Scientia potentia est: Making threats of copyright infringement

References

• Anderson, M. 2011. “Threats provisions: time to abolish them?.” IP Draughts. Available at http://ipdraughts.wordpress.com/2011/05/26/ip-threats-provisions-time-to-abolish-them/ (last accessed 5 November 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Atkins, R. 2009. “Copyright, contract and the protection of computer programs.” International Review of Law, Computers and Technology, 23: 143. doi: 10.1080/13600860902753528
   Google Scholar
• Barlow, J. P. 1996. “A declaration of the independence of cyberspace.” In Quoted in Spiller, N. (ed). 2002. Cyber_Reader, 270–271. New York: Phaidon.
   Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y. 2006. The wealth of networks, Chapters 1 & 6, and throughout. Harvard: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bentham, J. 1787. “Panopticon.” In M. Bozovic. (Ed.), The Panopticon Writings, London: Verso, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Cassidy, L. 2007. “Unjustifiable threats in UK trade mark actions: Should the unjustifiable threats provisions be maintained?.” , Available at http://www.ffw.com/publications/all/articles/unjustifiable-threats-in-uk-tr.aspx (last accessed 7 December 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. 1968. “‘Differance’, in Derrida, J. 1982.” Margins of Philosophy, New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, W. 2004. Promises to keep, Chapter 1. California: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1969. “What is an author?.” In D. Bouchard and S. Simon (Ed.), Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews, (pp. 113–138). New York: Cornell University Press, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1973. “Truth and juridical forms. Parts II & III.” In M. Faubion (Ed.), In Michel Foucault: Power - essential works of Foucault 1954-1984 Volume 3, Trans. inter alia R. Hurley, 1–89. London: Penguin Books, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2008. In M. Senellart. (Ed.), The birth of biopolitics, Trans. G. Burchell. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, J. 1949. Law and the modern mind, Chapter 1. New York: Tudor Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fysh, M., Roughton, A., Johnson, P., and Cook, T. (Eds.). 2010. The modern law of patents, 1000. London: LexisNexis.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1984. The constitution of society, Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grajetzki, W. 2007. Burial customs in Ancient Egypt, London: Duckworth.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, J. 2011. “The interface between copyright and contract: Suggestions for the future.” European Journal of Law and Technology, 2(1):
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, J. 2013. “The digital copyright exchange.” Law, Computers and Technology, 27(5):
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, J. 2013. “Copyright Evolution: Creation, Regulation and the Decline of Substantively Rational Copyright Law” [2013] IPQ (forthcoming).
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1984, 1987. Theory of communicative action, Vols I & II. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, I. 2011. “Digital opportunity: A review of intellectual property and growth, 3, Chapter 4.” London: UK-IPO.
   Google Scholar
• Heald, P. J. 1994. “Payment demands for spurious copyrights: Four causes of action.” Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 259(1): 267.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, M. 2010. The gridlock economy: How too much ownership wrecks markets, stops innovation, and costs lives, New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper, R. 2012. Rights and wrong, London: UK-IPO.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper, R., and Lynch, R. 2012. Copyright works: Streamlining copyright licensing for the digital age.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. 2010. Review of civil litigation costs, London: TSO.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. 1999. “Wet footprints? Digital watermarks: A trail to the copyright infringer on the Internet.” Pepperdine Law Review, 26: 559.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. 1956. Metaphysic of morals, 17. Trans. H.J. Paton, 69. London: Hutchison & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, D., Llewelyn, D., Mellor, J., Meade, R., and Moody-Stuart, T. 2001. Kerly's law of trade marks and trade names, Chapter 17. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
   Google Scholar
• Landes, W. and R. Posner 1989. “An economic analysis of Copyright Law.” Journal of Legal Studies, 18: 325. doi: 10.1086/468150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanier, D. 2011. You are not a gadget, 28. London: Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lessig, L. 2004. Free culture: How big media uses technology and the law to lock down culture and control creativity, New York: Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzone, J. 2006. “Copyfraud.” New York University Law Review, 81: 1026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzone, J. 2011. Copyfraud and other abuses of intellectual property law, California: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morcom, C., Roughton, A., Graham, J., and Malynicz, S. 2008. Modern law of trade marks, 3rd ed., (pp. 349 London: Lexis Nexis Butterworths.
   Google Scholar
• Nietzsche, F. 1887. The gay science, Trans. W. Kaufmann. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Nimmer, M., Marcus, P., Myers, D., and Nimmer, D. 1991. Copyright, 4th ed., Chapter 7 Minn.: West.
   Google Scholar
• Page Keeton, W., Dobbs, D., Keeton, R., and Owen, G. 1984. Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts, 5th ed., at §107 at 748. Minn.: West.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, J. 2011. “Unwarranted threats for copyright infringement.” , ” At http://the1709blog.blogspot.co.uk/2011/07/unwarranted-threats-to-sue-for.html (last accessed 1 December 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Porter, D., ed. 1997. Internet culture, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, G. 1906. The censorship of the Church of Rome, vols I & II; see in particular vol. I, Chapter VI. New York: Benjamin Blom.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, G. 1980. Authors and their public in ancient times, 3rd ed. New York: Knickerbocker Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ransom, H. 1956. The first copyright statute, Chapter VI. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ricketson, S., and Creswell, C. 2001. The law of intellectual property: Copyright, designs & confidential information, 2nd ed., § 2.195. Sydney: Lawbook.
   Google Scholar
• Shneiderman, B. 2002. Leonardo's laptop, Chapter 3. MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, M., Dugdale, A., and Jones, M. 2010. Clerk and Lindsell on torts, 20th ed. London: Thomson Reuters.
   Google Scholar
• Stallman, R. 1997. “The right to read. Originally published in Communications of the ACM.” 40: 85 . (since updated). Available at http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. 2001. Death and the afterlife in Ancient Egypt, at 186–200, esp. 187–193 and 196–198. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• The Law Society 2009. Review of civil litigation costs: Preliminary report, at 35. London: The Law Society.
   Google Scholar
• Thorley, S., Miller, R., Burkill, G., Birss, C., and Campbell, D. 2006. Terrell on the law of patents, Chapter 15. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
   Google Scholar
• Trademark World. 2007. February.
   Google Scholar
• Vaidhyanathan, S. 2001. Copyrights and copywrongs: The rise of Intellectual Property and how it threatens creativity, 2nd ed., Chapter 1. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. 1978. Economy and society, vols I & II. California: California University Press.
   Google Scholar