Contesting the decision: living in (and living with) the smart city

References

• Apprich, Clemens. 2017. “FCJ-213 Babylonian Dreams: From Info-cities to Smart Cities to Experimental Collectivism.” The Fibreculture Journal. no. FCJ-213 (June). doi:10.15307/fcj.29.213.2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balkin, Jack M. 2012. “Room for Maneuver: Julie Cohen’s Theory of Freedom in the Information State.” Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies 6 (1): 79–95. doi: 10.1093/jrls/jls010
   Google Scholar
• Batty, Michael. 2017. “Producing Smart Cities.” In Understanding Spatial Media, edited by Rob Kitchin, Tracey P. Lauriault, Matthew W. Wilson, 204–215. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, Genevieve, and Paul Dourish. 2007. “Yesterday’s Tomorrows: Notes on Ubiquitous Computing’s Dominant Vision.” Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 11 (2): 133–143. doi: 10.1007/s00779-006-0071-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braverman, Irus. 2011. “Hidden in Plain View: Legal Geography from a Visual Perspective.” Law, Culture and the Humanities 7 (2): 173–186. doi:10.1177/1743872109355579.
   Google Scholar
• Braverman, Irus, Nicholas Blomey, David Delaney, and Alexandre S. Kedar. 2014. “Introduction: The Expanding Spaces of Law.” In The Expanding Spaces of Law, 1–30. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brownsword, R. 2015. “In the Year 2061: From Law to Technological Management.” Law, Innovation and Technology 7 (1): 1–51. doi:10.1080/17579961.2015.1052642.
   Google Scholar
• Brownsword, R. 2016a. “Law, Liberty, and Technology.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Law and Regulation of Technology, edited by Roger Brownsword, Eloise Scotford, and Karen Yeung. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199680832.013.2.
   Google Scholar
• Brownsword, Roger. 2016b. “Technological Management and the Rule of Law.” Law, Innovation and Technology 8 (1): 100–140. doi: 10.1080/17579961.2016.1161891
   Google Scholar
• Burrell, Jenna. 2016. “How the Machine ‘Thinks’: Understanding Opacity in Machine Learning Algorithms.” Big Data & Society 3 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1177/2053951715622512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, Luís. 2014. “Smart Cities from Scratch? A Socio-technical Perspective.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 8 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsu010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cath, Corinne, Sandra Wachter, Brent Mittelstadt, Mariarosaria Taddeo, and Luciano Floridi. 2016. “Artificial Intelligence and the ‘Good Society’: The US, EU, and UK Approach.” SSRN Electronic Journal, December, 1–23. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2906249.
   Google Scholar
• Citron, D.K. 2008. “Technological Due Process.” Washington University Law Review 85: 1249–1313.
   Google Scholar
• Cocchia, Annalisa. 2014. “Smart and Digital City: A Systematic Literature Review.” In Smart City, edited by Renata Paola Dameri and Camille Rosenthal-Sabroux, 13–43. Progress in IS. Cham: Springer International. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-06160-3_2.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Julie E. 2012a. Configuring the Networked Self. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Julie E. 2012b. “Power/Play: Discussion of Configuring the Networked Self.” Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies 6 (1): 137–149. doi:10.1093/jrls/jlt013.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, D. 2017. “Prefiguring the State.” Antipode 49 (2): 335–356. doi:10.1111/anti.12277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, Kate. 2016. “Can an Algorithm Be Agonistic? Ten Scenes from Life in Calculated Publics.” Science, Technology & Human Values 41 (1): 77–92. doi:10.1177/0162243915589635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, Kate, Meredith Whittaker, Madeleine Clare Elish, Solon Barocas, Aaron Plasek, and Kadija Ferryman. 2016. “The AI Now Report.” 1st ed.
   Google Scholar
• Crivellaro, Clara, Rob Comber, Martyn Dade-Robertson, Simon J. Bowen, Peter C. Wright, and Patrick Olivier. 2015. “Contesting the City: Enacting the Political Through Digitally Supported Urban Walks.” In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seoul, Republic of Korea, April 18–23, 2853–2862. New York, NY: ACM Press. https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2702123.2702176.
   Google Scholar
• Danaher, John. 2016. “The Threat of Algocracy: Reality, Resistance and Accommodation.” Philosophy & Technology 29 (3): 1–24. Springer. doi:10.1007/s13347-015-0211-1.
   Google Scholar
• de Waal, Martijn. 2011. “The Urban Culture of Sentient Cities: From an Internet of Things to a Public Sphere of Things.” In Sentient City: Ubiquitous Computing, Architecture, and the Future of Urban Space, 190–195. London: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Waal, Martijn, Michiel de Lange, and Matthijs Bouw. 2016. “The Hackable City.” In 4D Hyperlocal, 50–57. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Decker, A. 2014. “Smart Law for Smart Cities Symposium: Introduction.” Fordham Urban Law Journal 41: 1491–1498.
   Google Scholar
• Diakopoulos, Nicholas. 2016. “Accountability in Algorithmic Decision Making.” Communications of the ACM 59 (2): 56–62. doi:10.1145/2844110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domingos, Pedro. 2015. The Master Algorithm. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, Ronald. 1968. “On Not Prosecuting Civil Disobedience.” The New York Review of Books 10 (11). http://www.nybooks.com/articles/1968/06/06/on-not-prosecuting-civil-disobedience/.
   Google Scholar
• Easterling, K. 2014. Extrastatecraft: The Power of Infrastructure Space. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, L. 2016. “Privacy, Security and Data Protection in Smart Cities.” European Data Protection Law Review 2, 28–58. doi: 10.21552/EDPL/2016/1/6
   Google Scholar
• Eger, J. M., and A. Maggipinto. 2010. “Technology as a Tool of Transformation: E-Cities and the Rule of Law.” In Information Systems: People, Organizations, Institutions, and Technologies, edited by Alessandro D'Atri and Domenico Saccà, 23–30. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag HD. doi:10.1007/978-3-7908-2148-2.
   Google Scholar
• Elish, M., and Tim Hwang. 2016. An AI Pattern Language. New York: Data & Society.
   Google Scholar
• Ewick, Patricia, and Susan S. Silbey. 2014. The Common Place of Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Floridi, Luciano. 2016. “True AI Is Both Logically Possible and Utterly Implausible.” Aeon, April 9. https://aeon.co/essays/true-ai-is-both-logically-possible-and-utterly-implausible.
   Google Scholar
• Georgiou, M. 2008. “Urban Encounters: Juxtapositions of Difference and the Communicative Interface of Global Cities.” International Communication Gazette 70 (3–4): 223–235. doi:10.1177/1748048508089949.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberger, Paul. 2001. “Cities, Place and Cyberspace.” Paulgoldberger.com. Berkeley: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, B., and S. Flaxman. 2016. “EU Regulations on Algorithmic Decision-making and a ‘Right to Explanation’.” arXiv.org.
   Google Scholar
• Greenfield, Adam. 2013. Against the Smart City. New York City: Do projects.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1985. “Civil Disobedience: Litmus Test for the Democratic Civil Disobedience.” Berkeley Journal of Sociology 30. doi:10.2307/41035345.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Robert T. 1971. “Legal Toleration of Civil Disobedience.” Ethics 81 (2): 128–142. doi: 10.1086/291803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildebrandt, Mireille. 2008a. “Legal and Technological Normativity.” Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 12 (3): 169–183. doi:10.5840/techne20081232.
   Google Scholar
• Hildebrandt, Mireille. 2008b. “A Vision of Ambient Law.” In Regulating Technologies, 175–191. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hildebrandt, Mireille. 2011. “Who Needs Stories if You Can Get the Data? ISPs in the Era of Big Number Crunching.” Philosophy & Technology 24 (4): 371–390. doi:10.1007/s13347-011-0041-8.
   Google Scholar
• Hildebrandt, Mireille. 2015a. “The Public(S) Onlife.” In The Onlife Manifesto, edited by Luciano Floridi, 181–193. Cham: Springer International. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-04093-6_19.
   Google Scholar
• Hildebrandt, Mireille. 2015b. Smart Technologies and the End(S) of Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hildebrandt, Mireille. 2015c. “Legal Protection by Design: Objections and Refutations.” Legisprudence 5 (2): 223–248. doi:10.5235/175214611797885693.
   Google Scholar
• Hildebrandt, Mireille. 2016a. “Law as Information in the Era of Data-Driven Agency.” The Modern Law Review 79 (1): 1–30. doi:10.1111/1468-2230.12165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildebrandt, Mireille. 2016b. “New Animism in Policing: Re-Animating the Rule of Law?” In The SAGE Handbook of Global Policing, 406–428. London: SAGE. doi:10.4135/9781473957923.n13.
   Google Scholar
• Hildebrandt, Mireille. 2017. “Learning as a Machine. Crossovers Between Humans and Machines.” Journal of Learning Analytics 4 (1): 6–23. doi:10.18608/jla.2017.41.3.
   Google Scholar
• Hildebrandt, Mireille, and Jeanne Gaakeer. 2013. Human Law and Computer Law: Comparative Perspectives. Edited by Mireille Hildebrandt and Jeanne Gaakeer. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6314-2.
   Google Scholar
• Hildebrandt, Mireille, and Bert-Jaap Koops. 2010. “The Challenges of Ambient Law and Legal Protection in the Profiling Era.” The Modern Law Review 73 (3): 428–460. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.2010.00806.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollands, Robert G. 2008. “Will the Real Smart City Please Stand Up?” City 12 (3): 303–320. doi:10.1080/13604810802479126.
   Google Scholar
• Joh, Elizabeth E. 2016. “Policing Police Robots.” November.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, Rob. 2015. “Making Sense of Smart Cities: Addressing Present Shortcomings.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 8 (1): 131–136. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsu027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klauser, Francisco, Till Paasche, and Ola Söderström. 2014. “Michel Foucault and the Smart City: Power Dynamics Inherent in Contemporary Governing Through Code.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 32 (5): 869–885. doi:10.1068/d13041p.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, L. 1999. Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Le Dantec, Christopher. 2014. “The Right Way to Make Cities Smart.” The Atlantic, May 20. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/05/the-right-way-to-make-cities-smart/370900/.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, Henri. 1996. Writings on Cities. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lessig, Lawrence. 1996. “The Zones of Cyberspace.” Stanford Law Review 48: 1403–1411. doi: 10.2307/1229391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leszczynski, A. 2016. “Speculative Futures: Cities, Data, and Governance Beyond Smart Urbanism.” Environment and Planning A 48 (9): 1691–1708. doi:10.1177/0308518X16651445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, Karen E.C. 2017. “Book-Smart, Not Street-Smart: Blockchain-Based Smart Contracts and the Social Workings of Law.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 3 (0): 1–15. doi:10.17351/ests2017.107.
   Google Scholar
• Marres, Noortje. 2012. Material Participation: Technology, The Environment and Everyday Publics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9781137029669.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, J., and A.D. Oliveira. 2014. “The Human Smart Cities Cookbook.” Planum 1 (28): 1–58.
   Google Scholar
• McClain, Noah. 2018. “The Horizons of Technological Control: Automated Surveillance in the New York Subway.” Information, Communication & Society 21 (1): 46–62. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1260624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, Albert, and M. Bolivar. 2013. “Governing the Smart City: Scaling-Up the Search for Socio-Techno Synergy.” https://www.scss.tcd.ie/disciplines/information_systems/egpa/docs/2013/BolivarMeijer.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, Albert, and Manuel Pedro Rodríguez Bolívar. 2016. “Governing the Smart City: A Review of the Literature on Smart Urban Governance.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 82 (2): 392–408. SAGE. doi:10.1177/0020852314564308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertia, Sandeep. 2017. “FCJ-217 Socio-Technical Imaginaries of a Data-Driven City: Ethnographic Vignettes from Delhi.” The Fibreculture Journal. no. FCJ-217 (June). doi:10.15307/fcj.29.217.2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, William J. 1996. City of Bits. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Don, and Lynn A Staeheli. 2005. “Permitting Protest: Parsing the Fine Geography of Dissent in America.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 29 (4): 796–813. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2005.00622.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittelstadt, B.D., P. Allo, M. Taddeo, S. Wachter, and L. Floridi. 2016. “The Ethics of Algorithms: Mapping the Debate.” Big Data & Society 3 (2). doi:10.1177/2053951716679679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morozov, Evgeny. 2013. To Save Everything, Click Here. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Mullagh, Louise, Lynne Blair, and Nick Dunn. 2014. “Beyond the Smart City: Reflecting Human Values in the Built Environment.” The third international conference on Smart Systems, Devices and Technologies SMART, Paris, France, July 20–24, IARIA, 43–46.
   Google Scholar
• Mulligan, C.M. 2008. “Perfect Enforcement of Law: When to Limit and When to Use Technology.” Richmond Journal of Law & Technology 14 (4): 1–49.
   Google Scholar
• Nam, T., and T. A. Pardo. 2011. “Conceptualizing Smart City with Dimensions of Technology, People, and Institutions.” In, 282. New York: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/2037556.2037602.
   Google Scholar
• Neirotti, Paolo, Alberto De Marco, Anna Corinna Cagliano, Giulio Mangano, and Francesco Scorrano. 2014. “Current Trends in Smart City Initiatives: Some Stylised Facts.” Cities 38 (June): 25–36. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2013.12.010.
   Google Scholar
• Niaros, Vasilis. 2016. “Introducing a Taxonomy of the ‘Smart City’: Towards a Commons-oriented Approach?” Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society 14 (1): 51–61. http://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/718.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, Ceri. 2016. “8 Predictions for the World in 2030.” World Economic Forum, November 12. https://perma.cc/2CUA-MU2K.
   Google Scholar
• Pasquale, Frank. 2015. The Black Box Society. London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rainie, Lee, and Janna Anderson. 2017. “Code-Dependent: Pros and Cons of the Algorithm Age.” Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/2017/02/08/code-dependent-pros-and-cons-of-the-algorithm-age.
   Google Scholar
• Re, R. M. 2016. “Imagining Perfect Surveillance.” UCLA Law Review Discourse 64: 264–292.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, Stuart Jonathan, and Peter Norvig. 2013. Artificial Intelligence. Harlow: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Sadowski, Jathan. 2016. “Access Denied: Snapshots of Exclusion and Enforcement in the Smart City.” In Our Digital Rights to the City, edited by Joe Shaw and Mark Graham, 6–11. Meatspace Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sadowski, Jathan, and Frank Pasquale. 2015. “The Spectrum of Control: A Social Theory of the Smart City.” First Monday 20 (7). doi:10.1068/d16812 doi: 10.5210/fm.v20i7.5903
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, Tom, and Peter Baeck. 2015. “Rethinking Smart Cities from the Ground Up.” Nesta.
   Google Scholar
• Schellekens, Maurice. 2016. “Technology-mediated Barriers, a Counter-Trend.” Law, Innovation and Technology 8 (1): 39–60. doi: 10.1080/17579961.2016.1161892
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. 2012. “The Stupefying Smart City.” LSE Cities. https://lsecities.net/media/objects/articles/the-stupefying-smart-city/en-gb/.
   Google Scholar
• Shay, Lisa A., Woodrow Hartzog, John Nelson, Dominic Larkin, and Conti Gregory. 2016. “Confronting Automated Law Enforcement.” In Robot Law, 235–273. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Shelton, Taylor, Matthew Zook, and Alan Wiig. 2014. “The ‘Actually Existing Smart City’.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 8 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsu026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava, L., and A. Vakali. 2012. “Towards a Narrative-Aware Design Framework for Smart Urban Environments.” In 7281 LNCS:166–77. Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-30241-1_15.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, Peter, Rodney Brooks, Erik Brynjolfsson, Ryan Calo, Oren Etzioni, Greg Hager, Julia Hirschberg, et al. 2016. “Artificial Intelligence and Life in 2030.” http://ai100.stanford.edu/2016-report.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, Anthony M. 2013. Smart Cities: Big Data, Civic Hackers, and the Quest for a New Utopia. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Tranos, Emmanouil, and Drew Gertner. 2012. “Smart Networked Cities?” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 25 (2): 175–190. doi:10.1080/13511610.2012.660327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wachter, Sandra, Brent Mittelstadt, and Luciano Floridi. 2016. “Why a Right to Explanation of Automated Decision-making Does Not Exist in the General Data Protection Regulation.” SSRN Electronic Journal, December. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2903469.
   Google Scholar
• Weiser, Mark, and John Seely Brown. 1997. “The Coming Age of Calm Technology.” In Beyond Calculation, 75–85. New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0685-9_6.
   Google Scholar
• White, James Merricks. 2016. “Anticipatory Logics of the Smart City’s Global Imaginary.” Urban Geography, March, 1–18. doi:10.1080/02723638.2016.1139879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohllaib, Nikola. 2008. “Smart Homes and Cities.” Siemens Global Website. https://perma.cc/M9K8-9P3V.
   Google Scholar
• Woolgar, Steve, and Daniel Neyland. 2013. Mundane Governance. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199584741.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Wray, Stefan. 1999. “On Electronic Civil Disobedience.” Peace Review 11 (1): 107–111. doi:10.1080/10402659908426237.
   Google Scholar
• Zittrain, Jonathan. 2008. “Perfect Enforcement on Tomorrow’s Internet.” In Regulating Technologies, 125–156. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar