Do generic gTLDs require their own ex ante regulation?

References

• Albitz, P., and C. Liu. 2001. DNS and BIND. 4th ed. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly.
   Google Scholar
• Ballon, P., and E. Van Heesvelde. 2011. “ICT Platforms and Regulatory Concerns in Europe.” Telecommunications Policy 35: 702–714. Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2011.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, S. 2003. “Domain Name Conflicts in Germany – An Economic Analysis of the Federal High Court's Recent Decisions.” European Business Organisation Law Review 4: 137–170. T.M.C Asser Press. doi: 10.1017/S156675290300137X
   Google Scholar
• Bing, J. 2011. “Building Cyberspace: A Brief History of the Internet.” In Internet Governance: Infrastructure and Institutions, edited by Lee A. Bygrave and Jon Bing, 8–47. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broumas, A. 2009. “The Necessity of Sector Specific Regulation in Electronic Communications Law.” Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology 4 (3): 176–184.
   Google Scholar
• Bygrave, L., et al. 2011. “The Naming Game: Governance of the Domain Name System.” In Internet Governance: Infrastructure and Institutions, edited by Lee A. Bygrave and Jon Bing, 147–212. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cave-Browne-Cave, J. 2002. “.biz Means Business – Fact or Fiction?” IRLCT 16: 67–79. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chander, A. 2002. “The New, New Property.” Texas Law Review 81: 715–797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Streel, A. 2008. “The Relationship between Competition Law and Sector Specific Regulation: The Case of Electronic Communications.” Reflets et perspectives de la vie économique XLVII: 53–70. doi: 10.3917/rpve.472.0053
   Google Scholar
• Easton, C. 2012. “ICANN's Core Principles and the Expansion of Generic Top Level Domain Names.” IJILT 20: 273–290. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fajtur, A. 2012. EU Competition Law and the Information and Communication Technology Network Industries. 1st ed. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, D. 2010. Global Competition: Law, Markets, and Globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goyder, J., and A. Albers-Llorens. 2009. Goyder's EC Competition Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hörnle, J. 2009. Cross-border Internet Dispute Resolution. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones Harbour, P., and T. Isa Koslov. 2010. “Section 2 in a Web 2.0 World: An Expanded Vision of Relevant Product Markets.” Antitrust Law Journal 76: 769–797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerf, M. and D. Geradin. 1999. “Controlling Market Power in Telecommunications: Antitrust vs. Sector Specific Regulation.” Berkeley Technology Law Journal 14: 919–1020.
   Google Scholar
• Lao, M. 2009. “Networks, Access, and ‘Essential Facilities’: From Terminal Railroad to Microsoft.” Southern Methodist University Law Review 62: 557–596.
   Google Scholar
• Lianos, I. and Motchenkova, E. 2013. “Market Dominance and Search Quality in the Search Engine Market.” JCLE 9 (2): 419–455.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, A., and J. Sidak. 1998. “Essential Facilities.” Stanford Law Review 51: 1187–1248. doi: 10.2307/1229408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahler, T. 2014. “A gTLD Right? Conceptual Challenges in the Expanding Internet Domain Namespace.” IJLIT 22: 27–48. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McManis, S. 2003. “Australian Domain Name Registrations.” World Patent Information 25: 39–42. Pergamon. doi: 10.1016/S0172-2190(02)00125-4
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. 1998. “Resolving Domain Name-Trademark Disputes: A New System of Alternative Dispute Resolution is needed in Cyberspace.” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 14: 157–192.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. 1999. “Domain Name Trademark Disputes Need a New Cyberspace ADR System.” CPR Institute for Dispute Resolution 17 (8): 147–149.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, X. 2001. “Shifting the Paradigm in E-Commerce.” American University Law Review 50: 937–978.
   Google Scholar
• Oppedahl, C. 1996. “Analysis and Suggestions Regarding NSI Domain Name Trademark Policy.” Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal 7: 73–119.
   Google Scholar
• Piropato, M. 2000. “Open Access and the Essential Facilities Doctrine: Promoting Competition and Innovation.” University of Chicago Legal Forum 2000: 369–411.
   Google Scholar
• Pitt, E., and R. Morton-Fincham. 2009. “Competition Law in Telecommunications.” In Telecommunications Law and Regulation, edited by Ian Walden, 441–498. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prendergast, J. 2004. “Kremen v Cohen: The Knotty Saga of sex.com.” Jurimetrics 45: 75–91.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, S. 2011. “Sensible Agnosticism: An Updated Approach to Domain-Name Trademark Infringement.” Duke Law Journal 61: 211–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renda, A. 2010. “Competition-Regulation Interface in Telecommunications: What's Left of the Essential Facilities Doctrine?” Telecommunications Policy 34: 23–35. Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2009.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidak, J. 2003. “Remedies and the Institutional Design of Regulation in Network Industries.” Michigan State DCL Law Review 2003: 741–756.
   Google Scholar
• Themelis, A. 2013. “Information and Intermediation, Abuse of Dominance and Internet ‘Neutrality’: ‘Updating’ Competition Policy under the Digital Single Market and the Google Investigations (?).” EJLT 4 (3).
   Google Scholar
• Walden, I. 2009. “European Union Communications Law.” In Telecommunications Law and Regulation, edited by Ian Walden, 167–209. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, M. 2003. “Regulating the Domain Name System: Is the ‘.BIZ’ Domain Name Distribution Scheme an Illegal Lottery?” University of Illinois Law Review 2003: 245–288.
   Google Scholar
• Weber Waller, S. 2012. “Access and Information Remedies in High-Tech Antitrust.” Journal of Competition Law & Economics 8 (3): 575–593. doi: 10.1093/joclec/nhs015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar