The contextual nature of university-wide curriculum change

References

• Baker, P., Jackson, N. J., & Longmore, J. (2014). Tackling the wicked challenge of strategic change: The story of how a university changed itself. Bloominton, IN: Authorhouse.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, R. (2000). Supercomplexity and the curriculum. Studies in Higher Education, 25(3), 255–265.10.1080/713696156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, R., & Coate, K. (2005). Engaging the curriculum in higher education. Maidenhead: SRHE and Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becher, T., & Kogan, M. (1980). Process and structure in higher education. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blackmore, P., & Kandiko, C. (Eds.). (2012). Strategic curriculum change: Global trends in universities. London: Society for Research into Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, C. H., Spronken-Smith, R., McLean, A., Smith, N., Frielick, S., Jenkins, M., & Marshall, S. (2017). A framework for enabling graduate outcomes in undergraduate programmes. Higher Education Research & Development., 36(1), 43–58.10.1080/07294360.2016.1170767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clegg, S. (2008). Academic identities under threat? British Educational Research Journal, 34(3), 329–345.10.1080/01411920701532269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, J. (2006). On becoming an innovative university teacher: Reflection in action (2nd ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press and McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Cuneo, C., Harnish, D., Roy, D., & Vajoczki, S. (2012). Lessons learned: The McMaster inquiry story from innovation to institutionalization. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 129, 93–104.10.1002/tl.v2012.129
   Google Scholar
• de la Harpe, B., & Thomas, I. (2009). Curriculum change in universities. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 3(1), 75–85.10.1177/097340820900300115
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, S., & Bosanquet, A. (2006). The curriculum? That’s just a unit outline, isn’t it? Studies in Higher Education, 31(3), 269–284.10.1080/03075070600680521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, M., Bradford, M., Roberts, C., & Knight, Y. (2013). Collaborative discipline-based curriculum change: Applying Change Academy processes at department level. International Journal for Academic Development, 18(1), 31–44.10.1080/1360144X.2011.628394
   Google Scholar
• Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2009). Developing undergraduate research and inquiry. York: Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, M., O’Connor, K., & Broadfoot, P. (2010). Reflections on engaging students in the process and product of strategy development for learning, teaching and assessment: An institutional case study. International Journal for Academic Development, 15(1), 19–32.10.1080/13601440903529877
   Google Scholar
• Healey, M., & Roberts, J. (Eds.). (2004). Engaging students in active learning: Case studies in geography, environment and related disciplines. Cheltenham: Geography Discipline Network and School of Environment, University of Gloucestershire.
   Google Scholar
• Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario. (2014). HEQCO annual report 2013–2014. Toronto: Queen’s Printer for Ontario. Retrieved September 7, 2015, from http://www.heqco.ca/
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, A. (2008). Supporting student development in and beyond the disciplines: The role of the curriculum. In C. Kreber (Ed.). The university and its disciplines: Teaching and learning within and beyond disciplinary boundaries (pp. 157-168). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kezar, A. (2014). How colleges change: Understanding, leading, and enacting change. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, G. (2010). Initiating curriculum revision: Exploring the practices of educational developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 15(1), 61–71.10.1080/13601440903529927
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, P. (2015). Higher education curriculum orientations and the implications for institutional curriculum change. Teaching and Higher Education, 20(5), 542–555.10.1080/13562517.2015.1036731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearer, M. C. (2007). Implementing a new interdisciplinary module: The challenges and the benefits of working across disciplines. Practice and Evidence of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 2(1), 2–20.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246.10.1177/1098214005283748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toohey, S. (1999). Designing courses for higher education. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trowler, P., Saunders, M., & Bamber, V. (2012). Tribes and territories in the 21st-century: Rethinking the significance of disciplines in higher education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Trowler, P., Saunders, M., & Knight, P. (2003). Change thinking, change practices: A guide to change for heads of department, programme leaders and other change agents in higher education. York: Learning and Teaching Support Network Generic Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803932
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Designing case studies Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed., pp. 19–39). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar