An experimental approach to regulating non-military unmanned aircraft systems

References

• Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., C. I. Eriksson, A. Ståhlbröst, and J. Svensson. 2009. “ A Milieu for Innovation: Defining Living Labs.” ISPIM Innovation Symposium, New York, December 6–9.
   Google Scholar
• Black, J. 2008. Forms and Paradoxes of Principle based Regulation. LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers 13/2008.
   Google Scholar
• Brownsword, R. 2008. Rights, Regulation and the Technological Revolution. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butenko, A., and P. Larouche. 2015. “Regulation for Innovativeness or Regulation of Innovation?” Law Innovation and Technology 7 (1): 52–82. doi: 10.1080/17579961.2015.1052643
   Google Scholar
• Coglianese, C., and E. Mendelson. 2010. “Meta-regulation and Self Regulation.” In The Oxford Handbook of Regulation, edited by R. Baldwin, M. Cave, and M. Lodge, 146–168. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Communities and Local Government. 2011. Consultation Paper. Proposals to Introduce a Community Right to Challenge. London: Department for Communities and Local Government. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/8502/1835810.pdf/.
   Google Scholar
• Devine-Wright, P. 2009. “Rethinking NIMBYism: The Role of Place Attachment and Place Identity in Explaining Place-Protective Action.” Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 19 (6): 426–441. doi: 10.1002/casp.1004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, H., and M. A. Heldeweg. 2017. Responsible Design of Drones and Drone Services. Legal Perspective (Synthetic Report). University of Twente. Research Project Commissioned by NWO (The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research). https://ssrn.com/abstract=3096573/.
   Google Scholar
• EASA. 2015. “ Roadmap for UAS Operations in the European Union (EU). The Roll-out of the EU Operation Centric Approach.” http://rpas-regulations.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/EASA_EU-Roadmap-Operation-Centric-Approach-UAS-Ops-v13_160620.pdf/.
   Google Scholar
• EASA. 2016. “Prototype” Commission Regulation on Unmanned Aircraft Operations. https://www.easa.europa.eu/system/files/dfu/UAS%20Prototype%20Regulation%20final.pdf/.
   Google Scholar
• Fairgrieve, D. 2003. State Liability in Tort: A Comparative Study. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finn, R., D. Wright, L. Jacques, and P. De Hert. 2014. Study on Privacy, Data Protection and Ethical Risks in Civil Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems Operations. Final Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, L. L. 1969. The Morality of Law (Vol. 152). New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, H. L. A. 1962. The Concept of Law. 3rd ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heldeweg, M. A. 2015. “Experimental Legislation Concerning Technological & Governance Innovation – an Analytical Approach.” The Theory and Practice of Legislation 3 (2): 169–193. doi: 10.1080/20508840.2015.1083242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heldeweg, M. A. 2016. “Legal Regimes for Experimenting with Cleaner Production – Especially in Sustainable Energy.” Journal of Cleaner Production 169: 48–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heldeweg, M. A. 2017. “Normative Alignment, Institutional Resilience and Shifts in Legal Governance of the Energy Transition.” Sustainability 9 (7): 1273. doi: 10.3390/su9071273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICAO. 2011. “ Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS), Cir. 328.” http://www.icao.int/Meetings/UAS/Documents/Circular%20328_en.pdf/.
   Google Scholar
• Karpowicz, J. 2017. “ Assessing and Understanding the European Commercial Drone Market.” Commercial UAV News, June 1. https://www.expouav.com/news/latest/assessing-understanding-european-commercial-drone-market/.
   Google Scholar
• Lammers, I., and L. Diestelmeier. 2017. “Experimenting with Law and Governance for Decentralized Electricity Systems: Adjusting Regulation to Reality?” Sustainability 9 (2): 212. doi: 10.3390/su9020212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi-Faur, D., ed. 2011. Handbook on the Politics of Regulation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Marinakis, Y. D. 2016. Advances in Technology Commercialization Models. Diss., University of Twente.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, A., and C. Scott. 2002. “Controlling the New Media: Hybrid Responses to New Forms of Power.” The Modern Law Review 65 (4): 491–516. doi: 10.1111/1468-2230.00392
   Google Scholar
• Popelier, P. 2008. “Five Paradoxes on Legal Certainty and the Lawmaker.” Legisprudence 2 (1): 47–66. doi: 10.1080/17521467.2008.11424673
   Google Scholar
• Ranchordás, S. 2014. Constitutional Sunsets and Experimental Legislation: A Comparative Perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ranchordás, S. 2015. “Innovation Experimentalism in the Age of the Sharing Economy.” Lewis & Clark Law Review 19 (4): 871–924.
   Google Scholar
• Sabel, C., G. Herrigel, and P. H. Kristensen. 2017. “Regulation under Uncertainty: The Coevolution of Industry and Regulation.” Regulation & Governance. doi:10.1111/rego.12146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabel, C. F., and J. Zeitlin. 2008. “Learning from Difference – The New Architecture of Experimentalist Governance in the European Union.” European Law Journal 14: 271–327. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2008.00415.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selmi, D. P. 1993. “Experimentation and the New Environmental Law.” Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 27: 1095.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. W. 2016. “Regulation and the Risk of Inaction.” In Autonomous Driving, edited by M. Maurer, J. C. Gerdes, B. Lenz, and H. Winner, 571–587. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Snead, J., and J. Seibler. 2016. The FAA Drone Registry: A Two-Month Crash Course in How to Overcriminalize Innovation. The Heritage Foundation, March 8. http://www.heritage.org/crime-and-justice/report/the-faa-drone-registry-two-month-crash-course-how-overcriminalize#_ftn43/.
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. 2008. “Science, Precaution, and the Politics of Technological Risk.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1128 (1): 95–110. doi: 10.1196/annals.1399.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Veen, W. 2017. Creating more Freedom for Experiments Living Smart Campus also Tests Rules, June 6. https://www.utwente.nl/en/news/!/2017/6/20987/creating-more-freedom-for-experiments/.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. 1889. Experiment in Legislation. Law Magazine & Law Review, 5th Series 14: 299.
   Google Scholar
• Zeitlin, J. H., ed. 2015. Extending Experimentalist Governance? The European Union and Transnational Regulation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar