1,710
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A neglected area: supervision development opportunities for doctoral researchers involved in undergraduate and masters project mentoring

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 74-86 | Received 26 Oct 2019, Accepted 14 Mar 2021, Published online: 17 Sep 2021

References

  • Anderson, C., Day, K., & McLaughlin, P. (2006). Mastering the dissertation: Lecturers’ representations of the purposes and processes of Master’s level dissertation supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572017
  • Boyer, E. L. (1998). The boyer commission on educating undergraduates in the research university, reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for America’s Research Universities. State University of New York at Stony Brook. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED424840.pdf
  • Browning, L., Thompson, K., & Dawson, D. (2017). From early career researcher to research leader: Survival of the fittest? Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 39(4), 361–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2017.1330814
  • Bryan, B., & Guccione, K. (2018). Was it worth it? A qualitative exploration into graduate perceptions of doctoral value. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(6), 1124–1140. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1479378
  • Chadha, D. (2013). Reconceptualising and reframing graduate teaching assistant (GTA) provision for a research-intensive institution. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(2), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.696537
  • Dolan, E. L., & Johnson, D. (2010). The undergraduate-postgraduate-faculty triad: Unique functions and tensions associated with undergraduate research experiences at research universities. Cell Biology Education – Life Sciences Education, 9(4), 543–553. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-03-0052
  • Dooley, D. A., Mahon, R. M., & Oshiro, E. A. (2004). An undergraduate research opportunity: Collaboration between undergraduate and graduate students. Journal of Food Science Education, 3(1), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4329.2004.tb00034.x
  • Drennan, J., & Clarke, M. (2009). Coursework master’s programmes: The student’s experience of research and research supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 34(5), 483–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802597150
  • Duke, D. C., & Denicolo, P. M. (2017). What supervisors and universities can do to enhance doctoral researcher experience (and how they can help themselves). FEMS Microbiology Letters, 364(9), fnx090. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnx090
  • Fairbrother, H. (2012). Creating space: Maximising the potential of the graduate teaching assistant role. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(3), 353–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.678601
  • Feldon, D. F., Litson, K., Jeong, S., Blaney, J. M., Kang, J., Miller, C., Griffin, K., & Roksa, J. (2019). Postdocs’ lab engagement predicts trajectories of PhD students’ skill development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(42), 20910–20916. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912488116
  • French, D., & Russell, C. (2002). Do graduate teaching assistants benefit from teaching inquiry-based laboratories? BioScience, 52(11), 1036–1041. h ttps://d oi.org/1 0.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[1036:DGTABF]2.0.CO;2
  • Gibney, E. (2013, September 19). Training schemes help improve PhD outcomes. Times Higher Education Supplement. The World Universities Insights Limited. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/training-schemes-help-improve-phd-outcomes/2007447.article
  • Gilmore, J., Maher, M. A., Feldon, D. F., & Timmerman, B. (2014). Exploration of factors related to the development of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics graduate teaching assistants’ teaching orientations. Studies in Higher Education, 39(10), 1910–1928. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.806459
  • Gonzalez, C. (2001). Undergraduate research, graduate mentoring, and the University’s mission. Science, 293(5535), 1624–1626. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1062714
  • Lee, A. (2008). How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802049202
  • Lee, A. (2012). Successful research supervision. Routledge.
  • Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1–55. Retrieved July 29, 2021, from http://www.voteview.com/pdf/Likert_1932.pdf
  • Neves, J. (2018). Postgraduate research experience survey. AdvanceHE Press.
  • Neves, J., & Leman, J. (2019). Postgraduate taught experience survey. AdvanceHE Press.
  • Porter, S. D., & Phelps, J. M. (2014). Beyond skills: An integrative approach to doctoral student preparation for diverse careers. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 44(3), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.v44i3.186038
  • Ravitch, S. M. (2020). The best laid plans … qualitative research design during COVID-19. Social Science Space. https://www.socialsciencespace.com/2020/03/the-best-laid-plans-qualitative-research-design-during-covid-19/
  • Reeves, T. D., Marbach-Ad, G., Miller, K. R., Ridgway, J., Gardner, G. E., Schussler, E. E., & Wischusen, E. W. (2016). A conceptual framework for graduate teaching assistant professional development evaluation and research. CBE - Life Sciences Education, 15(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-08-0183
  • Scott, J., & Maw, S. J. (2009). The role of the postgraduate student in delivering bioscience teaching. Bioscience Education, 14(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3108/beej.14.3
  • Sharpe, R. (2000). A framework for training graduate teaching assistants. Teacher Development, 4(1), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530000200106
  • Shellito, C., Shea, K., Weissmann, G., Mueller-Solger, A., & Davis, W. (2001). Successful mentoring of undergraduate researchers: Tips for creating positive student research experiences. Journal of College Science Teaching, 30(7), 460–464. https://www.proquest.com/docview/200332320
  • Shortlidge, E. E., & Eddy, S. L. (2018). The trade-off between graduate student research and teaching: A myth? PLoS ONE, 13(6), e0199576. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199576
  • Taylor, S. (2016). UK Professional Standards Framework (UKPSF). Dimensions of the framework for doctoral supervisors. Higher Education Academy.
  • Taylor, S. (2017). Enhancing Practice in Research Supervision. UK Council for Graduate Education. http://www.ukcge.ac.uk/media/Download.aspx?MediaId=2002
  • Turner, G. (2015). Postgraduate Research Experience Survey (PRES) 2015: The research student journey. Higher Education Academy. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/postgraduate-research-experience-survey-2015
  • UK National Union of Students. (2013). Postgraduates who teach. http://www.nus.org.uk/PageFiles/12238/1654NUS_PostgradTeachingSurvey_v3.pdf
  • Vitae. (2010). Researcher development framework: Summary of the analysis of consultation responses. www.vitae.ac.uk/CMS/files/upload/Vitae‐RDF‐consultation‐analysis‐may‐2010.pdf
  • Wood, W. B. (2003). Inquiry-based undergraduate teaching in the life sciences at large research universities: A perspective on the boyer commission report. Cell Biology Education, 2(2), 112–116. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.03-02-0004