain-futures-inspiration-and-innovation-worlds-highlands
   Google Scholar
• Sagynbekova, L. (2017). Environment, rural livelihoods, and labor migration: A case study in central Kyrgyzstan. Mountain Research and Development, 37(4), 456–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shigaeva, J., Hagerman, S., Zerriffi, H., Hergarten, C., Isaeva, A., Mamadalieva, Z., & Foggin, M. (2016). Decentralizing governance of agro-pastoral systems in Kyrgyzstan: An assessment of recent pasture reforms. Mountain Research and Development, 36(1), 91–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvius, A. J. G., Kampinga, M., Paniagua, S., & Mooi, H. (2017). Considering sustainability in project management decision making; An investigation using Q-methodology. International Journal of Project Management, 35(6), 1133–1150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparks, J., & Rutkowski, D. (2016). Exploring project sustainability: Using a multiperspectival, multidimensional approach to frame inquiry. Development in Practice, 26(3), 308–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanforth, C. (2007). Using actor-network theory to analyze E-government implementation in developing countries. Information Technologies and International Development, 3(3), 35–60.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. (1991). Power, technologies and the phenomenology of conventions: On being allergic to onions. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination (pp. 26–56). London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Steimann, B. (2012). Conflicting strategies for contested resources: Pastoralists’ responses to uncertainty in post-socialist Kyrgyzstan. In H. Kreutzmann (Ed.), Pastoral practices in high Asia. Agency of ‘development’ effected by modernisation, resettlement and transformation (pp. 145–160). Dordrecht Heidelberg, New York London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Stirrat, R. L., & Henkel, H. (1997). The development gift : The problem of reciprocity in the NGO world. The American Academy of Political and Social Science, 554(1), 66–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockbruegger, J., & Bueger, C. (2017). Actor-network theory: Objects and actants, networks and narratives D. R., McCarthy. In Technology and world politics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Swidler, A. N. N., & Watkins, S. C. (2009). ‘Teach a Man to Fish’: The sustainability doctrine and its social consequences. World Development, 37(7), 1182–1196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatnall, A. (2011). Actor-network theory and technology innovation: Advancements and new concepts. Hershey, New York: Information Science Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Yue, H., Peng, Q., He, C., Hong, S., & Bryan, B. A. (2020). Recent responses of grassland net primary productivity to climatic and anthropogenic factors in Kyrgyzstan. Land Degradation and Development, 31(16), 2490–2506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardle, C., & Zakiriaeva, N. (2018). Sustainability and long-term impact of community-managed water supply in rural Kyrgyzstan, Central Asia. Waterlines, 37(2), 118–131.
   Google Scholar
• WCED (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future Accessed 21 October 2021. From https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wiltsey Stirman, S., Kimberly, J., Cook, N., Calloway, A., Castro, F., & Charns, M. (2012). The sustainability of new programs and innovations: A review of the empirical literature and recommendations for future research. Implementation Science, 7(17). doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-17
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wiltsey, S. S., Kimberly, J., Cook, N., Calloway, A., Castro, F., & Charns, M. (2012). The sustainability of new programs and innovations: A review of the empirical literature and recommendations for future research. Implementation Science, 7(1), 17. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yu, L., & Kasymov, U. (2020). Social construction of Pastureland: Changing rules and resource-use rights in china and Kyrgyzstan. International Journal of the Commons, 14(1), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar