432
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Information biopolitics: copyright law and the regulation of life in the network society

ORCID Icon

References

  • Alien. Directed by Ridley Scott. USA: 20th Century Fox, 1978.
  • Beckerle, P., C. Castellini, and B. Lenggenhager. 2018. “Robotic Interfaces for Cognitive Psychology and Embodiment Research: A Research Roadmap.” WIRES Cognitive Science, doi:10.1002/wcs.1486.
  • Benkler, Y. 2006. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Blade Runner. Directed by Ridley Scott. USA: Warner Bros, 1982.
  • Bolter, J. D., and R. Grusin. 1999. Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Bonetto, G. 2018. “Internet Memes as Derivative Works: Copyright Issues Under EU law.” Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 13: 989–997. doi: 10.1093/jiplp/jpy086
  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986. “The Forms of Capital.” In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, edited by John Richardson, 241–258. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
  • Boyle, J. 2003. “The Second Enclosure Movement and The Construction Of The Public Domain.” Law and Contemporary Problems 66: 33–74.
  • Boyle, J. 2008. The Public Domain: Enclosing the Commons of the Mind. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Braidotti, R. 2013. The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Brey, Philip. 2000. “Technology as Extension of Human Faculties.” In Metaphysics, Epistemology and Technology (Research in Philosophy and Technology, vol.19, edited by C. Mitcham, 59–78. London: Elsevier/JAI Press.
  • Brooker, Will, ed. 2005. The Blade Runner Experience: The Legacy of a Science Fiction Classic. London: Wallflower Press.
  • Bruno, G. 1987. “Ramble City: Postmodernism and Blade Runner.” October 41: 61–74. doi: 10.2307/778330
  • Bruns, A. 2008. Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Buckingham, David. 2010. “Defining Digital Literacy; What Young People Need to Know About Digital Media.” In Medienbildung in Neuen Kulturräumen: Die Deutschsprachige und Britische Diskussion, edited by B. Bachmair, 59–71. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. doi: 10.1007/978-3-531-92133-4_4
  • Byers, T. 1987. “Commodity Futures: Corporate State and Personal Style in Three Recent Science-Fiction Movies (Les Avenirs Mercantiles: L'etat Corporatiste et le Style Personnel de Trois Films Récentsde Science-Fiction).” Science-Fiction Studies 14: 326–339.
  • Castells, Manuel. 2004. “Informationalism, Networks, and the Network Society: a Theoretical Blueprint.” In The Network Society: A Cross-Cultural Perspective, edited by Manuel Castells, 3–45. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Castells, M. 2015. Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Cohen, J. 2017. “The Biopolitical Public Domain: The Legal Construction of the Surveillance Economy.” Philosophy & Technology 31: 213–233. doi:10.1007/s13347-017-0258-2.
  • Comor, E. 2013. “Digital Engagement: America’s Use (and Misuse) of Marshall McLuhan.” New Political Science 35: 1–18. doi:10.1080/07393148.2012.754666.
  • Coombe, R. 1998. The Cultural Life of Intellectual Properties; Authorship, Appropriation and the Law. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Drahos, P. 1996. A Philosophy of Intellectual Property. Aldershot: Ashgate Dartmouth.
  • Drahos, P., and J. Braithwaite. 2002. Information Feudalism: Who Owns the Knowledge Economy? New York: The New Press.
  • Elwell, S. 2011. Crisis of Transcendence: a Theology of Digital art and Culture. Lanham: Lexington Books.
  • Firth, J., J. Torous, B. Stubbs, J. Firth, G. Steiner, L. Smith, M. Alvarez-Jimenez, et al. 2019. “The ‘Online Brain’: how the Internet may be Changing our Cognition.” World Psychiatry 18: 119–129. doi:10.1002/wps.20617.
  • Flisfeder, M. 2017. Postmodern Theory and Blade Runner. New York: Bloomsbury.
  • Foucault, Michel. 1978. The History of Sexuality; Volume I: An Introduction. Translated by Robert Hurley. New York: Pantheon Books.
  • Foucault, Michel. 1983. “The Subject and Power.” In Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, edited by Hubert Dreyfus, and Paul Rabinow, 208–226. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Foucault, Michel. 2003. ‘Society Must Be Defended’: Lectures at the Collège de France 1975–1976. Translated by David Macey. New York: Picador.
  • Foucault, Michel. 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France 1978–1979. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Fuchs, C. 2008. Internet and Society: Social Theory in the Information Age. New York: Routledge.
  • Fuchs, C. 2015. Culture and Economy in the Age of Social Media. New York: Routledge.
  • Fuchs, C. 2017. “The Information Economy and the Labor Theory of Value.” International Journal of Political Economy 46: 65–89. doi:10.1080/08911916.2017.1310475.
  • Gibson, W. 1984. Neuromancer. New York: Ace Books.
  • Gordon, T. 2010. McLuhan: A Guide for the Perplexed. London: Continuum.
  • Grenier, J.-Y., and A. Orléan. 2007. “Michel Foucault, L'économie Politique et le Libéralisme.” Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales 62: 1155–1182. doi: 10.1017/S0395264900035794
  • Haraway, D. 1991. Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.
  • Hardt, M., and A. Negri. 2000. Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Hardt, M., and A. Negri. 2004. Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. New York: The Penguin Press.
  • Hardt, M., and A. Negri. 2011. Commonwealth. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • Hardt, M., and A. Negri. 2017. Assembly. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Harvey, D. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hayes, Christina. 2008. “Changing the Rules of the Game: How Video Game Publishers Are Embracing User-Generated Derivative Works.” Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 21: 567–587.
  • Hayles, K. 1999. How we Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Hayles, K. 2005. My Mother was a Computer: Digital Subjects and Literary Texts. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Hetcher, S. 2009. “Using Social Norms to Regulate Fan Fiction and Remix Culture.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 157: 1869–1935.
  • Holt, Raymond, and Stuart Murray. 2019. “Prosthesis and the Engineered Imagination: Reading Augmentation and Disability Across Cultural Theory, Representation and Product Design.” Medical Humanities, March 20. Accessed January 15, 2020 https://mh.bmj.com/content/early/2019/03/20/medhum-2018-011583. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2018-011583
  • Huerta, E., and R. Sandoval-Almazán. 2007. “Digital Literacy: Problems Faced by Telecenter Users in Mexico.” Information Technology for Development 13: 217–232. doi:10.1002/itdj.20071.
  • Ibosiola, Damilola, Ignacio Castro, Gianluca Stringhini, Steve Uhlig, and Gareth Tyson. 2019. “A Large-Scale Empirical Analysis of DMCA Notices and Online Complaints.” Accessed January 15, 2020. http://www.eecs.qmul.ac.uk/~tysong/files/Lumen-DMCA.pdf.
  • Jamar, S. 2010. “Crafting Copyright Law to Encourage and Protect User-Generated Content in The Internet Social Networking Context.” Widener Law Journal 19: 843–872.
  • Jenkins, H. 2006. Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.
  • Jones, M. 1998. “Blade Runner Capitalism, the Transnational Corporation, and Commodification: Implications for Cultural Integrity.” Cultural Dynamics 10: 287–306. doi: 10.1177/092137409801000304
  • Jones, Marc. 2000. “Blade Runner Capitalism: A New Narrative on Globalization.” In Rethinking Globalization(s): From Corporate Transnationalism to Local Interventions, edited by Preet Aulakh, and Michael Schechter, 249–267. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Kerman, Judith. 1997. “Technology and Politics in the Blade Runner Dystopia.” In Retrofitting Blade Runner: Issues in Ridley Scott's Blade Runner and Philip K. Dick's Do Android's Dream of Electric Sheep?, edited by Judith Kerman, 2nd ed., 16–24. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Klein, N. 2000. No Logo: Taking Aim at the Brand Bullies. New York: Picador.
  • Koopman, Colin. 2014. “Michel Foucault’s Critical Empiricism Today: Concepts and Analytics in the Critique of Biopower and Infopower.” In Foucault Now: Current Perspectives in Foucault Studies, edited by James Faubion, 88–111. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Kuczerawy, Aleksandra. 2015. “Intermediary Liability & Freedom of Expression: Recent Developments in the EU Notice & Action Initiative.” Computer Law & Security Review 31: 46–56. doi: 10.1016/j.clsr.2014.11.004
  • Kurzweil, R. 2005. The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. New York: Viking Penguin.
  • Lange, David, and Jefferson Powell. 2009. No Law; Intellectual Property in the Image of our Absolute First Amendment. Stanford, CA: Stanford Law Books.
  • Lankshear, Colin, and Michele Knobel, eds. 2008. Digital Literacies: Concepts, Policies and Practices. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Lawson, Clive. 2010. “Technology and the Extension of Human Capabilities.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 40: 207–223. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5914.2009.00428.x
  • Lee, P. 2019. “Reconceptualizing the Role of Intellectual Property Rights in Shaping Industry Structure.” Vanderbilt Law Review 72: 1197–1283.
  • Lemke, T. 2011. Biopolitics: An Advanced Introduction. Trans. Eric Frederic Trump. New York: New York University Press.
  • Lessig, L. 2004. Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity. New York: The Penguin Press.
  • Lessig, L. 2006. Code Version 2.0. New York: Basic Books.
  • Lessig, L. 2008. Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy. London: The Penguin Press.
  • Liesen, L., and M. B. Walsh. 2012. “The Competing Meanings of ‘Biopolitics’ in Political Science: Biological and Postmodern Approaches to Politics.” Politics and the Life Sciences 31 (1-2): 2–15. doi: 10.2990/31_1-2_2
  • Litman, J. 2001. Digital Copyright: Protecting Intellectual Property on the Internet. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
  • Livingstone, S. 2004. “Media Literacy and the Challenge of New Information and Communication Technologies.” The Communication Review 7: 3–14. doi: 10.1080/10714420490280152
  • Logan, R. 2016. Understanding New Media: Extending Marshall McLuhan. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Macherey, P. 2015. The productive subject. Viewpoint Magazine, October 31. Accessed January 15, 2020. https://www.viewpointmag.com/2015/10/31/the-productive-subject/.
  • MacMillan, Fiona. 2013. “The Protection of Cultural Heritage: Common Heritage of Humankind, National Cultural Patrimony or Private Property.” Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 64: 351–364.
  • McFalls, Laurence, and Mariella Pandolfi. 2014. “Parrhesia and Therapeusis: Foucault on and in the World of Contemporary Neoliberalism.” In Foucault Now: Current Perspectives in Foucault Studies, edited by James Faubion, 168–187. Cambridge: Polity.
  • McLuhan, M. 1959. “Myth and Mythmaking.” Daedalus 88: 339–348.
  • McLuhan, M. 1962. The Guttenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • McLuhan, M. 1994. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Meyers, Eric, Ingrid Erickson, and Ruth Small. 2013. “Digital Literacy and Informal Learning Environments: an Introduction.” Learning, Media and Technology 38: 355–367. doi:10.1080/17439884.2013.783597.
  • Miller, Toby. 2014. “Foucault, Marx, Neoliberalism: Unveiling Undercover Boss.” In Foucault Now: Current Perspectives in Foucault Studies, edited by James Faubion, 188–202. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Morris, M., and C. Ogan. 1996. “The Internet as Mass Medium.” Journal of Communication 46: 39–50. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.1996.tb00174.x doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01460.x
  • Nadesan, M. H. 2008. Governmentality, Biopower, and Everyday Life. New York: Routledge.
  • Ng, Lye Ee. 2017. “Technology as an Extension of the Self: Socialising Through Technology for Young People with Autism.” In Vol. 10290 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Design, User Experience, and Usability: Understanding Users and Contexts. DUXU 2017 Proceedings, Part III, edited by A. Marcus and W. Wang, 393–402. Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-58640-3_28
  • Niedernhubera, M., D. G. Baroneb, and B. Lenggenhagerc. 2019. “Prostheses as Extensions of the Body: Progress and Challenges.” Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 9: 1–6.
  • Patel, R. 2013. “First World Problems: A Fair Use Analysis of Internet Memes.” UCLA Entertainment Law Review 20: 235–256.
  • Randell-Moon, Holly, and Ryan Tippet. 2016. “Introduction.” In Security, Race, Biopower; Essays on Technology and Corporeality, edited by Holly Randell-Moon and Ryan Tippet, v–xxvi. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Roberts, A. 2008. “Privatizing Social Reproduction: The Primitive Accumulation of Water in an Era of Neoliberalism.” Antipode 40: 535–560. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2008.00623.x.
  • Robocop. Directed by Paul Verhoeven. USA: Orion Pictures, 1987.
  • Seltzer, M. 1991. Bodies and Machines. New York: Routledge.
  • Seltzer, Wendy. 2010. “Free Speech Unmoored in Copyright’s Safe Harbor: Chilling Effects of the DMCA on the First Amendment.” Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 24: 171–232.
  • Shanahan, T. 2014. Philosophy and Blade Runner. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Spinello, R., and M. Bottis. 2009. A Defense of Intellectual Property Rights. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Strate, L. 2008. “Studying Media AS Media: McLuhan and the Media Ecology Approach.” MediaTropes 1: 127–142.
  • Sun, H. 2013. “Copyright and Responsibility.” Harvard Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law 4: 263–317.
  • Tajiri, Y. 2007. Samuel Beckett and the Prosthetic Body: the Organs and Senses in Modernism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Takács, Ádám. 2017. “Biopolitics and Biopower: The Foucauldian Approach and Its Contemporary Relevance.” In Bioethics and Biopolitics: Theories, Applications and Connections, edited by Péter Kakuk, 3–15. Cham: Springer.
  • Tushnet, R. 2008. “User-Generated Discontent: Transformation in Practice.” Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts 31: 497–516.
  • Urban, J., J. Karaganis, and B. Schofield. 2017. Notice and Takedown in Everyday Practice. Version 2: Updated March 2017. University of California, Berkeley School of Law and the American Assembly at Columbia University.
  • Williams, D. 1988. “Ideology as Dystopia: An Interpretation of Blade Runner.” International Political Science Review 9: 381–394. doi:10.1177/019251218800900406.
  • Williams, Linda. 2011. “Shadows of the Holocene: Transfigurations of the Non-Human World in Science Fiction Film.” In Changing the Climate: Utopia, Dystopia and Catastrophe, edited by Andrew Milner, Simon Sellars, and Verity Burgman, 196–216. Melbourne: Arena Publications.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.