Who decides on the future of data protection? Role of law firms in shaping European data protection regime

References

• Beddard, R. 1994. Human rights and Europe, 95. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, C. J. 1992. Regulating privacy – data protection and public policy in Europe and the United States, 12. New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, C. J. 2008. The privacy advocates: resisting spread of surveillance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bieler, A., and A. D. Morton, eds. 2001. Social forces in the making of the new Europe: the restructuring of European social relations in the global political economy. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. A., and T. Risse. 2010. “Governance without a state: Can it work?” Regulation & Governance 4: 113–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2010.01076.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkert, H. 1988. “The law of information technology - Basic concepts.” Datenschutz und Datensicherung 8: 384–5, et seq.
   Google Scholar
• Bygrave, L. 2002. Data protection law: Approaching its rationale, logic and limits. The Hague, London, New York: Kluwer Law International.
   Google Scholar
• Clarkson, K. W., R. LeRoy Miller, and F. B. Cross. 2010. Business law: Text and cases - legal, ethical, global, and corporate environment. Mason, OH: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, L., and Y. Poullet. 2012. “Privacy and the regulation of 2012.” Computer Law & Security Review 28.
   Google Scholar
• Cowles, M. 2003. “Non-state actors and false dichotomies: Reviewing IR/IPE approaches to European integration.” Journal of European Public Policy 10 (1): 102–120, at 104. doi: 10.1080/1350176032000046967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, P. 2011. “Integration, democracy and legitimacy.” In The evolution of EU law, edited by P. Craig and G. de Burca, 13–41. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Hert, P., and S. Gutwirth. 2009. “Data Protection in the case-law of Strasbourg and Luxembourg: Constitutionalization in action.” In Reinventing data protection? edited by S. Gutwirth et al., 3–45, at 15. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• De Hert, P., and V. Papakonstantinou. 2012. “The proposed data protection Regulation replacing Directive 95/46/EC: A sound system for the protection of individuals.” Computer Law & Security Review 28: 130–42. doi: 10.1016/j.clsr.2012.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ENISA. 2009. Cloud Computing: benefits, risks, and recommendations for the information security. Report, eds. D. Catteddu and G. Hogben, available online at http://www.enisa.europa.eu/.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2011. Impact assessment accompanying the document Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulation) and Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and the free movement of such data. Commission Stuff Working Paper, SEC(2012) 72 final 11, para. 3.2.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2013. “The data protection reform – one year on. MEMO13/39. Brussels, 28 January 2013, available online at http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-13-39_en.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Feder, G. “Firm size, risk aversion and the adoption of new technology under uncertainty.” Oxford Economic Papers, New Series 32 (2): 263–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flood, J. 1991. “Doing business: The management of uncertainty in lawyers' work.” Law & Society Review 25 (1): 41–71. doi: 10.2307/3053889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flood, J. 2007. “Lawyers as sanctifiers: The role of elite law firms in international business transactions.” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 14 (1): 35–66. doi: 10.2979/GLS.2007.14.1.35
   Google Scholar
• Flood, J., and E. Skordaki. 1997. “Normative bricolage: Informal rule-making by accountants and lawyers in mega-insolvencies.” In Global law without a state, edited by G. Teubner, 109–31. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, D., D. Gomien, and L. F. Zwaak. 1996. Law and practice of the European Convention on Human Rights and the European Social Charter. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.231
   Google Scholar
• Heisenberg, D. 2005. Negotiating privacy: The European Union, the United States, and Personal Data Protection, 53–4. Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Hutter Bridget, M 2006. “The role of non-state actors in regulation.” London School of Economics Discussion paper series, 37. April.
   Google Scholar
• Keck, M. E., and K. Sikking. 1998. Activists beyond borders: advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.35
   Google Scholar
• Koops, B.-J. 2010. “Law, technology, and shifting power relations.” Berkeley Technology Law Journal 25 (2): 973–1035. ; at 1034.
   Google Scholar
• Koops, E. J. 2011. “Forgetting footprints, shunning shadows: A critical analysis of the ‘right to be forgotten' in big data practice.” SCRIPTed 8 (3): 229–56.
   Google Scholar
• Kroes, N. 2012. “EU data protection reform and cloud computing.” Speech 11/40, available online at http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-12-40_en.htm?locale=EN).
   Google Scholar
• Kuner, C. 2007. European data protection law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.219
   Google Scholar
• Kuner, C. 2010. “Internet jurisdiction and data protection law: An international legal analysis. Parts 1 and 2.” International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 18: 176–227. doi: 10.1093/ijlit/eaq002
   Google Scholar
• Mayer-Schőnberger, V. 1997. In Data protection in Europe, in technology and privacy: The new landscape, edited by P. E. Agre and M. Rotenberg. Cambridge. MA, London: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moerel, L. 2011. “Back to basics: When does EU data protection law apply?.” International Data Privacy Law 1 (2): 92–110. doi: 10.1093/idpl/ipq009
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. L. 1985. “Ideology, practice, and professional autonomy: Social values and client relationships in the large law firm.” Stanford Law Review 37 (2): 503–55. doi: 10.2307/1228625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, A. L. 2008. “Building transnational civil liberties: Transgovernmental entrepreneurs and the European data privacy directive.” International Organization 1 (62): 103–30.
   Google Scholar
• Nugter, A. C. M. 1990. Transborder flow of personal data within the EC, 29. Boston: Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Nymity. 2011. Before and after implementation of the BCR: Nymity BCR accountability analysis. On hand with the author.
   Google Scholar
• Prechal, S. 2005. Directives in EC Law. Oxford European Union Law Library, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Purtova, N. N. 2011a. Property rights in personal data: A European perspective. Alphen aan De Rijn: Kluwer Law International.
   Google Scholar
• Purtova, N. 2011b. “Property in personal data: Second life of an old idea in the age of cloud computing, chain informatization, and ambient intelligence.” In Privacy and data protection. An element of choice, edited by P. de Hert, S. Gutwirth and Y. Poullet. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Purtova, N. 2012. Rethinking (yet again) the core of the data protection: options and implications. Conference paper presented at APC2012.
   Google Scholar
• Quack, S. 2007. “Legal professionals and Transnational law-making: A case of distributed agency.” Organization 14: 643. doi: 10.1177/1350508407080313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raab, C., and B.-J. Koops. 2009. “Privacy actors, performances and the future of privacy protection.” In Reinventing data protection?, edited by S. Gutwirth et al., 207–25. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Reding, V. 2010. Towards a true single market of data protection. Speech given at the Meeting of the Article 29 Working Party ‘Review of the Data Protection Legal Framework’, Brussels, 14 July 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, N., H. Graux, M. Botterman, and L. Valeri. 2009. “Review of the European Data Protection Directive: Technical report prepared for the Information Commissioner's Office.” RAND.
   Google Scholar
• Rouvroy, A., and Y. Poullet. 2009. “The right to information self-determination and the value of self-development: Reassessing the importance of privacy for democracy.” In Reinventing data protection?, edited by S. Gutwirth et al., 45–77, at 62. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Thayyil, N. 2012. “GMOs in Europe.” PhD diss., Tilburg University.
   Google Scholar
• UK Ministry of Justice. 2012. “Call for Evidence on the Proposed EU Data Protection Legislative Framework: Summary of responses. published on 28 June 2012 available online at https://consult.justice.gov.uk/digital-communications/data-protection-proposals-cfe (last accessed 30 July 2012).
   Google Scholar