Inclusion of IMF in Eurozone Crisis Management: Legitimacy Through External Expertise and Internal Depoliticisation

References

• Ban, C. 2015. “Austerity Versus Stimulus? Understanding Fiscal Policy Change at the International Monetary Fund Since the Great Recession.” Governance 28: 167–183. doi:10.1111/gove.12099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barro, R. J., and L. Jong-Wha. 2005. “IMF Programs: Who is Chosen and What are the Effects?” Journal of Monetary Economics 52 (7): 1245–1269. doi:10.1016/j.jmoneco.2005.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastasin, C. 2015. Saving Europe: Anatomy of a Dream. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Best, J. 2012. “Ambiguity and Uncertainty in International Organizations: A History of Debating IMF Conditionality.” International Studies Quarterly 56 (4): 674–688. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2012.00744.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, G. 2007. “The IMF: A Bird's Eye View of its Role and Operations.” Journal of Economic Surveys 21 (4): 683–745. doi:10.1111/joes.2007.21.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blustein, P. 2015. Laid Low: The IMF, the Euro Zone and the First Rescue of Greece. Waterloo, ON: Centre for International Governance Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Boughton, J. M. 2000, September 11. The IMF and the Silent Revolution. Global Finance and Development in the 1980s. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Broome, A. 2013. “The Politics of IMF-EU co-Operation: Institutional Change from the Maastricht Treaty to the Launch of the Euro.” Journal of European Public Policy 20 (4): 589–605. doi:10.1080/13501763.2012.718882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broome, A. 2015. “Back to Basics: The Great Recession and the Narrowing of IMF Policy Advice.” Governance 28 (2): 147–165. doi:10.1111/gove.12098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broome, A., and L. Seabrooke. 2007. “Seeing Like the IMF: Institutional Change in Small Open Economies.” Review of International Political Economy 14 (4): 576–601. doi:10.1080/09692290701475346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunnermeier, M. K., H. James, and J. Landau. 2016. The Euro and the Battle of Ideas. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, C., J. Clifton, and L. Quaglia. 2018. “Explaining Policy Change in the EU: Financial Reform After the Crisis.” Journal of European Public Policy 25 (5): 728–746. doi:10.1080/13501763.2017.1301535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. L., and O. K. Pedersen. 2014. The National Origins of Policy Ideas: Knowledge Regimes in the United States, France, Germany, and Denmark. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carstensen, M. B., and V. A. Schmidt. 2018. “Ideational Power and Pathways to Legitimation in the Euro Crisis.” Review of International Political Economy 25 (6): 753–778. doi:10.1080/09692290.2018.1512892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chwieroth, J. M. 2015. “Professional Ties That Bind: How Normative Orientations Shape IMF Conditionality.” Review of International Political Economy 22: 757–787. doi:10.1080/09692290.2014.898214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clift, B. 2018. The IMF and the Politics of Austerity in the Wake of the Global Financial Crisis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clift, B. 2019. “Book Review: Tangled Governance: International Regime Complexity, the Troika, and the Euro Crisis.” Perspectives on Politics 17 (2): 623–625. doi:10.1017/S1537592719000549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clift, B. 2020. “The IMF, the Eurozone and Global Financial Crises, and the Politics of Economic Ideas.” Comparative European Politics 18 (1): 99–108. doi:10.1057/s41295-018-0146-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coman, R. 2018. “Why and how do Think Tanks Expand Their Networks in Times of Crisis? The Case of Bruegel and the Centre for European Policy Studies.” Journal of European Public Policy 26 (2): 286–301. doi:10.1080/13501763.2017.1415953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E 11/2010 vp. ECOFIN-neuvosto. 2010, March 16. Vakaus- ja Kasvusopimuksen Toimeenpano; Kreikan Toimenpiteet. Valtionvarainministeriön Perusmuisto VM 2010-00097.
   Google Scholar
• E 27/2010 vp – TaVP 68/2010 vp. Compilation of expert statements in Commerce Committee. Eduskunta, asiakirjavihko.
   Google Scholar
• Ecofin. 2010, May 9/10. Council Conclusions. Brussels: Council of the EU.
   Google Scholar
• Eurogroup. 2010. “Statement on the Support to Greece by Euro Area Members States.” MEMO/10/123.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. 2010, February 11. Statement by the Heads of State or Government of the European Union. Brussels: European Council.
   Google Scholar
• Gabor, D. 2010. “The International Monetary Fund and its new Economics.” Development and Change 41 (5): 805–830. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2010.01664.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould, E. R. 2003. “Money Talks: Supplementary Financiers and International Monetary Fund Conditionality.” International Organization 57 (3): 551–586. doi:10.1017/S0020818303573039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gros, D. 2010. Europe in the IMF. CEPS Commentary 4.10. 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Henning, C. R. 2017. Tangled Governance: International Regime Complexity, the Troika, and the Euro Crisis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, D. 2015. “The IMF as a de Facto Institution of the EU: A Multiple Supervisor Approach.” Review of International Political Economy 22 (3): 570–598. doi:10.1080/09692290.2014.956136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEO. 2016. The IMF and the Crises in Greece, Ireland, and Portugal. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund.
   Google Scholar
• IMF. 2013. Greece: Ex Post Evaluation of Exceptional Access Under the 2010 Stand-By Arrangement. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, R. 2010. Greece and the IMF: Who Exactly is Being Saved?. Washington, DC: Center for Economic and Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, A. O. 2006, February 23. Evolution not Revolution. The Changing Role of the IMF in the Global Economy. Stanford, CA: Address to International Development Club, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Lütz, Susanne, and S. Hilgers. 2019. “When Overlapping Organisations Play Two-Level Games: Imf–EU Interaction in Credit Lending to Latvia and Greece.” New Political Economy 24 (3): 299–312. doi:10.1080/13563467.2018.1443063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moschella, M. 2012. “IMF Surveillance in Crisis: The Past, Present and Future of the Reform Process.” Global Society 26 (1): 43–60. doi:10.1080/13600826.2011.629987.
   Google Scholar
• Nordström, L. forthcoming. “Power of Experts in EU. Networks of Decision-Making and Expert Knowledge in the European debt crisis in 2010.” Doctoral disseration.
   Google Scholar
• Nordström, L., and N. Laiho. 2022. “Explaining IMF Design of 2010 Greece Loan: Bricoleurs Relying on Fiscal Space and Non-Linear Multiple Equilibria Processes.” Comparative European Politics. doi:10.1057/s41295-022-00307-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordström, L., and T. Teivainen. 2022. “IMF Expertise in the Eurozone Crisis: From Stimulus Talk to Austerity Policy.” Global Political Economy 1 (2): 271–292. doi:10.1332/TZPB5276.
   Google Scholar
• Papaconstantinou, G. 2016. Game Over. The inside story of the Greek crisis. Scotts Valley: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform.
   Google Scholar
• Pénet, P. 2018. “The IMF Failure That Wasn’t: Risk Ignorance During the European Debt Crisis.” The British Journal of Sociology 69: 1031–1055. doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petiteville, F. 2018. “International Organizations Beyond Depoliticized Governance.” Globalizations 15 (3): 301–313. doi:10.1080/14747731.2017.1370850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pisani-Ferry, J. 2014. The Euro Crisis and Its Aftermath. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Protokoll 17/18. 2010. Protokoll Nr. 17/18. Haushaltsausschuss unkorrigiertes Stenografisches Protokoll 18. Sitzung (5.5.2010). Deutscher Bundestag, 17. Wahlperiode.
   Google Scholar
• Protokoll Nr. 17/21. 2010. Haushaltsausschuss Unkorrigiertes Stenografisches Protokoll 21. Sitzung. Deutscher Bundestag Protokoll Nr. 17/21 17. Wahlperiode.
   Google Scholar
• Rehn, O. 2012. Myrskyn Silmässä. Eurokriisistä eteenpäin. Otava.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhart, C. M., and C. Trebesch. 2016. "The International Monetary Fund: 70 Years of Reinvention.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 30 (1): 3–28. doi:10.1257/jep.30.1.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, C. 2012. The IMF and European Economies: Crisis and Conditionality. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Roos, J. E. 2019. Why Not Default?: The Political Economy of Sovereign Debt. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lütz S., and M. Kranke. 2013. “The European rescue of the Washington Consensus? EU and IMF lending to Central and Eastern European countries.” Review of International Political Economy 21 (2): 310–338. doi:10.1080/09692290.2012.747104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salo, S. 2017. “The Curious Prevalence of Austerity. Economic Ideas in Public Debates on the Eurozone Crisis in Ireland and Finland, 2008-2012.” PhD diss., European University Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Seitz, F., & Thomas J. (2012). The Role of the IMF in the European Debt Crisis. No. 32. Weidener Diskussionspapiere.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. 2008. Social Movements for Global Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stallings, B. 1982. “The IMF in Europe: Inflation Fighting in Britain, Italy and Portugal.” In The Politics of Inflation. A Comparative Analysis, edited by Richard Medley, 77–103. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, R. W. 2011. Controlling Institutions: International Organizations and the Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Store, J. 2014. Euroopan Ytimessä. Helsinki: Otava.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, W. 2015, May. “Heller, Schmitt and the Euro.” European Law Journal 21 (3): 361–370. doi:10.1111/eulj.12134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedberg, R. 1986. “The Doctrine of Economic Neutrality of the IMF and the World Bank.” Journal of Peace Research 23 (4): 377–390. doi:10.1177/002234338602300406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallberg, J., and M. Zürn. 2019. “The Legitimacy and Legitimation of International Organizations: Introduction and Framework.” The Review of International Organizations 14: 581–606. doi:10.1007/s11558-018-9330-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teivainen, T. 1999. “Globalization of Economic Surveillance: The International Monetary Fund as a Modern Priest.” Passages: Journal of Transnational and Transcultural Studies 1 (1): 84–116. doi:10.1163/15691675_001_01-06.
   Google Scholar
• Teivainen, T. 2002. Enter Economism, Exit Politics. Experts, Economic Policy and Damage to Democracy. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Verdun, A. 2015. “A Historical Institutionalist Explanation of the EU's Responses to the Euro Area Financial Crisis.” Journal of European Public Policy 22 (2): 219–237. doi:10.1080/13501763.2014.994023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyplosz, C., and S. Sgherri. 2017. “The IMF’s Role in Greece in the Context of the 2010 Stand-By Arrangement.” In Background Papers on The IMF and the Crises in Greece, Ireland, and Portugal. International Monetary Fund, edited by M. J. Schwartz and S. Takagi, 257–318. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
   Google Scholar