Assistive technology as support for the exercise of legal capacity

References

• Appiah, K. Anthony. 2001. “Grounding Human Rights.” In Michael Ignatieff: Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry, edited by Amy Gutmann, 106–108. New York: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arstein-Kerslake, A. 2014a. “A Call to Action: The Realisation of Equal Recognition Under the Law for People with Disabilities in the EU.” In European Yearbook of Disability Law, Vol. 5, edited by L. Waddington, G. Quinn, and E. Flynn, 75–102. Antwerp: Intersentia.
   Google Scholar
• Arstein-Kerslake, A. 2014b. “An Empowering Dependency: Exploring Support for the Exercise of Legal Capacity.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research. doi:10.1080/15017419.2014.941926.
   Google Scholar
• Arstein-Kerslake, A., and E. Flynn. 2014. “The Support Model of Legal Capacity: Fact, Fiction or Fantasy?.” Berkeley Journal of International Law 32 (1): 124–143.
   Google Scholar
• Asia Pacific Regional EGM. n.d. Revised Bangkok Draft (Drafted by the Coalition of Individuals, Organizations and Agencies of the People, for the People and by the People with Disabilities in Eastern Europe (Ukraine, Russia, Belarus, Moldova and Poland)), Art. 25(3)). Accessed April 15, 2015. http://www.worldenable.net/bangkok2003a/bangkokdraftrev.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Autistic Self-Advocacy Network. 2014. “ASAN Statement on Sprint “Neurodiversity ID Pack’.” Accessed April 15, 2015. http://autisticadvocacy.org/2014/06/asan-statement-on-sprint-neurodiversity-id-pack/.
   Google Scholar
• Bagenstos, S. 2009. Law and the Contradictions of the Disability Rights Movement. Yale: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baggs, A. 2007. “In My Language.” (YouTube video-clip), January 14. Accessed April 15, 2015. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnylM1hI2jc.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, P., O. Lewis, and O. Thorold. 2007. Mental Disability and the European Convention on Human Rights. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, T. 2013. Our Necessary Shadow: The Nature and Meaning of Psychiatry. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J., and M. Oliver. 1996. Disability Politics: Understanding our Past, Changing our Future. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carlston, D. E., and E. R. Smith. 1996. “Principles of Mental Representation.” In Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, edited by E. T. Higgins and A. W. Kruglanski, 184–210. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clinical Quality and Patient Safety. 2014. “Improving Communication – My Healthcare Passport.” East Kent Hospitals University. Accessed April 15, 2015. http://www.ekhuft.nhs.uk/patients-and-visitors/about-us/boards-and-committees/trustwide-safeguarding-group/people-with-learning-disabilities/my-healthcare-passport/.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. 2012. “Competency and Voters with Psychiatric Disabilities: Considerations for Social Workers.” Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare 39 (3): 47–62.
   Google Scholar
• Dawe, M. 2006. “Desperately Seeking Simplicity: How Young Adults with Cognitive Disabilities and their Families Adopt Assistive Technologies.” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’06), edited by R. Grinter, T. Rodden, P. Aoki, E. Cutrell, R. Jeffries, and G. Olson, 1143–1152. New York: AC.
   Google Scholar
• Dhanda, A. 2006–2007. “Legal Capacity in the Disability Rights Convention: Stranglehold of the Past or Lodestar for the Future?” Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce 34: 429–459.
   Google Scholar
• Dhanda, A. 2012. “Universal Legal Capacity as a Universal Human Right.” In Mental Health and Human Rights: Vision, Praxis, and Courage, edited by M. Dudley, D. Silove, and F. Gale, 177–188. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferri, D., G. A. Giannoumis, and E. O'Sullivan. 2015. “Fostering Accessible Technology and Sculpting an Inclusive Market through Regulation.” International Review of Law, Computers & Technology. doi:10.1080/13600869.2015.1055666.
   Google Scholar
• Fleischer, D., and F. Zames. 2011. The Disability Rights Movement: From Charity to Confrontation. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, E., and A. Arstein-Kerslake. 2014. “Legislating Personhood: Realizing the Right to Support in Exercising Legal Capacity.” International Journal of Law in Context 10 (1): 81–104.
   Google Scholar
• Glannon, W. 2014. “The Free Will Fix: New Brain Implants can Restore Autonomy to Damaged Minds, but can they Settle the Question of Whether Free Will Exists?.” Aeon, October 1. Accessed April 15, 2015. http://aeon.co/magazine/psychology/how-new-brain-implants-affect-free-will/.
   Google Scholar
• Glen, K. B. 2012. “Changing Paradigms: Mental Capacity, Legal Capacity, Guardianship and Beyond.” Columbia Human Rights Law Review – Particular Article 44: 93–169.
   Google Scholar
• Gooding, P. 2013. “Supported Decision-Making: A Rights-Based Disability Concept and its Implications for Mental Health Law.” Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 20 (3): 431–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gooding, P. 2015. “Navigating the Flashing Amber Lights of the Right to Legal Capacity in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Responding to Major Concerns.” Human Rights Law Review 15 (1): 45–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haleem, M. 1988. “The Domestic Application of International Human Rights Norms.” Paper presented at the Judicial Colloquium held under the auspices of the Commonwealth Secretariat, London, at Bangalore, India.
   Google Scholar
• Hoppestad, B. 2007. “Inadequacies in Computer Access Using Assistive Technology Devices in Profoundly Disabled Individuals: An Overview of the Current Literature.” Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 2 (4): 189–199.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huffman, L. 2006. “Focus on Screen Magnification, Part 1: A Review of ZoomText 9.0 and LunarPlus 6.5.” AccessWorld 7: 2. Accessed May 2, 2015. http://www.afb.org/afbpress/pub.asp?DocID=aw070203.
   Google Scholar
• International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Article 16, U.N. Doc. A/6316 (1966), 999 U.N.T.S. 171 (23 March 1976 ).
   Google Scholar
• Kimble, C. J., D. M. Johnson, B. A. Winter, S. V. Whitlock, K. R. Kressin, A. E. Horne, J. C. Robinson, J. M. Bledsoe, et al. 2009. “Wireless Instantaneous Neurotransmitter Concentration Sensing System (WINCS) for Intraoperative Neurochemical Monitoring.” Conference proceedings: IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Minneapolis, MN, USA, September 2–6, 4856–4859.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. E., W. R. Neuman, and M. Mackuen. 2000. Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago: The Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Naci, L., and A. M. Owen. 2013. “Making Every Word Count for Nonresponsive Patients.” JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association Neurology 70 (10): 1235–1241.
   Google Scholar
• Nayak, A., T. Ohno, T. Tsuruoka, K. Terabe, T. Hasegawa, J. K. Gimzewski, and M. Aono. 2012. “Controlling the Synaptic Plasticity of a Cu2S Gap-Type Atomic Switch.” Advanced Functional Materials 22: 3606–3613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. 2005. “Background Conference Document Prepared by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights: Legal Capacity.” Accessed April 15, 2015. www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/rights/documents/ahc6ohchrlegalcap.doc.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M., and C. Barnes. 1998. Disabled People and Social Policy: From Exclusion to Inclusion. Longman: Harlow.
   Google Scholar
• Perlin, M. 2012. International Human Rights Law and Mental Disability Law: When the Silenced Are Heard. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perlmutter, J. S., and J. W. Mink. 2006. “Deep Brain Stimulation.” Annual Review of Neuroscience 29: 229–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, S. S., C. E. Dixon, D. O. Okonkwo, and R. M. Richardson. 2014. “Neurostimulation for Traumatic Brain Injury.” Journal of Neurosurgery 121 (5): 1219–1231.
   Google Scholar
• Smart Sensors and Integrated Microsystems. 2014. “Neurological Implants.” Wayne State University. Accessed October 12, 2014. http://www.ssim.eng.wayne.edu/implants/neurological_implants.asp.
   Google Scholar
• Sundram, C. J. 1998. “In Harm's Way: Research Subjects Who are Decisionally Impaired.” Journal of Health Care Law and Policy 1 (1): 36–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sundram, C. J. 2006. ‘A Discussion of Legal Capacity in the Draft Convention on Disability.’ (issues paper) (National Disability Authority, Ireland) 6. Accessed April 15, 2015. http://www.mdri.org/mdri-web-2007/pdf/A%20discussion%20of%20Capacity.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sundram, C. J. 2013. ‘Lost in the Shadows: Willowbrook and the Era of Institutionalization,’ (presentation paper) Fulfilling the Promise, Albany Law School, March 22, 4. Accessed April 15, 2015. http://www.justicecenter.ny.gov/sites/default/files/archivereports/Publications/CQC041113.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UN Econ. & Soc. Council [ECOSOC]. 2005. Ad Hoc Comm. on a Comprehensive & Integral Int'l Convention on the Prot. & Promotion of the Rights & Dignity of Pers. with Disabilities, Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on a Comprehensive and Integral International Convention on the Protection and promotion of the Rights and Dignity of Persons with Disabilities on its Fifth Session, U.N. Doc. A/AC.265/2005/2 (February 23). Accessed April 15, 2015. http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/rights/ahc5reporte.htm.
   Google Scholar
• UNCRPD Committee (United Nations Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities). 2014. “General Comment No. 1, Article 12: Equal Recognition Before the Law, paras.” 16–19, UN Doc. No. UNCRPD/C/GC/1, April.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. 2005. Ad Hoc Committee on a Comprehensive and Integral International Convention on Promotion of Rights and Dignity of Persons with Disabilities, Working Group on Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on a Comprehensive and Integral International Convention on Promotion of Rights and Dignity of Persons with Disabilities on its Fifth Session, para 18. U.N. Doc. A/AC.265/2005/2 (23 February 2005). Accessed April 15, 2015. http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/rights/ahc5reporte.htm.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Secretary-General. 2006. Final Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on a Comprehensive and Integral International Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Rights and Dignity of Persons with Disabilities, 4, delivered to the General Assembly, U.N. Doc. A/61/611 (December. 6).
   Google Scholar
• UDHR (Universal Declaration of Human Rights), G. A. Res. 217(111), UN Doc. A/810 at 71 (10 December 1948 ).
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, Margaret. 2012, November. Evaluation of the Supported Decision Making Project. Office of the Public Advocate of South Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, M. 2013. “Self-advocacy vs. the Rise of the Medical Model.” In The Palgrave Macmillan Autism: A Social and Medical History, 133–165. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Weller, P. 2008. “Supported Decision-Making and the Achievement of Non-Discrimination: The Promise and Paradox of the Disabilities Convention.” Law in Context 26 (2): 85–110.
   Google Scholar
• Weller, P. 2013. “The Genesis of a Movement.” In New Law and Ethics in Mental Health Advance Directives: The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the Right to Choose, 53–60. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, Richard, and Michael Marmot, eds. 2003. Social Determinants of Health: The Solid Facts. Brussels: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Wolman, D. 2008. “The Truth About Autism: Scientists Reconsider What They Think They Know.” Wired, February 25. Accessed April 15, 2015. http://archive.wired.com/medtech/health/magazine/16-03/ff_autism?currentPage=all.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, S. I. 2008. “Justice and Cognitive Disabilities: Specifying the Problem.” Essays in Philosophy 9 (1): 12–33.
   Google Scholar
• Zajonc, R. B. 1980. “Feeling and Thinking: Preferences Need no Inferences.” American Psychologist 35 (2): 151–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar