Governing Techno-Futures: OECD Anticipation of Automation and the Multiplication of Managerialism

References

• Akgiray, V. 2018. Blockchain Technology and Corporate Governance – Technology, Markets, Regulation and Corporate Governance. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Amoore, L., 2020. Cloud Ethics. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amoore, L. 2013. The Politics of Possibility: Risk an Security Beyond Probability. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. 2010. “Preemption, Precaution, Preparedness: Anticipatory Action and Future Geographies.” Progress in Human Geography 34 (6): 777–798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alawattage, C. and Elshihry, M., 2017. “The Managerialism of Neoliberal Global Governance: The Case of the OECD.” In The Politics of Expertise in International Organizations, edited by A. Littoz-Monnett, 167–186. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Berryhill, J., T. Bourgery, and A. Hanson. 2018. Blockchains Unchained – Blockchain Technology and its Use in the Public Sector. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Berten, John, and Matthias Kranke. 2022. “Anticipatory Global Governance: International Organisations and the Politics of the Future.” Global Society 36 (2): 155–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, J., and W. Walters. 2013. “Actor-Network Theory” and International Relationality: Lost (and Found) in Translation: Introduction.” International Political Sociology 7 (3): 332–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bislev, S., D. Salskov-Iversen, and H. K. Hansen. 2002. “The Global Diffusion of Managerialism: Transnational Discourse Communities at Work.” Global Society 16 (2): 199–212.
   Google Scholar
• Blundell-Wignall, A. 2014. “The Bitcoin Question: Currency Versus Trust-Less Transfer Technology.” OECD Working Papers on Finance, Insurance and Private Pensions, No. 37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/5jz2pwjd9t20-en.
   Google Scholar
• Buterin, V. 2013. “Bootstrapping a Decentralised Autonomous Corporation: Part I.” Bitcoin Magazine, September 20. https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/bootstrapping-a-decentralised-autonomous-corporation-part-i-1379644274.
   Google Scholar
• Büttner, T., and M. Thiemann. 2017. “Breaking Regime Stability? The Politicization of Expertise in the OECD/G20 Process on BEPS and the Potential Transformation of International Taxation.” Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2016-0069/html.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell-Verduyn, M., and F. Giumelli. 2022. “Enrolling into Exclusion: African Blockchain and Decolonial Ambitions in an Evolving Finance/Security Infrastructure”. Journal of Cultural Economy.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Campbell-Verduyn, M., and M. Hütten. 2019. “Beyond Scandal? Blockchain Technologies and the Legitimacy of Post-2008 Finance.” Finance and Society 5 (2): 126–144.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell-Verduyn, M., and M. Hütten. 2021. “The Formal, Financial and Fraught Route to Global Digital Identity Governance.” Frontiers in Blockchain 4: 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Champagne, P. 2014. The Book of Satoshi. Lexington: e53 Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, S. 2018. “Crypto Discussions at Highest Level: The OECD’s Love of Blockchain Obscures Its Fear of Bitcoin.” Coin Telegraph, September 10. https://cointelegraph.com/news/crypto-discussions-at-highest-level-the-oecds-love-of-blockchain-obscures-its-fear-of-bitcoin.
   Google Scholar
• Chase-Dunn, C., and K. S. Lawrence. 2011. “The Next Three Futures, Part One: Looming Crises of Global Inequality, Ecological Degradation, and a Failed System of Global Governance.” Global Society 25 (2): 137–153.
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, Barbara. 2004. “: On Time, Space, and Action Nets.” Organization 11 (6): 773–791. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508404047251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Filippi, P., C. Wray, and G. Sileno. 2021. “Smart Contracts.” Internet Policy Review 10: 2.
   Google Scholar
• de Goede, M. 2012. Speculative Security: The Politics of Pursuing Terrorist Monies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Goede, M. 2020. “Engagement all the Way Down.” Critical Studies on Security 8 (2): 101–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeNardis, L. 2014. The Global War for Internet Governance. London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, J., B. Hong, and L. Wu. 2020. “The Robot Revolution: Managerial and Employment Consequences for Firms.” https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3422581.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, W. 2021. “CEOs are Hugely Expensive – Why Not Automate Them?” New Statesman, 26 April.
   Google Scholar
• DuPont, Q. 2018. “Experiments in Algorithmic Governance: A History and Ethnography of ‘The DAO’, a Failed Decentralized Autonomous Organization.” In Bitcoin and Beyond: Cryptocurrencies, Blockchains and Global Governance, edited by M. Campbell-Verduyn, 157–177. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eagleton-Pierce, M., and S. Knafo. 2020. “Introduction: The Political Economy of Managerialism.” Review of International Political Economy 27 (4): 763–779. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2020.1735478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esposito, E. 2011. The Future of Futures: The Time of Money in Financing and Society. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fehl, C., and K. Freistein. 2020. “Organising Global Stratification: How International Organisations (Re)Produce Inequalities in International Society.” Global Society 34 (3): 285–303. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2020.1739627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forkast.News. 2019. “WATCH: Top Takeaways from OECD Global Blockchain Policymakers – What is Coming in 2020.” Forkast, September 24. https://forkast.news/watch-top-takeaways-from-oecd-global-blockchain-policymakers-what-is-coming-in-2020/.
   Google Scholar
• Fritsch, S. 2014. “Conceptualizing the Ambivalent Role of Technology in International Relations: Between Systemic Change and Continuity.” In The Global Politics of Science and Technology-Vol. 1, edited by M. Mayer, M. Carpes, and R. Knoblich, 115–138. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Githens, G. 2019. How to Think Strategically: Sharpen Your Mind. Develop Your Competency. Contribute to Success. Palmyra: Maven House.
   Google Scholar
• Godin, B. 2004. “The New Economy: What the Concept Owes to the OECD.” Research Policy 33 (5): 679–690. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2003.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golumbia, D. 2015. “Bitcoin as Politics: Distributed Right-Wing Extremism.” In MoneyLab Reader: An Intervention in Digital Economy, edited by G. Lovink, N. Tkacz, and P. De Vries, 117–131. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures.
   Google Scholar
• Graz, J. C., and C. Hauert. 2019. “Translating Technical Diplomacy: The Participation of Civil Society Organisations in International Standardisation.” Global Society 33 (2): 163–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurría, J. A. 2018a. “High-Level Panel: Blockchain for Better Policy Forum, Opening Remarks by Angel Gurría.” September 4. http://www.oecd.org/about/secretary-general/high-level-panel-blockchain-for-better-policies-paris-september-2018.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Gurría, J. A. 2018b. “2018 IMF and World Bank Annual Meetings – Written Statement to the Development Committee.” October 13. https://www.oecd.org/about/secretary-general/oecd-sg-written-statement-to-the-development-committee-imf-wb-2018.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Gurría, J. A. 2019. “OECD Global Blockchain Policy Forum, Opening Remarks by Angel Gurría.” September 12. http://www.oecd.org/finance/oecd-global-blockchain-policy-forum-france-september-2019.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Hütten, M. 2019. “The Soft Spot of Hard Code: Blockchain Technology, Network Governance and Pitfalls of Technological Utopianism.” Global Networks 19 (3): 329–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2004. “The Idiom of Co-Production.” In States of Knowledge, edited by S. Jasanoff, 12–23. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffries, D. 2021. “It’s 2031. This is the World That Crypto Created.” CoinDesk, 21 May. https://www.coindesk.com/its-2031-this-is-the-world-that-crypto-created.
   Google Scholar
• Jentzsch, C. 2016. “Decentralized Autonomous Organization to Automate Governance – Final Draft.” https://lawofthelevel.lexblogplatformthree.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/187/2017/07/WhitePaper-1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Juho, L., J. Berryhill, B. Welby, and M. A. Barbieri. 2020. The Uncertain Promise of Blockchain for Government. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/19934351
   Google Scholar
• Klikauer, T. 2013. Managerialism: A Critique of an Ideology. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Knafo, S. 2020. “Neoliberalism and the Origins of Public Management.” Review of International Political Economy 27 (4): 780–801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leese, M., and M. Hoijtink. 2019. “How (Not) to Talk About Technology: International Relations and the Question of Agency.” In Technology and Agency in International Relations, edited by M. Leese and M. Hoijtink 1–23. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lindmann, J., J. Berryhill, B. Welby, and M. C. Barbieri. 2020. The Uncertain Promise of Blockchain for Government. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/d031cd67-en
   Google Scholar
• Lotti, L. 2016. “Contemporary Art, Capitalization and the Blockchain: On the Autonomy and Automation of Art’s Value.” Finance and Society 2 (2): 96–110.
   Google Scholar
• Manjikian, M. 2017. “Social Construction of Technology: How Objects Acquire Meaning in Society.” In Technology and World Politics, edited by D. R. McCarthy, 23–41. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maurer, B. 2016. “Re-Risking in Realtime. On Possible Futures for Finance After the Blockchain.” Behemoth-A Journal on Civilisation 9 (2): 82–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.6094/behemoth.2016.9.2.917.
   Google Scholar
• Medcraft, G. 2018. “The OECD and the Blockchain Revolution.” Presentation by Greg Medcraft, March 29. https://www.oecd.org/parliamentarians/meetings/meeting-on-the-road-london-april-2018/The-OECD-and-the-Blockchain-Revolution-Presentation-by-Greg-Medcraft-delivered-on-29-March-2018.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, P. V., and S. Joyce. 2020. “Black Box or Hidden Abode? The Expansion and Exposure of Platform Work Managerialism.” Review of International Political Economy 27 (4): 926–948. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2019.1627569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, P. V., M. Upchurch, and X. Whittaker. 2018. “Humans and Machines at Work: Monitoring, Surveillance and Automation in Contemporary Capitalism.” In Humans and Machines at Work, edited by P. Moore, M. Upchurch, and X. Whittaker, 1–16. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamoto, S. 2008. “Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System.” Bitcoin.org [Online]. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donovan, N. 2020. “From Knowledge Economy to Automation Anxiety: A Growth Regime in Crisis?” New Political Economy 25 (2): 248–266. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2019.1590326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2018a. OECD Blockchain Primer. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/finance/OECD-Blockchain-Primer.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2018b. Executive Summary of the Hearing on Blockchain and Competition Policy. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://one.oecd.org/document/DAF/COMP/M(2018)1/ANN8/FINAL/en/pdf.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2018c. Blockchain Technology and Competition Policy – Issues Paper by the Secretariat. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://one.oecd.org/document/DAF/COMP/WD(2018)47/en/pdf.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2019. Blockchain Technologies as a Digital Enabler for Sustainable Infrastructure. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/23097841
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2021. “Regulatory Approaches to the Tokenisation of Assets.” OECD Blockchain Policy Series. www.oecd.org/finance/Regulatory-Approaches-to-the-Tokenisation-of-Assets.htm.
   Google Scholar
• OECD/ITF. 2018. Blockchain and Beyond: Encoding 21st Century Transport. Corporate Partnership Board Report. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://www.itf-oecd.org/sites/default/files/docs/blockchain-and-beyond-encoding-21st-century-transport.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• O’Grady, N. 2018. Governing Future Emergencies: Lived Relations to Risk in the UK Fire and Rescue Service. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• O’Grady, N. 2020. “Automating Security Infrastructures: Practices, Imaginaries, Politics.” Security Dialogue. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010620933513.
   Google Scholar
• Perritt, H. H. 1998. “The Internet as a Threat to Sovereignty-Thoughts on the Internet’s Role in Strengthening National and Global Governance.” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 5 (2): 423–442.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, T., and M. Webb. 2008. “The Role of the OECD in the Orchestration of Global Knowledge Networks”.” In The OECD and Transnational Governance, edited by R. Mahon, and S. McBridge, 43–59. Vancouver: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poutanen, M., T. Tomperi, H. Kuusela, V. Kaleva, and T. Tervasmäki. 2020. “From Democracy to Managerialism: Foundation Universities as the Embodiment of Finnish University Policies.” Journal of Education Policy. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2020.1846080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinsberg, B. 2019. “Blockchain Technology and the Governance of Foreign Aid.” Journal of Institutional Economics 15 (3): 413–429. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137418000462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmelzer, M. 2016. The Hegemony of Growth: The OECD and the Making of the Economic Growth Paradigm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seabrooke, L., and O. J. Sending. 2020. “Contracting Development: Managerialism and Consultants in Intergovernmental Organisations.” Review of International Political Economy 27 (4): 802–827. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2019.1616601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, S., and S. Soederberg. 2020. “Redesigning the Business of Development: The Case of the World Economic Forum and Global Risk Management.” Review of International Political Economy 27 (4): 828–854. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2019.1640125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slaughter, A. M. 2004. “Sovereignty and Power in a Networked World Order.” Stanford Journal of International Law 40 (2): 283–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockdale, L. P. 2016. Taming an Uncertain Future: Temporality, Sovereignty, and the Politics of Anticipatory Governance. New York/London: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Swan, M. 2015. Blockchain: Blueprint for a New Economy. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media.
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, T. 2014. Great Chain of Numbers: A Guide to Smart Contracts, Smart Property and Trustless Asset Management.
   Google Scholar
• Swartz, L. 2018. “What was Bitcoin, What Will it Be? The Techno-Economic Imaginaries of a New Money Technology.” Cultural Studies 32 (4): 623–650. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2017.1416420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, S. N., and B. W. Sculos. 2018. “Repressive Robots and the Radical Possibilities of Emancipated Automation.” In The Political Economy of Robots, edited by R. Kiggins, 101–125. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Winickoff, D. E., and S. M. Pfotenhauer. 2018. “Chapter 10. Technology Governance and the Innovation Process.” OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2018. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/sti_in_outlook-2018-15-en/index.html?itemId=/content/component/sti_in_outlook-2018-15-en.
   Google Scholar
• Zwitter, A., O. J. Gstrein, and E. Yap. 2020. “Digital Identity and the Blockchain: Universal Identity Management and the Concept of the ‘Self-Sovereign’ Individual.” Frontiers in Blockchain 28.
   Google Scholar