Understanding the impact of educational development interventions on classroom instruction and student success

References

• Bain, K. (2004). What makes great teachers great. Chronicle of Higher Education, 50(31), B7–B9.
   Google Scholar
• Beach, A. L., Sorcinelli, M. D., Austin, A. E., & Rivard, J. K. (2016). Faculty development in the age of evidence: Current practices, future imperatives. Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC higher education reports. ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, M. J., Cerna, O., Han, J., & Sàenz, V. (2008). The contradictory roles of institutional status in retaining underrepresented minorities in biomedical and behavioral science majors. The Review of Higher Education, 31(4), 433–464. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.0.0011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chism, N. V. N., Holley, M., & Harris, C. J. (2012). Researching the impact of educational development: Basis for informed practice. To Improve the Academy, 31(1), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-4822.2012.tb00678.x
   Google Scholar
• Condon, W., Iverson, E. R., Manduca, C. A., Rutz, C., & Willett, G. (2016). Faculty development and student learning: Assessing the connections. Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, K. M., Downing, V. R., & Brownell, S. E. (2018). The influence of active learning practices on student anxiety in large-enrollment college science classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0123-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daempfle, P. A. (2003). An analysis of the high attrition rates among first year college science, math, and engineering majors. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 5(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.2190/DWQT-TYA4-T20W-RCWH
   Google Scholar
• Ebert-May, D., Derting, T. L., Hodder, J., Momsen, J. L., Long, T. M., & Jardeleza, S. E. (2011). What we say is not what we do: Effective evaluation of faculty professional development programs. BioScience, 61(7), 550–558. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2011.61.7.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Favre, D., Bach, D., & Wheeler, L. B. (In review). Measuring institutional transformation: A multi-faceted assessment of a new faculty development program.
   Google Scholar
• Fink, L. D. (2013). Creating significant learning experiences, revised and updated. An integrated approach to designing college courses. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasiewski, J. A., Eagan, M. K., Garcia, G. A., Hurtado, S., & Chang, M. J. (2012). From gatekeeping to engagement: A multicontextual, mixed method study of student academic engagement in introductory STEM courses. Research in Higher Education, 53(2), 229–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-011-9247-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehrke, S., & Kezar, A. (2017). The roles of STEM faculty communities of practice in institutional and departmental reform in higher education. American Educational Research Journal, 54(5), 803–833. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217706736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haak, D. C., HilleRisLambers, J., Pitre, E., & Freeman, S. (2011). Increased structure and active learning reduce the achievement gap in introductory biology. Science, 332(6034), 1213–1216. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, C., Beach, A., & Finkelstein, N. (2011). Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(8), 952–984. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kezar, A., & Gehrke, S. (2017). Sustaining communities of practice focused on STEM reform. The Journal of Higher Education, 88(3), 323–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2016.1271694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolomitro, K., & Anstey, L. M. (2017). A survey on evaluation practices in teaching and learning centres. International Journal for Academic Development, 22(3), 186–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2017.1313162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreber, C., & Brook, P. (2001). Impact evaluation of educational development programmes. International Journal for Academic Development, 6(2), 96–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/13601440110090749
   Google Scholar
• Kuh, G. D., Cruce, T. M., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M. (2008). Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 540–563. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakshmanan, A., Heath, B. P., Perlmutter, A., & Elder, M. (2011). The impact of science content and professional learning communities on science teaching efficacy and standards-based instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(5), 534–551. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauridsen, K. M., & Lauridsen, O. (2018). Teacher capabilities in a multicultural educational environment: An analysis of the impact of a professional development project. International Journal for Academic Development, 23(2), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2017.1357557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luft, J. A., & Hewson, P. W. (2014). Research on teacher professional development programs in science. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 899–910). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, T. J., & Stains, M. (2015). The importance of context: An exploration of factors influencing the adoption of student-centered teaching among chemistry, biology, and physics faculty. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0026-8
   Google Scholar
• Meizlish, D. S., Wright, M. C., Howard, J., & Kaplan, M. L. (2018). Measuring the impact of a new faculty program using institutional data. International Journal for Academic Development, 23(2), 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2017.1364644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2017). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2017, special report NSF 17-310. www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, M. S., Bach, D. J., & Streifer, A. C. (2014). Measuring the promise: A learning‐focused syllabus rubric. To Improve the Academy: A Journal of Educational Development, 33(1), 14–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/tia2.20004
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, M. S., Streifer, A. C., & Williams-Duncan, S. (2016). Systematic assessment of a high impact course design institute. To Improve the Academy: A Journal of Educational Development, 35(2), 339–361. https://doi.org/10.1002/tia2.20041
   Google Scholar
• President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST). (2012). Engage to Excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Executive Office of the President.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, M., & Preckel, F. (2017). Variables associated with achievement in higher education: A systematic review of meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 143(6), 565–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. R. (2007). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. K., Jones, F. H. M., Gilbert, S. L., & Wieman, C. E. (2013). The classroom observation protocol for undergraduate stem (COPUS): A new instrument to characterize university STEM classroom practices. CBE Life Sciences Education, 12(4), 618–627. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-08-0154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, J. J., Sloane, J. D., Dunk, R. D. P., & Wiles, J. R. (2016). Peer-Led team learning helps minority students succeed. PLoS Biology, 14(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stains, M., Harshman, J., Barker, M. K., Chasteen, S. V., Cole, R., DeChenne-Peters, S. E., Eagan, M. K., Esson, J. M., Knight, J. K., Laski, F. A., Levis-Fitzgerald, M., Lee, C. J., Lo, S. M., McDonnell, L. M., McKay, T. A., Michelotti, N., Musgrove, A., Palmer, M. S., Plank, K. M., Sanders, E. R., … Young, A. M. (2018). Anatomy of STEM teaching in North American universities. Science, 359(6383), 1468–1470. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8892
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomkin, J. H., Beilstein, S. O., Morphew, J. W., & Herman, G. L. (2019). Evidence that communities of practice are associated with active learning in large STEM lectures. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0154-z
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment. Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Winkelmes, M. A., Bernacki, M., Butler, J., Zochowski, M., Golanics, J., & Weavil, K. H. (2016). A teaching intervention that increases underserved college students’ success. Peer Review, 18(1/2), 31.
   Google Scholar