The rise of risk management in the universities: a new way to understand quality in university management

References

• Association of Governing Boards, 2009, Faculty, Governing Boards, and Institutional Governance (Washington, DC, AGB).
   Google Scholar
• Association of Governing Boards and United Educators (AGB and UE), 2014, A Wake-up Call: Enterprise risk management at colleges and universities today (Washington, DC, AGB).
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S., Vincent, C. & Radnor, H., 1997, ‘Info confusion: LEAs, accountability and democracy’, Journal of Education Policy, 12, pp. 147–164.
   Google Scholar
• Bargh, C., Scott, P. & Smith, D., 1996, Governing Universities: Changing the culture? (London, SRHE).
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, R., 1994, Academic Community: Discourse or discord? (London, Jessica Kingsley).
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U., 1992, Risk Society: Towards a new modernity (New Delhi, Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U., Giddens, A. & Lash, S., 1994, Reflexive Modernization (Cambridge, Policy Press).
   Google Scholar
• Bleiklie, I., 1998, ‘Justifying the evaluative state: new public management ideas in higher education’, European Journal of Education, 33(3), pp. 299–316.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, B., 1998, Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational pathways of transformation (Oxford, International Association of Universities Press and Pergamon).
   Google Scholar
• Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, 2013, Internal Control-integrated Framework: Executive summary (Durham, COSO).
   Google Scholar
• Deem, R., 1998, ‘New managerialism and higher education: The management of performances and culture in universities in the United Kingdom’, International Studies in Sociology of Education, 8(1), pp. 47–70.
   Google Scholar
• Dill, D., 1999, ‘Academic accountability and university adaptation: the architecture of an academic learning organization’, Higher Education, 38, pp. 127–54.10.1023/A:1003762420723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Financial Reporting Council (FRC), 2014, Guidance on Risk Management, Internal Control and Related Financial and Business Reporting (London, FRC).
   Google Scholar
• Financial Reporting Council (FRC), 2016, Preparers Levy 2016/2017 Public Sector Fact Sheet (London, FRC).
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1988, ‘Technologies of the self’, in Martin, L. (Ed.) A Seminar with Michel Foucault, pp. 16–19 (Amherst, University of Massachusetts Press).
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1991, ‘Governmentality’, in Burchell, G., Gordon, C. & Miller, P. (Eds.) The Foucault Effect: Studies in governmentality, pp. 87–104 (Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A., 1990, The Consequences of Modernity (Cambridge, Polity Press).
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A., 1999, ‘Risk and responsibility’, Modern Law Review, 62(1), pp. 1–10.10.1111/mlr.1999.62.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Gornitzka, A. & Maassen, P., 2000, ‘Hybrid steering approaches with respect to European higher education’, Higher Education Policy, 13, pp. 267–85.10.1016/S0952-8733(00)00012-X
   Google Scholar
• Huisman, J. & Currie, J., 2004, ‘Accountability in higher education: Bridge over troubled water?’, Higher Education, 48, pp. 529–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higher Education Founding Council for England (HEFCE), 2014, Analysis of Responses to Consultation on HEFCE’s Financial Memorandum with Institutions (2014/09) (HEFCE, Bristol).
   Google Scholar
• Independent Commission on the Future of the State University of New York, 1985, The Change and the Choice (The Wharton Commission’s Report) (Albany, New York State Commission).
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Chartered Accounts in England and Wales (ICAEW), 1999, Internal Control: Guidance for directors on the combined code (The Turnbull guidance) (London, The Financial Reporting Council).
   Google Scholar
• Kelderman, E., 2010, ‘Shaping SUNY into a whole greater than its parts’, Chronicle of Higher Education, 56(32), pp. A1–A21.
   Google Scholar
• Kelderman, E., 2011, ‘SUNY plan to share Presidents between campuses sparks protest’, Chronicle of Higher Education, 58(3), p. A23.
   Google Scholar
• Maassen, P., 2000, Governmental Policies and Programmes for Strengthening the Relationship between Higher Education Institutions and the Economy (Utrecht, Center for Higher Education Policy Studies).
   Google Scholar
• Maassen, P. & van Vught, F., 1994, ‘Alternative models of governmental steering in higher education’, in Maassen, P. & van Vught, F. (Eds.) Comparative Policy Studies in Higher Education, pp. 35–64 (Utrecht, Center for Higher Education Policy Studies).
