‘It’s hard to grow when you’re stuck on your own’: enhancing teaching through a peer observation and review of teaching program

References

• Barnard, A., Croft, W., Irons, R., Cuffe, N., Bandara, W., & Rowntree, P. (2011). Peer partnership to enhance scholarship of teaching: A case study. Higher Education Research and Development, 30(4), 435–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.518953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, A., & Mladenovic, R. (2008). The benefits of peer observation of teaching for tutor development. International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning, 55(6), 735–752. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10734-007-9093-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, M., & Cooper, P. (2013). Peer observation of teaching in university departments: A framework for implementation. International Journal for Academic Development, 18(1), 60–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2011.633753
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, D., & Hunt, L. (2016). Evaluation of teaching. HERDSA Review of Higher Education, 3, 25–55. https://www.herdsa.org.au/herdsa-review-higher-education-vol-3/25-55
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, C., & Reid, J. (2013). Foundational academic development: Building collegiality across divides? International Journal for Academic Development, 18, 318–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2012.728529
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, J. (2018). Peer observation of teaching: A practical tool in higher education. The Journal of Faculty Development, 32(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.19455.82084
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/doi:10.1073/pnas.1319030111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgiou, H., & Sharma, M. (2015). Does using active learning in thermodynamics lectures improve students’ conceptual understanding and learning experiences? European Journal of Physics, 36(1), 015020. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/36/1/015020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgiou, H., Sharma, M., & Ling, A. (2018). Peer review of teaching: What features matter? A case study within STEM faculties. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(2), 190–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2017.1342557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosling, D. (2002). Models of peer observation of teaching. Paper for LTSN Generic Centre. Retrieved September, 2018, from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/David_Gosling/publication/267687499_Models_of_Peer_Observation_of_Teaching/links/545b64810cf249070a7955d3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gosling, D. (2009). A new approach to peer review of teaching. In D. Gosling & K. M. O’Connor (Eds.), Beyond the peer observation of teaching (pp. pp. 7–15). SEDA Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gosling, D. (2014). Collaborative peer-supported review of teaching. In J. Sachs & M. Parsell (Eds.), Peer review of learning and teaching in higher education (pp. pp. 13–31). Springer Dordrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley‐Fletcher, L., & Orsmond, P. (2004). Evaluating our peers: Is peer observation a meaningful process? Studies in Higher Education, 29(4), 489–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507042000236380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, M., & Solomonides, I. (2014). Peer review in a foundations in learning and teaching program. In J. Sachs & M. Parsell (Eds.), Peer review of learning and teaching in higher education (pp. pp. 137–149). Springer Dordrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Hatzipanagos, S., & Lygo-Baker, S. (2006). Teaching observations: Promoting development through critical reflection. Journal of Further & Higher Education, 30(2), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770600965425
   Google Scholar
• Hendry, G. D., Bell, A., & Thomson, K. (2014). Learning by observing a peer’s teaching situation. International Journal for Academic Development, 19(4), 318–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2013.848806
   Google Scholar
• McMahon, T., Barrett, T., & O’Neill, G. (2007). Using observation of teaching to improve quality: Finding your way through the muddle of competing conceptions, confusion of practice and mutually exclusive intentions. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(4), 499–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510701415607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, R. (2001). Disciplinary differences and university teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 26(2), 135–146. https://doi.org/doi:10.1080/03075070120052071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nulty, D. D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: What can be done? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 301–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701293231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachs, J., & Parsell, M. (2014). Peer review of learning and teaching in higher education. International perspectives (Vol. 9). Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, M. D., & Georgiou, H. (2017). More active lecture approaches in science and mathematics: Using expert cultural capital to drive change (Final report submitted to the Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching). Department of Industry, Innovation, Science, Research and Tertiary Education.
   Google Scholar
• Shortland, S. (2004). Peer observation: A tool for staff development or compliance? Journal of Further and Higher Education, 28(2), 219–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877042000206778
   Google Scholar
• Shortland, S. (2010). Feedback within peer observations: Continuing professional development and unexpected consequences. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(3), 295–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2010.498181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. W., Atwood, C. H., & Hutchings, P. A. (2000). Why are chemists and other scientists afraid of the peer review of teaching? Journal of Chemical Education, 77(2), 239. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed077p239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yiend, J., Weller, S., & Kinchin, I. (2014). Peer observation of teaching: The interaction between peer review and developmental models of practice. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 38(4), 465–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2012.726967
   Google Scholar
• Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 981–1015. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar