Bibliography
- Acker, Amelia, and Adam Kriesberg. 2017. “Tweets May Be Archived: Civic Engagement, Digital Preservation and Obama White House Social Media Data.” Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 54 (1): 1–9. doi:10.1002/pra2.2017.14505401001.
- Aristotle. n.d. ‘Politics’. In Aristotle in 23 Volumes, Translated by Harris Rackham. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:abo:tlg,0086,035:1:1253a.
- Badura, Peter. 2015. Staatsrecht: Systematische Erläuterung des Grundgesetzes für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. 6th ed. München: C.H.Beck.
- Barassi, Veronica, and Emiliano Treré. 2012. “Does Web 3.0 Come After Web 2.0? Deconstructing Theoretical Assumptions Through Practice.” New Media & Society 14 (8): 1269–1285. doi:10.1177/1461444812445878.
- Beausoleil, Lauren. n.d. “Is Trolling Trump a Right or a Privilege?: The Erroneous Finding in Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University v. Trump.” Boston College Law Review 60 (Supp. II): 31–46.
- Belli, Luca and Primavera De Filippi, eds. 2016. Net Neutrality Compendium: Human Rights, Free Competition and the Future of the Internet. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
- Berman, Paul. 2000. “Cyberspace and the State Action Debate: The Cultural Value of Applying Constitutional Norms to “Private” Regulation.” University of Colorado Law Review 71: 1263–1310.
- Berry, Elise. 2018. “Suppression of Free Tweets: How Packingham Impacts the New Era of Government Social Media and the First Amendment.” ConLawNOW 9 (1): 297–320.
- Briggs, Samantha. 2018. “The Freedom of Tweets: The Intersection of Government Use of Social Media and Public Forum Doctrine.” Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems 52 (1): 1–38.
- Burnette-McGrath, Madeleine. 2019. “Packingham v. North Carolina.” Ohio Northern University Law Review 44 (1): 117–129.
- Butler, Alan. 2017. “US Supreme Court Finds Broad Restrictions on Access to Social Media Sites Unconstitutional.” European Data Protection Law Review 4 (4): 555–557.
- Byrne, David. 2005. Social Exclusion. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
- Celeste, Edoardo. 2018. “. ‘Packingham v North Carolina: A Constitutional Right to Social Media?” ’ Cork Online Law Review 17: 116–119.
- Celeste, Edoardo. 2019a. “Terms of Service and Bills of Rights: New Mechanisms of Constitutionalisation in the Social Media Environment?” International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 33 (2): 122–138. doi:10.1080/13600869.2018.1475898.
- Celeste, Edoardo. 2019b. “‘Digital Constitutionalism: A New Systematic Theorisation’. International Review of Law.” Computers & Technology 33 (1): 76–99. doi:10.1080/13600869.2019.1562604.
- Cherednychenko, Olha O. 2007. “‘Fundamental Rights and Private Law: A Relationship of Subordination or Complementarity?’.” Utrecht Law Review 3 (2): 1. doi:10.18352/ulr.45.
- Clapham, Andrew. 2006. Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Douek, Evelyn. 2019. “‘Facebook’s Oversight Board: Move Fast with Stable Infrastructure and Humility’.” North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology 21: 1.
- Dowek, Gilles. 2017. Vivre, aimer, voter en ligne et autres chroniques numériques. Paris: Le Pommier.
- Einstein, Albert. 1954. Ideas and Opinions. New York: Random House.
- Engle, Eric. 2009. “Third Party Effect of Fundamental Rights (Drittwirkung).” Hanse Law Review 5 (2): 165–173.
- Facebook. n.d. ‘Community Standards’. Community Standards. https://www.facebook.com/communitystandards/objectionable_content.
- Frosini, Tommaso Edoardo. 2013. The Internet Access as a Fundamental Right’. Federalismi.It 25.
- Fuchs, Christian. 2010. “Social Software and Web 2.0: Their Sociological Foundations and Implications.” In Handbook of Research on Web 2.0, 3.0, and X.0: Technologies, Business, and Social Applications, edited by San Murugesan, 763–789. IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-60566-384-5.
- Fuchs, Christian. 2014. “Social Media and the Public Sphere.” TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique 12 (1): 57–101. doi:10.31269/triplec.v12i1.552.
- Fuchs, Christian. 2018. Digital Demagogue: Authoritarian Capitalism in the Age of Trump and Twitter. London: Pluto Press.
- Gillespie, Tarleton. 2018. Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media. New Haven: Yale University Press.
- Hartmann, Ivar A. 2013. “A Right to Free Internet? On Internet Access and Social Rights.” Journal of High Technology Law XIII (2): 297–429.
- Heins, Marjorie. 2014. “The Brave New World of Social Media Censorship.” Harvard Law Review 127: 325–330.
- Heldt, Amélie. 2020. “Merging the “Social” and the “Public”: How Social Media Platforms Could Be a New Public Forum.” Mitchell Hamline Law Review 46), https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3460067.
- Helsper, Ellen Johanna. 2012. “A Corresponding Fields Model for the Links Between Social and Digital Exclusion.” Communication Theory 22 (4): 403–426. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01416.x.
- Helsper, Ellen Johanna. 2017. “The Social Relativity of Digital Exclusion: Applying Relative Deprivation Theory to Digital Inequalities: The Social Relativity of Digital Exclusion.” Communication Theory 27 (3): 223–242. doi:10.1111/comt.12110.
- Hert, Paul De, and Dariusz Kloza. 2012. “Internet (Access) as a New Fundamental Right. Inflating the Current Rights Framework?” European Journal of Law and Technology 3 (3).
- Hills, John, Julian Le Grand, and David Piachaud, eds. 2002. Understanding Social Exclusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Hudson, David L. 2018. “In the Age of Social Media, Expand the Reach of the First Amendment.” Human Rights (chicago, Ill ) 43 (4): 2.
- Karavas, Vagias. 2010. “Governance of Virtual Worlds and the Quest for a Digital Constitution.” In Governance of Digital Game Environments and Cultural Diversity: Transdisciplinary Enquiries, edited by Christoph B. Graber, and Mira Burri-Nenova, 153–169. Cheltenham-Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Karavas, Vagias, and Gunther Teubner. 2005. “www.CompanyNameSucks.Com: The Horizontal Effect of Fundamental Rights on “Private Parties” Within Autonomous Internet Law.” Constellations (oxford, England) 12 (2): 262–282. doi:10.1111/j.1351-0487.2005.00415.x.
- Karppi, Tero. 2018. Disconnect. Minneapolis-London: University of Minnesota Press.
- Kay, Richard. 1993. “The State Action Doctrine, the Public- Private Distinction, and the Independence of Constitutional Law.” Constitutional Commentary 10: 329–360.
- Klonick, Kate. 2019. “The Facebook Oversight Board: Creating an Independent Institution to Adjudicate Online Free Expression.” Yale Law Journal 129: 2418.
- Kravets, David. 2017. ‘There’s a Constitutional Right to Use Social Media, Supreme Court Says’. Ars Technica, 19 June 2017. https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/06/sex-offenders-cannot-be-excluded-from-social-media-supreme-court-says/.
- Ladeur, Karl-Heinz. 2008. “Legal Questions of Excluding Participants from Internet Discussion Groups: On the Guaranteeing of Freedom of Communication Through Network- Adapted Private Law.” German Law Journal 9: 965–981.
- Langvardt, Kyle. 2018. “Regulating Online Content Moderation.” Georgetown Law Journal 106: 1353–1388.
- Lapowski, Issie. 2017. ‘The Supreme Court Could Soon Decide If You Have a Right to Facebook’. WIRED, 28 February 2017. https://www.wired.com/2017/02/supreme-court-soon-decide-right-facebook/.
- Markham, Annette N. 1998. Life Online: Researching Real Experience in Virtual Space. Lanham: Rowman Altamira.
- Marsden, Christopher T. 2010. Net Neutrality: Towards a Co-Regulatory Solution. London: Bloomsbury.
- Miller, Katie. 2018. “‘Constitutional Law - Sex Offenses and Free Speech: Constitutionality of Ban on Sex Offenders’ Use of Social Media: Impact on States with Similar Restrictions’.” North Dakota Law Review 93: 129–142.
- Morgan v. Bevin. 2018. United States District Court Eastern District of Kentucky.
- Mueller, Milton, Derrick L. Cogburn, John Mathiason, and Jeanette Hofmann. 2007. ‘Net Neutrality as Global Principle for Internet Governance’. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2798314. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2798314.
- Norris, Pippa. 2001. Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Nunziato, Dawn C. 2009. Virtual Freedom: Net Neutrality and Free Speech in the Internet Age. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Obar, Jonathan A., and Steve Wildman. 2015. “Social Media Definition and the Governance Challenge: An Introduction to the Special Issue.” Telecommunications Policy 39 (9): 745–750. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2015.07.014.
- Piccinelli, Fernandino. 1980. Studi e ricerche intorno alla definizione Dominium est ius utendi et abutendi re sua quatenus iuris ratio patitur. Edited by Luigi Capogrossi Colognesi. Napoli: Jovene.
- Pollicino, Oreste. 2019. “Judicial Protection of Fundamental Rights in the Transition from the World of Atoms to the Word of Bits: The Case of Freedom of Speech.” European Law Journal 25 (2): 155–168. doi:10.1111/eulj.12311.
- Prakash, Saikrishna B., and John C. Yoo. 2003. “The Origins of Judicial Review.” The University of Chicago Law Review 70 (3): 887–982. doi:10.2307/1600662.
- Quigley, Mike. 2017. ‘H.R.2884 - 115th Congress (2017-2018): COVFEFE Act of 2017’. Webpage. 12 June 2017. https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/2884.
- Ratcliffe, Susan, ed. 2018. Oxford Essential Quotations. doi:10.1093/acref/9780191866692.001.0001.
- Ritzer, George, and Nathan Jurgenson. 2010. “‘Production, Consumption, Prosumption: The Nature of Capitalism in the Age of the Digital “Prosumer”.” . Journal of Consumer Culture 10 (1): 13–36. doi:10.1177/1469540509354673.
- Roberts, Jemimah. 2019. “Trump, Twitter, and the First Amendment.” Alternative Law Journal March: 1–7. doi:10.1177/1037969X19831102.
- Rodotà, Stefano. 2013. Il terribile diritto. Studi sulla proprietà privata e i beni comuni. Bologna: Il Mulino.
- Schneider, Frank M., Britta Zwillich, Melanie J. Bindl, Frederic R. Hopp, Sabine Reich, and Peter Vorderer. 2017. “Social Media Ostracism: The Effects of Being Excluded Online.” Computers in Human Behavior 73 (August): 385–393. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.052.
- Schulz, Wolfgang. 2018. ‘Regulating Intermediaries to Protect Privacy Online – The Case of the German NetzDG’. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3216572. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3216572.
- Schwenke, Thomas. 2012. “Das virtuelle Hausrecht als Abwehrmaßnahme gegen “Shitstorms” innerhalb von Social Media Plattformen.” Kommunikation & Recht 5: 305–309.
- Shelley v. Kraemer. 1948. US Supreme Court.
- Smolla, Rodney A. 2018. “The First Amendment and the Social Media Accounts of Public Officials.” Computer and Internet Lawyer 35 (11): 1–4.
- Sobczak, Katarzyna Natalia. 2017. “Facebook as a New Source of Social Exclusion in the Web 2.0 Era.” Adeptus 10 (December), doi:10.11649/a.1500.
- Spindler, Gerald. 2017. “‘Internet Intermediary Liability Reloaded’. Journal of Intellectual Property.” Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law (JIPITEC 8 (3): 166–179.
- Suzor, Nicolas. 2019. Lawless. The Secret Rules That Govern Our Digital Lives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Swartzwelder, Sara. 2018. “Taking Orders from Tweets: Redefining the First Amendment Boundaries of Executive Speech in the Age of Social Media.” First Amendment Law Review 16: 538–577.
- Teubner, Gunther. 2012. Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Teubner, Gunther. 2018. “Quod Omnes Tangit: Transnational Constitutions Without Democracy?” Journal of Law and Society 45 (S1): S5–29. doi:10.1111/jols.12102.
- Tolon, Elizabeth. 2016. “‘Updating the Social Network: How Outdated and Unclear State Legislation Violates Sex Offenders’ First Amendment Rights Notes’.” Fordham Law Review 85: 1827–1862.
- Tully, Stephen. 2014. “A Human Right to Access the Internet? Problems and Prospects.” Human Rights Law Review 14 (2): 175–195. doi:10.1093/hrlr/ngu011.
- Turkle, Sherry. 1995. Life on the Screen. New York: Simon and Schuster.
- Tushnet, Mark V. 2009. Weak Courts, Strong Rights: Judicial Review and Social Welfare Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law. Second printing, and First paperback printing. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Weiser, Mark. 1991. ‘The Computer for the 21st Century’. Scientific American.
- West, Sonja R. 2018. “Suing the President for First Amendment Violations.” Oklahoma Law Review 71: 321–346.
- The White House. 2020. ‘Executive Order on Preventing Online Censorship’. 28 May 2020. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-preventing-online-censorship/.
- Williams, Kipling D., Christopher K. T. Cheung, and Wilma Choi. 2000. “Cyberostracism: Effects of Being Ignored Over the Internet.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79 (5): 748–762. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.748.
- Wong, Yu Cheung, Chi Kwong Law, John Yat Chu Fung, and Jolie Chi Yee Lam. 2009. “Perpetuating Old Exclusions and Producing New Ones: Digital Exclusion in an Information Society.” Journal of Technology in Human Services 27 (1): 57–78. doi:10.1080/15228830802459135.
- Table of cases:
- AG Hamburg, 11.09.2012 - 18b C 389/11, available at: https://openjur.de/u/541688.html.
- AG Kerpen, 10.04.2017 - 102 C 297/16, available at: https://openjur.de/u/2137758.html
- Cornelius v. NAACP Leg. Def. Fund, 473 U.S. 788 (1985), available at: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/473/788/.
- Davison v. Loudoun County Board of Supervisors, 267 F. Supp. 3d 702 (E.D. Virginia 2017), available at: https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/virginia/vaedce/1:2016cv00932/348006/57/.
- Davison v. Randall, 912 F. 3d 666, 673 (4th Cir. 2019), available at: https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca4/17-2002/17-2002-2019-01-07.html.
- Knight First Amendment Inst. at Columbia Univ. v. Trump, 302 F. Supp. 3d 541, 552 (S.D.N.Y. 2018), available at: https://casetext.com/case/knight-first-amendment-inst-at-columbia-univ-v-trump.
- Knight First Amendment Institute, et al. v. Donald J. Trump, et al., No. 18-1691 (2d Cir. 2020), available at: https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca2/18-1691/18-1691-2020-03-23.html.
- Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University v. Trump, No. 18-1691 (2d Cir. 2019), available at: https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca2/18-1691/18-1691-2019-07-09.html.
- LG Bonn, 16.11.1999 - 10 O 457/99, available at https://openjur.de/u/150000.html.
- LG Frankfurt/Main, 10.09.2018 - 2-03 O 310/18, available at: https://openjur.de/u/2188268.html.
- LG Frankfurt/Main, 14.05.2018 - 2-03 O 182/18, available at: https://openjur.de/u/2188212.html.
- LG München I, 25.10.2006 - 30 O 11973/05, available at: https://www.jurpc.de/pdf-repository/get?id=http://www.jurpc.de/jurpcpdf/20070100.pdf&mode=stream&recType=pdf&repo=jurpc&url=https://www.jurpc.de/jurpc/show?id=20070100&domAuthSessId=.
- Morgan et al v. Bevin, No. 3:2017cv00060 - Document 26 (E.D. Ky. 2018), available at: https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/kentucky/kyedce/3:2017cv00060/83733/26/.
- OLG Dresden, 08.08.2018 - 4 W 577/18, available at: https://www.online-und-recht.de/urteile/Hassrede-Klausel-in-Facebook-AGB-wirksam-Oberlandesgericht-Dresden-20180808/.
- OLG Köln, 25.08.2000 - 19 U 2/00, available at: https://openjur.de/u/151871.html.
- OLG München, 17.07.2018 - 18 W 858/18, available at: https://openjur.de/u/2110762.html.
- OLG München, 24.08.2018 - 18 W 1294/18, available at: https://openjur.de/u/2111165.html.
- Packingham v. North Carolina, 582 U.S. ___ (2017), available at: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/582/15-1194/#tab-opinion-3749201.
- Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 521 U.S. 844 (1997), available at: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/521/844/.
- Trump, President of the United States, et al., v. Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, et al., No. 20-197, 18-1691-cv (U.S. Aug. 20, 2020) available at: https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/20-197/150726/20200820102824291_Knight%20First%20Amendment%20Inst.pdf.