   Google Scholar
• McLendon, M., Deaton, S. & Hearn, J., 2007, ‘The enactment of reforms in state governance of higher education’, Journal of Higher Education, 78(6), pp. 645–75.10.1080/00221546.2007.11772075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meek, V.L. (2002) ‘Changing patterns in modes of co-ordination of higher education’, in Enders, J. & Fulton, O. (Eds.) Higher Education in a Globalising World, pp. 53–72 (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
   Google Scholar
• Neave, G., 1988, ‘On being economical with university autonomy: Being an account of the retrospective joys of a written constitution’, in Tight, M. (Ed.) Academic Freedom and Responsibility, pp. 337–349 (London, SRHE and Open University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Neave, G., 1998, ‘The evaluative state reconsidered’, European Journal of Education, 33(3), pp. 265–284.
   Google Scholar
• Neave, G. & van Vught, F., 1994, Government and Higher Education Relationships Across Three Continents (Oxford, IAU Press/Pergamon).
   Google Scholar
• New York State Commission on Higher Education, 2007, A Preliminary Report of Findings and Recommendations (Albany, New York State Commission on Higher Education).
   Google Scholar
• New York State Governmental Accountability, Audit and Internal Control Act, 1987, 1999 (Albany, State of New York).
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, J.P., 1988, ‘Administrative reform and theories of organization’, in Campbell, C. & Peters, B. (Eds.) Organizing Governance: Governing organizations, pp. 233–254 (Pittsburg, PA, University of Pittsburgh Press).
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard, R., 1994, ‘Government power in British higher education’, Studies in Higher Education, 19(3), pp. 253–65.10.1080/03075079412331381860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Public Higher Education Empowerment and Innovation Act, 2010, (Albany, State of New York).
   Google Scholar
• Rhoades, G. & Stensaker, B., 2017, ‘Bringing organisations and systems back together: extending Clark’s Entrepreneurial University’, Higher Education Quarterly, 71(2), pp. 129–40.10.1111/hequ.2017.71.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romek, B.S., 2000, ‘Dynamics of public accountability in an era of reform’, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 66(1), pp. 21–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarbanes-Oxley Act, 2002, (Washington DC, The United States Government Publishing Office).
   Google Scholar
• Schmidtlein, F.A. & Berdahl, R.O., 2005, ‘Autonomy and accountability: Who controls academe?’, in Altbach, P.G., Berdahl, R.O. & Gumport, P.J. (Eds.) American Higher Education in the Twenty-First Century, pp. 71–90 (Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Sharman Panel of Inquiry, 2012, Going Concern and Liquidity Risks: Lesson for companies and auditors (Sharman Inquiry) (London, Financial Reporting Council).
   Google Scholar
• State University of New York, 2014a, Internal Control Program ( SUNY Document No. 7500) (New York, NY, SUNY).
   Google Scholar
• State University of New York, 2014b, Internal Control Program Guidelines ( SUNY Document No. 7501) (New York, NY, SUNY).
   Google Scholar
• Tapper, T. & Palfreyman, D., 1998, ‘Continuity and change in the collegial tradition’, Higher Education Quarterly, 52(2), pp. 142–161.
   Google Scholar
• Toma, J.D., 2007, ‘Expanding peripheral activities, increasing accountability demands and reconsidering governance in US higher education’, Higher Education Research and Development, 26(1), pp. 57–72.
   Google Scholar
• Trow, M., 1996, ‘Trust, markets and accountability in higher education: a comparative perspective’, Higher Education Policy, 9(4), pp. 309–24.10.1016/S0952-8733(96)00029-3
   Google Scholar
• Universities UK, 2010, Adapting Business Models in a Changing Environment (London, Universities UK).
   Google Scholar
• Universities UK, 2014, Statement of Recommended Practice: Accounting for further and higher education (London, Universities UK).
   Google Scholar
• Van Vught, F. (Ed.), 1989, Governmental Strategies and Innovation in Higher Education (London, Jessica Kingsley).
   Google Scholar
• Vidovich, L. & Slee, R., 2001, ‘Bringing universities to account? Exploring some global and local policy tensions’, Journal of Education Policy, 16, pp. 431–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M., 1947, The Theory of Social and Economic Organization (New York, NY, Free Press).
   Google Scholar
• Williams, G., 1992, Changing Patterns of Finance in Higher Education (Buckingham, Open University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Yokoyama, K., 2010, Government, Policy and Ideology: Higher education’s changing boundaries in two island kingdoms – Japan and England (Lanham, University Press of America).
   Google Scholar
• Yokoyama, K., 2014, ‘Risk management of the English universities after credit crunch’, paper presented at the AERA annual meeting, Philadelphia, USA, May.
   Google Scholar