References
- Angelopoulos, C. 2016. “MTE v Hungary: A New ECtHR Judgement on Intermediary Liability and Freedom of Expression.” Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 11: 582–584. doi: 10.1093/jiplp/jpw081
- Angelopoulos, C. 2017. “On Online Platforms and the Commission’s New Proposal for a Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market.” https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2947800.
- Angelopoulos, C., and S. Smet. 2016. “Notice-and-Fair-Balance: How to Reach a Compromise between Fundamental Rights in European Intermediary Liability.” https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2944917.
- Bridy, A., and D. Keller. 2017. “US Copyright Office Section 512 Study [Docket no 2015-7] Comments of Annermarie Bridy and Daphne Keller.” https://www-cdn.law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/SSRN-id2920871.pdf.
- Cameron, Iain. 2006. An Introduction to the European Convention on Human Rights. 5th ed. Uppsala: Iustus Förlag.
- CE (Council of EU). 2017a. “Document 12127/17, Interinstitutional File 2016/0280 (COD), Proposal for a Directive on the European Parliament and of the Council on Copyright in the Digital Single Market – Questions by the Belgian, Czech, Finnish, Hungarian and Dutch Delegations to the Council Legal Service Regarding Article 13 and Recital 38.”
- CE (Council of EU). 2017b. “Document 12291/17, Interinstitutional File 2016/0280 (COD), Proposal for a Directive on the European Parliament and of the Council on Copyright in the Digital Single Market – Questions by the German Delegation to the Council Legal Service Regarding Article 13.”
- EC (European Commission). 2016a. “Commission Staff Working Document Impact Assessment on the Modernisation of EU Copyright Rules” (number one). https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/impact-assessment-modernisation-eu-copyright-rules.
- EC (European Commission). 2016b. “Commission Staff Working Document Impact Assessment on the Modernisation of EU Copyright Rules” (number three). https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/impact-assessment-modernisation-eu-copyright-rules.
- EC (European Commission). 2017. “Communication Tackling Illegal Content Online.” https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/illegal-content-online-platforms.
- EDPS. 2010. “Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the Current Negotiations by the European Union of an Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA).” https://secure.edps.europa.eu/EDPSWEB/webdav/shared/Documents/Consultation/Opinions/2010/10-02-22_ACTA_EN.pdf.
- EDPS. 2012. “Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the Proposal for a Council Decision on the Conclusion of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, Australia, Canada, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the United Mexican States, the Kingdom of Morocco, New Zealand, the Republic of Singapore, the Swiss Confederation and the United States of America.” https://secure.edps.europa.eu/.
- Electronic Frontier Foundation. 2017. “In the Matter of Section 512 Study: Docket No 2015-7 – Additional Comments of the Electronic Frontier Foundation.” https://www.eff.org/files/2017/02/22/2015-7_additional_comments_of_eff_512_study.pdf.
- Engstrom, Evan, and Nick Feamster. 2017. “The Limits of Filtering: A Look at the Functionality and Shortcomings of Content Detection Tools.” Engine 1–32. http://www.engine.is/the-limits-of-filtering/.
- “European Commission Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on copyright in the Digital Single Market – COM(2016) 593.”
- Frosio, Giancarlo. 2017. “Reforming Intermediary Liability in the Platform Economy: A European Digital Single Market Strategy.” Northwestern University Law Review. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Papers.cfm?abstract_id=2912272.
- Google. 2017. “Section 512 Study: Request for Additional Comments.” https://regmedia.co.uk/2017/02/23/google-section-512.pdf.
- INTERIGHTS. 2009. Right to a Fair Trial Under the European Convention on Human Rights (Article 6). London: London INTERIGHTS.
- Internet Society. 2010. “Perspectives on Policy Responses to Online Copyright Infringement.” http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/copyright/en/wipo_isoc_ge_11/wipo_isoc_ge_11_ref_00_runnegar.pdf.
- Lucas-Schoetter, Agnès. 2017. “Transfer of Value Provisions of the Draft Copyright Directive (Recitals 38, 39, Article 13).” http://www.authorsocieties.eu/uploads/Lucas-Schloetter%20Analysis%20Copyright%20Directive%20-%20EN.pdf.
- Ombelet, P. J., A. Kuczerawy, and P. Valcke. 2016. “Supervising Automated Journalists in the Newsroom: Liability for Algorithmically Produced News Stories.” https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2768646.
- Rubenstein, W. 2002. “The Concept of Equality in Civil Procedure.” Cardozo Law Review 23: 1–69. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=281271.
- Senftleben, M., Christina Angelopoulos, Giancarlo Frosio, Valentina Moscon, Miquel Peguera and Ole Andreas Rognstad. 2017. “The Recommendation on Measures to Safeguard Fundamental Rights and the Open Internet in the Framework of the EU Copyright Reform.” https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3054967.
- Stalla-Bourdillon, S., Eleonora Rosati, Karmen Turk, Christina Angelopoulos, Aleksandra Kuczerawy, Miquel Peguera, and Martin Husovec. 2016. “A Brief Exegesis of the Proposed Copyright Directive.” https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2875296.
- Urban, Jennifer M., Joe Karaganis, and Brianna L. Schofield. 2016. “Notice and Takedown in Everyday Practice.” BerkeleyLaw University of California 1–147. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2755628.
- Wagner, Ben, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, and Universiteit Leiden. 2009. “Deep Packet Inspection and Internet Censorship: International Convergence on an ‘Integrated Technology of Control’.” https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2621410.
- Woods, Lorna. 2015. “The Delfi SA v Estonia Judgement Explained.” http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/80766/1/Delfi%20vs%20Estonia%20judgement%20explained%20_%20LSE%20Media%20Policy%20Project.pdf.