References
- Anderson, D. 2015. A Question of Trust: Report of the Investigatory Powers Review.
- Aviram, A. 2016. “Revealed: Bristol’s Police and Mass Mobile Phone Surveillance.” The Bristol Cable. https://thebristolcable.org/2016/10/imsi/.
- Big Brother Watch v United Kingdom (Case 58170/13). 2018, September 13.
- Burnton, S. 2017. Report of the Interception of Communications Commissioner Annual Report for 2016, (HC 2017–19, 297).
- cellXion Ltd. n.d. Product List. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/810703-202-cellxion-product-list-ugx-optima-platform.html.
- Corfield, G. 2017. “Prisoners’ ‘innovative’ Anti-IMSI Catcher Defence was … er, Tinfoil.” The Register. https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/03/01/imsi_catcher/.
- Eberspächer, Jörg, Hans-Joerg Vögel, Christian Bettstetter, and Christian Hartmann. 2009. GSM – Architecture, Protocols and Services. 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
- Entick v Carrington. 1765. 19 St Tr 1029.
- The Ferret. 2016. Prisoners Outwit £1.2m Mobile Phone Blocking Technology. https://theferret.scot/imsi-catcher-trial-scottish-prison-service/.
- The Ferret. 2017. Scrutiny Over Phone Snooping Tech Won’t Extend to Scotland. https://theferret.scot/scrutiny-phone-snooping-tech-wont-extend-scotland/.
- Hardina, N. V. 2018. “Uncovering the Secrecy of Stingrays: What Every Practitioner Needs to Know.” Criminal Justice, 20–24.
- Hedley, P., and C. Aynsley. 1967. The D-Notice Affair. London: Michael Joseph.
- HM Treasury v Ahmed. 2010. UKSC 2.
- Home Office. 2016. Explanatory Memorandum to the Telecommunications Restriction Orders (Custodial Institutions) (England and Wales) Regulations 2016.
- Hosein, G., and C. W. Palow. 2013. “Modern Safeguards for Modern Surveillance: An Analysis of Innovations in Communications Surveillance Techniques.” Ohio State Law Journal 74: 1071–1104.
- Malone v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (No 2). 1979. Ch 344.
- Malone v United Kingdom. 1984. 7 EHRR 14.
- Malone v United Kingdom. 1992. 14 EHRR 657.
- Ministry of Justice. 2017. Prisons and Courts Bill – Overarching Impact Assessment. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/620700/impact-assessment-prisons-and-courts-bill.pdf.
- Ministry of Justice. n.d. Delegated Powers Memorandum for the Prisons and Courts Bill. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/2016-2017/0145/Prisons-and-Courts-bill-Ministry-of-Justice-22-February-2017.pdf.
- Ministry of Justice, Ofcom, EE Ltd, Hutchison 3G Ltd, Telefonica UK Ltd, Vodafone Ltd. n.d. Memorandum of Understanding on the use of Radio Frequency Interfering Equipment Within Prisons. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2864653-NoMS-Ofcom-IMSI-Catcher-MoU-Redacted.html
- MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd. 2012. EWCA Civ 7.
- Naarttijärvi, M. 2016. “Swedish Police Implementation of IMSI Catchers in a European Law Perspective.” Computer Law & Security Review 32: 852–867. doi: 10.1016/j.clsr.2016.07.006
- Nichols, S. 2017. “US Cops Point at Cell Towers and Say: Give us Every Phone Number That’s Touched that Mast.” The Register. https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/08/17/verizon_says_us_cops_taking_to_pulling_phone_data_in_bulk/.
- O’Brien, K. J. 2009. “Secret Code Protecting Most Cellular Calls is Deciphered and Published.” New York Times.
- Peck v United Kingdom. 2003. 36 EHRR 41.
- Pell, S. K., and C. Soghoian. 2014. “Your Secret StingRay’s No Secret Anymore: The Vanishing Government Monopoly Over Cell Phone Surveillance and its Impact on National Security and Consumer Privacy.” Harvard Journal of Law and Technology 28: 1–75.
- Privacy International. 2018. We Can Confirm that the Police Can no Longer Deny Our Freedom of Information Requests. https://privacyinternational.org/blog/2218/we-can-confirm-police-can-no-longer-deny-our-freedom-information-requests.
- Privacy International v The Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs. 2016. UKIP Trib 14/85-CH.
- Regan, A. 2015. “Dumping the Probable Cause Requirement: Why the Supreme Court Should Decide Probable Cause is Not Necessary for Cell Tower Dumps.” Hofstra Law Review 43: 1189–1129.
- R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms. 2000. 2 AC 115.
- Scott, Paul F. 2017. “General Warrants, Thematic Warrants, Bulk Warrants: Property Interference for National Security Purposes.” NILQ 68: 99–121.
- Scott, Paul F. 2018. The National Security Constitution. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
- Scottish Prison Service. 2015. Mobile Phone Signal Intervention End Project Report. http://www.sps.gov.uk/nmsruntime/saveasdialog.aspx?fileName=FOI+End+Project+Report+-+Redacted+160224087_2010.pdf.
- Stratford, J., and T. Johnston. 2014. “The Snowden “Revelations”: Is GCHQ Breaking the Law?” European Human Rights Law Review 129: 129–141.
- Tomkins, A., and P. Scott, eds. 2015. Entick v Carrington: 250 Years of the Rule of Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
- Uzun v Germany. 2011. 53 EHRR 24.
- Weber and Saravia v Germany. 2008. 46 EHRR SE5.
- Wicker, S. B. 2013. Cellular Convergence and the Death of Privacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.