A legal perspective on body implants for therapy and enhancement

References

• Allhoff, F., P. Lin, J. Moor, and J. Weckert. 2009, August 31. Ethics of Human Enhancement: 24 Questions & Answers. Report for the US National Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Aszmann, O. C., A. D. Roche, S. Salminger, T. Paternostro-Sluga, M. Herceg, A. Sturma, C. Hofer, and D. Farina. 2015. “Bionic Reconstruction to Restore Hand Function after Brachial Plexus Injury: A Case Series of Three Patients.” Lancet 385 (9983): 2183–2189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61776-1. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61776-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battaglia, F., and A. Carnevale, eds. 2014. Reframing the Debate on Human Enhancement. Special issue of Humana.Mente 26. http://www.humanamente.eu/PDF/Complete_Issue%2026.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bertolini, A., and E. Palmerini. 2014. “Regulating Robotics: A Challenge for Europe.” In Upcoming issues of EU Law. Compilation of in-depth analyses. Workshop for the IURI Committee of the European Parliament. Session II: 94–129. Brussels: Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities. Accessed April 15, 2015. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/studies.
   Google Scholar
• BMA (British Medical Association). 2007. Boosting Your Brainpower: Ethical Aspects of Cognitive Enhancement. London. http://enhancingresponsibility.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Boosting_brainpower_tcm41-147266.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Boer, T., and R. Fischer, eds. 2013. Human Enhancement. Scientific, Ethical and Theological Aspects from a European Perspective. Strasbourg: Church and Society Commission of the Conference of European Churches (CEC).
   Google Scholar
• Brownsword, R. 2009. “Regulating Human Enhancement: Things Can Only Get Better?” Law, Innovation and Technology 1: 125–152.
   Google Scholar
• Butter, M., A. Rensma, J. van Boxsel, S. Kalisingh, M. Schoone, M. Leis, G. Jan Gelderblom, et al. 2008. Robotics for Healthcare. Final Report.
   Google Scholar
• Coeckelbergh, M. 2013. Human Being @ Risk. Enhancement, Technology, and the Evaluation of Vulnerability Transformations. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Coenen, C., M. Schuijff, M. Smits, P. Klaassen, L. Hennen, M. Rader, and G. Wolbring. 2009. Human Enhancement. Brussels: Study for the European Parliament, Science and Technology Options Assessment (STOA).
   Google Scholar
• Courtine, G., S. Micera, J. DiGiovanna, and J. del R. Millàn. 2013. “Brain–machine Interface: Closer to Therapeutic Reality?” Lancet. published online December 17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62164-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danish Council of Ethics. 2011. Medical Enhancement. English Summary. Copenhagen. http://www.etiskraad.dk/en/Udgivelser/~/media/publications-en/Medical%20enhancement.ashx.
   Google Scholar
• EGE (European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies to the European Commission). 2005. Ethical Aspects of ICT Implants in the Human Body. Opinion n. 20. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Farina, D., and O. Aszmann. 2014. “Bionic Limbs: Clinical Reality and Academic Promises.” Science Translational Medicine 6 (257): 257ps12. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3010453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasson, M., E. Kosta, and D. M. Bowman, eds. 2012. Human ICT Implants: Technical, Legal and Ethical Considerations. The Hague: TMC Asser Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gordijn, B., and R. Chadwick, eds. 2008. Medical Enhancement and Posthumanity. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hochberg, L., and T. Cochrane. 2013. “Implanted Neural Interfaces. Ethics in Treatment and Research.” In Neuroethics in Practice. Medicine, Mind, and Society, edited by A. Chatterjee and M. J. Farah, 235–250. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klaming, L., and P. Haselager. 2013. “Did My Brain Implant Make Me Do It? Questions Raised by DBS Regarding Psychological Continuity, Responsibility for Action and Mental Competence.” Neuroethics 6: 527–539. doi: 10.1007/s12152-010-9093-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koops, B. J., and M. N. Gasson. 2013. “Attacking Human Implants: A New Generation of Cybercrime.” Law, Innovation and Technology 5 (2): 248–277. doi: 10.5235/17579961.5.2.248
   Google Scholar
• Koops, B. J., C. H. Lüthy, A. Nelis, C. Sieburgh, J. P. M. Jansen, and M. S. Schmid, eds. 2013. Engineering the Human. Human Enhancement Between Fiction and Fascination. Berlin – Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kraemer, F. 2013. “Me, Myself and My Brain Implant: Deep Brain Stimulation Raises Questions of Personal Authenticity and Alienation.” Neuroethics 6: 483–497. doi: 10.1007/s12152-011-9115-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucivero, F., and A. Vedder, eds. 2013. Beyond Therapy v. Enhancement? Multidisciplinary Analyses of a Heated Debate. Pisa: Pisa University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald Glenn, L. 2012. “Case study: Ethical and Legal Issues in Human Machine Mergers (Or the Cyborgs Comet).” Annals of Health Law, ASLME Special Edition 21: 175–180.
   Google Scholar
• Maslen, H., T. Douglas, R. Cohen Kadosh, N. Levy, and J. Savulescu. 2014. Mind Machines. The Regulation of Cognitive Enhancement Devices. Oxford Martin Policy Paper. http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/briefings/Mind_Machines.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• McCullagh, P., G. Lightbody, J. Zygierewicz, and W. G. Kernohan. 2014. “Ethical Challenges Associated with the Development and Deployment of Brain Computer Interface Technology.” Neuroethics 7: 109–122. doi: 10.1007/s12152-013-9188-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolelis, M. 2011. Beyond Boundaries: The New Neuroscience of Connecting Brains With Machines And How It Will Change Our Lives. New York: Times Books.
   Google Scholar
• Nordmann, A. 2004. Converging Technologies. Shaping the Future of European Society. Report of the High Level Expert Group on “Foresighting the New Technology Wave”. Luxembourg: Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Nuffield Council on Bioethics. 2013. Novel Neurotechnologies: Intervening in the Brain. http://nuffieldbioethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Novel_neurotechnologies_report_PDF_web_0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ortiz-Catalan, M., Bo Håkansson, and Rickard Brånermark. 2014. “An Osseointegrated Human-machine Gateway for Long-term Sensory Feedback and Motor Control of Artificial Limbs.” Science Translational Medicine 6 (257): 257re6. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3008933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmerini, E. 2013. “The Interplay Between Law and Technology, or the Robolaw Project in Context.” In Law and Technology. The Challenge of Regulating Technological Developments, edited by Erica Palmerini and Elettra Stradella, 7–24. Pisa: Pisa University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radin, M. J. 1987. “Market-inalienability.” Harvard Law Review 100 (8): 1849–1937. doi: 10.2307/1341192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radin, M. J. 1996. Contested Commodities. The Trouble with Trade in Sex, Children, Body Parts, and Other Things. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramachandran, G. 2009. “Against the Right to Bodily Integrity: Of Cyborgs and Human Rights.” Denver University Law Review 87: 1–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raspopovic, S., M. Capogrosso, F. M. Petrini, M. Bonizzato, J. Rigosa, G. Di Pino, J. Carpaneto, et al. 2014. “Restoring Natural Sensory Feedback in Real-time Bidirectional Hand Prostheses.” Science Translational Medicine 6 (222): 222ra19. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3006820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodotà, S. 2011. “Of Machines and Men: The Road to Identity. Scenes for a Discussion.” In Law, Human Agency and Autonomic Computing. The Philosophy of Law Meets the Philosophy of Technology, edited by Mireille Hildebrandt and Antoinette Rouvroy, 179–198. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, Simone, Mark Hallett, Paolo M. Rossini, Alvaro Pascual-Leone, and The Safety of TMS Consensus Group. 2009. “Safety, Ethical Considerations, and Application Guidelines for the Use of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Clinical Practice and Research.” Clinical Neurophysiology 120 (12): 2008–2039. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savulescu, J., Ruud ter Meulen, and G. Kahane, eds. 2011. Enhancing Human Capacities. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Synofzik, M. 2013. “Functional Neurosurgery and Deep Brain Stimulation.” In Neuroethics in Practice. Medicine, Mind, and Society, edited by Anjan Chatterjee and Martha J. Farah, 190–208. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, D. W., M. A. Schiefer, M. J. Keith, J. R. Anderson, J. Tyler, and D. J. Tyler. 2014. “A Neural Interface Provides Long-term Stable Natural Touch Perception.” Science Translational Medicine 6 (257): 257ra138. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3008669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US President's Council on Bioethics. 2003. Beyond Therapy. Biotechnology and the Pursuit of Happiness. Washington, DC. https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/bitstream/handle/10822/559341/beyond_therapy_final_webcorrected.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, J., D. M. Cannon, and H. M. Machiel Van der Loos. 2005. “Cross-Cultural Considerations in Establishing Roboethics for Neuro-Robot Applications.” Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Chicago, IL, June 28–July 1.
   Google Scholar
• Wallach, W. 2011. “From Robots to Techno Sapiens: Ethics, Law and Public Policy in the Developments of Robotics and Neurotechnologies.” Law, Innovation and Technology 3 (2): 185–207. doi: 10.5235/175799611798204888
   Google Scholar
• Wittes, B., and J. Chong. 2014. Our Cyborg Future. Law and Policy Implications. Center for Technology Innovation at Brookings. Accessed July 2, 2015. http://www.brookings.edu/research/reports2/2014/09/cyborg-future-law-policy-implications.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, S., and M. Goodman. 2012. “Neural Devices Will Change Humankind: What Legal Issues Will Follow?” The SciTech Lawyer 8 (3). http://www.ckwlaw.com/tasks/sites/ckw/assets/Image/Neural-Devices-Will-Change-Humankind.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ziv, S. 2014. “Mind Controlled Prosthetic Arm Tested in Sweden.” Newsweek, October 10. Accessed April 15, 2015. http://www.newsweek.com/mind-controlled-prosthetic-arm-tested-sweden-276281.
   Google Scholar