Imagining Meaningful Human Control: Autonomous Weapons and the (De-) Legitimisation of Future Warfare

References

• Altmann, Jürgen, and Frank Sauer. 2017. “Autonomous Weapon Systems and Strategic Stability.” Survival 59 (5): 117–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2017.1375263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amoore, Louise. 2009. “Algorithmic War: Everyday Geographies of the War on Terror.” Antipode 41 (1): 49–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2008.00655.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amoroso, Daniele, and Guglielmo Tamburrini. 2021. “Toward a Normative Model of Meaningful Human Control Over Weapons Systems.” Ethics & International Affairs 35 (2): 245–272. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679421000241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Article 36. 2013. “Structuring Debate on Autonomous Weapons Systems: Memorandum for Delegates to the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW).” Accessed March 18, 2022. https://article36.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Autonomous-weapons-memo-for-CCW.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Asaro, Peter. 2012. “On Banning Autonomous Weapon Systems: Human Rights, Automation, and the Dehumanization of Lethal Decision-Making.” International Review of the Red Cross 94 (886): 687–709. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383112000768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australia, Canada, Japan, Republic of Korea, United Kingdom, and United States. 2022. “Principles and Good Practices on Emerging Technologies in the Area of Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems: 07.03.2022.” https://meetings.unoda.org/meeting/57989/documents.
   Google Scholar
• Bareis, Jascha, and Christian Katzenbach. 2022. “Talking AI Into Being: The Narratives and Imaginaries of National AI Strategies and Their Performative Politics.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 47 (5): 855–881. https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439211030007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellanova, Rocco, Katja L. Jacobsen, and Linda Monsees. 2020. “Taking the Trouble: Science, Technology and Security Studies.” Critical Studies on Security 8 (2): 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2020.1839852
   Google Scholar
• Berling, Trine V., Izabela Surwillo, and Sandra Sørensen. 2022. “Norwegian and Ukrainian Energy Futures: Exploring the Role of National Identity in Sociotechnical Imaginaries of Energy Security.” Journal of International Relations and Development 25 (1): 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-021-00212-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode, Ingvild. 2019. “Norm-Making and the Global South: Attempts to Regulate Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems.” Global Policy 10 (3): 359–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode, Ingvild, and Hendrik Huelss. 2018. “Autonomous Weapons Systems and Changing Norms in International Relations.” Review of International Studies 44 (3): 393–413. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210517000614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode, Ingvild, and Hendrik Huelss. 2022. Autonomous Weapons Systems and International Norms. Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bode, Ingvild, and Tom Watts. 2021. Meaning-Less Human Control: Lessons from Air Defence Systems on Meaningful Human Control for the Debate on AWS. Joint Report, Drone Wars UK, Oxford and Centre for War Studies, Odense.
   Google Scholar
• Boulanin, Vincent, Neil Davison, Netta Goussac, and Moa P. Carlsson. 2020. Limits on Autonomy in Weapon Systems: Identifying Practical Elements of Human Control: Report, Stockholm International Peace Research Institute and International Committee of the Red Cross. Stockholm. https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/2020-06/2006_limits_of_autonomy.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Boulanin, Vincent, and Maaike Verbruggen. 2017. Mapping the Development of Autonomy in Weapon Systems: Report, Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. Stockholm. https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/2017-11/siprireport_mapping_the_development_of_autonomy_in_weapon_systems_1117_1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Brazil, Chile, Mexico. 2021. “Elements for a Future Normative Framework Conducive to a Legally Binding Instrument to Address the Ethical, Humanitarian and Legal Concerns Posed by Emerging Technologies in the Area of (Lethal) Autonomous Weapons (LAWS): Written Commentary.” https://reachingcriticalwill.org/images/documents/Disarmament-fora/ccw/2021/gge/documents/Brazil-Chile-Mexico.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, R. C. 2014. Lost Causes: Agenda Vetting in Global Issue Networks and the Shaping of Human Security. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cave, Stephen, Kanta Dihal, and Sarah Dillon. 2020a. AI Narratives: A History of Imaginative Thinking About Intelligent Machines. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cave, Stephen, Kanta Dihal, and Sarah Dillon. 2020b. “Introduction: Imagining AI.” In AI Narratives: A History of Imaginative Thinking About Intelligent Machines, edited by Stephen Cave, Kanta Dihal, and Sarah Dillon, 1–22. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chenou, Jean-Marie. 2019. “Elites and Socio-Technical Imaginaries: The Contribution of an IPE-IPS Dialogue to the Analysis of Global Power Relations in the Digital Age.” International Relations 33 (4): 595–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117819885161a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• China. 2018. “Position Paper, UN-CCW GGE on LAWS: 11.04.2018.” CCW/GGE.1/2018/WP.7.
   Google Scholar
• Cohn, Carol. 1987. “Sex and Death in the Rational World of Defense Intellectuals.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 12 (4): 687–718. https://doi.org/10.1086/494362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coker, Christopher. 2018. “Still ‘The Human Thing’? Technology, Human Agency and the Future of War.” International Relations 32 (1): 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117818754640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crootof, Rebecca. 2015. “The Killer Robots Are Here: Legal and Policy Implications.” Cordozo Law Review 36 (5): 1837–1915.
   Google Scholar
• Crootof, Rebecca. 2016. “A Meaningful Floor for “Meaningful Human Control”.” Temple International & Comparative Law Journal 30 (1): 53–62.
   Google Scholar
• Csernatoni, Raluca. 2022. “The EU’s Hegemonic Imaginaries: From European Strategic Autonomy in Defence to Technological Sovereignty.” European Security 31 (3): 395–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2022.2103370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, M. L. 2019. “Lethal Autonomous Weapons: Meaningful Human Control or Meaningful Human Certification? [Opinion].” IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 20–26. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2019.2948438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danielsson, Anna, and Kristin Ljungkvist. 2022. “A Choking(?) Engine of War: Human Agency in Military Targeting Reconsidered.” Review of International Studies, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210522000353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demmers, Jolle. 2017. Theories of Violent Conflict: An Introduction. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Drezner, Daniel W. 2019. “Technological Change and International Relations.” International Relations 33 (2): 286–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117819834629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egeland, Kjølv. 2016. “Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems Under International Humanitarian Law.” Nordic Journal of International Law 85 (2): 89–118. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718107-08502001
   Google Scholar
• Ekelhof, Merel. 2017. “Complications of a Common Language: Why It Is so Hard to Talk About Autonomous Weapons.” Journal of Conflict and Security Law 22 (2): 311–331. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/krw029
   Google Scholar
• Ekelhof, Merel. 2019. “Moving Beyond Semantics on Autonomous Weapons: Meaningful Human Control in Operation.” Global Policy 10 (3): 343–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, Norman, Jane Mulderrig, and Ruth Wodak. 2013. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Critical Discourse Analysis: Volume I: Concepts, History, Theory, edited by Ruth Wodak, 79–101. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, and Sweden. 2022. “Working Paper, UN-CCW GGE on LAWS: 13.07.2022.” https://documents.unoda.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/WP-LAWS_DE-ES-FI-FR-NL-NO-SE.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, Denise. 2015. “Humanitarian Security Regimes.” International Affairs 91 (1): 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, Denise. 2016. “Future Arms, Technologies, and International Law: Preventive Security Governance.” European Journal of International Security 1 (1): 94–111. https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2015.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyns, Christof. 2013. “Report of the Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary Executions: General Assembly Human Rights Council Twenty-Third Session.” A/HRC/23/47.
   Google Scholar
• Hilgartner, Stephen. 2015. “Capturing the Imaginary: Vanguards, Visions and the Synthetic Biology Revolution.” In Science and Democracy: Making Knowledge and Making Power in the Biosciences and Beyond, edited by Stephen Hilgartner, Clark Miller, and Rob Hagendijk, 33–55. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, Michel A. 2020. The Black Box, Unlocked: Predictability and Understandability in Military AI. Geneva: United Nations Institute for Disarmament.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, Michel A. 2021. Known Unknowns: Data Issues and Military Autonomous Systems. Geneva: United Nations Institute for Disarmament.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, Michael. 2016. “Why Words Matter: The Real World Consequences of Defining Autonomous Weapons Systems.” Temple International & Comparative Law Journal 30 (1): 85–98.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, Michael. 2019. “When Speed Kills: Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems, Deterrence and Stability.” Journal of Strategic Studies 42 (6): 764–788. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2019.1621174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz, Michael, and Paul Scharre. 2015. “Meaningful Human Control in Weapon Systems: A Primer.” Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Watch. 2012. “Losing Humanity: The Case Against Killer Robots.” Accessed May 17, 2019. https://www.hrw.org/report/2012/11/19/losing-humanity/case-against-killer-robots.
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Watch. 2018. “Statements at the CCW GGE on LAWS on Agenda Item 6b: 11.04.2018.” https://docs-library.unoda.org/Convention_on_Certain_Conventional_Weapons_-_Group_of_Governmental_Experts_(2018)/2018_LAWS6b_HRW.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ICRC. 2021. “ICRC Position on Autonomous Weapon Systems.” https://www.icrc.org/en/document/icrc-position-autonomous-weapon-systems.
   Google Scholar
• International Panel on the Regulation of Autonomous Weapons. 2019. “Focus on Human Control: Report No. 5.” www.ipraw.org.
   Google Scholar
• International Panel on the Regulation of Autonomous Weapons. 2021. “Building Blocks for a Regulation on LAWS and Human Control: Updated Recommendations to the GGE on LAWS.” www.ipraw.org.
   Google Scholar
• Israel. 2018. “Statement at the CCW GGE on LAWS on Agenda Item 6b: 11.04.2018.” https://docs-library.unoda.org/Convention_on_Certain_Conventional_Weapons_-_Group_of_Governmental_Experts_(2018)/2018_LAWS6b_Israel.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jabri, Vivienne. 1996. Discourses on Violence: Conflict Analysis Reconsidered. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila. 2015. “Future Imperfect: Science, Technology, and the Imaginations of Modernity.” In Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power, edited by Sheila Jasanoff, and Sang-Hyun Kim, 1–33. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila, and Sang-Hyun Kim. 2009. “Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea.” Minerva 47 (2): 119–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallenborn, Zachary. 2021. “Was a Flying Killer Robot Used in Libya? Quite Possibly.” https://thebulletin.org/2021/05/was-a-flying-killer-robot-used-in-libya-quite-possibly/#post-heading.
   Google Scholar
• Kallenborn, Zachary. 2022. “Russia May Have Used a Killer Robot in Ukraine. Now What?” https://thebulletin.org/2022/03/russia-may-have-used-a-killer-robot-in-ukraine-now-what/.
   Google Scholar
• Klimburg-Witjes, Nina. 2023. “A Rocket to Protect? Sociotechnical Imaginaries of Strategic Autonomy in Controversies About the European Rocket Program.” Geopolitics Online first.
   Google Scholar
• Leese, Matthias, and Marijn Hoijtink. 2019. “How (Not) To Talk About Technology: International Relations and the Question of Agency.” In Technology and Agency in International Relations, edited by Marijn Hoijtink, and Matthias Leese, 1–23. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, George E. 1995. “Introduction.” In Technoscientific Imaginaries: Conversations, Profiles, and Memoirs, edited by George E. Marcus, 1–9. Late Editions 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martins, Bruno O., and Jocelyn Mawdsley. 2021. “Sociotechnical Imaginaries of EU Defence: The Past and the Future in the European Defence Fund.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 59 (6): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, Daniel R. 2021. “Imagining the Security of Innovation: Technological Innovation, National Security, and the American Way of Life.” Critical Studies on Security, 196–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2021.1934640
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, Maureen, Arribas-Ayllon-Michael Joan Haran, Adrian Mackenzie, and Richard Tutton. 2017. “Conceptualizing Imaginaries of Science, Technology, and Society.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by Ulrike Felt, Rayvon Fouché, Clark A. Miller, and Laurel Smith-Doerr, 435–463. 4th ed. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moyes, Richard. 2016. “Key Elements of Meaningful Human Control.” Accessed May 20, 2022. https://www.article36.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/MHC-2016-FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Palestine. 2021. “Statement at the CCW GGE on LAWS: 30.09.2021.” https://reachingcriticalwill.org/images/documents/Disarmament-fora/ccw/2021/gge/statements/30Sept_Palestine.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Peoples, Columba. 2010. Justifying Ballistic Missile Defence: Technology, Security and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riebe, Thea, Stefka Schmid, and Christian Reuter. 2020. “Meaningful Human Control of Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems: The CCW-Debate and Its Implications for VSD.” IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2020.3031846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosert, Elvira, and Frank Sauer. 2019. “Prohibiting Autonomous Weapons: Put Human Dignity First.” Global Policy 10 (3): 370–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosert, Elvira, and Frank Sauer. 2021. “How (Not) To Stop the Killer Robots: A Comparative Analysis of Humanitarian Disarmament Campaign Strategies.” Contemporary Security Policy 42 (1): 4–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2020.1771508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russian Federation. 2019. “Potential Opportunities and Limitations of Military Uses of Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems: CCW/GGE.1/2019/WP.1.” https://unoda-documents-library.s3.amazonaws.com/Convention_on_Certain_Conventional_Weapons_-_Group_of_Governmental_Experts_(2019)/CCW.GGE.1.2019.WP.1_R%2BE.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Saxon, Dan. 2022. Fighting Machines: Autonomous Weapons and Human Dignity. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schröder, Ingo, and Bettina Schmidt. 2001. “Introduction: Violent Imaginaries and Violent Practices.” In Anthropology of Violence and Conflict, edited by Bettina Schmidt, and Ingo Schröder, 1–24. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine, and Dvora Yanow. 2012. Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, Elke. 2021. “Autonomous Weapons Systems, Artificial Intelligence, and the Problem of Meaningful Human Control.” Philosophical Journal of Conflict and Violence 5 (1): 53–72. https://doi.org/10.22618/TP.PJCV.20215.1.139004
   Google Scholar
• Sharkey, Noel. 2012. “The Evitability of Autonomous Robot Warfare.” International Review of the Red Cross 94 (886): 787–799. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383112000732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharkey, Amanda. 2019. “Autonomous Weapons Systems, Killer Robots and Human Dignity.” Ethics and Information Technology 21 (2): 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9494-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, Tim. 2016. Cyber Security and the Politics of Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, Lucy. 2020. “Algorithmic Warfare and the Reinvention of Accuracy.” Critical Studies on Security 8 (2): 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2020.1760587
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, Lucy, Karolina Follis, and Jutta Weber. 2017. “Tracking and Targeting.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 42 (6): 983–1002. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243917731524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, Charles. 2004. Modern Social Imaginaries. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• UN-CCW. 2016. “Final Document of the Fifth Review Conference: Fifth Review Conference of the High Contracting Parties to the Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to Be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects.” CCW/CONF V/10.
   Google Scholar
• UN-CCW. 2019. “Report of the 2019 Session of the Group of Governmental Experts on Emerging Technologies in the Area of Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems: CCW/GGE.1/2019/3.”
   Google Scholar
• United Kingdom. 2018. “Human Machine Touchpoints: The United Kingdom’s Perspective on Human Control over Weapon Development and Targeting Cycles: CCW/GGE.2/2018/WP.1.” https://docs-library.unoda.org/Convention_on_Certain_Conventional_Weapons_-_Group_of_Governmental_Experts_(2018)/2018_GGE%2BLAWS_August_Working%2BPaper_UK.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2021. “Letter Dated 8 March 2021 from the Panel of Experts on Libya Established Pursuant to Resolution 1973 (2011) Addressed to the President of the Security Council: S/2021/229.” https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N21/037/72/PDF/N2103772.pdf?OpenElement.
   Google Scholar
• United States. 2018. “Human-Machine Interaction in the Development, Deployment and Use of Emerging Technologies in the Area of Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems: CCW/GGE.2/2018/WP.4.” https://docs-library.unoda.org/Convention_on_Certain_Conventional_Weapons_-_Group_of_Governmental_Experts_(2018)/2018_GGE%2BLAWS_August_Working%2BPaper_US.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• United States. 2021. “U.S. Proposals on Aspects of the Normative and Operational Framework, UN-CCW GGE on LAWS: 27.09.2021.” CCW/GGE.1/2021/WP.3.
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Defense. 2012. Directive 3000.09: Autonomy in Weapon Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, John. 2021. “Locating LAWS: Lethal Autonomous Weapons, Epistemic Space, and “Meaningful Human” Control.” Journal of Global Security Studies 6: 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar