The Participatory Index of Women’s Empowerment: development and an application in Tunisia

References

• Alkire, S., Meinzen-Dick, R., Peterman, A., Quisumbing, A., Seymour, G., & Vaz, A. (2013). The Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index. World Development, 52, 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arentze, T., Borgers, A., Timmermans, H., & DelMistro, R. (2003). Transport stated choice responses: Effects of task complexity, presentation format and literacy. Transportation Research Part E Logistics & Transportation Review, 39(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1366-5545(02)00047-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslanbeigui, N., Oakes, G., & Uddin, N. (2010). Assessing microcredit in Bangladesh: A critique of the concept of empowerment. Review of Political Economy, 22(2), 181–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/09538251003665446
   Google Scholar
• Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2001). Do people mean what they say? Implications for subjective survey data. American Economic Review, 91(2), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.2.67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, D., & Bowman, K. (2014). Still learning: A critical reflection on three years of measuring women’s empowerment in Oxfam. Gender & Development, 22(2), 253–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2014.920993
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, G. A. (2008). Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: A research note. Qualitative Research, 8(1), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107085301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridges, D. (2001). The ethics of outsider research. Journal of the Philosophy of Education, 35(3), 371–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.00233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chrzan, K. (2010). Using partial profile choice experiments to handle large numbers of attributes. International Journal of Market Research, 52(6), 827–840. https://doi.org/10.2501/S1470785310201673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decancq, K., & Watson, V. (2019, July 3–5). Eliciting weights for the Human Development index with a discrete choice experiment [paper presentation]. Eighth ECINEQ Meeting, Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Dobility, Inc. (2016). SurveyCTO (Version 2.12) [Computer software]. https://www.surveycto.com
   Google Scholar
• Galiè, A., Teufel, N., Korir, L., Baltenweck, I., Girard, A. W., Dominguez-Salas, P., & Yount, K. M. (2019). The Women’s Empowerment in Livestock Index. Social Indicators Research, 142(2), 799–825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1934-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghali, S., Goedhuys, M., Grimm, M., Meysonnat, A., Nillesen, E., & Zouari, S. (2018). Women’s and youth empowerment in rural Tunisia: An assessment using the Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index (WEAI) (Taqeem Impact Report Series No. 11). International Labour Office.
   Google Scholar
• Glennerster, R., Walsh, C., & Diaz-Martin, L. (2018). A practical guide to measuring women’s and girl’s empowerment in impact evaluations. Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, W. (2012). Econometric analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hainmueller, J., Hopkins, D. J., & Yamamoto, T. (2014). Causal inference in conjoint analysis: Understanding multidimensional choices via stated preference experiments. Political Analysis, 22(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpt024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D., Rose, J., & Greene, W. (2015). Applied choice analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchings, C. (2014). Balancing accountability and learning: A review of Oxfam GB’s Global performance framework. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 6(4), 425–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2014.971552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, S., & Alkire, S. (2007). Agency and empowerment: A proposal for internationally comparable indicators. Oxford Development Studies, 35(4), 379–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600810701701897
   Google Scholar
• Jahedi, S., & Méndez, F. (2014). On the advantages and disadvantages of subjective measures. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 98, 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.12.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jupp, D., Ibn Ali, S., & Barahona, C. (2010). Measuring empowerment? Ask them: Quantifying qualitative outcomes from peoples’ own analysis ( Sida Studies in Evaluation 2010:1). Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Development and Change, 30(3), 435–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khader, S. J. (2011). Adaptive preferences and women’s empowerment. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liebe, U., Moumouni, I. M., Bigler, C., Ingabire, C., & Bieri, S. (2020). Using factorial survey experiments to measure attitudes, social norms, and fairness concerns in developing countries. Sociological Methods & Research, 49(1), 161–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117729707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombardini, S. (2018). Women’s empowerment in Tunisia: Impact evaluation of the project ‘AMAL: Supporting Women’s Transformative Leadership’ in Tunisia. ( Effectiveness Review Series 2016/17). Oxfam GB.
   Google Scholar
• Lombardini, S., Bowman, K., & Garwood, R. (2017). A ‘how to’ guide to measuring women’s empowerment: Sharing experience from Oxfam’s impact evaluations. Oxfam GB.
   Google Scholar
• Malapit, H., Quisumbing, A., Meinzen-Dick, R., Seymour, G., Martinez, E. M., Heckert, J., Rubin, D., Vaz, A., Yount, K. M., & GAAP2 Study Team. (2019). Development of the project-level Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index (pro-WEAI). World Development, 122, 675–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.06.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, N. N., & Lombardini, S. (2023). The Participatory Index of Women’s Empowerment: Development and an application in Tunisia ( OPHI Research in Progress 67a). Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI), University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Raj, A. (2020). Women and girls’ health agency: Operationalizing the “Can-Act-Resist” of the women’s empowerment process. EClinicalMedicine, 20, 100287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100287
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rocha, E. M. (1997). A ladder of empowerment. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 17(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X9701700104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowlands, J. (1995). Empowerment examined. Development in Practice, 5(2), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/0961452951000157074
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rowlands, J. (1997). Questioning empowerment: Working with women in Honduras. Oxfam UK and Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, M., Gerard, K., & Amaya-Amaya, M. (Eds.). (2008). Using discrete choice experiments to value health and health care. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, M., Watson, V., & Entwistle, V. (2009). Rationalising the ‘irrational’: A think aloud study of discrete choice experiment responses. Health Economics, 18(3), 321–336. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1985a). Commodities and capabilities. North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1985b). Well-being, agency and freedom: The Dewey lectures 1984. The Journal of Philosophy, 82(4), 169–221. https://doi.org/10.2307/2026184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. (2000). So now they are going to measure empowerment!. Community Development Resource Association. https://www.cdra.org.za/uploads/1/1/1/6/111664/so_now_they_are_going_to_measure_empowerment_james_taylor_2000.doc
   Google Scholar
• United Nations General Assembly. (2015). Resolution 70/1. Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development (UNGA Res A/RES/70/1). https://undocs.org/en/A/RES/70/1
   Google Scholar
• UN Women. (2014). Gender mainstreaming in development programming (Guidance Note). https://www.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/2015/02/gender-mainstreaming-issues
   Google Scholar
• VeneKlasen, L., & Miller, V. (2002). A new weave of power, people & politics: The action guide for advocacy and citizen participation. World Neighbours.
   Google Scholar
• Vigneri, M., & Lombardini, S. (2017). Women’s empowerment in Mali: Impact evaluation of the educational project: ‘Girls CAN-Promoting Secondary Education in West Africa’. ( Effectiveness Review Series 2015/16). Oxfam GB.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, V., Dibben, C., Cox, M., Atherton, I., Sutton, M., & Ryan, M. (2019). Testing the expert based weights used in the UK’s index of multiple deprivation (IMD) against three preference-based methods. Social Indicators Research, 144(3), 1055–1074. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-02054-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar