mHealth and data protection – the letter and the spirit of consent legal requirements

References

• Article 29 Data Protection Working Party. 2011. Opinion 15/2011 on the Definition of Consent, 01197/11/EN WP.187.
   Google Scholar
• Article 29 Data Protection Working Party. 2007. Working Document on the Processing of Personal Data Relating to Health in Electronic Health Records (EHR), 00323/07/EN WP 131.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, J.W., Appelbaum, P.S., Lidz, C.W. and Parker, L.S. 2001. Informed Consent. Legal Theory and Clinical Practice (2nd ed). Oxford: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bix, B. 2010. Consent in Contract Law. In The Ethics of Consent: Theory and Practice, eds A. Wertheimer and F.G. Miller, 251–79. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Canterbury v. Spence 464 F.2d 772 (1972)
   Google Scholar
• De Hert, P. and Gutwirth, S. 2009. Data Protection in the Case Law of Strasbourg and Luxembourg: Constitutionalisation in Action. In Reinventing Data Protection? Eds. S. Gutwirth, Y. Poullet, P. De Hert, J. Nouwt and C. De Terwangne, 3–44. The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• De Hert, P. and Mantovani, E. 2010. On Consent. In Ageing and Invisibility, eds E. Mordini, & P. De Hert, 131–42. The Netherlands: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Hert, P. and Papakonstantinou, V. 2012. The Proposed Data Protection Regulation Replacing Directive 95/46/EC: A Sound System for the Protection of Individuals. Computer Law & Security Review, 28, no. 2. doi: 10.1016/j.clsr.2012.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and Council of 24 October 1995 on the Protection of Individuals with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of Such Data. Official Journal of the European Communities L281, 23 November 1995, 31–50.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2010. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, A comprehensive approach on personal data protection in the European Union, COM(2010) 609 final paragraph 2.1.5.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2012. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Protection of individuals with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of such Data (General Data Protection Regulation), COM(2012) 11/4 draft (including explanatory memorandum).
   Google Scholar
• European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS). 2011. Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – ‘A Comprehensive approach on Personal Data Protection in the European Union’, 14 January 2011, http://www.edps.europa.eu/EDPSWEB/webdav/site/mySite/shared/Documents/Consultation/Opinions/2011/11-01-14_Personal_Data_Protection_EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gutwirth, S. 2012. Short Statement about the Role of Consent in the European Data Protection Directive. The Selected Works of Serge Gutwirth, http://works.bepress.com/serge_gutwirth/80
   Google Scholar
• Mantovani, E., Lopez, D., and Thompson, O. 2012. Discussion on the Notion of Consent of Older Citizens in Situations of Dependency, Marie Curie VALUE AGEING Project. Deliverable 2.2., http://www.valueageing.eu/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/D2.2_FINAL.pdf (accessed 3 December 2012).
   Google Scholar
• McLean, S. 2010. Autonomy, Consent and the Law. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. 2008. The Logic of Care: Health and the Problem of Patient Choice. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• O'Neill, O. 2003. Some Limits of Informed Consent. Journal of Medical Ethics 29: 4–7. doi: 10.1136/jme.29.1.4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinch, T. J. and Bijker, W. E. 1984. The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science 14: 399–441. doi: 10.1177/030631284014003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pols, J. 2010. The Heart of the Matter. About Good Nursing and Telecare. Health Care Analysis 18, no. 4: 374–88. doi: 10.1007/s10728-009-0140-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, P. and De Hert, P. 2012. The European Patients' Rights Directive: A Clarification and Codification of individual Rights Relating to Cross Border Healthcare and Novel initiatives aimed at improving Pan-European Healthcare co-operation. Medical Law International 12, no. 1: 28–69. doi: 10.1177/0968533212439573
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, J. 2012. Symposium Issue, The Right to be Forgotten. Stanford Law Review Online 88. Available at http://www.stanfordlawreview.org/sites/default/files/online/topics/64-SLRO-88.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schloendorf v. Society of New York Hospital, 211 NY 125, 129-130, N.E (1914).
   Google Scholar
• Sciascia, L. 1974. Todo Modo. Gli Adelphi (fifth edition, 1995)
   Google Scholar
• Weindling, P. 2001. The Origins of Informed Consent: The International Scientific Commission on Medical War Crimes, and the Nuremburg Code. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 75: 37–71. doi: 10.1353/bhm.2001.0049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, D., Gutwirth, S., Friedewald, M., Vildjiounate, E. and Punie, Y., eds. 2008. Safeguards in a World of Ambient Intelligence. The Netherlands: Springer
   Google Scholar
• Yu, P., Wu, M., Yu, H. and Xiao, G. 2006. The Challenges for the Adoption of M-Health. In IEEE International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics and Informatics, Shanghai, China, June 21–23, 181–186.
   Google Scholar